Battle of the electric estates: BMW i5 Touring vs Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Electric
See, it's not all SUVs in the electric era. Audi's new A6 Avant e-tron goes toe to toe with BMW's i5 Touring, but which is better? Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading
Close run battle, this. And that's not a surprise, is it? For all recorded time, comparing big German bizniz barges has been like agonising over shades of off-white in the paint aisle. The BMW 530d M Sport Almond Ivory... or the Audi A6 S line Elephant's Breath? Sorry love, better grab a tester pot to be sure we don't prefer Mercedes E-Class AMG Line Waiting Room Beige.
But it is incredible how equal the latest evolutions of A6 and 5 Series are, because here we have the two polar opposite views the car industry is currently arguing over – how to build an EV.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Option one: BMW's one size fits all masterplan. Build a car to accept every powertrain choice going. Into this immense, awkwardly angular bodyshell, BMW stuffs petrol and diesel engines, hybrids, or this totally electric solution, the i5.
Photography: Jonny Fleetwood You might like
That's why you sit a little bit higher than you're used to in a 5 Series – because about 300kg of cells need room to lie down. It's why this car is punctured by grilles – in case this body contained an engine. It also explains the XXL overhangs and traditionally long bonnet (with no front boot stowage beneath it, meaning the charging cables get in the way of shopping and knot the dog's legs). And the 'classic' plutobarge look means the aero is none too clever.
So there are compromises, and not just for the i5. All 5 Series' (including the infamously porky M5) are now stupidly heavy, because the basic structure has been armour plated in case it needs to carry monumental e-flab.
Advertisement - Page continues below
But the upshot is BMW only has to build one car called a 5 Series. The factory is happy, the badging department is pleased, and you don't need a treasure map to negotiate BMW's website.
Option two: Audi will soon build two entirely unrelated A6s. One is this car: the electric only A6 e-tron. The other is the new, um, A6, a combustion or hybrid powered car on an entirely different chassis. The two cars will both be called A6 but won't share a single body panel.
Still, the advantages to dreaming up a fresh platform are obvious. The A6 e-tron Avant isn't just slipperier than the BMW. It's one of the world's most aerodynamically efficient production cars, because it's not full of holes, the underbody is flatter than morale at Old Trafford, and it lacks door mirrors. We'll come back to those.
Besides leaving the air neat and tidy, the A6's bespoke foundations unlock other useful advantages. Yes, it's actually 5kg heavier than the 5er, but it carries 17 per cent more battery capacity in a car that's usefully smaller overall.
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox.
Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
No surprise then that there's a heap more range. BMW quotes 327 miles from the industry lab test, but we're more forensic. This car has been our TG Garage long termer for eight months and 10,000 miles. It averaged 310 miles to a charge last summer. Even the least efficient A6 e-tron – this Launch Edition on 21in wheels – claims over 400 miles. The Sport model reckons it'll outrun the i5 by a good 100 miles.
So far, so 'we told you so' by Audi then. An electric car is best when it's built to be electric from the wheels up. And the virtuous circle keeps on spinning, running four rings around the bloated i5.
It's not just your eyes, either. The A6 is indeed noticeably shorter (if marginally wider) – easier to park and place – yet passengers in the second row enjoy more space to lounge in. Opening the back doors of a 5 Series is like going to a flat viewing after studying the cheeky fisheye lens photos posted by the estate agent. Hang about, it looked ginormous on the outside. Where's all the space gone?
But the weather (as motorsport commentators gleefully point out) is a great leveller. It's bitingly cold when A6 meets i5. And you know what? Both offer up 250 miles. A colleague spends longer with the Audi and coaxes it to 2.8 miles per kWh over 270 miles, but the BMW avenges its smaller battery by being more efficient overall, effortlessly managing three miles per kWh. And though the i5 loses the space wars for 'people', it wins it back on 'stuff'. It has the marginally bigger boot and even a slightly faster electric tailgate. Skip 8 photos in the image carousel and continue reading
Just as things are looking up for the i5, let's roll price into the equation. An i5 Touring squeaks in at under £70k, but Brits will almost always tick the M Sport box as seen here, taking the price north of £76k, or £1,100 a month on the BMW finance calculator. A6 e-tron Avants are a few grand cheaper to begin with, while the equivalently thrusting S line trim is £68,605.
This particular car is a spec laden Launch Edition unhelpfully no longer listed on Audi's website, but here to give you a good idea what an A6 looks like with every option optioned. Even at an eye watering £87k, it's £6k less than BMW charges for this bell and whistle festooned i5. At this point we ought to cover depreciation, but the BBC doesn't allow depictions of cruelty and torture in its publications.
So we'll drive them instead, just as soon as the BMW's 87-point turned its way out of the multistorey. And nicked a wheel on the down ramp kerb in the process. My fault. Or was it? For all its screens, cameras, sensors, bongs, alerts and assists, the sheer bulk of the i5 simply isn't compatible with quite a lot of Britain. Over 5m long, 2m wide over the mirrors. Rear steer and 360° cameras help, but the Audi is wieldier and less stressful at each end of your journey.
Partly that's because you sit up in the roof rafters rather than (relatively) down on the cat's eyes. What Audi's done here is dress up a crossover driving position in an estate car suit. That black fillet breaking up the thickset doors and 21in rims does a convincing job of hiding the fact an A6 driver is no longer eye to eye with other pilots of German business expresses. They're riding high and mighty with the Evoques and Qashqais. Easier to judge your surroundings from up there.
Life in the BMW is calm and cultured. It's a very expensive car, but it has the feel of one too
Or it would be, if Audi hadn't wilfully sabotaged itself with yet more virtual mirrors. OK, we've been here before with the old e-tron SUV and in various Hyundais and Lexuses, so the problems with this tech are fairly well established. The displays aren't clear enough in dark or wet conditions (gawd help you if it's both), there's no depth perception so telling at a glance how quickly that car in the next lane is closing is nigh on impossible, and because the camera is fixed, you can't change your perspective by bobbing or weaving your head. You need to swipe at the screen to muddle where the lens is pointing. It's a faff.
And despite shifting the screens away from the corners of the pillars and up onto the doors, it's tricky to unlearn the instinct of looking out the window to check the mirror. Ah, whoops, that's a camera. Refocus to inside the door to check screen. Oopsie, there's a 10-tonne truck in my blind spot. Why all this inconvenience and this hefty cost (the digital mirrors are usually a £1,495 option)? According to Audi's wind tunnel boffins, the drag saving is worth four miles of range over a full charge. I think I'd sooner park in the next village and walk.
There are other quibbles. The entire Top Gear road test team drove the A6 during its stay with us and not one thought the ride was acceptable. Yes, it's wearing 21in rims and our roads are rougher than Hardest Geezer's foot calluses, but there's a tension and restlessness to the A6's ride which gets on your nerves. You'll have read how the car is much more at home on the highways of continental Europe which are cared for like putting greens, but that's cold comfort when the A6 is jouncing down the A6003 and everyone's having their heads tossed around like they're on a moody seaside donkey.
Life in the BMW is calm and cultured. It's a very expensive car, but it has the feel of one too, straddling the line between where an executive 5 Series ends and a luxury 7 Series limo begins. It squashes bumps the Audi fidgets over, absorbs imperfections the Audi hosts a conference call about, and generally oozes about like a shooting brake Rolls-Royce Spectre. Once you're on a road it can comfortably fit down. When you tug its bombproof door closed behind you, it seals you off from the outside world so effectively you half expect your ears to pop, as if it's a pressurised cabin in a business jet. Skip 9 photos in the image carousel and continue reading
Perhaps this is a personal preference thing, but across all the i-kind and e-trons I've driven, BMW's intelligent regen braking is more logical than Audi's paddle adjusted settings. Click the i5 into B mode in town for maximum recuperation and it's a very relaxing one pedal car.
In the very old days, an Audi/BMW faceoff would traditionally alight on the fact the BMW also had steely eyed rear drive chops and was obviously the choice of serious drivers, while the Audi was about as memorable as a Dulux paint chart. The gap is a lot closer these days. For one thing, the Audi's rear wheel drive too. More efficient that way. Back to back, the lower set, slightly more agile BMW was the keener drive, but come on. Two-tonne e-wagons with augmented warp soundtracks hardly scream Sunday morning thrap, right?
Be in no doubt, the Audi's a fine car. Our team preferred its interior screen logic (cameras excepted) and found it easier to manoeuvre. It's spacious, futuristic and has the potential to be a genuine range monster. Probably comfier, less annoying and better value with a more modest spec, too.
But the i5 earns the narrowest of moral victories here, because despite not even being built to be an EV first and foremost, it's the better car to drive, to ride in, to carry things and isn't remotely compromised enough to justify building a whole other car as an electric offshoot. So there you have it, carmakers of the world. BMW's been the canary in the coal mine and done you a big favour. Keep building cars you can sell with or without engines. Y'know, just in case electric doesn't end up being the only fuel of the near future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Car
34 minutes ago
- Auto Car
What is a Lepas? Inside the newest Chinese car brand looking to conquer the UK
Close At Chery's sprawling HQ in the city of Wuhu, two hours west of Shanghai, dozens of prototypes circle the streets linking the company's various R&D facilities. In one prototype jam, we spot a camouflaged Lepas with Audi's four rings crudely drawn on tape covering the badge. The marking was clearly a joke, but it was also a sign of Chery's sky-high confidence that it can conjure up a new export brand, launch it globally, including in the UK, within a year and quickly establish it as a serious contender.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Oscar Piastri sees off McLaren team-mate Lando Norris to claim his FIFTH victory of the F1 season at the Spanish Grand Prix - as Max Verstappen and George Russell reignite fiery feud
There is only one flaw in the greatest driver in the world. Just as there was with Michael Schumacher when he ruled Formula One. And it brought him, Max Verstappen, low on lap 64 of 66 on Sunday as he blew his top and lost his composure. A few minutes later he was gracious as he spoke about his deed of moments earlier, if unrepentant. Introspection is not his style. Action is. It is part of the DNA that makes him by a wider margin superior to the next best of his contemporaries than anyone in history. But there was a sense of desperation, of not being in charge of all he surveyed, that, surely, impelled him to drive deliberately into George Russell. As Murray Walker always argued in Schumacher's defence, the German acted without 'malice aforethought' and that is about as solid a defence as you can offer for Verstappen's impulsive act. And his instinct to fight out of a dark hole was more vivid because Sunday's Spanish Grand Prix may prove pivotal in several ways. It was a race won by Oscar Piastri with ice in his veins. It means the Australian is now clear favourite for the world title. He has won five of nine races this season. Linked, it indicates that Lando Norris is struggling to stay in the ring. His form is fragile. He is unable to piece together back-to-back wins. Up in Monaco last week, down in Barcelona this. Second meant he slipped 10 points behind Piastri in the other superlative McLaren. Perhaps time will help Norris – there are 14 races remaining – or will the nagging doubts grow horns? And the final of the three things this race suggested, is that we may be witnessing the end of the Verstappen dominance. Four times in four years, touched by the angels more than the devil, he has won the title. Once controversially, twice with sledgehammer-force, finally with grit that raised him beyond what ought to have been the limitations of his car. Now, he is 49 points off Piastri. You sense that frustration was crowding in on him. McLaren are up the road, dominant beyond belief, a reality underlined by Red Bull rightly turning to a three-stop strategy yesterday. On a two-stopper, they were toast. So when the safety car came out after Kimi Antonelli's Mercedes had given up the ghost and all the leaders were reshod, Verstappen was restricted to hard tyres. It's all they had left. His opponents were on softs. It put him at a dreadful disadvantage. He expressed his disquiet over the radio. He then made a rare mistake. He went on to the kerb on the straight and lost his shape. Ferrari's Charles Leclerc went past him. They touched. The stewards cleared them both. A second or two later, he was attacked by Russell at the first corner. Rather than take the bend, Verstappen was forced off and went straight on – an off-the-road shortcut. Then came the fateful instruction to swap places with Russell. Now, Verstappen is a good reader of these things, knowing how to press his claims with nuclear tenacity yet within the rules. He did so several times in close combat with Norris last year, only once – in my view – overstepping the mark, in Mexico. This time he was right in asserting he did not need to cede to Russell. The stewards later said so in their adjudication. So the event that was to unfold would not have unfolded had his race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase, known as GP, not insisted he did. Verstappen saw red. He operates on a short fuse. He does not blink. Thus, he deliberately steered right into Russell, accelerating as he did so. Nico Rosberg, world champion nine years ago, said the Dutchman should be black-flagged. Rosberg is a big admirer of Verstappen's repertoire of skills that have slaughtered every team-mate he has encountered. But here, in this condemnation, was an echo of his father Keke, 1982 world champion, who called Schumacher a 'cheap cheat' that afternoon of infamy in Monaco where the German parked up at Rascasse to block Fernando Alonso's qualifying lap in 2006. The calculation in that skulduggery was worse than some of Schumacher's more impetuous fouls, and worse, in my estimation, than Verstappen's hot-headed madness here. But the Dutchman acted dangerously and the 10-second penalty that sent him from fifth to 10th was lenient. If it was deliberate – and Verstappen given the chance to deny it declined to – an exemplary sentence was required. Later, told that Russell accused him of setting a bad example to youngsters, Verstappen seemed to think the verdict priggish. 'OK, well, I'll bring some tissues next time,' he said. On the question of entangling intentionally, Verstappen said: 'He has his view; I have my view. It's better not to do comment.' Of Rosberg's black-flag call: 'That's his opinion.' As of the championship situation: 'I never said that I was in a championship fight. Every race has been tough. When McLaren get their things right, they are unbeatable.' Will he speak to Russell? 'No, not necessary. I don't have anything to say.' Does he regret anything? 'In life you shouldn't regret too many things. No regrets.' That is fair up to a point. Elite sport is not a place for self-doubters. But conduct is important in the assessment of reputation and legacy, not least when you have a genius talent to protect and nurture. It was also another horror show for Lewis Hamilton (who, it should be noted, has never resorted to shady deeds on track). He was asked to let his faster team-mate Leclerc through, just as he was in China on the only previous occasion he out-qualified him. He was later passed by Sauber's Nico Hulkenberg and finished sixth. Leclerc claimed third place. 'I have no idea why it was so bad,' said Hamilton. 'That was the worst race I have experienced, balance-wise.' Positives? 'Zero.' And where does he go from here? 'Home.'
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
UK cities with slowest charging times and lowest number of EVs revealed – don't get caught out when driving your motor
THE BRITISH cities with the worst availability and speed of electric vehicle charging have been revealed in new research. More and more people are making the switch to EVs each passing year, but access to charging infrastructure continues to be a key concern for motorists. 3 3 3 Cost, speed and access to EV chargers can vary vastly from region to region across the country. But new data from Available Car has shed light on exactly which cities are the best and worst to drive an electric vehicle. Researchers looked at the number of charging points per 10,000 people within a five mile radius of city centres. They also noted the average cost and time it takes to charge half an EV battery. The data examines 53 major cities across the UK, excluding London. Liverpool was found to be the city with the lowest number of chargers, with just two chargers per 100,000 people within a five mile radius of the city centre. Newcastle barely did better at 2.4 chargers per 100,000, while Bradford and Leeds followed up with 2.6 each. 10 cities with the fewest EV chargers The following 10 cities have the fewest number of EV chargers per 100,000 people within a five mile radius of the city centre according to Available Car: Liverpool - 2.0 Newcastle-upon-Tyne - 2.4 Bradford - 2.6 Leeds - 2.6 Sheffield - 3.0 Bristol - 3.4 Birmingham - 3.5 Southend-on-sea - 3.8 Durham - 4.0 Canterbury - 4.5 Smaller cities boasted far better numbers in the EV charging accessibility ranking. Ripon was the city with the highest number of chargers per 100,000 at 63.1 - far ahead of second placed Salisbury at 43.7. But simply finding a charger isn't the only issue EV owners face. Available Car's data also highlighted a major regional disparity in the time it takes to charge half a battery. Leicester is the city found to have the slowest EV charging times - taking an average of 8.25 hours to get to half charge. Available Car's report reads: "The city's slower charging infrastructure highlights the need for investment in faster chargers to support the growing demand for electric vehicles. "Without quicker charging options, Leicester may face challenges in encouraging more drivers to switch to electric." But Leicester EV drivers have some solace - as the survey also found it to cheapest city to charge your car, where a half full battery would cost an average of £12.60. 10 cities with the slowest EV charging time The following cities have the slowest average time to charge an EV according to Available Car: Leicester - 8.25 hours Brighton & Hove - 6.24 hours Portsmouth - 5.67 hours Coventry - 5.45 hours Oxford - 4.65 hours York - 4.58 hours Bath - 4.54 hours Leeds - 4.51 hours Manchester - 4.46 hours Norwich - 4.28 hours Brighton & Hove and Portsmouth followed Leicester as the next slowest for charging, 6.24 and 5.67 hours respectively. Wakefield recorded the speediest charge of the cities surveyed, taking an average of just 0.8 hours. The researchers used a Tesla Model Y as the benchmark vehicle when gathering the data. Their report adds: "Making the switch to an electric vehicle (EV) should be an exciting step towards greener, more sustainable driving. "However, one of the biggest barriers preventing drivers from switching from petrol or diesel to electric vehicles is having to rely on their local charging infrastructure, particularly the time it takes to charge and the cost involved. "Unlike petrol and diesel drivers, EV owners must navigate the UK's charging network, where charging speeds and costs vary significantly based on location and charger type."
