Zelenskyy dismisses Alaska summit between Putin, Trump that excludes Ukraine
The Trump-Putin meeting, scheduled for Friday in Alaska, is seen as a potential breakthrough in the more than three-year war.
Trump had previously agreed to meet with Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Zelenskyy, stoking fears Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent's biggest conflict since World War II.
In a statement posted to Telegram, Zelenskyy said Ukraine's territorial integrity, enshrined in the constitution, must be non-negotiable and emphasized that lasting peace must include Ukraine's voice at the table.
Zelenskyy said Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.'
Story continues below advertisement
Touching on Ukrainian anxieties that a direct meeting between Putin and Trump could marginalize Kyiv and European interests, Zelenskyy said: 'Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work.'
1:59
Trump envoy meets with Putin as peace deal deadline for Russia nears
Ukrainian officials had previously told the Associated Press privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognize Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily.
Trump said he will meet with Putin to discuss ending the war in Ukraine.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'It seems entirely logical for our delegation to fly across the Bering Strait simply, and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held in Alaska,' Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said Saturday in a statement posted to the Kremlin's news channel.
Story continues below advertisement
The summit may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbor and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there's no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace.
In comments to reporters at the White House before his post confirming the date and place, Trump suggested that any agreement would likely involve 'some swapping of territories,' but he gave no details. Analysts, including some close to the Kremlin, have suggested that Russia could offer to give up territory it controls outside of the four regions it claims to have annexed.
Trump said his meeting with Putin would come before any sit-down discussion involving Zelenskyy. His announcement that he planned to host one of America's adversaries on U.S. soil broke with expectations that they'd meet in a third country. The gesture gives Putin validation after the U.S. and its allies had long sought to make him a pariah over his war against Ukraine.
Nigel Gould-Davies, an associate fellow of Chatham House, told The Associated Press the 'symbology' of holding the summit in Alaska was clear, and that the location 'naturally favors Russia.'
'It's easy to imagine Putin making the point … we once had this territory and we gave it to you, therefore Ukraine had this territory and now should give it to us,' he said, referring to the 1867 transaction known as the Alaska Purchase when Russia sold Alaska to the United States for $7.2 million.
Story continues below advertisement
Exasperated that Putin did not heed his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, Trump, almost two weeks ago, moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement.
1:44
U.S. moves up Russia ceasefire deadline, threatens tariffs on allies
The deadline was Friday.
But the White House did not answer questions that evening about the state of possible sanctions after Trump announced an upcoming meeting with Putin.
Gould-Davies likened attempts to understand what seems to be Trump's latest pivot toward Moscow to 'Kremlinology,' the Cold War-era practice of deciphering opaque signals from Soviet leadership.
'We're … looking for clues and for hints … about what the hell is going on; what the mix of influences around Trump and indeed in Trump's head is propelling his latest statement,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
'It's as if his disillusionment with Putin … never happened,' Gould-Davies noted, pointing to a sudden return to the more conciliatory Russia policy Trump embraced at the start of his presidency.
Prior to Trump announcing the meeting with Putin, his efforts to pressure Russia into stopping the fighting had delivered no progress.
The Kremlin's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armor while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities.
Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace.
Two people died and 16 were wounded Saturday when a Russian drone hit a minibus in the suburbs of the Ukrainian city of Kherson, regional Gov. Oleksandr Prokudin said. Two others died after a Russian drone struck their car in the Zaporizhzhia region, according to regional Gov. Ivan Fedorov.
Ukraine's air force said Saturday it intercepted 16 of the 47 Russian drones launched overnight, while 31 drones hit targets across 15 different locations. It also said it shot down one of the two missiles Russia deployed.
Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses shot down 97 Ukrainian drones over Russia and the Black Sea overnight and 21 more on Saturday morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Letters, Aug. 11
Opinion Budgets and belt-tightening Re: NDP's balanced-budget dreams hit by fiscal reality, June 27 and NDP, living in fiscal fantasy world, must face reality, Aug. 6 After laying out the challenges of balancing the budget anytime soon, the first opinion piece ends with the following advice: 'Being honest with Manitobans about the province's fiscal challenges is the best policy right now.' After noting that the current and projected deficits are a result of a structural imbalance, the second opinion piece states: 'You don't close a gap of that size in two years without serious belt-tightening or significant tax increases.' I couldn't agree more, we should expect the government to be honest and forthright about the fiscal challenges we are facing. And yes, let's have a discussion about how much of each — belt-tightening and tax increases — should be done to address the problem rather than kicking the can down the road and saddling future generations with excessive debt and interest payments. As a starting point, I suggest we begin with a discussion regarding the following propositions. First, the least well-off among us should not be subject to any further belt-tightening. Second, the tax decreases brought in by the former government were ill-advised, as was the decision to retain them by the current government. And as we are doing this, let's remind ourselves of the extent of child poverty and homelessness in this province, and that both the personal income tax top rate and the retail sales tax rate in Manitoba are the third-owest in the country. So yes, let us all be as honest as possible, have the discussion, and then do what needs to be and should be done. Gerald Farthing Winnipeg Emissions and disagreement There are many points to disagree with in Robert Parsons' article What do we do now regarding emissions, Aug. 7, but I will only deal with two of his statements. Parsons dismisses ground source heat pumps as an alternative to natural gas as unaffordable. He mentions community loops and neighbourhood systems as a way to implement them but quickly dismisses the idea. Not so fast, Mr. Parsons. Natural gas is primarily methane and is a potent source of greenhouse gas emissions both in its extraction and in its consumption. Heat pumps are largely benign as far as greenhouse gas production. District heating is in widespread use in European countries. What we need in Manitoba is a mandate for Manitoba Hydro to install ground source heat pumps and district heating in all new developments and to have homeowners pay it off gradually on their Hydro bills. It can be sold as a positive as it will save them money over time while benefiting the planet. Parsons likewise dismisses solar energy as a source of electricity for the province in favour of gas turbines. This argument is even more unconvincing, as it is widely known that solar energy production is now the least expensive alternative for electricity generation. Some 600 gw of solar were installed worldwide last year (Manitoba's entire capacity is about 6 gw). When combined with large scale battery storage, solar has gas beaten on all counts, particularly in friendliness to the planet. Parsons ends his opinion piece by saying that we need to be realistic and think things through. Doing what is good for our children and grandchildren is the height of thinking things through. Joe Leven Winnipeg Nuclear nightmares Re: The little-known dangers we live with, Think Tank, July 30 To accompany this very timely article and the mentioned Annie Jacobsen book Nuclear War: A Scenario would be the Eric Schlosser non-fiction book and PBS documentary of the same name Command – and Control about the real accidental explosive self-destruction in September 1980 of a Titan 2 missile and its silo in Arkansas and the subsequent search for the nuclear warhead (found in a ditch unexploded), and the 700-1,000 known accidents since. And the 1957 fiction book On the Beach by Nevil Shute about MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) by accident (made into a movie of the same name starring Gregory Peck, Ava Gardner) foretelling the possible self-annihilation of the human race well before the real 16-28 Oct. 1962 Kennedy/ Kruschev Cuban Missile Crisis nuclear standoff. Only a matter of time before hubris gets us all, and remember that the Orange Menace now has the nuclear codes, as do Netanyahu and Putin (with International Criminal Court warrants out for their arrest), and North Korea, Pakistan and India; all involved in wars and standoffs as we speak. The Sword of Damocles. Andy Maxwell Winnipeg Respecting elders The editorial Seniors deserve decent care home food, Aug. 7, builds on John Longhurst's article Driven by faith, frustrated by funding, which was on the front page on Aug. 5. Both articles have a common theme. In the world of 'trickle down funding,' not much money is trickling down from the regional health authorities to the folks who are trying to make ends meet operating personal care homes (PCHs). Our provincial government was elected to fix health care. There have been no notable improvements and some areas are likely worse than before. Meanwhile, the health authorities are shorting the funding of elder care to fund other areas, meaning that they are driving the one area of health care that was sort of functioning into a desperate situation. In John Longhurst's article, there is much discussion on the trade-offs that faith-based PCH's make in providing decent food to those in their care. Just imagine the choices that are being made in the for-profit PCH's, where return on investment is the guiding principle! Many families visit loved ones regularly to help in feeding, to provide companionship and in some cases help with care. This is laudable but it shouldn't be the de facto fallback to adequate funding. Some families due to geography or other limitations cannot do this. Who feeds them? Who makes sure they get their meds? Who makes sure that their undergarments are clean? Wab Kinew comes from a culture with a tradition of respecting its elders. It's time to walk the walk, Premier Kinew. Tom Pearson Winnipeg Doing something Another article in the Free Press again chronicles choking smoke in Manitoba and across Canada. Given that, according to the current U.S. administration, climate change is a hoax, we're not likely to see the reduction of vehicle speed limits on their highways as we did during the oil 'crisis' of the 1997's. Canada and much of the rest of the world are on board with the idea that something needs to be done about climate change. The lack of infrastructure for electric vehicles and the high cost of their purchase makes the shift to electric cars a challenge and yes, there are some issues related to the batteries that power them. That said, every driver on every highway is capable of reducing their speed to the 90 km/h that we maintained when we were so concerned about running out of oil. Running out of oil is one thing. Running out of time is a much bigger problem. George Bednarczyk Winnipeg
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
China and U.S. plot pathways to AI dominance
Opinion In late July, the world's two superpowers in artificial intelligence (AI) laid out their near-term strategies. The plans diverge on how to achieve tech supremacy. They also both contain many contradictions and are based on numerous bold assumptions. Yet whichever country best executes their imperfect AI roadmap will gain major advantages. And not only in re-shaping the global economy but also tilting the military balance of power in their favour. The Trump administration's new AI Action Plan takes a predictably ultranationalist approach. 'America is the country that started the AI race,' Trump said in a speech the evening it was published. 'And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.' The Associated Press China is aiming to take the lead in the battle for AI supremacy. Chinese President Xi Jinping is displayed on a screen as he delivers a speech at the closing ceremony for China's National People's Congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 13. To do so, the White House intends to give U.S. tech giants far more leeway. 'The action plan, at its highest level, reads just like a wish list from Silicon Valley,' an executive at the AI Now Institute, a non-partisan research organization, told media outlet Defense One. Existing government guardrails will be rolled back and 'woke' safety measures will disappear. Federal funds will be withheld from states attempting to regulate AI on their own. Environmental laws that impede data centre construction are on the chopping block. Protectionist trade policies at home will be paired with efforts to champion American companies abroad. Vague details for mitigating national security risks arising from cutting-edge models only appear on the manifesto's final two pages. Nevertheless, many experts have praised the plan. In particular, for committing the U.S. to unleashing domestic AI innovation, emphasizing digital literacy in the workforce and building enormous new computing power for American companies. Although, the strategy doesn't specify any new funding. The brash anti-diplomacy of Trump's second act has also already done lasting damage. America's friends, including Canada, are increasingly motivated to wean themselves off U.S. technology. 'Even longstanding allies and partners are framed as mere markets to be captured in the interests of global American supremacy,' says Kat Duffy, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'Ultimately, when it comes to global engagement, the plan sings a zero-sum tune.' A populist crusade against America's universities and foreign workers is chasing away vital talent as well. Washington's heavy-handed tariff regime will aggravate the cost of expanding domestic digital infrastructure. China, meanwhile, retains a stranglehold on the critical minerals market. And in many ways, the nation of 1.4 billion has already leapfrogged America in embracing AI in its economy and society. Beijing now intends to harness Chinese products and expertise to bolster its growing soft power throughout the developing world. Released on Jul. 26 during this year's annual summer tech conference in Shanghai, China's 'global action plan' on AI proposes to help developing nations utilize Chinese technology for their own purposes. China already offers a full package of IT hardware, software, training and financing to nations in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America via its Digital Silk Road initiative. A key selling feature going forward will be how client states can seamlessly integrate high-performance, open-source Chinese tools into local systems that are based on Chinese networks. DeepSeek's AI reasoning model, for example, is already outcompeting Silicon Valley's closed-source, subscription-based AI products across the Global South. Developing nations thus gain greater flexibility to improve their health care, education and workforce training programs — all while entrenching Chinese technology in their domestic industries. Indeed, the Trump administration recognizes this gravely threatens America's ambitions. The AI Action Plan thus presses U.S. firms to pivot to creating more open-source models. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. Beijing also proposes setting up a new entity to facilitate international collaboration on AI development. This comes after President Xi Jinping in 2023 launched the China-led Global AI Governance Initiative, based on claims of wanting to advance safe, human-centred systems. However, China's benevolent rhetoric shouldn't be taken at face value. It's the same country that's harnessed AI to craft the world's most fearsome surveillance state. The northwest region of Xinjiang, especially, has been rendered a digital gulag for Uyghur Muslims and other minorities. And China is busy exporting these dystopian technologies to dozens of countries worldwide. 'Some global AI industry leaders are concerned that Chinese open generative models could spread Chinese Communist Party propaganda to users by censoring or distorting information on Chinese history, global politics, and human rights issues,' warn two senior fellows at the Atlantic Council. All told, if either China or the U.S. truly 'win' the AI race, it'll probably equate to a loss for almost everyone else. Kyle Hiebert is a Montreal-based political risk analyst and former deputy editor of the Africa Conflict Monitor.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
On the front lines in eastern Ukraine, peace feels far away
Ukrainian soldiers from air-defence unit of 59th brigade fire at Russian strike drones in Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka) MAL flag wire: true flag sponsored: false article_type: : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/toronto_star bHasMigratedAvatar : false :
