Brics leaders meet in Rio to defend multilateralism ‘under attack'
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (right) and Chinese Premier Li Qiang ahead of the Brics summit in Brazil.
RIO DE JANEIRO - Leaders of the growing Brics group of developing nations met in Brazil on July 6, calling for reform of traditional Western institutions while presenting the bloc as a defender of multilateral diplomacy in an increasingly fractured world.
With forums such as the G-7 and G-20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of US President Donald Trump, expansion of the Brics has opened new space for diplomatic coordination.
In his opening remarks at the meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted formally joining either side of a polarised global order.
'Brics is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement,' Mr Lula told leaders. 'With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again.'
Brics nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40 per cent of its economic output, Mr Lula noted in remarks on July 5 to business leaders warning of rising protectionism.
The Brics group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and in 2024 included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as members. This is the first summit of leaders to include Indonesia.
'The vacuum left by others ends up being filled almost instantly by the Brics,' said a Brazilian diplomat who asked not to be named. Although the G-7 still concentrates vast power, the diplomat added, 'it doesn't have the predominance it once did.'
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore First BTO project in Sembawang North to be offered in July HDB launch
World Tariffs will kick in on Aug 1 barring trade deals: US Treasury Secretary
Singapore Woman on SMRT's 190 bus injured after bottle thrown at vehicle leaves hole in window
Business Great Eastern says Takeover Code not breached when it shared IFA valuation with OCBC
Asia 'Don't be seen in India again': Indian nationals pushed into Bangladesh at gunpoint
Asia Thousands evacuated as Typhoon Danas lashes Taiwan
Asia Two women fatally stabbed at bar in Japan by man
Life Star Awards 2025: Christopher Lee wins big, including Special Achievement Award and Best Actor
However, there are questions about the shared goals of an increasingly heterogeneous Brics group, which has grown to include regional rivals along with major emerging economies.
Stealing some thunder from this year's summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his prime minister in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online due to
an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court.
Still, several heads of state gathered for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on July 6 and 7, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
More than 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in the Brics, either as full members or partners.
Growing clout, complexity
Expansion of the Brics has added diplomatic weight to the gathering, which aspires to speak for developing nations across the Global South, strengthening calls for
reforming global institutions such as the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund.
'If international governance does not reflect the new multipolar reality of the 21st century, it is up to Brics to help bring it up to date,' Mr Lula said, in his opening remarks.
Mr Lula defended the integrity of Iran's borders, two weeks after the country was bombed by the United States, and highlighted the failure of US-led wars in the Middle East.
The Brics nations will also continue their
thinly veiled criticism of Mr Trump's US tariff policy, according to diplomats drafting a joint statement. In April, the bloc's foreign ministers voiced concern about 'unjustified unilateral protectionist measures, including the indiscriminate increase of reciprocal tariffs.'
At the Brics summit in Brazil on July 6 are (from left) Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chinese Premier Li Qiang, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
PHOTO: AFP
Brazil, which also hosts the United Nations climate summit in November, has seized on both gatherings to highlight how seriously developing nations are tackling climate change, while Trump has slammed the brakes on US climate initiatives.
China and the UAE signalled in meetings with Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad in Rio that they plan to invest in a proposed Tropical Forests Forever Facility, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions about funding conservation of endangered forests around the world.
The growth of the bloc has also increased the challenges to reaching consensus on contentious geopolitical issues.
Ahead of the summit, negotiators struggled to find shared language for a joint statement about the bombardment of Gaza, the Israel-Iran conflict and a proposed reform of the Security Council, two sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
To overcome differences among African nations regarding the representation on a reformed Security Council, the group agreed to endorse seats for Brazil and India while leaving open which country should represent Africa's interests, a person familiar with the talks told Reuters. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Putin, unfazed by Trump, will fight on and could take more of Ukraine
US President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin's refusal to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine. MOSCOW – Russia's President Vladimir Putin intends to keep fighting in Ukraine until the West engages on his terms for peace, unfazed by US President Donald Trump's threats of tougher sanctions, and his territorial demands may widen as Russian forces advance, three sources close to the Kremlin have said. Mr Putin, who ordered Russian troops into Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in the country's east between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops, believes Russia's economy and its military are strong enough to weather any additional Western measures, the sources said. Mr Trump on July 14 expressed frustration with Mr Putin's refusal to agree to a ceasefire and announced a wave of weapons supplies to Ukraine, including Patriot surface-to-air missile systems. He also threatened further sanctions on Russia unless a peace deal is reached within 50 days. The three Russian sources, familiar with top-level Kremlin thinking, said Mr Putin will not stop the war under pressure from the West and believes Russia, which has survived the toughest sanctions imposed by the West, can endure further economic hardship, including threatened US tariffs targeting buyers of Russian oil . 'Putin thinks no one has seriously engaged with him on the details of peace in Ukraine, including the Americans, so he will continue until he gets what he wants,' one of the sources told Reuters on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the situation. Despite several telephone calls between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, and visits to Russia by US special envoy Steve Witkoff, the Russian leader believes there have not been detailed discussions of the basis for a peace plan, the source said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MBS' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong Singapore Current economic headwinds do not dampen outlook for new MBS building: Las Vegas Sands president Business MAS records net profit of $19.7 billion, fuelled by investment gains Singapore $3b money laundering case: MinLaw acts against 4 law firms and 1 lawyer over seized properties Singapore Man charged with attempted murder of woman at Kallang Wave Mall Singapore Ex-cleaner jailed over safety lapses linked to guard's death near 1-Altitude rooftop bar Singapore Singapore CDL's long-time director Phillip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years 'Putin values the relationship with Trump and had good discussions with Witkoff, but the interests of Russia come above all else,' the person added. Mr Putin's conditions for peace include a legally binding pledge that Nato will not expand eastwards, Ukrainian neutrality and limits on its armed forces, protection for Russian speakers who live there, and acceptance of Russia's territorial gains, the sources said. He is also willing to discuss a security guarantee for Ukraine involving major powers, though it is far from clear how this would work, the sources said. President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukraine will never recognise Russia's sovereignty over its conquered regions, and that Kyiv retains the sovereign right to decide whether it wants to join Nato. 'Appetite comes with eating' However, a second source familiar with Kremlin thinking said Mr Putin considered Moscow's goals far more important than any potential economic losses from Western pressure, and he was not concerned by US threats to impose tariffs on China and India for buying Russian oil. Two of the sources said Russia has the upper hand on the battlefield and its economy, geared towards war, is exceeding the production of the US-led Nato alliance in key munitions, like artillery shells. Russia, which already controls nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory, has advanced some 1,415 sq km in the past three months, according to data from the DeepStateMap, an open-source intelligence map of the conflict. 'Appetite comes with eating,' the first source said, meaning that Mr Putin could seek more territory unless the war was stopped. The two other sources independently confirmed the same. Russia currently controls Crimea, which it annexed in 2014, plus all of the eastern region of Luhansk, more than 70 per cent of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, and fragments of Kharkiv, Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk regions. Mr Putin's public position is that those first five regions – Crimea and the four regions of eastern Ukraine – are now part of Russia and Kyiv must withdraw before there can be peace. Mr Putin could fight on until Ukraine's defences collapse and widen his territorial ambitions to include more of Ukraine, the sources said. 'Russia will act based on Ukraine's weakness,' the third source said, adding that Moscow might halt its offensive after conquering the four eastern regions of Ukraine if it encounters stiff resistance. 'But if it falls, there will be an even greater conquest of Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy and Kharkiv.' Mr Zelensky has said Russia's summer offensive is not going as successfully as Moscow has hoped. His top brass, who acknowledge that Russian forces outnumber Ukraine's, say Kyiv's troops are holding the line and forcing Russia to pay a heavy price for its gains. Trump and Putin The United States says 1.2 million people have been injured or killed in the war, Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II. Neither Russia nor Ukraine give full figures for their losses, and Moscow dismisses Western estimates as propaganda. Mr Trump, since returning to the White House in January after promising a swift end to the war, has sought to repair ties with Russia, speaking at least six times by telephone with Mr Putin. On July 14, he said the Russian leader was not 'an assassin, but he's a tough guy'. In an abrupt break from his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, Mr Trump's administration has cast the war as a deadly proxy conflict between Russia and the US, withdrawn support for Ukraine joining Nato and floated the idea of recognising Russia's annexation of Crimea. Mr Putin portrays the war as a watershed moment in Moscow's relations with the West, which he says humiliated Russia after the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union by enlarging Nato and encroaching on what he considers Moscow's sphere of influence, including Ukraine and Georgia. Mr Putin has yet to accept a proposal from Mr Trump for an unconditional ceasefire, which was quickly endorsed by Kyiv. Recent days have seen Russia use hundreds of drones to attack Ukrainian cities. However, Mr Trump told the BBC in an interview published on July 15 that he was not done with Mr Putin and that a Ukraine deal remained on the cards. The first source rejected Mr Trump's assertion last week that Mr Putin had thrown 'bullshit' around, saying there had been a failure to transform positive talks with Mr Witkoff into a substantive discussion on the basis for peace. A White House official said on July 14 Mr Trump was considering 100 per cent tariffs on Russian goods, as well as secondary sanctions on other countries that buy its exports as a means to drive Moscow to the negotiating table. China and India are the biggest buyers of crude. Despite existing sanctions and the cost of fighting Europe's biggest conflict since World War II, Russia's US$2 trillion (S$2.6 trillion) economy has performed far better than many in Russia or the West expected. The economic ministry forecasts a slowdown to 2.5 per cent annual growth in 2025 from 4.3 per cent in 2024. The second person said Mr Trump has little leverage over Mr Putin and suggested that, even if Washington imposes tariffs on the purchasers of Russian crude, then Moscow will still find a way to sell it to world markets. 'Putin understands that Trump is an unpredictable person who may do unpleasant things, but he is manoeuvring to avoid irritating him too much,' the source said. Looking ahead, one of the sources said there is likely to be an escalation of the crisis in the coming months, and unscored the dangers of tensions between the world's two largest nuclear powers. And, he predicted, the war will continue. REUTERS
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine's PM Shmyhal resigns as part of major government reshuffle
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said on Tuesday he had submitted a resignation letter, as part of the country's largest wartime governmental reshuffle expected this week. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Monday nominated First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko to replace Shmyhal. Svyrydenko, who is also the economy minister, is a close and long-standing ally of Zelenskiy. Shmyhal, who has been in his post since March 2020, is expected to be appointed as Ukraine's new defence minister, Zelenskiy said on Monday. Parliament is due to vote on Svyrydenko's nomination later this week. Zelenskiy said that he had already discussed priority tasks for the next six months with her. "We are preparing the initial steps of the renewed government," he said on the Telegram app, posting a picture from their meeting in his office. The key tasks would be to increase domestic weapons production and implement reforms to unlock Ukraine's economic potential, he said. The shakeup, the biggest since Russia's invasion in February 2022, comes as the Russian forces continue their grinding advance in Ukraine's east, and prospects for any fast ceasefire deal look dim. Ukraine's economy is still smaller than before the war, despite local businesses adapting to the wartime reality and billions in foreign aid from Kyiv's Western allies to help maintain macroeconomic stability. Next year the country is facing a tough task of financing its ballooning budget deficit as foreign aid is set to diminish. Ukrainian officials have said the country would need about $40 billion in external financing in 2026. Parliament is due to vote on the new government nominations on Thursday, lawmakers said. REUTERS
New Paper
an hour ago
- New Paper
'Against racial harmony': S'poreans riled by Chinese menus with no English translation
Stepping into an eatery, the last thing most diners would expect is a menu entirely in a language they don't understand. After all, English is Singapore's lingua franca and the working language of the civil service, bringing its diverse communities together. While bigger chains like Haidilao, Tanyu, and Tongue Tip Lanzhou Beef Noodle cater to all customers with bilingual menus, some Chinese food establishments have been spotted operating without English menus - a trend that some non-Chinese Singaporeans call "exclusionary". A photo of a Chinese pancake stall menu recently went viral for its lack of English. The stall is located in Clementi's Gantral Mall, which one Google Maps user nicknamed "mini-Chinatown" in a review. This is in spite of Singapore Food Agency (SFA) regulations stating that food businesses offering prepacked food for sale in Singapore must provide labels with basic information about the product, such as its source, contents, and net quantity, in English. The labelling requirements do not extend to non-prepacked food like dishes served in a restaurant. Only the store's name was translated into English. PHOTOS: UNFAIR-BIKE/REDDIT, THE DRUG ARCHITECT/FACEBOOK This seems to be an issue across some Chinese food establishments in Singapore. In June, a Reddit user shared a post detailing the struggles of understanding a menu entirely in Chinese, as an Indian Muslim who does not speak Mandarin. "Yes, they're a Chinese business, and Singapore is Chinese-majority. But having only the Chinese language means you are excluding non-Chinese people and even some Chinese Singaporeans who struggle with their mother tongue," the user wrote. Comments in response to the user noted that Singaporeans are not the customer base these businesses are targeting: "Your absence does not make a difference to their bottom line because the (China national) expat bubble is self-sustaining." Another user who identified as a Chinese Singaporean felt that service staff should be trained to speak basic English: "I'm going to do my part and speak (in English) to the staff in Chinese restaurants." Not a one-off The Grantral Mall stall is not an exception - when The New Paper visited Scarlett Supermarket on a weekday afternoon, some signage was entirely in Chinese. The newly-opened outlet in Sembawang, one of 38 outlets owned by the Chinese supermarket chain, was predominantly staffed and patronised by Chinese nationals. It boasted a food court with four stalls, one of which was a mala stall with no English on its signage. The menu was written entirely in Chinese. PHOTO: ST LIM SAN TENG/GOOGLE MAPS An item on the menu of a dumpling stall was labelled in English, apparently with the help of online translation services, as Sichuan chilli oil wonton was awkwardly mistranslated to "copyist with red oil". Other items were properly translated. PHOTO: XIAN XIAN WONG/GOOGLE MAPS Alienating non-Chinese customers 24-year-old university student Nornabihah Mohamed Noor told The New Paper that the lack of proper English translation alienates non-Mandarin-speaking customers: "Honestly, I dislike it. It feels unfair and goes against the idea of racial harmony that Singapore stands for. "As a Malay who looks Chinese, I often get told I should speak Mandarin, even though I didn't grow up speaking it. It feels like there's an assumption or pressure to fit in a certain box." She added that, intentionally or not, these businesses are sending a message to customers that other races are not as welcome: "Not having English labels would make people feel excluded or like they don't belong in their own country." 'We are a multilingual society' A 47-year-old woman from China's Hainan province, who only wanted to be known as Mrs Tan, told TNP that she first visited Singapore 20 years ago in search of a job. She later met her Singaporean husband through a friend and settled here. Mrs Tan, who admitted that her English is still "not good", has since obtained Singapore citizenship and has two teenage children. "When I first came here, I didn't know English at all. Nowadays, I know basic words that I can use at work," Mrs Tan, who has worked as a dessert stall hawker for over 15 years, said in Mandarin. While she acknowledged the preponderance of Chinese immigrants, Mrs Tan stressed that it should not excuse the absence of English translations on menus. "If you're living here, you should follow how things are done here," she said. "We are a multilingual society, so of course, you have to label your menu in English. That's the most basic level of respect you can give to customers because not everybody can understand Chinese." Taking action Some Chinese eateries have amended their menus to better reflect their offerings. Xiang Xiang Hunan Cuisine, with 15 outlets across Singapore, recently updated its menu to correct some English translations. However, not all Chinese words on the menu were translated. The item is priced differently for members and non-members, but not indicated in English. PHOTOS, ARS 3276/GOOGLE MAPS, XIANG XIANG HUNAN CUISINE In September 2021, Scarlett Supermarket was investigated by authorities for selling products without English labels. In April 2023, the chain came under fire again for selling instant Chinese bread soup that listed methamphetamine as an ingredient. It was later clarified that the ingredients had been wrongly translated by the Chinese manufacturer. At press time, Scarlett Supermarket and Xiang Xiang Hunan Cuisine had not responded to TNP's queries. Miss Nornabihah told TNP that the lack of proper English labelling on menus is "not right" in a multiracial country. "It goes against the idea of inclusivity and racial harmony we claim to value and preach about."
