Big powers need to reassess postures towards Pakistan, India
Listen to article
The recent Indo-Pak crisis has been temporarily defused by a still fragile ceasefire. Yet, this crisis has major policy implications not only for the subcontinent, but for the world's two major global superpowers, the US and China, which are locked in increasingly intensive great power competition.
The impact of the unfolding great power competition has become particularly acute within South Asia. Much has been said about Pakistan's historical alliances with the US, and its growing strategic embrace with China, and America's simultaneous bet to help prop up India to counter China. However, these strategic policy postures cannot remain static but must instead be subjected to constant revision.
The post-Pahalgam conflict was a defining moment which should provide strategic thinkers and policymakers ample reasons to reassess their postures, especially if they want to prevent another steep and slippery escalatory crisis between the neighbouring nuclearised rivals.
Pakistan did not take long to side with the US during the Cold War, joining regional alliances such as SEATO and CENTO, way back in the 1950s. As India decided to remain non-aligned, the US had to walk a regional tightrope to prevent the Indians from joining the Soviet camp. While Pakistan was disappointed that the US did not come rushing to Pakistan's aid during its 1965 and 1971 wars with India, a lot of US aid poured into Pakistan to entice Presidents Zia and Musharraf to subsequently cooperate with the US in neighbouring Afghanistan.
Following the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, and before the post-9/11 US-led invasion of Afghanistan, Washington also became convinced of the need to simultaneously bolster its relations with New Delhi. Bill Clinton onwards, all US administrations have been wooing "the largest democracy in the world", considering it a natural ally to counterbalance the steady rise of Communist China.
China, on the other hand, had extended the hand of friendship to Pakistan, viewing it is the ideal strategic ally to exert pressure on India, soon after the Sino-Indian war in 1962. China's relationship with Pakistan remained modest during the Cold War years, but when the US started bolstering its relationship with India, China also became convinced of the need to integrate Pakistan into its ambitious BRI vision. Alongside its economic relationship with Pakistan, the Chinese military also began forging closer ties with Pakistan, quickly supplanting Pakistan's reliance on American military hardware.
However, the burning question now is, how China and the US will reposition their stances towards India and Pakistan following the post-Pahalgam confrontation? The US, alongside other regional mediators, did manage to secure de-escalation this time around. President Trump was quick to claim credit for defusing this crisis.
Yet, his stated willingness to even resolve the 'fifteen-hundred-year-old' Kashmir dispute seems more a self-aggrandising assertion rather than a signal indicating a shift in America's longstanding stance of not meddling in this thorny dispute, especially without India's consent. While Pakistan has decided to nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, perhaps in the bid to pander to his ego, not many serious Pakistani analysts expect him to help resolve the Kashmir dispute.
Conversely, many strategic advisors within the US still want it to continue bolstering India's capabilities. China may also have to pay the price of increased stress in its already strained relations with India for choosing to side openly with Pakistan during the recent military confrontation. India's decision to hold IWT in abeyance does not bode well for enabling regional stabilisation, especially if India chooses to disregard the recent decision by the International Court of Arbitration.
Instead of using the Indo-Pak rivalry as another arena for proxy confrontation, a saner geostrategic recalibration necessitates placing greater emphasis on restraint, and the systematic mitigation of tensions between India, Pakistan and China. More cooperative approaches to water sharing and softening existing borders do exist, but they are unfortunately not being given the attention they need within our increasingly unstable and transactional world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Drought, dams and diplomacy: Afghanistan's water crisis goes regional
FARYAB (Afghanistan): Over four decades of war, Afghanistan wielded limited control over five major river basins that flow across its borders into downstream neighbouring nations. But as Taliban authorities swept to power and tightened their grip on the country, they have pushed for Afghanistan's water sovereignty, launching infrastructure projects to harness precious resources in the arid territory. Dams and canals have sparked tensions with neighbouring states, testing the Taliban authorities' efforts to build strong regional ties, as they remain largely isolated on the global stage since their 2021 takeover. At the same time, the region is facing the shared impacts of climate change intensifying water scarcity, as temperatures rise and precipitation patterns shift, threatening glaciers and snowpack that feed the country's rivers. Here are key points about Afghanistan's transboundary water challenges: Central Asian states to the north Afghanistan is emerging as a new player in often fraught negotiations on the use of the Amu Darya, one of two key rivers crucial for crops in water-stressed Central Asia, where water sharing relies on fragile accords since Soviet times. Central Asian states have expressed concern over the Qosh Tepa mega canal project that could divert up to 21 percent of the Amu Darya's total flow to irrigate 560,000 hectares of land across Afghanistan's arid north, and further deplete the Aral Sea. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are likely to face the biggest impact, both joined by Kazakhstan in voicing alarm, even as they deepen diplomatic ties with the Taliban authorities — officially recognised so far by only Russia. 'No matter how friendly the tone is now,' water governance expert Mohd Faizee warned, 'at some point there will be consequences for Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan when the canal starts operating'. Taliban officials have denied that the project will have a major impact on the Amu Darya's water levels and pledged it will improve food security in a country heavily dependent on climate-vulnerable agriculture and facing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. 'There is an abundance of water, especially when the Amu Darya floods and glacial meltwater flows into it' in the warmer months, said project manager Sayed Zabihullah Miri, during a visit to the canal works in Faryab province, where diggers carved into a drought-ridden plain dotted with camels and locusts. Iran to the west Iran is the only country with which Afghanistan has a formal water sharing treaty, agreed in 1973 over the Helmand river, which traverses Taliban heartland territory, but the accord was never fully implemented. Longstanding tensions over the river's resources have spiked over dams in southern Afghanistan, particularly in periods of drought, which are likely to increase as climate shocks hit the region's water cycle. Iran, facing pressure in its parched southeastern region, has repeatedly demanded that Afghanistan respect its rights, charging that upstream dams restrict the Helmand's flow into a border lake. The Taliban authorities insist there is not enough water to release more to Iran, blaming the impact of climate pressures on the whole region. They also argue long-term poor water management has meant Afghanistan has not gotten its full share, according to an Afghanistan Analysts Network report by water resources management expert Assem Mayar. Iran and Afghanistan have no formal agreement over their other shared river basin, the Harirud, which also flows into Turkmenistan and is often combined into a single basin with the Morghab river. While infrastructure exists on the Afghan portions of the basin, some has not been fully utilised, Faizee said. But that could change, he added, as the end of conflict in Afghanistan means infrastructure works don't incur vast security costs on top of construction budgets, lifting a barrier to development of projects such as the Pashdan dam inaugurated in August on the Harirud. Pakistan to the east Water resources have not topped the agenda in consistently fraught relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Afghanistan's Kabul river basin, which encompasses tributaries to the greater Indus basin and feeds the capital and largest city, is shared with Pakistan. The countries, however, have no formal cooperation mechanism. With the Afghan capital wracked by a severe water crisis, the Taliban authorities have sought to revitalise old projects and start new ones to tackle the problem, risking fresh tensions with Pakistan. But the lack of funds and technical capacity means the Taliban authorities' large water infrastructure projects across the country could take many years to come to fruition — time that could be good for diplomacy, but bad for ordinary Afghans.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
India-Pakistan conflict: Naqvi heaps praise on armed forces, intelligence agencies
LAHORE: Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Raza Naqvi has lauded the remarkable role of Pakistan's armed forces, intelligence agencies, and national leadership in the country's victory during the May war against India. Speaking at a seminar titled 'Global Impacts of Pakistan's Military and Diplomatic Victories over India', organised by the Waris Mir Foundation at Aiwan-e-Iqbal on Sunday, the minister said that every move, decision, and plan of the enemy was intercepted in advance during the conflict. Interior minister said that the current political and administrative setup in Pakistan should continue for the country's stability and progress. Pak-India conflict: Indian opposition assails Modi for failures Naqvi said it was a major challenge for the government to provide evidence to the world, including wreckage of Indian jet fighters shot down by Pakistani forces. He noted with pride that within minutes of the operation, not only images but also videos of the destroyed aircraft were available, strengthening Pakistan's stance globally. Paying tribute to the 'hidden soldiers', who worked in secrecy, the interior minister said the nation also witnessed divine help during the war. He cited the example of seven missiles fired by Indian forces towards a Pakistani military base, none of which hit the target. Similarly, despite repeated attempts, Indian strikes failed to damage Pakistan's bases, except for one where Pakistani soldiers embraced martyrdom. 'Faith, belief, and determination are weapons that invite the help of Allah,' he remarked, adding that Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal General Asim Munir responded to Indian aggression with courage and conviction. He informed the audience that Pakistan's forces successfully struck multiple targets inside India and achieved all their objectives. Recalling a meeting with a Saudi delegation during the war, Naqvi said the Field Marshal had drawn a comparison, describing India as a 'shining car' and Pakistan as a 'loaded dumper', making it clear what happens when the two collide. He highlighted the unity and coordination of Pakistan's civil and military leadership, in contrast to India's conflicting narratives during the conflict. He accused Indian leaders Ajit Doval and Amit Shah of being the real architects behind the 'drama' staged by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, warning that they would eventually bring India to ruin. The minister appreciated the unity demonstrated by all national political parties during the war and pointed out that PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's voice was heard globally, while the Indian delegation faced difficulties abroad. He further accused India of openly supporting terrorism in Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, stressing that Pakistan possesses concrete evidence of Indian involvement. Naqvi warned that Pakistan would continue to pursue India until the Kashmiris are granted their right to self-determination as pledged in UN resolutions once signed by India's former prime minister. He said despite immense international pressure after Indian jets were downed, Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir stood firm and gave a strong response to India. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan has video evidence of downed six Indian aircraft, says Mohsin Naqvi
Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi on Sunday that Pakistan has video evidence of six Indian aircraft, which were shot down during the recent military conflict between the two neighbouring nuclear states. Speaking at a seminar hosted by the Professor Waris Mir Foundation at Aiwan-e-Iqbal, titled 'Global Impacts of Pakistan's Military and Diplomatic Victories over India', the minister stressed that the country's intelligence and defense preparedness outmatched India at every level. Naqvi said, 'We have videos of six Indian aircraft that were shot down.' He said it was decided that no announcement would be made until field evidence was obtained, 'and believe me, we had it within minutes.' Pak-India conflict: Indian opposition assails Modi for failures Naqvi credited Pakistan's intelligence agencies for providing real-time information during the conflict. 'Every decision made in India, every flight their aircraft took — we knew in advance. This was the extraordinary work of our intelligence agencies, the silent warriors who rarely get the credit they deserve,' he said. He also spoke of divine protection, recounting an incident in which seven Indian missiles targeted a major Pakistani base but failed to hit it. 'Some missiles fell short, some landed to the side, but none hit the base. It was nothing short of a miracle,' he added. In contrast, Naqvi said that Pakistan's retaliatory missile strikes hit India's largest oil storage facility with precision. The interior minister praised Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir's leadership, saying he led with great courage and bravery. 'At that time, a delegation from the Saudi government visited Pakistan. The delegation had come from India to Pakistan, seeking peace. The field marshal told them: 'India is like a shining Mercedes, but we are like a dumper truck loaded with stones. Now imagine what will happen when the two collide.' The members of the delegation remained silent,' he said. The minister also highlighted that for the first time, the army, air force, and navy devised a joint strategy and fought the war under one plan. Whereas, he said India's each service chief reported separately to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. '…their viewpoints were entirely different and split. The result was before the world.' Naqvi said that two key figures behind India's strategy were National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Home Minister Amit Shah, not Modi himself. 'These two will be responsible for Modi's downfall and for the damage they are bringing to India,' he warned. IAF chief must have claimed downing Pakistan's aircraft under pressure: defence analyst He also emphasised political unity within Pakistan during the conflict, stating that all parties stood together. 'The Indian delegation failed to lobby international support, particularly in the U.S., while Pakistan's diplomatic front, led by the PPP chairman, was far more effective,' he said. Naqvi further stated India sponsored terrorism in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan, and used post-9/11 narratives to delegitimise the Kashmiri freedom movement. The seminar was also addressed by Chairman Senate Syed Yusuf Raza Gillani and Speaker Punjab Assembly Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan.
