
Chandrababu Naidu is dreaming new dreams at 75. What other CMs are missing
Chandrababu Naidu bays for my blood'—This is a subhead in Subhash Chandra Garg's new book No, Minister . In the section, the former finance secretary of India writes how the Naidu-led Andhra Pradesh had 'cornered more than 40 per cent of the total portfolio of projects' approved by the World Bank in 1999–2000.
He has cited another example. In 2001, the Andhra Pradesh Structural Adjustment Loan (SAL) for $250 million was being negotiated with the World Bank. The package also included a $100 million grant from the Department for International Development (DFID) to India. The DFID grant and the World Bank loan were to go to Andhra Pradesh on the standard 70:30 loan–grant ratio. The Naidu-led government, however, reached an understanding with the DFID—without the DEA's concurrence—to make it a 100 per cent grant. Garg wouldn't agree to it; he got them to agree to the DEA's terms. Two days after the negotiations were completed, the DEA Secretary asked Garg to again submit the Andhra file to him. The file came back with orders, approved by the finance minister, that an exception be made in the case and that the DFID grant be given to Andhra Pradesh as a 100 per cent grant.
'Evidently, on his return to India, Chandrababu Naidu had moved heaven and earth and forced the government at the highest level to agree to his completely unjustified demand,' writes Garg.
'The utter disregard for fair distribution of central government resources to all the states and the manic zeal and insistence to grab all resources for Andhra Pradesh were disturbing,' he writes.
V Srinivas, private secretary to then finance minister Jaswant Singh, later told Garg that VS Sampath, the Andhra finance secretary who went on to become the chief election commissioner of India, sought his help to 'find ways to fix Subhash'.
Nobody would be surprised to read ex-IAS officer Garg's account of how Chandrababu Naidu used his clout in the Vajpayee government to wrangle anything and everything from the Centre for his state. Garg's counterparts in other departments would have similar stories to tell.
Let me cite just one more example here. Of the 4 million tonnes of rice the Centre sanctioned for the Food for Work programme between September 2001 and April 2002, Andhra alone got 2.15 million tonnes, 53 per cent of the total. And then it got one million tonnes more.
Cut to 2025. Naidu hasn't changed. Only that it's now the Narendra Modi-led government that is going out of its way to please the Andhra CM. The Centre has already committed Rs 15,000 crore for Phase I of the Amaravati capital project. The state has secured Rs 12,157 crore from the Centre to support the first phase of the Polavaram irrigation project.
In May, PM Narendra Modi laid the foundation for central projects worth Rs 5,000 crore, including a missile testing centre, Unity mall, Rail overbridge and six national highway projects in Andhra.
And these are early days yet. Modi 3.0 still has four years left, and Naidu will continue to be vital for its survival.
Also read: Chandrababu Naidu is important in both Centre and state. He is his own double-engine now
Political opportunism or Andhra First?
The former finance secretary of India has only revived an old debate. Chandrababu Naidu's political rivals and critics have a long list of his political 'betrayals'— marrying NT Rama Rao's daughter and then leaving the Congress to join the TDP; ousting NTR to become the CM; leaving the United Front to support the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government in 1998; Lok Sabha Speaker GMC Balayogi from the TDP allowing then Odisha CM Giridhar Gomang (who was yet to resign as MP) to vote against the confidence motion, which ended up bringing the Vajpayee government down in 1999; joining the NDA in 1999 Lok Sabha election to reap the electoral dividends of the Kargil War; demanding Narendra Modi resign as Gujarat CM post-2002 riots to joining hands with him ahead of the 2014 election; leaving the NDA for the Congress five years later only to re-embrace Modi before 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections.
It's certainly a long list. Naidu's critics would call them examples of political opportunism. His admirers would cite them as examples of his brilliant political acumen and his ability to play bigger national parties to his advantage. And, ex-IAS officer Subhash Garg as a neutral observer is only the latest to certify that Andhra Pradesh has made the biggest gains from Naidu's political somersaults. I call it his Andhra First politics.
Take a look at this report by India Today in May 2002: 'Over the past five years, Naidu has managed to get the Central ministries to pour over Rs 40,000 crore into Andhra Pradesh. While the Central loans have doubled in five years from Rs 1,575.6 to Rs 3,189.9 crore, grants have jumped from Rs 1,528 crore to Rs 3,424.1 crore and external assistance has trebled from Rs 1,118 to Rs 3,640 crore. That the state has cornered a lion's share of resources is proved by just one statistic: while Central grants to all states increased by only 2.6 per cent between 2000-1 and 2001-2, Andhra Pradesh's share rose by 34 per cent.'
The report quoted Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury as saying that Naidu's success in extracting resources was due to 'a weak Centre vulnerable to political blackmail'. When you talk to Congress MPs today, as the Modi-led government showers Naidu's Andhra with generosity, they echo similar sentiments. But ask the people in Andhra Pradesh. They would repeat the Onida TV slogan: 'Neighbour's envy, owner's pride.'
Also read: Nobody should doubt Chandrababu Naidu's determination. If anything, they should fear it
What other CMs need to learn from CBN
Chandrababu Naidu, 75, is the third-oldest CM in India today—after Kerala's Pinarayi Vijayan, 80 and Karnataka's Siddaramaiah, 76. CBN, as he's known in the state, could afford to rest on his laurels. Creating something like Cyberabad and Genome Valley in Hyderabad would have been a lifetime achievement for any CM.
Instead, he is setting new challenges for himself. 'Same things (liked Cyberabad) can't be created but improved versions (can be brought),' Naidu told me in an interview last month.
It's not just the creation of the new capital city of Amaravati. CBN has now set out to build India's first quantum computing valley.
He has launched a space policy to leverage Sriharikota's strategic location in Andhra Pradesh. It aims to attract investment worth Rs 25,000 crore in space-linked industries.
He is very optimistic about his Zero Poverty-P4 (Public-Private-People Partnership) programme. I could tell this by the child-like excitement in his voice when he was telling me about P4. At a time when most Opposition leaders seem to be convinced that poverty can be eliminated only when the rich are made poor, Naidu's P4 is an interesting idea. You don't have to be an Adani or Ambani to participate in it. If you have surplus money to spare, help a family, mentor them. You can do it at the community level, too.
What differentiates CBN from other CMs is ideas—original, imaginative and innovative. Look at his counterparts in other states. Most of them are doing the same things, often aping each other. At 75, Naidu stands apart.
'Imagination has no age,' wrote senior Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh functionary Ram Madhav, quoting Walt Disney, in a column in The Indian Express.
He was building a case for PM Modi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat to ignore the unwritten 75-year age ceiling for holding office. Age doesn't matter unless you are a cheese, wrote Madhav. It's true.
As I mentioned, Naidu's much younger counterparts in other states already look jaded and spent in terms of originality or ideas or imagination in policymaking. Is Modi 3.0 any different? That's food for thought for another column.
DK Singh is Political Editor at ThePrint. He tweets @dksingh73. Views are personal.
(Edited by Theres Sudeep)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Murdering democracy': Priyanka Gandhi slams government over Bihar SIR row; INDIA bloc protests outside Parliament
File photo: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi (Picture credit: PTI) NEW DELHI: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday criticised the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, accusing the BJP-led government of trying to "murder democracy" ahead of the state assembly elections. 'They are murdering democracy. We have been protesting against it, and this is wrong,' Gandhi said during a protest at the Parliament premises, as quoted by news agency ANI. Her remarks came amid a united opposition protest led by the INDIA bloc against the Election Commission 's SIR exercise. Several MPs, including Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, gathered at the Makar Dwar steps of Parliament holding placards reading 'SIR: Stealing Indian Rights' and 'Death of Democracy'. They alleged that the revision of voter rolls was being misused to suppress votes and disenfranchise sections of the population. Posting on X, Priyanka Gandhi accused the government of manipulating elections, first by 'inflating' the voter list in Maharashtra and now by 'removing names' in Bihar. She labelled the SIR as a 'conspiracy to snatch the right to vote granted by the Constitution', adding, 'We stand firmly against every attempt to trample the Constitution.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Better Sleep, Better Mornings Start Here ResMed Buy Now Undo Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi also alleged the government wants to 'cut votes', and vowed that the issue would be raised in Parliament. 'The entire opposition is speaking on it and is united,' he said, as per ANI. Congress MP Karti Chidambaram compared the SIR to the discriminatory Jim Crow laws of segregated America, saying it would be 'used as a tool to disenfranchise people of the minority community'. As per news agency PTI, MPs from Congress, SP, RJD, TMC, DMK and JMM joined the protest and slammed the EC's exercise as 'vote bandi' and an attempt to 'steal elections'. They demanded an immediate halt to the revision process. Congress leaders Gaurav Gogoi, S Jothimani, Ranjeet Ranjan and Neeraj Dangi moved adjournment motions in both Houses, seeking a debate on the issue. However, amid loud opposition sloganeering, both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned till 2:00 pm. Earlier in the day, a meeting of INDIA bloc leaders was held, where they resolved to press for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's presence in Parliament and discuss a range of issues, including the Pahalgam terror attack, Operation Sindoor, the AI 171 crash, and the 'civil war' in Manipur, along with Bihar's SIR row. Congress general secretary K C Venugopal said the issues raised are directly connected to the people and 'must be given utmost priority'.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Centre approves price deficiency payment scheme for AP's Totapuri mangoes
The Centre, for the first time, has approved a Price Deficiency Payment Scheme (PDPS) for 162,500 metric tonnes of 'Totapuri' Mangoes from Andhra Pradesh under its market intervention scheme (MIS). The proposal was approved following a letter from Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and key NDA ally Chandrababu Naidu to Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, requesting intervention. The scheme is aimed at benefiting farmers in the Chittoor, Tirupati, and Annamayya districts of Andhra Pradesh, where prices of 'Totapuri' Mangoes have dropped due to a bumper harvest. Under the scheme, the central government has set the market intervention price (MIP) or floor rate for 'Totapuri' Mangoes at ₹1,490.73 per quintal, or around ₹15 per kilogram. If prices fall below the floor rate, a payment of up to ₹372.68 per quintal, or ₹3.73 per kilogram, will be directly transferred to the bank accounts of farmers. However, this relief will be limited to 162,500 tonnes of mangoes, which represent 25 percent of the total 'Totapuri' production in major districts of Andhra Pradesh. The deficiency payment of ₹372.68 per quintal, or ₹3.73 per kilogram, will be shared equally between the Centre and the Andhra Pradesh state government. The MIS guidelines stipulate that farmers wishing to avail themselves of the scheme's benefits must trade their produce with traders with proper documentation and verification, as notified by the APMCs, or mango processing units and ramps, as duly notified by the district collectors under state Acts. The Price Deficiency Payment Scheme will be operational for 30 days during the 2025-26 season, starting from the date of the first transaction after the issue of this letter. The state government will be responsible for notifying all traders for coverage of 'Totapuri' Mangoes under the PDPS scheme in Andhra Pradesh. The price differential between the MIP and the sale price will be updated on the Agmarknet portal of the state government. The scheme is expected to bring price stability, protect farmers from market volatility, and reinforce the commitment to doubling farmers' income.


Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian cities at climate crossroads, urgent action needed, says World Bank
New Delhi: India must urgently scale up investments in climate-resilient urban development to protect its cities from mounting climate risks and unlock long-term economic growth, the World Bank has warned. With the country's urban population set to nearly double, from 480 million in 2020 to 951 million by 2050, Indian cities stand at a pivotal moment, the report titled Towards Resilient and Prosperous Cities in India said on Tuesday, calling for forward-looking, climate-smart urban planning. "With a doubling of the urban population expected by 2050, from 480 million in 2020 to 951 million, more than half of urban growth, in terms of new infrastructure, buildings and urban services, is still to come," the report noted. "This gives Indian cities a huge opportunity to plan for resilient urban development and avoid large future damages and losses from climate and disaster impacts," it added. The report is based on analytical work carried out between September 2022 and May 2025, and is supported by the World Bank Group and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, including its City Resilience Program. Highlighting the high cost of retrofitting urban infrastructure, the Bank emphasized the need for cities to strengthen defences against climate shocks but also embed resilience into future growth. Such a shift, it said, is essential to improve quality of life and ensure sustained economic momentum. The report warned of severe consequences if timely action is not taken. Cities could face escalating losses from more frequent and intense climate events such as floods, extreme heat, and water scarcity. "It is projected that urban pluvial or stormwater flooding-related losses, which currently cost between 0.5 and 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product annually, will double under a global high-emission scenario," the report said. "Urban Heat Island effect compounds the impact of increasingly frequent and severe heat waves. If nothing changes, it is projected that heat-related deaths in Indian cities will double by 2050," it added. Indian cities, the report noted, are particularly exposed due to the dense concentration of people and assets, compounded by weak planning systems that are struggling to keep pace with urbanization and rising demand for services. "Cities also face higher impacts, compared to rural areas, from climate impacts and disaster shocks as they are highly interconnected systems; when key infrastructure assets break down, it can cause a chain reaction and cities can become paralyzed or experience cascading infrastructure failure," it said. "For example, flooding can cause road closures and disrupt traffic flow, affect electricity lines, and lead to damage and economic losses," the report added. The World Bank called for targeted investment and immediate action to build resilient infrastructure, improve service delivery, and ensure cities remain engines of growth and innovation in the face of accelerating climate threats. Meanwhile, the report highlighted that while climate change effects are likely to prove ever more challenging, timely actions can help avert large potential impacts. "Given rapid urbanization, time is limited to undertake the necessary planning and to scale up investment in resilient urban development, which is essential not only to make cities more efficient and livable, but also to reduce future climate and disaster impacts," it said. "Better managed and resilient urban development has the potential to further improve access to urban amenities such as parks and recreational areas," it added.