logo
Former Amb. Nicholas Burns: Don't think the U.S. and China are close to a comprehensive trade deal

Former Amb. Nicholas Burns: Don't think the U.S. and China are close to a comprehensive trade deal

CNBC30-06-2025
Nicholas Burns, Harvard's Belfer Center professor and former U.S. Ambassador to China, joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the state of U.S.-China trade negotiations, what a comprehensive trade deal would look like, future of TikTok, and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Climate Change, Regulation and Health
Climate Change, Regulation and Health

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

Climate Change, Regulation and Health

To the Editor: In 'How Trump E.P.A. Is Giving Up Role of U.S. Protector' (front page, Aug. 4), about the recent E.P.A. reversal of its previous finding that climate change is endangering the American people, David Gelles and Maxine Joselow note the longstanding debate over the proper role of government in regulating dangers. Adam Smith, they remind us, argued that 'governments should play a limited role.' But a limited role in what? Smith contrasted the benefits of the emerging system of capitalism with the mercantilist system that it was soon to replace, but even he recognized that governments sometimes had to get involved. Regulations were warranted, he wrote in 'The Wealth of Nations,' when the 'natural liberty of a few individuals, which might endanger the security of the whole society, are, and ought to be, restrained by the laws of all governments; of the most free, as well as of the most despotical.' Smith was referring specifically to banking regulation, but his argument was not sui generis. He compared banking regulation to the requirements for firewalls, which had been mandated in London under the Fires Prevention Act of 1774, just two years before Smith wrote his classic work. Worsened wildfires are, of course, one of the many costly consequences of man-made climate change. Today, the liberty of fossil fuel companies is endangering the security of us all. Adam Smith would have seen the need to regulate them. Naomi OreskesCambridge, writer is a professor of the history of science and an affiliated professor of earth and planetary sciences at Harvard. She is also an author, with Erik M. Conway, of 'The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market.' To the Editor: Re 'E.P.A. to Retract Bedrock Finding on Climate Crisis' (front page, July 30): The Trump administration's proposal to repeal the endangerment finding is a threat to people's health across the country. The endangerment finding affirms, based on overwhelming scientific evidence, that emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change while worsening air pollution and harming health. With this proposal, the E.P.A. is essentially turning its back on decades of scientific consensus and putting polluters ahead of the health of children, seniors and communities. As the American Lung Association hears frequently from nurses, physicians and patients experiencing them firsthand, climate change has profound effects on respiratory health, including heightened risks of asthma attacks, worsening symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and premature death. Make no mistake: This decision will immediately affect the health of every American, especially those who are most vulnerable to air pollution, including children, older adults and pregnant women. We urge the E.P.A. not to move forward with this harmful action and to instead prioritize the health and well-being of all communities. Laura Kate BenderFairfax, writer is the vice president for nationwide advocacy and public policy at the American Lung Association. Hiding Unfavorable Jobs Data To the Editor: Re 'Trump Pick for Agency on Job Data Stirs Alarm' (Business, Aug. 13), about the selection of E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the Heritage Foundation: I was struck by this quote from Preston Caldwell, an economist, in the article: 'First impressions here, this guy has an extreme degree of partisan motivation, which affects how he interprets the facts. But I do not think he's fundamentally dishonest.' If President Trump and his appointments have shown anything, it is their blind loyalty and willingness to, if not lie outright, at least fudge at every opportunity. One of Mr. Antoni's first comments was that maybe these employment figures do not have to be published every month. If the figures were favorable, they would be published by this administration every day. Only unfavorable stats would go unpublished. Is hiding the facts a lie or a fudge? Does it matter as long as we no longer trust the government at all? Stephen T. SchreiberPrinceton, N.J. To the Editor: President Trump has named a new head for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. I imagine the job application had a single question: How much is two plus two? The winning answer: Whatever you want it to be, Mr. President. Robert S. CarrollStaten Island

Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment
Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment

Associated Press

timea minute ago

  • Associated Press

Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment

WASHINGTON (AP) — Harvard University and the Trump administration are getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations, according to a person familiar with the matter. The framework is still being sorted out with significant gaps to close, but both sides have agreed on the financial figure and a settlement could be finalized in coming weeks, according to the person who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Harvard declined to comment. The agreement would end a monthslong battle that has tested the boundaries of the government's authority over America's universities. What began as an investigation into campus antisemitism escalated into an all-out feud as the Trump administration slashed more than $2.6 billion in research funding, ended federal contracts and attempted to block Harvard from hosting international students. The university responded with a pair of lawsuits alleging illegal retaliation by the administration after Harvard rejected a set of demands that campus leaders viewed as a threat to academic freedom. Details of the proposed framework were first reported by The New York Times. A $500 million payment would be the largest sum yet as the administration pushes for financial penalties in its settlements with elite universities. Columbia University agreed to pay the government $200 million as part of an agreement restoring access to federal funding, while Brown University separately agreed to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. Details have not been finalized on where Harvard's potential payment would go, the person said. The Republican president has been pushing to reform prestigious universities that he decries as bastions of liberal ideology. His administration has cut funding to several Ivy League schools while pressing demands in line with his political campaign. None has been targeted as frequently or as heavily as Harvard, the richest U.S. university with an endowment valued at $53 billion. More than a dozen Democrats in Congress who attended Harvard cautioned against a settlement on Aug. 1, warning the university it may warrant 'rigorous Congressional oversight and inquiry.' Capitulating to political demands, they said, would set a dangerous precedent across all of higher education. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Top 10 Creative Ways to Use AI for Social Media Growth in 2025
Top 10 Creative Ways to Use AI for Social Media Growth in 2025

Time Business News

time23 minutes ago

  • Time Business News

Top 10 Creative Ways to Use AI for Social Media Growth in 2025

Social media is no longer just about posting pretty pictures – it's about delivering engaging, personalized content at lightning speed. In 2025, social media AI tools are giving creators and brands the ability to automate production, customize experiences, and stay ahead of trends. If you want to generate high-performing ads in seconds, AI Ad generator – is a must-have. For attention-grabbing video personalization, Free Unlimited Video Face Swap makes content more memorable and shareable than ever. Here are ten AI-powered strategies to supercharge your social media marketing this year. With tools like you can instantly create multiple ad variations for different platforms and audiences. This ensures every campaign is optimized for clicks, conversions, and brand visibility. AI marketing strategies like automated A/B testing and audience targeting save time while improving ROI. Using Free Unlimited Video Face Swap, you can produce personalized videos where your audience sees themselves in the content. This approach drives higher watch times, increases shares, and creates a deeper emotional connection – a key element in AI-powered storytelling. AI algorithms analyze trending topics, competitor performance, and audience behavior to suggest high-impact hashtags and keywords. This AI content optimization ensures your posts reach the right audience and perform well in both search engines and social feeds. AI graphic design tools create on-brand, visually appealing social media assets in seconds. Whether it's a carousel post, infographic, or meme, AI-generated templates help maintain consistency while adapting to seasonal trends. Short-form videos dominate TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts. AI editors can auto-trim highlights, sync with trending music, add captions, and format for multiple platforms – perfect for social media automation. AI sentiment analysis tools scan comments, mentions, and messages to detect audience mood and intent. Brands can then respond quickly with personalized messages, improving trust and loyalty. AI tools generate storyboards for video campaigns based on your topic and audience data. This helps content creators map out a cohesive series of posts and maintain a consistent narrative. By analyzing engagement history, AI tools suggest the best times to post for maximum reach. Some platforms even auto-schedule your content to match audience activity spikes. AI monitors millions of posts daily to detect emerging content trends before they go mainstream. This lets you create timely content that rides the wave early, increasing the chances of going viral. Post-performance AI tools evaluate engagement, click-through rates, and conversion data. They then recommend adjustments – like tweaking headlines, visuals, or call-to-actions – to continuously improve campaign performance. The challenge in social media marketing today is staying relevant while producing high-quality content consistently. Tools like and Arting AI make it possible to automate repetitive tasks while focusing on strategy, creativity, and relationship-building. By combining AI marketing strategies, AI content creation tools, and social media automation, brands can scale faster, engage deeper, and compete effectively in an increasingly crowded space. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store