Punjab BJP seeks FIR against Manish Sisodia over ‘saam, daam, dand, bhed' remark
The BJP leader further said the remarks constituted serious offences under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, including bribery (Section 123(1)), undue influence (Section 123(2)), and promotion of enmity (Section 123(3A)). He also cited provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita/IPC such as Sections 196, 197 and 353, saying the comments promoted enmity among groups, encouraged intimidation, and instigated fear.Calling the remarks a 'corrupt practice,' Jakhar urged the EC to disqualify Sisodia from contesting elections under Section 8 of the RPA Act. He also demanded immediate registration of an FIR against the AAP leader and action against the party's Punjab unit.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Resignation rumours swirl, Goa environment minister Aleixo Sequeira says: ‘Some truth… toying with the idea'
Amid rumours that he is set to resign from the Goa cabinet, Environment Minister Aleixo Sequeira on Wednesday acknowledged there was 'some truth' to the reports which suggested that he will tender his resignation due to 'personal reasons'. Sequeira, who is also holding Law and Judiciary, Legislative Affairs and Captain of Ports portfolios, told the media, 'There is some truth, but I am yet to submit the resignation. I am toying with the idea, but I am yet to take a final decision.' On the reasons for his resignation, if and when it happens, he said, 'Basically personal reasons.' Party sources said Sequeira could submit his resignation to the Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant later on Wednesday. In case of his exit, two cabinet berths will fall vacant, paving the way for a cabinet reshuffle in the coastal state. In June, former Art and Culture Minister Govind Gaude was dropped from the cabinet after he levelled corruption allegations in the department of Tribal Welfare, a portfolio held by Sawant. If he steps down, Sequeira is likely to be replaced in the cabinet by the former chief minister and Margao MLA Digambar Kamat. Sequeira and Kamat were among the group of eight turncoat MLAs who switched over to the BJP in September 2022. Sources said the Speaker of the Goa legislative assembly, Ramesh Tawadkar, is also expected to be inducted in the cabinet. Tawadkar, a senior tribal leader, is likely to resign from the Speaker's post on Thursday, according to party sources. Sawant, who is in Delhi for a meeting of the group of state ministers (GoM) on GST-related issues, is expected to return to the state late on Wednesday or Thursday. Speculations about a cabinet rejig in the state have been rife for several months. Last week, BJP state president Damodar 'Damu' Naik hinted at the possibility, saying the reshuffle could take place before the Ganesh Chaturthi festival. This would be the second reshuffle in the Sawant-led government since the BJP retained power and formed the government in the 2022 assembly elections. Former Congress veteran Sequeira, who represents Catholic-dominated Nuvem constituency, was inducted into the cabinet in November 2023, a decision explained by the party as fulfilment of a 'promise' and a 'commitment' made when he joined the party. Sequeira has been in and out of the hospital in the past few months. He has also faced flak from the BJP for the party's dismal performance in Salcete – the district's most populous taluka, which has a majority Christian population – in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. The party polled fewer votes than the Congress in seven out of eight assembly segments in Salcete and lost the South Goa constituency by 13,535 votes. On the sidelines of a party meeting of the core committee and legislators in January, the former BJP state president and Rajya Sabha MP Sadanand Shet Tanavade seemed to rebuke Sequeira, claiming he 'must introspect' whether he 'fit' into the party's system and must ponder whether he wanted to contest the 2027 assembly election on a BJP ticket. Tanavade later played down his remarks, saying he was responding to a question on the party failing to achieve 50 per cent enrolment in some constituencies in a membership drive.
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Tempers flare as HM Amit Shah introduces three Bills for removal of Ministers facing serious criminal charges
The Lok Sabha witnessed a face-off and sharp exchanges between Congress member K.C. Venugopal and Home Minister Amit Shah during the introduction of a Constitutional Amendment Bill on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). Mr. Shah had moved three Bills that allow the removal of elected representatives, including the Prime Minister and Chief Minister, upon being arrested or detained on serious criminal charges. Opposing the Bills, Mr. Venugopal questioned the BJP's claim that the Bills had been brought in to ensure morality and pointed out that Mr, Shah too had been arrested when he was Gujarat Home Minister. 'I was framed in fabricated cases, but I resigned before I was arrested,' Mr. Shah replied. Earlier, several Opposition members, including Congress's Manish Tewari and the Samajwadi Party's Dharmendra Yadav, had opposed the bill. What are the Bills about? The Bills say that the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, Ministers of States and Union Territories who are arrested and detained in custody for 30 consecutive days on allegation of committing an offence punishable with imprisonment for five years or more, shall be removed from office by the 31st day by the President, Chief Minister (in case of State Ministers), Governor (for Chief Ministers) and Lieutenant-Governor (for Chief Minister in Union Territories). The Bills say that they could be subsequently reappointed on release from custody. The statement of objects and reasons of the Bill sent by Mr. Shah, circulated among Lok Sabha members on Tuesday, said, 'the elected representatives represent hopes and aspirations of the people of India. It is expected that they rise above political interests and act only in the public interest and for the welfare of people. It is expected that the character and conduct of Ministers holding the office should be beyond any ray of suspicion.' It said that a Minister, who is facing allegation of serious criminal offences, arrested and detained in custody, may thwart or hinder the canons of constitutional morality and principles of good governance and eventually diminish the constitutional trust reposed by people in him.
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Video: Opposition tears copies of 3 Constitutional Bills, throws them at Amit Shah
The Opposition MPs on Wednesday 20 August tore copies of the three constitutional bills introduced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the Lok Sabha. The Bills were then thrown towards the BJP MP in Lok Sabha. Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday introduced three bills in Lok Sabha, including a Constitution Amendment bill, which seeks to remove the Prime Minister or Chief Ministers who are facing allegations of corruption or serious offences and have been detained for 30 consecutive days. Shah introduced the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, to further amend the Constitution of India and the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025, apart from the bill to amend the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. The government introduced three pieces of legislation: The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 Together, these bills provide a legal framework for the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers if they are arrested and detained on serious charges punishable by at least five years' imprisonment. Failure to resign within 30 days of custody would result in automatic disqualification. Union Minister Kiren Rijiju criticised the opposition's behaviour in Lok Sabha, saying MPs should not 'insult democracy' by tearing copies of legislation. 'The public sends us to work, does the opposition come to create a ruckus? The people of the country will not forgive those who disrespect democracy. MPs should contribute in debates and discussions,' Rijiju asserted. Home Minister Amit Shah, introducing the bills, argued that constitutional morality and public trust demanded such provisions. According to the government, allowing leaders accused of serious crimes to remain in power weakens governance and damages India's democratic credibility.
