logo
Why do police conduct psychiatric tests on accused?

Why do police conduct psychiatric tests on accused?

Indian Express21 hours ago
A 40-year-old school teacher, who was arrested last week for allegedly sexually assaulting a Class 12 student, underwent a 'psychiatric' test on Thursday. The development came after the Mumbai police asked the court on Wednesday to extend the accused's custody to conduct the examination.
The teacher has been booked under the sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
According to the police, the test was conducted to evaluate the teacher's mental condition to determine her mental health.
Speaking to The Indian Express, a police official has said these tests are conducted on the accused while they are in police custody. The test is executed in the presence of medical experts.
Police usually conduct a psychiatric test to check if the accused was mentally stable at the time of the alleged offence, according to the official.
Section 30 of the POCSO Act defines 'presumption of culpable mental state' as intention, motive, knowledge of a fact and the belief in, or reason to believe, a fact. While it is worded in a way to denote 'mental state', the section presumes that the accused was in a mental state or had the intent to commit the alleged offence. The Act puts the onus on the accused to prove that there was no sexual intent or mental state to commit the offence.
This is the opposite of the basic presumption under criminal law which states that a person is innocent until proven guilty of a particular. The burden, in law, is on the investigating agency, or the prosecution to prove the person's guilt beyond reasonable doubt by bringing evidence before the court.
Legal experts argue that since the POCSO Act deals with children, putting the burden on them to understand the intent of the abuser can be challenging. Therefore, the presumption of the culpability of the accused's intent, or mental state, is in the favour of the victims under this law.
However, this does not mean that the accused can be held guilty on presumption alone. When the prosecution has cogent evidence, the onus is on the accused to prove the contrary to show their innocence. For instance, if a child deposes that a person touched them inappropriately with sexual intent, the court will presume so, unless the accused can show evidence proving otherwise.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Child protection framework remains 'disjointed', needs fundamental shift: Supreme Court judge
Child protection framework remains 'disjointed', needs fundamental shift: Supreme Court judge

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Child protection framework remains 'disjointed', needs fundamental shift: Supreme Court judge

The child protection framework in the country remains disjointed and under-equipped, and what is needed is a fundamental shift-one that sees the child not as a passive witness in a criminal trial, but as a person in urgent need of sustained and holistic care, Supreme Court Judge Justice Surya Kant said on Saturday. Speaking at the inaugural session of the State-Level Meet 2025 on POCSO, Justice Kant added that the work is far from complete until children experience meaningful restorative justice-where the systems meant to protect them do not retraumatise them. Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy , in his address, said child survivors must be placed at the centre of India's legal and moral framework in fighting this heinous crime against humanity. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Justice Surya Kant emphasised that the system should prioritise the healing of children both within and outside the four walls of the courtroom, alongside ensuring accountability. "Our child protection framework, though well-intentioned, remains disjointed and under-equipped. What we need is a fundamental shift-one that sees the child not as a passive witness in a criminal trial, but as a person in urgent need of sustained and holistic care," Justice Kant reiterated. Live Events He also stated that justice for a child begins not in the courtroom, but the moment the child feels safe and secure, both within and outside their environment. Reintegration, he said, must not be an afterthought, but the foundation of our response. "Consider the case of a 10-year-old child made to recount trauma repeatedly-before a teacher, a police officer, a medical examiner, a lawyer, and then a judge. With each retelling, her voice grows fainter until it vanishes altogether," he said. Justice Kant observed that the distress of the victim is often compounded by the legal process. When the system forgets the child in its pursuit of the accused, it fails them both. He noted that this imbalance is not incidental, but structural. "The child's healing is not just a legal requirement-it is a moral obligation. In the Indian societal context, it is also a constitutional commitment," he said. He stressed that the task of protecting and supporting child victims is too important to be left to the legal system alone. It is not only the responsibility of the judiciary, police, and social workers-but a collective national duty. "We must move away from reactive justice to a more proactive, compassionate model, where rehabilitation is not a footnote, but the foundation," he said. In his speech, Chief Minister Revanth Reddy said, "We must protect our children from sexual abuse at any cost and by all possible means. My government gives top priority to the protection of children and women," Reddy said. He highlighted that the Telangana Bharosa Project has 29 centres, which provide police support, legal aid, medical assistance, and counselling in a friendly environment. He added that the goal is not merely faster disposal of cases, but complete child protection and development. Reddy acknowledged that while the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act are highly progressive legal instruments, they are not without challenges.

CCI directs UltraTech Cement, Dalmia Bharat to furnish financial records
CCI directs UltraTech Cement, Dalmia Bharat to furnish financial records

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

CCI directs UltraTech Cement, Dalmia Bharat to furnish financial records

NEW DELHI: Fair trade regulator CCI has directed Aditya Birla firm UltraTech, which now owns south-based cement firm India Cements , along with two other makers and their executives to submit financial documents, after its Director General in its investigations found contravention of competition norms. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has also directed Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements to submit their audited financial statement, including balance sheet and profit and loss account, within eight weeks of the order. It has directed UltraTech to submit the financial statements of its subsidiary India Cements for five years from FY15 to FY19, while Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements for nine years, from FY11 to FY19. Besides, CCI has also directed their executives to submit detailed financials and income tax records for five years, along with formal responses to the investigation report. An email sent to UltraTech Cements remained unanswered till the time of filing the story. Dalmia Bharat, in a regulatory filing, said CCI is yet to hear it in the matter or pass any formal order. "DCBL remains committed to full regulatory compliance and is cooperating with the authorities," it said. The CCI direction came over a complaint filed by ONGC alleging cartelisation in its tenders. Following this, the fair trade regulator had on November 18, 2020, directed its probe unit Director General to look into the issue. The DG had submitted its investigations report on February 18, 2025, in which found contraventions of the competition regulations. It had found that Ultratech's subsidiary India Cements, along with Shree Digvijay Cement and Dalmia Cement, with a middleman named Umakant Agarwal, engaged in anti-competitive collusion. Later, CCI on May 26, 2025, considered the investigation report and in a four-page order also directed the cement manufacturer to submit income derived from sales to alleged contraventions by the PSU. The CCI notice also mentioned if there is non-furnishing of the financial details or incomplete/false information, within the time frame by the companies, then they would be liable under section 45 of the Act. Earlier, in December 2024, UltraTech Cements had acquired 32.72 per cent stake from promoters and promoter group entities of India Cements Ltd. The Aditya Birla Group firm, which already had acquired a 22.77 per cent stake from the market, became the promoter of the Tamil Nadu-based company.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store