
US strike on Iran triggers oil shock in Asia
Asian currencies, equities and bonds are under renewed pressure as investors price in higher energy costs, a potential capital exodus and a delayed path to monetary easing.
The Bloomberg Asia Dollar Index dropped 0.3%, its largest single-day decline in weeks. The South Korean won and Indonesian rupiah led regional currency losses, while equity markets from Manila to Seoul posted declines.
The driver is oil. Brent crude has surged toward US$80 per barrel on concerns that the confrontation may escalate and disrupt crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
Nearly a third of all global maritime oil passes through that narrow chokepoint. Any material disruption to this corridor will have a disproportionate effect on Asia, which imports the overwhelming majority of its energy.
India, for example, imports more than 85% of its crude oil. Indonesia and the Philippines are similarly exposed. South Korea, Japan and Thailand—all manufacturing powerhouses—are highly sensitive to fuel costs.
Any sustained increase in crude prices will directly impact consumer inflation, industrial production costs and current account balances.
Bond markets have begun to reflect this risk shift. Yields on Indian, Indonesian, and Thai local currency bonds are rising as investors adjust for the dual risk of rising inflation and capital outflows.
Foreign holdings in Asian debt had been increasing over the last two months, supported by disinflation and expectations of rate cuts. This trend could now be at risk.
The Indian rupee, in particular, is facing renewed headwinds. Widening trade and fiscal deficits leave the currency vulnerable to sustained oil shocks.
The Reserve Bank of India may find its room to cut rates narrowing, especially if the inflation pass-through accelerates. Similar dynamics are at play in the Philippines, where food and fuel make up a large portion of the inflation basket.
South Korea's won is under pressure not only from energy prices but also from broader sensitivity to global supply chains and shifts in investor sentiment. The Bank of Korea has kept monetary policy tight to manage household debt and inflation expectations, but a prolonged energy spike may force it to choose between growth and price stability.
Thailand and Indonesia, while more domestically driven, are still at risk. Thailand's tourism recovery could slow if global travel costs rise. Indonesia's central bank has only recently managed to stabilize the rupiah through rate hikes, and another round of external pressure could complicate that progress.
Meanwhile, China—the world's largest oil importer—faces a different but equally significant challenge. While it holds substantial strategic reserves and maintains long-term import contracts, a spike in crude still threatens margins for exporters and industrial firms.
Higher shipping and insurance costs through the Gulf would only add to the pressure. With domestic demand already uneven, any input cost inflation from energy may undermine China's fragile recovery momentum.
The broader message is this: Asia's exposure to oil imports and trade routes leaves it vulnerable in moments of geopolitical volatility.
If Brent moves above $85 and stays there, inflation expectations across the region will rise again. That would likely derail any near-term plans for rate cuts in India, Indonesia, the Philippines, or South Korea. Central banks could be forced to hold or even hike again—at the cost of growth.
Market flows are adjusting accordingly. The dollar is strengthening. Gold prices are climbing. Demand for safe-haven assets is rising, while risk appetite in Asia is diminishing.
These aren't knee-jerk reactions. They reflect deeper concern about how the current conflict might evolve and how exposed Asia remains to external energy shocks.
The coming days will be crucial. If Iran retaliates or the conflict escalates, markets will reprice even further. The possibility of another round of global energy inflation is now being reflected in commodity markets and FX volatility.
Investors in Asia must now re-evaluate their positioning. Countries with better energy self-sufficiency, lower debt and stronger current account balances will fare better. Others will face rising fiscal and monetary constraints as the cost of energy, debt service, and currency defense rises simultaneously.
The uneasy calm that had returned to emerging Asia has been disrupted. This is not yet a regional crisis—but it is a clear warning that the balance between growth and inflation remains precarious.
Energy prices are once again the most important variable for policymakers and geopolitical risk is back as a central driver of capital markets.
Asian economies must brace for further volatility. For investors, selectivity will be critical. The ability to differentiate between vulnerable and resilient markets will define outcomes in the months ahead.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AllAfrica
13 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's tariff rage pushes a miffed Modi toward China
As geopolitical trolling goes, India's Narendra Modi suddenly heading to China for the first time in seven years is just elite. No one could possibly miss the Donald Trump of it all as Prime Minister Modi shifts into economic-emergency mode. This follows Trump imposing a 50% tariff on India, making it the second member of the BRICS — Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa — to suffer a US penalty of that magnitude. First, it was Brazil, ostensibly for holding former President Jair Bolsonaro accountable for a 2022 coup attempt. South Africa, meanwhile, is being hit by a 30% Trump tax, the highest rate in all of sub-Saharan Africa. Nigeria, Ghana, Lesotho and Zimbabwe all face just a 15% tariff. Now, as India faces its own 50% tariff reckoning, Modi is opting to fly to Beijing instead of Washington. Modi plans to attend the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization that begins on August 31. Trump, of course, is threatening an additional 10% tax on the BRICS. Among other reasons, Trump is irked that BRICS members are angling to replace the dollar as the world's reserve currency. He accuses the bloc of 'aligning themselves with anti-American policies.' For Modi's unbalanced economy, say economists at Nomura Holdings, a 50% tariff is essentially a 'trade embargo' against the world's biggest democracy, long a vital counterweight against China's regional ambitions. And, oddly, it's over Russia, a nation for which Trump, until very recently, had a well-known affinity. As Trump comes to realize Vladimir Putin is thumbing his nose at his White House, the US president is turning on Moscow. At least for the moment. For now, Trump World is retaliating against India for helping itself to supertanker after supertanker of cheap, sanctioned Russian oil. India buys an estimated $275 billion of annual oil purchases from Moscow. 'If the extra 25% tariff that President Trump has announced on imports from India remains in place, India's attractiveness as an emerging manufacturing hub will be hugely undermined,' says economist Shilan Shah at Capital Economics. A 50% tax, Shah adds, is 'large enough to have a material impact.' As such, India, the globe's fifth-largest economy, is bracing for a turbulent ride. Trump's economy is New Delhi's largest trading partner. In 2024, India shipped $87.4 billion of goods to the US. Some parts of Modi's economy are more exposed to Trump's tariff rage than others. 'In terms of sectors impacted, we think gems and jewellery, apparel, textiles, and other chemicals are more exposed to the US tariffs and could see some targeted support measures from the government,' says UBS economist Tanvee Gupta Jain. Rajat Agarwal, a strategist at Societe Generale, says 'the impact of tariffs for equities has fed through mainly via a weaker Indian rupee and higher currency volatility, which has weighed on foreign flows in the near term.' Trump turning on India could be remembered as the moment his trade war jumped the shark. While Modi and Xi Jinping compare notes in Beijing, the Chinese leader will have additional incentives to say no to a 'grand bargain' trade deal with Trump. The weeks since Trump struck tariff deals with Japan, the European Union and others have been rich with news cycles about confusion over what was — and wasn't — agreed to. Since the pact with Japan on July 22, both sides have been at odds about the rules of the road concerning the 15% tariff, particularly the treatment of autos. Richard Katz, who publishes the Japan Economy Watch newsletter, notes that is getting an earful from Detroit. Ford, General Motors and Stellantis complain that Trump's agreement with Japan and Europe puts them at a disadvantage. 'They have to pay a 25% tariff on automotive imports from Canada and Mexico, while Japanese and European vehicles and parts can come in at 15%. But the issue is a bit more complex,' Katz explains. On all imports from Mexico and Canada, except for autos, the tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico apply only to goods that do not comply with the North American content rules of origin under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), e.g., 75% for most products, Katz notes. For products that do comply, the tariffs will apply to that portion of content that does not comply, e.g. 20%. However, when it comes to automotive products, the 25% tariff applies to the non-US content, not the non-USMCA content. Over in Brussels, meanwhile, EU officials are doing damage control over the $750 billion of oil and gas Trump demands Europe buy from the US in short order. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen makes it clear the EU can't compel private companies to gorge on US energy for political ends. Back in New Delhi, Modi is reassuring farmers, a key political constituency, that he won't sell them out to Washington. Speaking at an agricultural sector conference in the Indian capital this week, Modi said he 'will never compromise on the interests of farmers, livestock owners and fishermen. I know, personally, I'll have to pay a heavy price — but I am ready for it.' Other industries are raising red flags, too. The nation's Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council termed Trump's tariff escalation a 'deeply concerning development.' The group says 'this move would have far-reaching repercussions across India's economy — disrupting critical supply chains, stalling exports and threatening thousands of livelihoods. We ask the government for immediate relief.' Billionaire Anand Mahindra, chair of India's sprawling Mahindra Group, warns of the economic risks of the 'law of unintended consequences,' calling on Team Modi to 'radically improve ease of doing business.' As Mahindra wrote on social media: 'We cannot fault others for putting their nations first, but we should be moved to make our own nation greater than ever.' Not everyone is panicking over Trump's India tariffs. Economists at Barclays write that it 'will likely inflict more visible economic damage on India but, as we have noted previously, the relatively domestic orientation of the Indian economy should limit the pain.' Yet Morgan Stanley economist Bani Gambhir says that if implemented, Trump's tariff would likely have the Reserve Bank of India stepping up efforts to boost growth. Gambhir expects the RBI to announce two quarter points each – on top of the 25 basis points of easing already factored in. The government, meanwhile, is almost certain to pause fiscal consolidation efforts to support domestic demand. Trump's own goal with India is dawning on BRICS members. Last month, the bloc met in Rio de Janeiro to discuss turning its goal of a currency to rival the dollar into a reality – and to argue for greater representation at the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. That seemed nearly impossible with India and China at odds with each other. As Moody's Analytics economist Sarah Tan puts it: 'With two uneasy bedfellows – China and India – in its ranks, it is difficult for BRICS to turn its goal of a currency to rival the US dollar into a reality. Adding pressure from afar, Trump promised an extra 10% US tariff to countries that align with 'the anti-American policies' of BRICS.' Now that Trump is pushing India and China into each other's arms, the dynamic could change rapidly in ways that may surprise Washington and the world. Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek


RTHK
15 hours ago
- RTHK
Intel boss in bid to ensure US officials 'have facts'
Intel boss in bid to ensure US officials 'have facts' Intel chief executive Lip-Bu Tan says he has 'always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards'. File photo: Reuters Intel chief executive Lip-Bu Tan said the US chipmaker was engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised and ensure officials "have the facts". Tan's statement came hours after US President Donald Trump demanded on Thursday that the new Intel boss resign "immediately" in the wake of national security concerns raised by Republican senator Tom Cotton over his links to firms in China. Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies, but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In his statement, Tan said there has been "a lot of misinformation circulating" about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. "I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40+ years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem," Tan said. "And I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards." He stressed that the United States has been his home for over 40 years and that he is "profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me." He added that he fully shares Trump's commitment to "advancing US national and economic security" and is proud to lead a company "so central to these goals". The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at struggling Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. He has previously said it "won't be easy" to overcome challenges faced by the company. The company was also caught by surprise with the emergence of Nvidia as the world's preeminent AI chip provider. Intel's niche has been chips used in traditional computing processes, which steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution. (AFP)


RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
Lula, Modi vow to defend multilateralism amid tariffs
Lula, Modi vow to defend multilateralism amid tariffs Narendra Modi (pictured) and Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva agreed to defend multilateralism and confront the economic challenges posed by Donald Trump's tariff war. File photo: Reuters The leaders of Brazil and India have vowed in a telephone call to "defend multilateralism" after US President Donald Trump imposed punishing tariffs on imports from both their countries. The talks between Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi came a day after Trump announced 50 percent tariffs on Indian goods, matching the punishing taxes he has imposed on a raft of Brazilian goods. Brazil's presidency said that the two leaders had stressed the need "to defend multilateralism and confront the economic challenges" posed by Trump's tariff war. Writing on X, Modi said he was committed to deepening ties with fellow Brics member Brazil, adding: "A strong people-centric partnership between Global South nations benefits everyone." Trump on Wednesday announced he would double levies on Indian goods to 50 percent over New Delhi's purchasing of Russian oil, a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. A first salvo of 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods took effect on Thursday, with the additional 25 percent set to take effect in three weeks. Trump has also singled out Brazil for particular punishment for putting his ally, former far-right president Jair Bolsonaro, on trial for plotting a coup. On Wednesday, a range of Brazilian exports to the United States, including coffee, became subject to 50-percent levies. (AFP)