logo
Herbal medicine firm Regencell Bioscience skyrockets 60,000%, stuns market

Herbal medicine firm Regencell Bioscience skyrockets 60,000%, stuns market

A Hong Kong-based company with no revenue, no regulatory approvals, and fewer than 15 employees has seen its stock surge nearly 60,000 per cent year-to-date on June 16, 2025.
Traditional medicine firm Regencell Bioscience Holdings, listed on the US stock exchange, has rallied sharply in recent days, including a nearly fourfold jump in a week, stunning market watchers and prompting questions over the nature of the gains and what might be driving them.
Regencell Bioscience was founded in 2014 and incorporated in the Cayman Islands, though its operations are run through two subsidiaries based in Hong Kong. It went public on the Nasdaq in July 2021, raising approximately $21 million through its initial public offering.
Screengrab of Regencell Bioscience stock movement
Regencell Bioscience company profile: What we know
The company develops liquid-based formulas rooted in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which it claims can help manage neurological conditions such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). These are proprietary blends made from natural ingredients and are still undergoing internal trials.
No regulatory approvals have been secured, and the company has not launched any commercial products. Despite this, the company is now worth more on paper than many established global companies.
Regencell reported a combined loss of $10.4 million over the last two financial years and has yet to generate any revenue. The company employs a small team of around 12 people. The company's founder and chief executive officer, Yat-Gai Au, owns approximately 86 per cent of the outstanding shares, effectively controlling the company. Track LIVE Stock Market Updates
How a stock split led to a sudden surge
The rise in Regencell's share price appears to have been triggered by a 38-for-1 stock split, which came into effect in early June. While such splits do not impact a company's fundamental valuation, they can generate interest by lowering the per-share price. Following the split, Regencell's share price jumped 283 per cent in a single day, briefly pushing its market capitalisation close to $39 billion, higher than companies such as Kraft Heinz and Reddit.
The stock rallied despite the absence of new business developments, product announcements, or regulatory progress. Much of the activity appears speculative, with discussion on retail investor forums such as Reddit fuelling interest in Regencell as a so-called 'meme stock'.
The situation stands as an example of how low-float stocks can spiral out of control in speculative markets.
Why the stock may have risen?
Beyond the stock split, several factors may have contributed to Regencell's rise. Only 30 million of the company's 500 million shares are publicly traded. That means even small spikes in demand can move the price dramatically. The tightly held structure, with most shares owned by the founder and a small group of investors, makes the stock susceptible to volatility.
There may also be a broader sentiment at play.
US interest in natural health may have played a role
The surge coincided with renewed debate in the United States around vaccine alternatives and natural health remedies, including comments by public figures questioning conventional immunisation practices. Regencell's positioning as a traditional medicine company, despite making no claims in this space, may have drawn attention from retail traders looking for exposure to alternative healthcare options.
What does this soaring valuation mean for Regencell?
A market capitalisation of $39 billion for a firm with under 15 employees has raised eyebrows across the financial community. Despite its massive paper valuation, Regencell remains an early-stage company with no commercial revenue and limited operational capacity.
Regulatory warnings have already flagged this type of activity. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission have cautioned investors about small-cap foreign stocks with limited free float being vulnerable to manipulation.
Alternative medicine market on the rise
Globally, interest in traditional and alternative medicine is rising. The complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) market was valued at $178.5 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $919.5 billion by 2034, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 17.9 per cent, according to Global Market Insights, driven by rising demand for holistic, non-invasive, and natural health solutions.
Market research also expects China's TCM industry, valued at $19.5 billion in 2022, to reach nearly $48 billion by 2030. Policy support and public interest in wellness products have driven sustained growth. However, stock surges in the sector have typically followed regulatory decisions or mergers, and have not approached the scale seen in Regencell's case.
Ayurveda market grows with demand
In India, the Ayurveda and herbal health segment has also expanded rapidly, supported by both government backing and rising consumer demand. The domestic market is projected to grow to ₹36 trillion by 2033 from ₹8.76 trillion in 2024, according to research shared by Imarc Group. Listed companies such as Dabur and Kerala Ayurveda have delivered strong financial performances, driven by product demand and retail penetration. Unlike Regencell, their valuations have been more closely tied to business metrics.
As of Wednesday, June 18, the stock had dropped 18 per cent in intraday trading to $63.35 on Nasdaq, but it was still up 48,630.77 per cent year-to-date.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Step Inside the Future of Indian Strength Equipment
Step Inside the Future of Indian Strength Equipment

The Wire

time10 minutes ago

  • The Wire

Step Inside the Future of Indian Strength Equipment

Unrack Factory Open Day on June 20 Bengaluru, Karnataka, India (NewsVoir) After a successful first edition, Unrack Fit, India's homegrown strength training brand, is reopening its factory doors on June 20, an open invitation for fitness professionals, gym owners, and anyone interested to know how strength equipment is made in India. From raw steel to finished barbells, witness how high-performance lifting gear is imagined, engineered, and built entirely in India. Whether you're a gym owner, fitness coach, strength enthusiast, or simply curious about how world-class equipment is made, Unrack's Factory Open Day offers a behind-the-scenes experience you won't find anywhere else. Led by Dr. Sahana, Unrack Fit's Founder and former Strength & Conditioning Coach for British Aquatics, playing a key role in preparing female divers through the Tokyo and Paris Olympic cycles. The walkthrough includes demonstrating raw material handling, polishing, finishing, and product testing. Attendees also had the opportunity to interact directly with the team and try out the equipment on-site. 'This isn't just a tour. It's a conversation about Indian innovation in strength equipment, and why it matters,' says Dr. Sahana. With over seven years in elite sport, including Olympic medal-winning campaigns, her mission is to build world-class equipment from India, for the world. The first open day on June 14 brought together members of the fitness community who spent time understanding the work behind each product. It was not a promotional event. It was about sharing the process, taking questions, and opening up the space. The next factory open day is on June 20. Location: Unrack, Peenya, Bengaluru Register Now: About Unrack Fit Unrack is a Bengaluru-based brand focused on designing and manufacturing strength training equipment in India. Unrack's products are developed in-house, combining performance, durability, and practical design. The company was founded by Dr Sahana, a former Olympic strength and conditioning coach, with a commitment to making high-quality equipment accessible to athletes, gyms, fitness enthusiasts and training professionals. For further information, visit (Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with Newsvoir and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). This is an auto-published feed from PTI with no editorial input from The Wire.

How the world's top ad agencies aligned to fix prices in India
How the world's top ad agencies aligned to fix prices in India

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How the world's top ad agencies aligned to fix prices in India

HighlightsOmnicom Media's India Chief, Kartik Sharma, expressed frustration over a rival's attempt to poach their client by offering lower prices, which violated a collective agreement among global advertising agencies on ad rates in India. The Competition Commission of India is investigating a suspected cartel among major advertising firms, including WPP Media, Omnicom Media, and Interpublic Group Mediabrands, for coordinating pricing and denying business to non-compliant agencies. A WhatsApp group named 'AAAI media agencies' included top executives from various advertising companies coordinating their pitches and pricing strategies, which led to concerns about antitrust violations in India's media sector. Omnicom Media 's India chief was frustrated. It was October 5, 2023 and a rival was trying to poach the U.S. firm's client by offering lower prices, just weeks after global advertising agencies and broadcasters struck secret pacts on ad rates in the South Asian country. The attempt to woo the client violated the agencies' agreement, Omnicom Media's India CEO Kartik Sharma wrote in a WhatsApp group comprising a who's who of advertising, according to excerpts of the discussion documented by antitrust investigators and verified by Reuters. "This kind of practice is not in the spirit of what we are collectively trying to achieve," Sharma wrote, without identifying the parties. Shashi Sinha, then India CEO of New York-based IPG Mediabrands, suggested an industry group should "admonish the agency". The exchanges form part of a confidential dossier compiled by India's antitrust watchdog that chronicles how global advertising companies, including leading U.S. and European firms, coordinated to rig prices in the world's most populous nation. Reuters reviewed evidence from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) investigation, including a 10-page document with messages and records of meetings between top advertising executives, and two industry agreements under scrutiny for antitrust violations; and interviewed two people familiar with the probe. The key details, which haven't been previously reported, centre on WhatsApp interactions involving 11 industry executives. They include the top India or South Asia executives of WPP's GroupM; U.S.-based Omnicom Media and Interpublic's IPG Mediabrands; France's Publicis and Havas Media; Japan's Dentsu and India's Madison World. Over WhatsApp and in meetings, the executives coordinated responses to clients, which "resulted in alignment of competing advertising agencies," CCI officials said in the August 9 dossier, determining on an initial basis that the conduct contravened competition law. The firms agreed to cooperate on pricing, including not to undercut each other; colluded with broadcasters to deny business to agencies that didn't comply; and discussed financial terms involving at least four Indian clients over conference calls, according to the investigation documents. The documents don't indicate whether the agencies' foreign headquarters were aware of the executives' actions. A spokesperson for WPP Media , which until May was known as GroupM, told Reuters it was aware of the investigation but declined to comment further. A Dentsu India spokesperson confirmed Reuters reporting that it had disclosed industry practices to the CCI in February 2024 under the regulator's leniency program, which enables lesser penalties for firms that share evidence of malpractice. The spokesperson didn't address specific evidence raised in the dossier but said the firm had implemented stricter audits and controls. The other agencies and their executives didn't respond to Reuters questions about the antitrust probe and information in the dossier. The regulator also didn't respond to queries. Reuters has reported that in March, as part of the continuing investigation, the regulator raided the Indian offices of many advertising firms and an industry group that represents broadcasters, including the Reliance-Disney venture and Sony . CCI investigations typically take several months. The regulator can't press criminal charges, but can impose financial penalties on the media agencies of up to three times their profit or 10% of an Indian entity's global turnover, whichever is higher, for each year of wrongdoing. Secret Pacts WPP Media, the world's largest media buying agency, last year - when it was still known as GroupM - won new India business worth $447 million, followed by Omnicom's $183 million, according to research firm COMvergence. But India's near-$30 billion media and entertainment sector is grappling with weak consumer sentiment. Ad spending will rise 7% to $19 billion in 2025, the slowest growth in three years, according to GroupM estimates. The CCI is investigating the role of two industry bodies, the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI) and the Indian Broadcasting & Digital Foundation (IBDF), in orchestrating the suspected cartel. The former group is led by WPP Media India head Prasanth Kumar, while the broadcasting body's president is Kevin Vaz, a top Reliance-Disney venture executive. Neither industry group responded to requests for comment. The dossier shows the AAAI circulated guidelines to ad agencies in August 2023: They must charge clients whose annual spending exceeds $29 million a minimum 3% commission for digital ads and 2.5% for traditional media. Lower-spending clients would pay higher minimum commissions of up to 8%. A month later, the industry associations entered a joint pact, agreeing no agency would "unilaterally offer any discount" on rates while pitching for business. The pact, reviewed by Reuters, declared its aim was to eliminate "lower pricing as a reason to award a pitch". The advertising firms began coordinating their activities at least as early as August 2023, according to the CCI documents. Ad executives who met on December 1 that year hailed their collaboration as a "great success" and resolved to continue, according to meeting minutes cited in the CCI's evidence. 'All Aligned' In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission this month sought information from advertising agencies as part of a probe into whether they coordinated boycotts of certain sites. The Justice Department in 2016 probed agencies it suspected of rigging bids to favour in-house units, but eventually closed the case without bringing charges. Brewer Anheuser-Busch InBev used CCI's leniency program to blow the whistle on an industry cartel in India in 2017. In the case of the ad industry, Dentsu India told Reuters it filed its leniency application with the CCI not as a reaction to external pressure but out of a decision to "support reform from within". Two people with knowledge of the matter told Reuters the evidence Dentsu submitted included a transcript of the WhatsApp group. The group, formed in August 2023 and reviewed in part by Reuters, was named "AAAI media agencies" and contained scores of chat messages. Participants included Kumar of WPP's media company, Sharma of Omnicom Media, IPG Mediabrands' Sinha, Havas Media India CEO Mohit Joshi, Dentsu South Asia CEO Harsha Razdan and then-media business CEO Anita Kotwani, Publicis South Asia chief Anupriya Acharya and Madison boss Sam Balsara, the investigators' evidence shows. Members of the group discussed advertising pitches and coordinated on interactions with clients such as food delivery giant Swiggy , drug maker Cipla, SoftBank-backed e-commerce firm Meesho, and Kshema Insurance. In Swiggy's case, the AAAI arranged a Zoom call with media agency heads to discuss the company's advertising pitch. Later, GroupM's Kumar, as AAAI president, suggested an email response to Swiggy explaining the industry's agreed position on rebates. "Ok all aligned thanks," he wrote after a consensus emerged. Kshema told Reuters the insurer was unaware of the matter. The other clients didn't respond to questions. During another discussion on client rebates, an unspecified Dentsu executive told rivals over WhatsApp that "the lowest we go to is retain 30% and 70% we pass back to the client," according to the CCI dossier. CCI officials noted in the document that advertisers and the broadcasters' group had sought to penalise enterprises that didn't comply with the pricing pacts. In an email to Walt Disney in August 2023, Kumar wrote that broadcasters should refrain from granting business to a firm that had breached the pacts, ITW Consulting, though he said it had later agreed not to approach clients directly. ITW didn't respond to Reuters questions. Tensions heated up again over WhatsApp three months later. Sharma, of Omnicom Media, learned that ITW had done another "direct deal with a client of ours" for advertising on streaming platform Hotstar, which was run by Disney. This irked Sharma, as Hotstar had the rights for the cricket World Cup held in India at the time. "This nuisance has to stop," he wrote in the group.

Star chase: Why Mark Zuckerberg is deploying billions to acquire hot AI talent like Alexandr Wang for Meta
Star chase: Why Mark Zuckerberg is deploying billions to acquire hot AI talent like Alexandr Wang for Meta

Mint

time15 minutes ago

  • Mint

Star chase: Why Mark Zuckerberg is deploying billions to acquire hot AI talent like Alexandr Wang for Meta

It sounded like something that should have come from the sports desk—a $14.3 billion transfer fee for a young up-and-coming prospect as Meta looks to rebuild its team for the tough season ahead. The head coach is an under-pressure Mark Zuckerberg, and the hot talent is Alexandr Wang, 28. His company is Scale AI, and Meta is taking a 49% stake, it was confirmed last week. Were this an acquisition, it would be the second largest in Meta's history after its $19 billion purchase of WhatsApp in 2014. But it's not an acquisition, so don't call it that, even though it bears many of the hallmarks of one. Wang is going to join Meta as a top executive tasked with running a crack team to build an AI superintelligence, sitting next to Zuckerberg at Meta's headquarters. Other Scale AI employees will join, too, according to multiple reports. So—definitely not an acquisition, just an investment that also includes putting the company's top talent on Meta's payroll. Meanwhile, Meta has been trying to poach AI talent from Google and OpenAI with the promise of 'seven-to nine-figure" salaries, the New York Times reported. Also Read: Brave Chinese voices have begun to question the hype around AI In its defence, Meta is hardly a pioneer here. As Bloomberg Tech's Jackie Davalos mentioned, this kind of squad building is becoming a regular occurrence. Microsoft signed Inflection AI's co-founders; Alphabet hired founders; took on Adept AI's chief executive officer. On none of these occasions did they acquire the actual companies. Two forces are driving this approach. The first, glaringly, is that big companies are particularly keen to avoid being seen to be making acquisitions right now when judges are deep in consideration over whether earlier actions, such as Meta's purchases of Instagram and WhatsApp, should be deemed illegal. For Meta, structuring the Scale AI deal as an investment means avoiding a long, turbulent timeline that would come with a buyout effort. But the second factor is what I find more interesting. Ever since the launch of ChatGPT, there's been no shortage of soul-searching among Big Tech firms as to why they didn't get there first. How could it be that the pioneering work was done outside of their campuses by individuals and companies with relative pennies compared with their R&D budgets? The reason, as evidenced by these hirings and investments, is the very nature of bigness. Also Read: Trump's policies assure China an edge in the race for AI dominance Now that the Big Tech companies are mature businesses, never has their inability to move quickly and take risks been more apparent. Does an Alexandr Wang find success at a place like Meta had he been hired as a young engineer? A company with 77,000 employees and a fierce focus on keeping Wall Street happy? One that's run by a CEO he would likely have never been able to meet, let alone be able to influence? Startups have always had an upper hand in this way, for sure, but the low barrier to entry for those with bright AI ideas means it has never been easier to attract attention. But then what? Founders are finding themselves staring at unfathomably large data centre costs to scale their businesses. When a hyperscaler like Meta comes knocking, it can look like the only sensible way forward. So the startup ecosystem may now behave like the minor leagues. Feeder clubs that are a breeding ground for talent waiting in the wings of the bigger teams with the deepest pockets. The talent leaves, but the club remains. In what form isn't quite clear, though at least investors get their money back. Also Read: Dave Lee: Apple must make peace with developers for AI success The approach may seem expensive, but it is certainly fast. Why would tech giants, seeking tighter headcounts these days, try to incubate these talents when they could just sit back and wait for special geniuses to make themselves known? Of course, there's a risk of losing talent to a competitor—hence the jacking up of compensation to levels that only the biggest companies could afford, consolidating AI expertise in just a few of the usual places. At the same time, some smaller companies may not want to be a feeder club and might feel unfairly treated as homegrown talent disappears after receiving an email from Zuckerberg offering $10 million to sign on—which is maybe just the beginning. We'll see just how long this approach remains possible. As Axios' Dan Primack has pointed out, antitrust authorities do have the power to go after these kinds of deals if they want. The Federal Trade Commission last year announced it was looking into them—just because they are not acquisitions doesn't mean they can't and won't be scrutinized. But for Meta and its peers, that's a later concern. Today's means assembling a squad as quickly as possible. ©Bloomberg The author is Bloomberg Opinion's US technology columnist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store