Cross-border platforms and development finance to power BRICS+ growth: EY Report
cross-border payments platform
, the
New Development Bank
(NDB), and the BRICS
Contingent Reserve Arrangement
(CRA) are gaining strategic momentum, according to the
EY Economy Watch
July 2025 edition.
These efforts come at a time when global trade is navigating uncertainty from geopolitical developments, evolving supply chains, and shifting trade dynamics - encouraging emerging economies to strengthen resilience and diversify their financial and trade frameworks.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Artificial Intelligence
Digital Marketing
Data Analytics
Others
PGDM
Public Policy
MBA
Design Thinking
Project Management
Cybersecurity
others
CXO
Finance
Technology
Healthcare
Data Science
healthcare
Product Management
Management
Leadership
Degree
Data Science
Operations Management
MCA
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
7 Months
S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
As of 2024, BRICS+ countries accounted for 42.5 per cent of global GDP (in purchasing power parity terms), 54.0 per cent of the global population, and 27.3 per cent of global merchandise exports.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription?
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
These milestones reflect not only the BRICS+ growing economic power but also a deepening commitment to reforming international financial and trade systems.
Given current trends, the EY report stated that it expects that the BRICS+ group would account for more than 50 per cent of global GDP in PPP terms by 2030, both due to growth prospects the current members and partners and induction of additional countries into the group.
Live Events
DK Srivastava, Chief Policy Advisor, EY India, said, "The BRICS+ institutional initiatives are gaining traction at a time when the global economic order is undergoing realignment. These mechanisms especially the payments platform and the CRA are designed to improve financial autonomy and macroeconomic stability among BRICS+ participating nations. The New Development Bank, with its potential to deliver scale and speed in development financing, is equally critical for infrastructure-led growth."
The BRICS+ payments platform, built on blockchain technology, is designed to enable cross-border transactions in local currencies.
This system is expected to enhance flexibility in currency use for trade among member nations. The EY report notes that this development could foster greater financial stability, facilitate smoother trade flows, and strengthen economic resilience across participating countries.
The NDB is also evolving as a major financing institution for emerging markets, particularly within the BRICS+ bloc.
With a focus on competitive interest rates and development-oriented lending, the bank is well-positioned to support infrastructure growth and long-term investment flows across member nations.
Another pillar of this new financial framework is the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement, which offers a safety net to participating countries through currency swaps during balance of payments challenges.
The CRA enhances collective financial security and provides an added layer of support to help manage external economic pressures.
Once these initiatives gain momentum, they may go a long way in fostering a multilateral system of global trade, global investment and global financial flows that are comparatively lower in cost and offer complementary options to existing global arrangements.
The report highlights the BRICS+ group's focus on facilitating trade in local currencies and expanding access to development financing, supporting efforts toward a more inclusive and balanced global financial architecture.
While the group is not seeking to replace the US dollar's role in the global economy, these initiatives aim to broaden financial options and promote a more balanced international monetary system.
As the BRICS+ grouping expands its reach, these financial innovations are expected to strengthen intra-group economic ties and support more inclusive global development.
With sustained efforts to operationalise and expand these platforms, BRICS+ could emerge as a key driver of more inclusive, resilient, and sovereign-oriented global economic growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Lula, Putin talk Ukraine peace; plan BRICS meet; weigh joint reply to Trump tariffs
Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Vladimir Putin (AP) Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva spoke with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin , for about 40 minutes on Saturday, the Brazilian presidential palace said. Putin briefed Lula on his talks with the United States and 'recent peace efforts between Russia and Ukraine,' as per the statement. The two leaders also discussed BRICS cooperation and the broader international political and economic situation, reported Reuters. Putin initiated the call, during which he discussed his talks with the US on Ukraine and Brazil-Russia cooperation, Lula's office said in a statement. The two leaders reaffirmed their plans to hold the next Brazil-Russia High-Level Commission on Cooperation later this year as well. This comes amid Lula saying that he intends to call the leaders of the BRICS nations, including South Africa, to coordinate a joint effort to Trump's tariffs on US imports. The Brazilian president, on Thursday, spoke with Prime Minister Narendra Modi as well. Following his talks with Lula, PM Modi wrote in a post on X that a strong, people-focused partnership among Global South nations serves the interests of everyone. Both countries have been hit with 50 percent US tariffs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When Knee Pain Hits, Start Eating These Foods, and Feel Your Pain Go Away (It's Genius) Click Here Undo Lula has said Brazil will not respond to Trump's 50 percent tariff on its goods with reciprocal measures but will explore the possibility of a coordinated response with its BRICS partners. The ministry of external affairs has called the tariff hike 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,' stressing that India's imports of Russian oil are guided by market factors and the energy security needs of its 1.4 billion people. Putin is set to meet US president Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, August 15, to broker a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Decoding US moves: Tariffs on India aren't about India
Until early August, the tariff sparring between Washington and New Delhi looked like another familiar round over soybeans. With China halting purchases and harvests approaching, it seemed like the US was looking for a buyer in India, as soybean farmers are a key MAGA base for Trump. Then, over just three days, the story shifted — from agriculture to a high-stakes game of geopolitics. On Aug 6, President Trump's negotiator, Steve Witkoff, met Russian president Vladimir Putin in St Petersburg for over three hours. Though billed as 'constructive', the talks yielded no major breakthrough. That same day, the White House announced an extra 25% tariff on Indian goods — lifting effective duties toward 50% — and framed the decision partly around New Delhi's continued intake of discounted Russian crude. In India, this was perceived as arm-twisting of its sovereignty, but a larger strategy was at play. The urgency in Washington comes from geopolitics as much as economics. The Ukraine war remains a key focus. In recent months, Russia has made incremental gains in Ukraine, giving it little reason to compromise. Official data showed a year-on-year rise in oil and gas revenues earlier this year, giving the Kremlin fiscal space to sustain the war. On another front, BRICS members are pushing for local-currency energy trade pilots. July's Rio summit saw Brazil and others call for 'economic sovereignty' from the dollar. If those systems take root, US sanctions will have less bite. It appears the White House wants to hit Russian revenues while the leverage window remains open. The domestic political calendar makes this even trickier. The midterms are barely a year away and while inflation has eased, it remains sensitive to fuel prices. Even a small Brent crude spike can quickly translate into higher gasoline costs, eroding consumer sentiment and complicating the Federal Reserve's path to cutting interest rates — a move the administration sees as vital to sustaining growth into 2025. A direct embargo on Russian oil would risk that spike, so Washington needs other channels. Since 2022, India has vaulted from a marginal buyer to Russia's largest swing customer, taking roughly 1-1.8m barrels of crude a day. Unlike private refiners tied to long-term contracts, India's state-owned refiners can quickly adjust their spot purchases when prices or risks change. If India reduces its spot purchases by 200,000 to 300,000 barrels a day, Russia may have to offer bigger discounts to other buyers, cutting its revenue by billions over a year. This would pinch Moscow's earnings and avoid a price surge that hurts American consumers. China, a larger buyer of Russian oil, has so far been spared to avoid disrupting US supply chains and ongoing tariff talks. Early signs suggest the tactic is having a marginal effect in India. One major state refiner recently reported a lower share of Russian crude as discounts narrowed. This is the kind of fine-tuning Washington is aiming for. For New Delhi, the irritation is real. It has watched Washington oscillate between warm words and hard edges — like this tariff move that risks raising Indian fuel costs while shielding US consumers. Yet this is also a moment to read beyond the headlines. Pakistan, despite entering this cycle with less leverage, has found its way into Trump's good books by using a cryptocurrency gambit and backing his bid for a Nobel Peace Prize. This has helped it carve out a tariff deal. India's own leverage is far greater: market size, strategic geography, technology and defence partnerships, and a pivotal role in energy flows. The smart play is to deploy that leverage to meet Trump's immediate need in exchange for wins of India's choosing. When both sides know they hold valuable cards, the game would be to trade them well, rather than escalate. This standoff is about much more than tariffs or a few oil shipments. For Washington, it is a test of whether it can squeeze Russia's war chest without spiking global fuel prices, hold China in check, and prevent the BRICS bloc from hardening into a true economic counterweight — all while keeping US inflation low enough for interest rates to fall. For New Delhi, it is about using its position as the swing buyer in the world's most strategic commodity to protect its autonomy, avoid an unnecessary rupture with America, and still extract tangible gains. The outcome will influence far more than trade flows. It will help decide who has the upper hand in setting oil prices, which currencies dominate energy trade, and whether the next global economic order tilts toward US-led systems or a more multipolar, BRICS-shaped architecture. How India and the US play this hand could echo for years in energy markets, currency systems, and the balance of global power. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's ‘gorilla' approach has actually made it harder for India to do a deal
When Dmitry Grozoubinski started writing 'Why Politicians Lie About Trade', Joe Biden was in the White House. 'I did not see the present developments coming,' he laughs. 'It's been great for my book sales, but not so great for the world.' The former Australian trade negotiator and diplomat who has trained officials from several countries, including India, speaks to Shruti Sonal about how trade policy became a frontline political weapon Trump has doubled tariffs on India to 50% and even halted trade negotiations. Did you think that it would play out this way? I have been following this negotiation and right from the start, one of the consistent things has been the lack of consistency. In a traditional negotiation — for example, between India and the UK — you had an Indian team who knew roughly what its govt wanted and would accept, and you had a UK team that knew what London would accept. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They would negotiate and then bring the final big questions to the leaders. In this case, the US negotiating teams do not know for a fact what Donald Trump will accept. At the end of a phone call, there is a 50% chance of an announcement where everyone's happy, and a 50% chance of a tariff escalation. When all of this kicked off, I had some optimism that India could do a reasonably good deal, or at least one that sort of turns the Trumpian 'Eye of Sauron' away from India and onto other targets because of the close personal relationship between Modi and Trump, and also because the Indian system itself is quite protectionist. I also naively thought that the US had a real strategic interest in making sure that they have a close working relationship with India. From the US perspective, India would be a natural ally in China's neighbourhood that should be courted and should certainly not be pushed into deepening its engagement with the BRICS. What we saw this week is that none of that was enough. In a recent podcast, you described Trump as the world's 'apex predator' when it came to deals. What did you mean by that? I think that Trump fundamentally believes that any negotiation is effectively kind of a power dynamic, where one side maximises the concessions it can extract and the weaker side gives up what it has to in the face of that power. To butcher a nature metaphor, it's sort of him saying, 'I am going to use US power to go and get things from others because we are the gorilla and they're the monkeys'. The problem with that approach is that it puts other leaders in a position where they have to politically justify any concession they make because it is a national humiliation. Some countries will understand a degree of national humiliation. But when you come to someone like Modi, whose personal image is that of someone who is tough and who fights for India, you actually make it hard for him to do a particularly one-sided deal. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It would be much, much easier for him to sell a deal with Trump if the latter did not have a tendency to then go on TV and be like 'we own them'. That makes it harder for other countries to give up too much. And if you look at what Trump has actually managed to gain from most countries, it's either fairly made-up stuff or not that much. Given your Ukrainian roots, how do you see Trump's criticism of India buying Russian oil? I was born in Kharkiv, and was there just three months ago, sitting as drones crashed down around me in Kyiv. I don't love the fact that India is buying Russian oil, but I have so much sympathy for the Indian govt because three months ago, I don't think anyone knew what side of that war the US was even on. So, to turn around today and say, 'As we've said all along, India's purchases of Russian oil are unconscionable' feels like a U-turn. Europe was able to wean itself off a lot of Russian oil and gas by throwing an insane amount of money at the problem, and even then, they've still got a huge amount of import. The idea that India can suddenly just flip a switch now that the Trump administration has decided that Russia's not a friend is an insane prospect. Even if my politics are fairly loudly anti-Russian, it feels like Russia's just an excuse. Long before Trump, populist leaders have used tariffs and sanctions. How are his tactics different? The scale is just nowhere close. It is a little bit like comparing nuclear war to a fistfight. The Trump administration finds tariffs appealing for a couple of reasons. First, they are one of the few levers of power that it can wield unilaterally due to a series of weird quirks of past legislation. If they wanted to raise taxes on anything in America, they would have to pass an Act of Congress and get it through the Senate. It would take months and be messy. On the other hand, he is able to wield tariff announcements like a scalpel or a flame-thrower to punish his enemies and reward his friends. Second, he believes he has a story that the American people have bought — that tariffs are paid by foreigners. And the reason tariffs and protectionism will always be rhetorically attractive is that politicians can pretend that the choice that's being made is between locals and foreigners. You've negotiated complex agreements at the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Is this the end of the rules-based order in world trade? The WTO, if you strip away all the pageantry, is a series of promises govts made to one another. It has always only been as strong as their commitment to those promises and to the premise those promises are built on. What we saw even before Trump's second term is govts increasingly reassessing some of that calculation. India is among those countries that have said these promises require us to give up too much sovereignty and too much policy space in exchange for the predictability that they give. A legitimate debate that's been raging at the WTO for 25 years. Obviously, it is bad for the system that the US is now just doing whatever it wants. I think the system, however, is holding on to the fact that he probably won't be president forever…but who knows? (laughs) The more important thing to keep in mind here is that other countries haven't started doing the same thing. You don't see India and Sri Lanka start using tariffs as weapons against each other in violation of WTO rules because Trump is doing it. That's giving people confidence that other countries still see value in the rules, especially now that they see what a lawless world might look like. India, for instance, was already making a bit of a trade policy push before Trump came in, but I think there's been a real acceleration in concluding more free-trade agreements than ever. It has also put the spotlight back on BRICS… Regional integration organisation models are really hard to crack, and there's a reason it's only ever really been done in Europe, and even that was considered a minor miracle. The five core BRICS members are not comfortable pooling sovereignty in that way. I keep having to remind people that China and India have literal border skirmishes, while Brazil's on the opposite side of the world. You're never going to get that same level of integration. With that being said, we've just seen the first visit by an Indian leader to China in decades. The US is in real danger of making BRICS work —despite itself.
