
UK billionaire declares ‘Britain has gone to hell,' lists $337m London estate on sale and moves to Dubai
TL;DR
UK billionaire
John Fredriksen
is leaving Britain due to the Labour government's abolition of non-dom tax status.
He's putting his £250 million
Chelsea
estate, The Old Rectory, up for sale.
Fredriksen
is relocating his business operations and residence to Dubai, UAE.
His departure follows the closure of his London firm Seatankers and reflects rising billionaire exits triggered by UK tax reforms.
A £13.7 Billion Departure: Why John Fredriksen Left London Behind
The United Kingdom is losing millionaires and billionaires at a record pace, and now, one of its most high-profile residents has joined the exodus.
J
ohn Fredriksen, once the UK's ninth-richest man, has left London, shut down key business operations, and put his prized Chelsea mansion,
The Old Rectory,
up for sale for a staggering £250 million ($337 million).
The trigger? A sweeping overhaul of Britain's tax policy targeting the global elite.
In a blunt interview earlier this month with Norwegian business outlet
E24
, Fredriksen did not mince words:
'Britain has gone to hell, like Norway,' he said. 'The entire Western world is on its way down.'
Who Is John Fredriksen?
At 81, John Fredriksen is one of the world's most influential shipping magnates. Born in Oslo and now a Cypriot national, he built his vast empire in oil tankers during the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s.
Over the decades, he expanded into offshore drilling, LNG shipping, dry bulk, gas, and aquaculture.
Fredriksen first left Norway in 1978 over its aggressive tax regime and settled in the UK, where he was long seen as a quiet but formidable presence in London's business circles.
In 2001, he purchased
The Old Rectory
, a 30,000-square-foot Georgian manor in Chelsea, for £37 million. The estate, which includes 10 bedrooms, a ballroom, and two acres of private gardens, has become one of the most valuable homes in Britain.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice
Grammarly
Install Now
Undo
He famously turned down a £100 million offer from Roman Abramovich in 2004.
According to
Forbes
, Fredriksen was recently ranked the 136th-richest person in the world, with an estimated net worth of $17.3 billion.
Why He's Leaving: The End of the 'Non-Dom' Era
Fredriksen's exit was set in motion earlier this year, when the UK's Labour government abolished the non-domicile (non-dom) tax status, a historic tax arrangement dating back to 1799. The policy had long allowed wealthy foreigners living in the UK to pay tax only on their British income, shielding offshore earnings.
But in April 2025, under Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the non-dom policy was scrapped. Alongside that came other tax hikes:
Higher National Insurance contributions for employers
Tighter inheritance tax rules
A 15% VAT on private school fees
For global billionaires with complex financial footprints like Fredriksen, this marked a turning point.
'[The UK is] starting to remind me more and more of Norway,' Fredriksen told E24. 'People should get up and work even more, and go to the office instead of having a home office.'
Soon after, he closed the London headquarters of Seatankers Management, one of his private shipping firms. Reports in
Forbes
noted that more than a dozen domestic staff were let go from his Chelsea estate.
The Mansion: Putting a £250 Million Landmark on the Market
Fredriksen's property,
The Old Rectory,
is not just any home. Built in the 1720s, it once belonged to the rector of Chelsea parish church. After a full refurbishment in the 1990s, it was bought in 1995 by Greek shipping magnate Theodore Angelopoulos for £22 million. Fredriksen acquired it six years later for £37 million.
Now, two decades on, it's being quietly shopped to ultra-wealthy buyers with an asking price of £250 million.
If sold at that value, it would be one of the most expensive private residential sales in UK history.
He's Not Alone: The Wealth Drain from the UK
Fredriksen's move is not an isolated case. According to Henley & Partners, a global citizenship advisory firm:
The UK lost 10,800 millionaires in 2024, a 157% rise from the year before.
In 2025, it's projected to lose 16,500 millionaires, more than any other country globally.
These individuals are expected to take £66 billion in investable wealth with them.
According to The Telegraph, other billionaires who have already left, or are preparing to, include:
Richard Gnodde
, Goldman Sachs vice-chairman
Lakshmi Mittal, steel magnate
Ian and
Richard Livingstone
, property tycoons
Christian Angermayer and Nassef Sawiris, owner of
Aston Villa
(The Telegraph, Forbes)
According to the Sunday Times Rich List, Britain now has 156 billionaires, down from 165 in 2024, the sharpest drop in the list's 37-year history.
Why the UAE? A New Magnet for Global Wealth
Fredriksen's new base, the United Arab Emirates, is more than just a tax-friendly destination. It's now one of the world's fastest-growing wealth hubs.
According to Henley & Partners:
The UAE is set to receive 9,800 new millionaires in 2025, more than any country in the world.
These new residents will bring in an estimated $63 billion in wealth.
Over the last decade, the UAE has seen a 98% increase in its millionaire population.
That growth is second only to Montenegro, whose millionaire population rose by 124%, followed by Malta (87%), the United States (87%), and China (74%).
Why are so many choosing Dubai and Abu Dhabi?
Zero income and capital gains taxes
Stable political climate and pro-business regulation
World-class infrastructure for aviation, banking, logistics, and technology
Attractive Golden Visa programs and flexible residency schemes
Strong networks for family offices, private equity, and shipping
For billionaires like Fredriksen, Dubai offers a full-service platform to run a global enterprise with fewer political and regulatory hurdles.
And socially, the city is now home to a thriving ecosystem of financiers, tech founders, luxury developers, and shipping magnates.
Fredriksen, who is now spending most of his time in the UAE, is reportedly preparing to hand over greater control of his empire to his twin daughters, Cecilie and Kathrine Fredriksen, both of whom already serve on boards of several family companies.
Whether this transition marks a new chapter for the Fredriksen empire or a broader rewriting of elite capital flows, one thing is clear: Dubai is rising, and London is watching.
FAQs:
Q. Why is John Fredriksen leaving the UK?
Because of the end of non-dom tax status and new tax burdens introduced by the Labour government.
Q. Where is he moving to?
To Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, where he plans to oversee his global business empire.
Q. What's happening to his UK property?
He's selling The Old Rectory in Chelsea for £250 million, one of Britain's most expensive homes.
Q. Why did he choose Dubai?
Dubai offers zero income tax, investor-friendly policies, and a fast-growing hub for global wealth and business.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Boeing Q2 results: Loss narrows to $611 million as revenue rises to $22.75 billion; labour, safety issues cloud recovery
Boeing Co posted a smaller second-quarter loss and stronger revenue, buoyed by a jump in commercial plane deliveries, even as the aerospace giant continued to grapple with safety scrutiny and looming labour unrest. The company reported a net loss of $611 million for the quarter ended June 30, down from $1.44 billion a year ago. Revenue rose to $22.75 billion from $16.87 billion, topping Wall Street expectations of $21.86 billion, as deliveries climbed to 150 commercial aircraft from 92 in the year-ago period, AP reported. On an adjusted basis, Boeing reported a loss of $1.24 per share, better than the $1.54 loss forecast by Zacks analysts. Boeing shares rose over 2% in premarket trading on Tuesday. Despite the improved performance, the company remains under pressure on multiple fronts. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in June cited 'lapses in Boeing's manufacturing and safety oversight' as contributing to the door plug panel detachment on an Alaska Airlines 737 Max 9 flight in January 2024. Boeing said it would review the NTSB findings and continue to strengthen safety and quality. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This is what he found in Paris after cleaning his canal, and believe me, you'll be surprised Daily Sport X Undo Separately, the Department of Justice reached a settlement in May that allowed Boeing to avoid criminal prosecution for misleading regulators ahead of the fatal 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019, which claimed 346 lives. The Max series has remained a key source of concern for both regulators and investors. On the labour front, Boeing said Sunday that more than 3,200 union workers at three St. Louis-area plants—responsible for manufacturing US fighter jets—are poised to strike on August 4. Members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 837 rejected a contract proposal that included a 20% pay raise over four years. A "cooling off" period is in place until next week. Meanwhile, Boeing was also in the spotlight following the crash of a Boeing 787 operated by Air India last month, which killed at least 270 people. Investigators have yet to determine the cause, though initial findings suggest no design flaw in the aircraft, which has historically maintained a strong safety record. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025


Economic Times
32 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India and Taiwan were leading buyers of Russian naphtha in June, LSEG data shows
Synopsis In June, India and Taiwan emerged as the primary destinations for Russian seaborne naphtha exports, driven by competitive pricing and robust domestic demand. India's imports reached 250,000 tons, while Taiwan doubled its intake to 234,000 tons. Due to Red sea crisis, shipments are being rerouted via Southern Africa, impacting delivery times and costs. Agencies India and Taiwan were the leading destinations for Russian seaborne naphtha exports in June, as cheaper volumes and domestic demand attracted buyers, according to traders and LSEG data. Naphtha is a primary feedstock in the petrochemical industry for producing olefins and aromatics, which are then used to manufacture a wide array of products, including plastics, synthetic resins, synthetic fibers, and various other chemicals. Since the European Union's full embargo on Russian oil products went into effect in February 2023, countries in the Middle East and Asia have become the main destinations for Russia's naphtha supplies. Naphtha export shipments from Russian ports to India in June totalled 250,000 metric tons, down 5% from May, and exceeded 1.4 million tons in the first half of 2025. Russian naphtha arrived at the western Indian ports of Mundra, Hazira, and Sikka, shipping data showed. India partially replaced naphtha purchases from the United Arab Emirates with cheaper Russian supplies in order to reduce import costs. Naphtha exports from Russian ports to Taiwan reached 234,000 tons last month, double their May level, and totalled 1.27 million tons between January and June, according to LSEG data. Singapore, Malaysia, Turkey and China were among the other top destinations for Russian naphtha export supplies in June. Ship-tracking data showed that no cargoes from Russian ports arrived in Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates in June. Russia had supplied 80,000 tons to the UAE in May. Vessels carrying nearly 300,000 tons of Russian naphtha loaded last month are heading to Asia via Southern Africa's Cape of Good Hope. Asia received 150,000 tons in May. Traders have been diverting Russian oil products cargoes around Africa since December 2023 to avoid the Red Sea due to a heightened risk of attacks by Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi group. All the shipping data above are based on the date of cargo departure.


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
ED filed closure reports in 49 PMLA cases over last 10 years: Govt in Parliament
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) over the last 10-and-a- half years, has filed closure reports in 49 cases before special courts meant to try anti-money laundering crimes, the government informed Parliament on Tuesday. The agency secured eight conviction orders involving 15 people from the special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) courts between 2015 to June 2025, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in a written statement furnished in Rajya Sabha . He was asked about the details of all cases lodged by the ED since 2015 where charge sheets have not yet been filed in courts, trial of the accused has not started and prosecution has been closed by the federal probe agency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Physiotherapist: The Fastest Way to Overcome Knee Pain and Swelling Wellnee Undo "During the period from 01.01.2015 to 30.06.2025, the Directorate of Enforcement has taken up 5,892 cases for investigation under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002," the minister said. In these cases, 1,398 prosecution complaints including 353 supplementary charge sheets have been filed before the respective special courts under PMLA, he said. Live Events Out of these, so far, the special courts have framed charges in 300 prosecution complaints including 66 supplementary charge sheets, Chaudhary said. "As on 30.06.2025, the PMLA special courts have convicted 15 persons in 08 conviction orders in these cases," he stated. The reply did not specify the reasons for filing of the closure reports by the ED. According to the scheme of PMLA, money laundering cases are only registered after taking cognisance of a predicate offence or primary case booked under various sections of the IPC or BNS and other laws. The courts have held that if the primary case falls before a court of law, the PMLA case will automatically go away.