Stalin doubles down on his defiance of NEP with 2-language state education policy—only Tamil & English
Chennai: Only two languages, Tamil and English—that's the upshot of the Tamil Nadu State Education policy released on Friday. It reaffirms the state's commitment to its two language policy and abolishes public examination for Class 3, 5 and 8, defying the National Education Policy.
'Our mother tongue Tamil will remain our pride and identity. Most importantly, our firm policy is the two-language policy—Tamil and English. Let me reiterate: the two-language policy is our resolute stance!,' Stalin said.
The SEP 2025 comes amid a heated dispute over the Union Government withholding Rs 2,291 crore under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan scheme because Tamil Nadu refused to adopt NEP 2020. The State has filed a petition before the Supreme Court, arguing that linking funds to NEP implementation is 'unconstitutional'.
The Tamil Nadu State Education policy, crafted by a 14-member committee led by retired High Court Judge Justice D. Murugesan, positions itself as a direct counter to the Centre's National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, emphasising inclusivity, social justice, and Tamil Nadu's cultural heritage.
The SEP 2025 is described as a 'child-centric, inclusive, and future-ready' blueprint. The policy also recommended banning advertisements for NEET coaching centres, reflecting the state's strong opposition to NEET, which the ruling DMK has labeled 'anti-social justice'.
'Do you know how many government school students who passed Plus-2 this year have enrolled in higher education? A remarkable 75%! I expect this number to increase even further next year, surpassing this achievement,' CM Stalin said, adding that the goal of the government is 100% enrollment in higher education.
Stalin also said he was proud of the number of students entering premier higher education institutions from government schools. 'Do you know how many government school students have secured admission to premier higher education institutions in the last three years since 2022? A total of 977 students! This year alone, 901 students have gained admission, and with admissions still ongoing in many institutions, I believe this number will rise further,' Stalin said.
'Efforts to destroy our education'
Addressing the gathering, Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin demanded education be brought to the State list from the concurrent list. 'Education was once in the State list, then changed to the concurrent list. It should be brought back to the State list again,' Udhayanidhi said.
Udhayanidhi also claimed that Tamils were given education even during the Sangam era. 'Tamil Nadu is creating history now. Our Tamils were given education in the Sangam Era, but it was denied somewhere in the middle. Not just then, even now, efforts are being made to destroy our education,' he said and added that it was Periyar who opposed the Kula Kalvi Scheme (hereditary education) then and it was Chief Minister M.K. Stalin who opposed NEP now.
In the newly released State Education policy, State government has highlighted a Gross Enrollment Ratio of over 95% at primary, upper primary and secondary levels and a near-zero dropout rate at primary and upper primary levels driven by welfare schemes, including the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme and the Mid-Day meal programme.
The state education policy also acknowledged the challenge of 7.7% dropout rate at the secondary level, which the policy aims to address through vocational counseling and bridge courses.
SEP also promotes continuous, formative assessments, retaining the no-detention policy for Classes 1–8 and introducing individualised support for vulnerable learners.
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: TN waging a language war, but data tells a different story—enrolment in Tamil-medium schools falling
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab land pooling policy appears to have been notified in haste: HC
Chandigarh, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that Punjab's land pooling policy appears to have been notified in haste and concerns including social impact assessment and environment impact assessment should have been addressed before its notification. Punjab land pooling policy appears to have been notified in haste: HC A division bench of justices Anupinder Singh Grewal and Deepak Manchanda on Thursday had ordered an interim stay on the operation of the A government's land pooling policy for four weeks. The direction had come on a petition filed by Gurdeep Singh Gill, challenging the Punjab government's land pooling policy 2025. The court has fixed September 10 as the next date of hearing. In the detailed order, which was released on Saturday, the court noted that the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 bars the acquisition of multi-cropped land and such acquisition is permissible only in exceptional circumstances. "We may hasten to add that the land which is sought to be acquired is amongst the most fertile land in the State of Punjab and it is possible that it may impact the social milieu," said the division bench. Ludhiana-based petitioner Gill sought directions to quash the state government notification dated June 24 along with the land pooling policy 2025, being ultra vires and an act of "colourable legislation", violating fundamental rights. "We are prima facie also of the view that the policy appears to have been notified in haste and all concerns including social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, timelines and redressal grievance mechanism should have been addressed at the very outset in the policy, before its notification. At this stage learned advocate general and senior counsel appearing for the state of Punjab submit that all concerns of the court shall be addressed by the next date of hearing and want some time in this regard. As an interim measure, lest any rights are created, the impugned Land Pooling Policy, 2025, notified on May 14 and June 6 and subsequently amended on July 25 shall remain stayed," read the court order. The order stated, "after hearing submissions of all parties, this court is of the opinion that the state proposes to take over tens of thousands of acres of fertile land in the entire state of Punjab for carrying out its proposed development work, without carrying out any social impact assessment or environmental impact assessment study, although a stand is taken that the assessment would be carried out later when they have definite information about the number of land owners who have opted for the scheme." The court said it has been held by the Supreme Court in several cases that before permitting urban development, the State ought to carry out an environmental impact assessment. The bench said it is also apparent that no timelines have been prescribed nor any mechanism has been provided that will address the grievances of the affected persons. "Payment of subsistence allowance has been provided to the land owners, but there is no provision for rehabilitation of those landless labourers, artisans and others who are dependent on the land." It has also been submitted before this court that the State's statutory bodies shall themselves develop the land but no budgetary provisions appear to have been made nor anything has been put forth before this court to indicate that the State has adequate resources to finance the development project under the policy, said the order. Referring to the submissions of the amicus curiae, the court said it has come across several instances wherein the owners have surrendered their land to the state development authority under the earlier land pooling policy, but the developed plots have not been allotted even after 10 years. In response to the court's query regarding any provision for rehabilitation of landless labourers, artisans, MGNREGA workers and those carrying out other occupations in the villages, the counsel appearing for the state of Punjab submitted that whatever concerns need to be addressed, shall be looked into at an appropriate stage by the government. No private builder would be allocated the land for any developmental activities and the development would be carried out by the state's statutory bodies, the counsel submitted. The amicus curiae informed the court that the costs for such development project will be in the vicinity of ₹1.25 crore per acre, and considering that land measuring about 7,806 acres is to be taken over by the state government in Ludhiana district alone, a budget of about ₹10,000 crore would have to be allocated for the development in one district alone. After the court asked about any budgetary allocation made for the proposed development project to be undertaken as per the said policy, the senior counsel submitted that he has no instructions. The petition, filed through counsels Gurjeet Singh, Manan Kheterpal and Manat Kaur, stated that since the land pooling policy was purported to be under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 but there was no such provision empowering the state to frame such a policy as the provisions of Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act 1995 was the only Act under which this policy could be framed. "That no such social impact assessment report was either prepared or published, as per the provisions of law, moreover, none of the Gram Panchayats or Gram Sabha were approached or consulted by the respondents before bringing the Land Pooling Policy 2025, which is clear disregard to the provisions mandated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013," said the petition. The A government has been facing flak from the opposition parties and various farmer bodies, which dubbed its land pooling policy a "looting" scheme to "rob" the farmers of their fertile land. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Former presidium chairman of MDMK issues legal notice against party general secretary Vaiko on ‘slander' charge
General secretary of Coimbatore and Periyar districts of Dravida Panjalai Thozhilalar Munnetra Sangam S. Doraisamy (90), who had resigned from the post of MDMK presidium chairman during 2023, on Saturday, served a legal notice on party general secretary Vaiko demanding an unconditional apology or ₹1 crore in compensation for indulging in 'slander' against the former by charging him with appropriating properties of the DMK worth ₹350 crore. Mr. Vaiko, with a deliberate intent of 'maligning' the name of Mr. Doraisamy had, on July 17, told mediapersons at a meeting of regional-level office-bearers at Villupuram that the latter had appropriated the DMK properties, by attaching them to a trust in his name. 'Even the DMK would accept that the statement was a blatant lie,' Mr. Doraisamy said. The notice states that the 'slander' had caused disrepute to Mr. Doraisamy, who, as the duly elected general secretary of the Sangam (Registration no. 2658/ 1959) since 1960, had been rendering service to the working class and to the general public as a politician. The Sangam to which election is conducted once in two years was an individual entity with its own by-laws on handling of properties purchased with the contributions of its members. Through adopting resolutions, the Sangam had supported the DMK till 1993, and thereafter, the MDMK after Mr. Vaiko was expelled from the DMK for raising his voice against dynastic politics. Mr. Doraisamy, in the legal notice reminded Mr. Vaiko of his appreciation of the former, during 2021, for having safeguarded the Sangam properties from the DMK since 1993, by winning the cases till the level of Supreme Court. The statement of appreciation by Mr. Vaiko was published in the MDMK publication Sangoli in August 27, 2021. On May 29, 2023, Mr. Doraisamy resigned from the post of MDMK presidium chairman, to which he was elected in 2010, and relinquished primary membership of the party in protest against the dynastic politics. Against this backdrop, the 'defamatory' statement by Mr. Vaiko had caused humiliation to Mr. Doraisamy, and it amounted to offence under BNNS 356 (1), the notice said. 'Either render an unconditional apology within 15 days of the receipt of the legal notice or pay ₹1 crore as compensation for the slander, through cheque or demand draft to the Sangam,' the notice said, adding: 'else, legal proceedings will follow, at your expense.'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
It is for the people to collectively determine whether the nation is secular, says J. Chelameswar
Former Supreme Court judge J. Chelameswar has said that it is ultimately for the people of the nation to collectively determine whether they live in a society that is secular in its true sense. 'We have to look at all human beings as human beings and not by their cultural practices,' he said in his address on 'Clamour for removal of Secularism & Socialism: Whether justified?' as part of the lecture series organised by the Ernakulam Law College Old Students' Association in Kochi on Saturday. He said that it was the maturity level of the civil society that preserved or destroyed the Constitution. 'Dropping one word and introducing another word are not going to make any difference. Let us be aware of why these words are there. It is ultimately we the people who make the nation,' he said. He said that lawyers had the responsibility to ask the question to society on 'whether we live in a country where you have no freedom of conscience or no freedom of liberty. That is the question, ultimately. This country is home to people of all parts of faith. The Constitution was created to provide a harmonious environment for all these people to live together,' he said. He said that Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first Prime Minister, who drafted the Karachi Congress resolution, adopted socialism to destroy poverty and create a prosperous society. He and his colleagues had seen the Russian revolution and hoped that something good might happen. 'But the doctrine was abandoned by the Congress party itself in 1990 by then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao and Finance Minister Manmohan Singh. Without deleting the word socialism, they did everything to destroy the concept. I am not blaming them. Perhaps the survival of the nation was at stake unless they made a deviation from the doctrine,' he said. K.M. Joseph, former Supreme Court judge, presided over the programme. P. Rajeeve, Minister for Law and Industries, was present.
