'Neglected or ignored': Brits in Europe urged to back campaign for overseas MPs
And while MPs get countless emails, a coalition of international citizens' rights groups has asked voters to send a postcard about the issue instead.
READ ALSO:
Campaign group for British overseas voters to hold first European meeting in Italy
'As MPs take a well deserved break, they should spare a thought for the millions of UK citizens abroad,' said Tom Brake, CEO of campaign group Unlock Democracy.
'Their views and priorities are often neglected or completely ignored. Establishing overseas constituencies is the best way to ensure their views are no longer marginalised.'
The postcard campaign was 'a way to show MPs who and where we are – although we don't all live in picture postcard tourist spots,' said Clarissa Killwick, representing pan-European citizens' rights group Brexpats - Hear Our Voice.
'I live in Italy which has overseas MPs. They've helped bring about important changes such as improved consular services,'
'It is also a two-way street – for example, reducing over-punitive taxes has made Italians abroad more inclined to pay them.'
Campaigner Clasissa Killwick sends her postcard from Italy. to her MP in the UK Photo courtesy of Clarissa Killwick.
Under the proposed system, UK citizens abroad would elect MPs who represent their part of the world in the UK parliament, rather than voting for the MP in the UK constituency they might have left years ago.
Italian citizens living abroad
elect a total of 12 overseas parliamentarians
- eight MPs and four senators. That accounts for two percent of the total number of seats in parliament.
In France, 11 MPs are elected to the Assemblée nationale whose role is to represent the interests of French citizens living overseas - they each represent a 'constituency' such as French people in northern Europe.
This type of representation often results in higher voter turnout and more focus on issues affecting overseas voters, according to the groups backing the campaign.
Advertisement
Terence Champion, Chair of Liberal Democrats Overseas, said: 'The more than 5,500,000 British citizens living overseas need their own MPs to represent their very specific concerns, which largely differ from those of domestic UK voters.
'Living overseas means facing some unique issues including frozen pensions, higher education fees, problems with UK bank accounts. spouse visas and complicated voting procedures, amongst others.'
The issue of overseas constituencies was also among several topics to be discussed by the British Overseas Voters Forum (BOVF) at its
inaugural meeting set to be held in Milan on September 9th
.
Organisations backing the campaign include: Unlock Democracy, New Europeans UK, British Overseas Voters Forum, Bremain in Spain, Liberal Democrats Abroad, Labour International, Brexpats - Hear Our Voice, and Liberal Democrats Overseas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Plastic pollution treaty talks end without an agreement
Negotiators working on a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution won't reach an agreement in Geneva on Friday. They were meeting for the 11th day at the United Nations office in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis but remained deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce the exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. This round of negotiations was meant to be the last, producing the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. But now delegates are leaving without a treaty after talks collapsed, just like they did at the meeting in South Korea last year. Nations deeply disappointed to leave Geneva without a treaty Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and other nations said they were deeply disappointed to be leaving Geneva without a treaty. "We came to Geneva to secure a global plastics treaty because we know the stakes could not be higher," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall said in a post on social media. "While the latest text on the table does not yet meet all our ambitions, it is a step forward—and the perfect must not be the enemy of the good." Roswall added that the EU will continue to push for a stronger, binding agreement. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal takes other states' views more into account and addresses plastic production, which they consider outside the scope of the treaty. No further action on the latest draft text Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by nations at the talks. That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production but recognised that current levels of production and consumption are 'unsustainable' and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceed current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, 'thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.' The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning, as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall, that no further action is being proposed at this stage on the latest draft. Talks in Geneva have been an "abject failure", David Azoulay, health programme director and head of the delegation for the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "In the final days of the negotiations, we have clearly seen what many of us have known for some time - some countries did not come here to finalise a text, they came here to do the opposite: block any attempt at advancing a viable treaty. "It's impossible to find a common ground between those who are interested in protecting the status quo and the majority who are looking for a functional treaty that can be strengthened over time." What happens now? Delegates are still meeting and have not decided on the next steps yet. Azoulay said that, while negotiations will continue, they will fail again if solutions aren't identified and the process doesn't change. "We need a restart, not a repeat performance. Countries that want a treaty must now leave this process and form a treaty of the willing. And that process must include options for voting that deny the tyranny of consensus we have watched play out here."
Local France
3 hours ago
- Local France
'Neglected or ignored': Brits in Europe urged to back campaign for overseas MPs
Campaigners say there's growing recognition in the UK parliament of the need for an MP whose main role is representing Brits living abroad and the 'unique issues' they face – with a similar system already used in several EU countries. And while MPs get countless emails, a coalition of international citizens' rights groups has asked voters to send a postcard about the issue instead. READ ALSO: Campaign group for British overseas voters to hold first European meeting in Italy 'As MPs take a well deserved break, they should spare a thought for the millions of UK citizens abroad,' said Tom Brake, CEO of campaign group Unlock Democracy. 'Their views and priorities are often neglected or completely ignored. Establishing overseas constituencies is the best way to ensure their views are no longer marginalised.' The postcard campaign was 'a way to show MPs who and where we are – although we don't all live in picture postcard tourist spots,' said Clarissa Killwick, representing pan-European citizens' rights group Brexpats - Hear Our Voice. 'I live in Italy which has overseas MPs. They've helped bring about important changes such as improved consular services,' 'It is also a two-way street – for example, reducing over-punitive taxes has made Italians abroad more inclined to pay them.' Campaigner Clasissa Killwick sends her postcard from Italy. to her MP in the UK Photo courtesy of Clarissa Killwick. Under the proposed system, UK citizens abroad would elect MPs who represent their part of the world in the UK parliament, rather than voting for the MP in the UK constituency they might have left years ago. Italian citizens living abroad elect a total of 12 overseas parliamentarians - eight MPs and four senators. That accounts for two percent of the total number of seats in parliament. In France, 11 MPs are elected to the Assemblée nationale whose role is to represent the interests of French citizens living overseas - they each represent a 'constituency' such as French people in northern Europe. This type of representation often results in higher voter turnout and more focus on issues affecting overseas voters, according to the groups backing the campaign. Advertisement Terence Champion, Chair of Liberal Democrats Overseas, said: 'The more than 5,500,000 British citizens living overseas need their own MPs to represent their very specific concerns, which largely differ from those of domestic UK voters. 'Living overseas means facing some unique issues including frozen pensions, higher education fees, problems with UK bank accounts. spouse visas and complicated voting procedures, amongst others.' The issue of overseas constituencies was also among several topics to be discussed by the British Overseas Voters Forum (BOVF) at its inaugural meeting set to be held in Milan on September 9th . Organisations backing the campaign include: Unlock Democracy, New Europeans UK, British Overseas Voters Forum, Bremain in Spain, Liberal Democrats Abroad, Labour International, Brexpats - Hear Our Voice, and Liberal Democrats Overseas.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump-Putin summit in Alaska: One meeting, different goals
As the countdown is on for the much-anticipated Alaska one-on-one meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, Moscow and Washington have been sending conflicting messages on what are their main goals and expectations for the summit. The US president said he believes that Vladimir Putin is heading to the meeting wanting to make a deal to end Moscow's war in Ukraine. "I believe now he's convinced that he's going to make a deal. He's going to make a deal. I think he's going to. And we're going to find out — I'm going to know very quickly," Trump said during an appearance on Fox News Radio. This isn't the first time Trump has made such a statement. He repeatedly stated that Putin wants to put an end to his full-scale invasion of Ukraine or at least that he can convince or even push Putin to make some sort of a deal. These statements have not materialised, at least not until now. Every time Trump mentioned a possible ceasefire, Russia continued or even intensified its frontline assaults and aerial attacks against Ukraine. The US president's rhetoric has somehow changed over the past few days, becoming a little less convincing and a lot less optimistic. Earlier this week the White House officials even called the Alaska meeting merely a "listening exercise." Over the past few days the US president himself played it down, describing the Friday summit as "setting the table for the second meeting," purportedly between Zelenskyy and Putin in the presence of Trump and possibly European leaders. "We are going to have the second meeting if the first one goes well," Trump said, adding that he would prefer the second meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy to take place "almost immediately." Asked if he believed he could convince Putin to stop targeting civilians in Ukraine, Trump replied: "I guess the answer to that is no, because I've had this conversation (with Putin)." And yet Trump still says he believes some sort of a deal will be signed in Alaska. What does Moscow want? But for Moscow the agenda seems different. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said no documents are expected to be signed during the Alaska summit. Although Peskov said it would be a "mistake" to predict the outcome of Friday talks, he stressed that there are no plans for Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump to formalise any agreements. "President Putin and President Trump are ready to talk and will discuss the most difficult issues," he added. Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov, who is part of the Russian delegation at the Friday meeting, said the central topic of the Alaska summit is "settlement" of Russia's war in Ukraine, though economic cooperation and global security will also be discussed. Putin himself held a special meeting on Thursday morning with the Russian authorities saying the US administration is "making sufficiently energetic and sincere efforts to end the hostilities, resolve the crisis, and reach agreements that are in the interests of all parties involved in this conflict." Pointing at the Kremlin's main goal of restarting and possibly even normalising Russia's relations with the US - which for the Kremlin have nothing to do with Ukraine - Putin said the meeting is important "In order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, in Europe, and in the world as a whole." The Russian president did not mention any steps towards ending his war against Ukraine and instead focused on Moscow's contact with Washington, in an effort to position the Friday meeting as a summit of the world's superpowers. The US-based Institute for Study of War assesses that the Kremlin is using the Alaska summit to portray Russia as a world power equal to the United States and to position Putin as an equal to Trump. On Wednesday, leading Russian negotiator and Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Kirill Dmitriev alluded to the 1945 Yalta Conference between the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union, claiming that the Yalta conference "won World War II" and that Putin and Trump will similarly "prevent World War III." The Russia-installed head of the annexed Crimea region, Sergei Aksyonov, claimed that Trump should visit the region in order to agree to a "new Yalta peace." Russian state-controlled media have also been pushing the Yalta summit comparison, claiming that "people who have a real influence on global processes" will be at the table in Alaska. Donald Trump rejected the claims that a one-on-one meeting with the US president could be perceived as a reward for Vladimir Putin. But even if the meeting doesn't go well and there is no second summit with the leaders of Ukraine and Europe, Putin will already have emerged from diplomatic isolation for the first time since the beginning of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
