Focus on Gregg Wallace, Glastonbury and Gaza as BBC releases annual report
The BBC will face scrutiny after 45 out of the 83 allegations of misconduct made against former MasterChef presenter Gregg Wallace were upheld (Andrew Matthews/PA)
The regulator said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'.
The programme was removed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture.
An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.'
The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'.
But the review found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'.
The BBC will also face scrutiny after a total of 45 out of the 83 allegations of misconduct made against former MasterChef presenter Wallace during his time on the show were substantiated, including one allegation of 'unwelcome physical contact', in a report following an investigation into his behaviour.
On Monday, Wallace's MasterChef co-host John Torode confirmed he had a standalone allegation of racist language upheld in the same report.
He said had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation in an Instagram post.
In November 2024 the show's production company, Banijay UK, announced Wallace would step away from his role on the BBC cooking show while historical allegations of misconduct were investigated.
The report concluded that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour', adding that 'a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated'.
Also expected to be on the agenda is coverage of Glastonbury, which saw the broadcaster livestream a set by punk duo Bob Vylan, during which singer Bobby Vylan, whose real name is reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster, led crowds in chants of 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)'.
Bob Vylan performing on the West Holts Stage during the Glastonbury Festival (Yui Mok/PA)
Director-general Tim Davie confirmed on Monday that staff at the festival had the authority to cut the stream
Avon and Somerset Police have since launched an investigation into the group's set with the BBC issuing an apology for the live stream, and promising to no longer broadcast live acts they deem 'high risk' as they had with Bob Vylan in a pre-festival assessment.
The Ipswich-formed duo, who are completed by drummer Bobbie Vylan, are also being investigated by the Met Police for alleged comments in a video of their performance supporting Iggy Pop at Alexandra Palace in May.
In the video, Vylan appears to say: 'Death to every single IDF soldier out there as an agent of terror for Israel. Death to the IDF.'
According to reports in The Times, the BBC's director of music Lorna Clarke was among a group of senior staff who have stepped back from their day-to-day roles after the broadcaster's decision to show Bob Vylan's set live.
Gary Lineker left the BBC earlier this year (Ian Walton/PA)
The salary of former Match Of The Day host Gary Lineker is expected to be included in the report, after he left his presenting role early following a social media row after he shared a post about Zionism which featured a depiction of a rat, historically an antisemitic insult.
Lineker, who issued an unreserved apology, was the BBC's highest-paid presenter until his departure, with the annual report for 2023/24 showing his salary to be to around £1.35 million a year.
The presenter will no longer front the BBC's coverage of the 2026 World Cup or the FA Cup next season, with his final appearance on Match Of The Day at the end of the last Premier League season.
It comes as it was announced that Mr Davie and BBC chairman Samir Shah will face questions from MPs over the documentary, Wallace, and its Glastonbury coverage.
The two will appear before the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on September 9.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
John Torode's contract on MasterChef not renewed, BBC and Banijay UK confirm
Australian-born Torode, 59, started presenting MasterChef alongside Gregg Wallace in 2005. On Monday night, Torode confirmed he was the subject of an allegation of using racist language that was upheld as part of a review carried out by law firm Lewis Silkin into the alleged behaviour of his co-presenter Wallace. John Torode after being made an MBE during an investiture ceremony at Buckingham Palace (Kirsty O'Connor/PA) A statement from Banijay UK said: 'In response to John Torode's statement, it is important to stress that Banijay UK takes this matter incredibly seriously. 'The legal team at Lewis Silkin that investigated the allegations relating to Gregg Wallace also substantiated an accusation of highly offensive racist language against John Torode which occurred in 2018. 'This matter has been formally discussed with John Torode by Banijay UK, and whilst we note that John says he does not recall the incident, Lewis Silkin have upheld the very serious complaint. 'Banijay UK and the BBC are agreed that we will not renew his contract on MasterChef.' The Lewis Silkin report, commissioned by Banijay UK, found 45 out of 83 allegations against Wallace were substantiated, alongside two standalone allegations made against other people, including one for using racist language. Torode confirmed on Monday night he was the person alleged to have used racist language but said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation. A BBC spokesperson said: 'John Torode has identified himself as having an upheld allegation of using racist language against him. 'This allegation – which involves an extremely offensive racist term being used in the workplace- was investigated and substantiated by the independent investigation led by the law firm, Lewis Silkin. John Torode denies the allegation. 'He has stated he has no recollection of the alleged incident and does not believe that it happened. He also says that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment. 'The BBC takes this upheld finding extremely seriously. We will not tolerate racist language of any kind and, as we have already said, we told Banijay UK, the makers of MasterChef, that action must be taken. 'John Torode's contract on MasterChef will not be renewed.' In 2022, Torode was made an MBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours, for services to food and charity.
Time Out
10 minutes ago
- Time Out
Starbucks' secret menu is now official, and you could win $25,000 for submitting your own creation
Secret menus—unofficial, creative combinations of standard menu options—have been a thing at many chains over the years, including Starbucks. Most remain secret, but Starbucks just pulled back the curtain by officially adding four "secret" drinks to their menu. Plus, they've launched a contest to find the next big drink and you could win big. Starting today, Starbucks is putting its most talked-about drink hacks front and center in the Starbucks app. The legendary 'secret menu' that's fueled Reddit threads and fan sites with the likes of Butterbeer Frappuccinos and Thin Mint Cold Brews is now officially endorsed. Rewards members can tap the "offers" tab in the app and find the first four creations, each already customized and ready to order with a single click. Here's what's in the inaugural lineup: Cookies on Top: Cold Brew with two pumps of vanilla syrup, Vanilla Sweet Cream Cold Foam and a cookie crumble topping Lemon, Tea & Pearls: Black tea and lemonade with raspberry popping pearls Just Add White Mocha: Brown Sugar Oatmilk Shaken Espresso upgraded with White Chocolate Mocha Sauce and Vanilla Sweet Cream Cold Foam The move is inspired by Starbucks' Not-So-Secret Menu broadcast channel on Instagram, where creative mashups have been shared for months. Now, these viral drinks can finally be ordered easily, without awkwardly reciting the recipe at the counter. But Starbucks isn't stopping there. To celebrate, they're launching a contest to find their next big drink. From now through July 20, submit your dream drink customization via the secret menu contest page. Four finalists will snag $5,000 and see their drink featured in the app from August 18–25. The drink with the most fan votes on Starbucks' Instagram wins an extra $25,000.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
10 scenes ruined by ridiculous product placement
When you go to the cinema or turn on your television, chances are that you are going to have something sold to you, ideally very subtly, while you watch it. There is a reason why technology and luxury goods companies pay millions to have their products displayed on screen, and that is because this kind of subliminal advertising is supposed to work. However, sometimes they overstep the mark, which is deemed to be what happened when Channel 4 soap Hollyoaks was deemed to have breached Ofcom's rules after an episode made both verbal and visual reference to the financial services app ClearScore. Of course, the advertisement of goods on-screen in film and television has existed since the medium came into being, and, at its best, can transform the fortunes of a product. Sales of Ray-Ban Aviator sunglasses soared after Tom Cruise wore them in Top Gun (and its sequel), and after M&Ms refused to allow their sweets to be used on-screen in ET, Reese's Pieces were only too happy to oblige instead. They duly reaped the benefits of their confectionery becoming every child's go-to treat that summer. Put the right product in the right film or series in the right context, and the results can be stellar. Get it wrong, however, and it can either be humiliating, bizarre or both. It was not for nothing that both Wayne's World and Arrested Development had some of their best jokes revolving around the egregious promotion of on-screen products, and audiences now are savvier than ever about being given the hard sell through cynically thought-out marketing schemes. Here are 10 occasions when the product placement went that bit too far, and the picture or show suffered as a result. Wings (1927) The first film to win Best Picture at the Oscars was a silent aeronautical epic that introduced many cinematic precedents, including a pioneering use of product placement that now seems comically on-the-nose. Although it was not the first picture to contain an advertisement of a commercially available product (that would be 1920s short film The Garage, with Red Crown petrol), there is a scene in which a young Gary Cooper, playing the Tom Cruise-Maverick character of his day, firstly impresses two would-be pilots by telling them about his daredevil antics, and then produces a bar of Hershey's chocolate. The full-screen close-up, with the camera lingering on the chocolate just that bit too long, established a more unwelcome trend that continues to this day. Mac and Me (1988) McDonald's and its wares has been found in countless films, not least those aimed at children, and the fast food giant is all too aware of the power of the commercial tie-ins that it specialises in. However, the worst picture that it has ever been associated with is almost certainly the dismal E.T rip-off Mac and Me, which focuses on the friendship between a young boy and a 'Mysterious Alien Creature' (or MAC) but in fact seems to exist as an extended advertisement for the Golden Arches, to say nothing of Coca-Cola. How else to explain a bizarre, almost horrific extended scene at a McDonald's establishment, complete with a terrifying Ronald McDonald himself dancing madly? Still, its producer RJ Louis – a former advertising executive who worked on McDonald's campaigns – could at least proudly boast that he was 'still the only person in the universe that ever had the exclusive motion picture rights to the McDonald's trademark, their actors, their characters and the whole company'. Yes, and Mac and Me – a film in which a child in a wheelchair flies off a cliff – is the miserable result. You've Got Mail (1998) Back in 1998, Starbucks was still a relatively hip coffee chain that had pioneered initiatives like jazz being played in their stores, exotic iced drinks with names like 'Frappuccino' and comfy sofas to lounge on. All well and good, but none of this excuses the sheer ubiquity of its name-checking and on-screen presence in the Meg Ryan-Tom Hanks romantic comedy You've Got Mail. For a film about the struggle of the quirky independent (Ryan's bookstore owner) against The Man (Hanks's bookshop chain owner), there is an awful lot of emphasis on them all visiting Starbucks (yes, including Ryan, who is otherwise vociferously anti-corporations). In a line that has become duly (in)famous, Hanks's character has a mini-monologue about how the coffee chain specialises in being all things to all men, ending with a remarkable line reading of the words 'Tall. Decaf. Cappuccino!' Cast Away (2000) Hanks must have enjoyed his experience of acting alongside commercial products, because one of his next big roles came a couple of years later when he played FedEx systems analyst Chuck Noland, who is shipwrecked when a FedEx cargo plane crashes and must fend for himself on an uninhabited tropical island. While the film attracted much attention for the Wilson volleyball who becomes a mute companion of sorts to Noland, its central message – that Noland will ensure that the last surviving FedEx package will eventually make it to its destined recipient – means that the film (which has not endured especially well) ultimately plays out as the longest, most expensive FedEx advert ever made. It is almost a surprise, when the end credits begin, not to hear a voiceover deliver the parting line: 'FedEx: getting you your deliveries, whatever the circumstances.' Casino Royale (2006) Daniel Craig and Martin Campbell rebooted the Bond franchise for an edgier, post-Bourne audience, and the results are still terrific. Less tremendous, however, is the sheer amount of product placement on show, as if producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson had taken fright at the potential cost of making an 007 film and had chosen to offset their expense against as many on-screen commercial partners as possible. You'll find everything from Heineken to Virgin Atlantic here, but there are a couple of truly excruciating moments, whether it's Bond driving, of all things, a Ford Mondeo, or the scene in which, asked by Eva Green's Vesper Lynd if he's wearing a Rolex, he replies 'Omega', only for Vesper to purr 'Beautiful.' Apparently the various advertisers paid $100 million to have their wares displayed on screen. For a franchise often (and rightly) criticised for its over-reliance on commercial tie-ins, this was a scheme worthy of a Bond villain. Jack and Jill (2011) In his memoir Sonny Boy, Al Pacino candidly explained the peculiar circumstances by which he came to play himself in the disastrous Adam Sandler 'comedy'. 'Jack and Jill was the first film I made after I lost my money. To be honest, I did it because I didn't have anything else. Adam Sandler wanted me, and they paid me a lot for it. So I went out and did it, and it helped.' Sandler (who Pacino calls 'a great actor and a hell of a guy') may have saved the great actor's bacon, but it was a different kind of foodstuff that features in the film's most peculiar scene. Pacino, in full 'Hoo-ha!' mode, over-enthusiastically promotes Dunkin' Donuts new drink, the Dunkaccino, at Sandler's behest. Announcing that his name is now 'Dunk', Pacino raps away, misquoting famous lines from his earlier films ('You want creamy goodness, I'm your friend/Say hello to my chocolate blend') and humiliating himself beyond measure. When Pacino, watching the commercial's playback, remarks to Sandler, in character, 'Burn this…this must never be seen by anyone', you can only wish that his request was followed. Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014) You would struggle to mount a defence of any of Michael Bay's Transformers films on artistic grounds – they are, after all, loud and imbecilic pictures aimed at pubescent boys that are intended to sell toy robots- but the sheer level of on-screen shilling that goes on during the miserable fourth instalment took excess to new depths. During its interminable 165 minute length, no fewer than 55 brands are featured on screen, most obviously Bud Light and Victoria's Secret, and Bay's background in advertisements is clear from the lingering close-ups that he gives every one of these products. Nearly every one, that is. Hilariously, it came out in 2016 that the Chinese company Wulong Karst Tourism were suing the producers for $27million on the grounds that their logo was not displayed prominently enough in the finished film, a reminder that this monstrosity was made during that brief, bizarre period when Hollywood desperately sucked up to China. In this instance, clearly not effectively enough. Sherlock (series 4, 2017) This is less offensive or annoying than many of the other examples, and more simply jarring. By the fourth series of the much-admired Cumberbatch-Freeman Sherlock Holmes revamp, it was clear that the show was not operating in the same way that most BBC series did, and so the usual Beeb rules of not using recognisable technological products (ie Apple's iPhones) did not apply. Therefore, we are shown Cumberbatch's Sherlock using a then-modish iPhone 6S, which, viewers are invited to infer, is the technological equivalent of the great detective's legendarily wide-ranging brain. It's not so much horrible, as just a bit forced. One half-expects the great detective to ask 'Siri, how do I solve this particular case?' Ted Lasso (2020- ) It is obviously unfair to criticise Apple for asking that their products be included in series that they have funded at enormous cost to themselves, and many people are enormously fond of the big-hearted comedy-drama Ted Lasso, with Jason Sudeikis as the sunniest football coach you could ever hope to meet. It's just a shame, then, that the product placement here is ladled on with a trowel. Virtually every single scene features a character wielding an iPhone or a MacBook, checking out something on an iPad or watching an Apple-branded monitor. And the software gets a big plug, too. When Ted's chatting to his son back home in the United States, what's his method of choice? FaceTime, naturally; Zoom doesn't get much of a look in here. Incidentally, Apple will only allow their products to be used for non-villainous characters, so Anthony Head's dastardly rival football club owner doesn't get a look in. Barbie (2023) Greta Gerwig's feminist toy fantasia was a huge box office hit and critically acclaimed, not least because it was thought to subvert its potentially tacky consumerist message with a deep strain of self-aware humour. (See, for instance, Rob Brydon being introduced in his micro-cameo not as the notorious 'Sugar Daddy Ken' but as 'Sugar's Daddy, Ken'.) However, it also functions as a two-hour advertisement for Mattel and the Barbie character. Despite its satirical nods at Mattel's patriarchal set-up, it's also a picture that is very keen to sell expensive merchandise to its audience, ranging from Tag Heuer watches to women's Birkenstocks. And when Ryan Gosling's scene-stealing Ken turns up at the end in a hoodie emblazoned with the term 'I am Kenough', it is no great stretch to imagine the sweater's £58 price tag becoming part of an incredibly expensive post-film shopping trip.
