&w=3840&q=100)
Google Search gets smart product tracking, AI Virtual Try-On: What's new
Virtual Try-on Features
Unveiled at I/O 2025 and tested through Search Labs in May, Google's virtual try-on feature is rolling out in the US. Users can upload a full-body image with 'good lighting' and no one else in the frame to see how clothing looks on them in real time. This AI tool uses a custom image generation model that accurately reflects how fabrics fold, stretch, and fit on diverse body types.
Custom price alerts with smarter tracking
Google's price alert tool lets users define their own price drop thresholds. A new slider-based setting called 'Only notify me below a specific price' enables alerts to be sent when a product drops to a set amount. Users can also choose to track specific colours or sizes. The Shopping Graph has products and prices from all across the web so it lets the user know when there is an offer that meets their criteria.
These updated alerts are now marked with a Gemini sparkle icon, this highlights the use of AI-driven product suggestions.
Visual inspiration for outfits or interior
Google is also previewing a new feature coming to AI Mode this fall. It will allow users to explore shoppable outfit and room ideas using vision match technology. For example: whether you are looking for style inspiration for a green flowy dress for a garden party or design ideas for a bedroom. By analysing images and queries, it will surface personalised product matches from over 50 billion items in Google's Shopping Graph.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google Pixel 10: Check out the launch event release date, time, how to watch live, and what to expect
Google Pixel 10 event date, and time in India, Dubai, and USA How to watch the Google Pixel 10 launch event live? Google Pixel 10 Launch Event Livestreaming: Date And Time In India, USA, Dubai, How To Watch Google Event Live, What To Expect ( Image credit : According to the Indian standard time, the event will begin at 10:30 PM | Credit: X/@pixeluibygoogle ) What to expect from the Google Pixel 10 launch event? Google is all set to unveil the much-awaited Pixel 10 at its annual Made by Google event. The launch is scheduled for August 20, 2025, and will be live-streamed globally. Tech enthusiasts worldwide are eager to see what upgrades and innovations the Pixel 10 brings, especially in areas like AI integration, camera performance, and Android 15 article covers everything you need to know about the launch—event time, date, expected features, and how to watch it live in India and other Tier 1 countries. Here's your complete guide to the Google Pixel 10 launch launch event for the Google Pixel 10 is approaching, and we will see the debut of four new Pixel phones: Google Pixel 10. For those who don't know, the Made by Google Event is scheduled for August 20, 2025., the Google Pixel 10 launch event will take place in the USA at 1:00 PM ET. For live streaming, the event will kick off in Dubai at 9:00 PM GST. The event will kick off at 10:30 PM, as per Indian standard wishing to view the live stream can do so via Google's official YouTube Google Pixel 10 launch event will take place, featuring four new models: the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, and Pixel 10 Pro FoldAs most devices in this series will feature a chassis similar to that of their predecessors, we are not expecting a design revolution. Nonetheless, the gadget will feature the Google Tensor G5 chip, ensuring a turbocharged performance in conjunction with high RAM and sufficient are also claims that the camera system in the base variant will be significantly reduced in capability, so that the Pro phones appear to be the heroes of the series. The base variant will feature a significant change: it will include a three-sensor setup, featuring a telephoto shooter.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru techie was mocked by interviewer: 'People like you won't make it to Google.' Her clapback has the internet's attention
A Bengaluru-based techie's job interview experience is striking a chord across the internet — and not just because of where she ended up. Arpita Das, a Software Engineer currently working at Google, took to X to share a bitter but ultimately satisfying story from her job hunt. In her post, she recalled being grilled by an interviewer from a mid-level startup during a system design round. He pushed her to estimate everything from CPU costs to infrastructure planning — practically everything except, as she joked, physically building the data centre. But what really stuck with her was what happened when she stumbled. According to Arpita, the interviewer smirked and said, 'This is why people like you won't make it to big companies like Google or Meta.' That sting didn't last long, though — today, she works at Google. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Technology MCA Data Science Design Thinking Finance Project Management Cybersecurity Others PGDM others Leadership Data Analytics CXO Healthcare Management Degree Product Management Data Science Public Policy Artificial Intelligence healthcare MBA Digital Marketing Operations Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details — Arpitaaa01 (@Arpitaaa01) by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why this MBA won't break the bank SRM Online Learn More Undo 'I'm not bragging,' she wrote. 'Just wondering why some folks gatekeep based on their own insecurities.' The post quickly gained traction, with people rallying behind her. One user cheekily asked where the interviewer works now. Arpita's reply? He's still at the same company. Internet reacts Others jumped in to share similar experiences and show support for Arpita. One user called her journey the best form of revenge, encouraging her to keep going strong. Another pointed out that when they conduct interviews, they focus on what they can learn from the other person, rather than trying to break them down. One particularly striking response came from someone who had also faced gender bias in the hiring process. She shared how a former interviewer doubted her ability to handle onsite work simply because she was a woman. Ironically, that interviewer was fired within a year and a half, while she went on to perform not just her own responsibilities, but his as well — and did a better job at it. Arpita's story isn't just a personal win — it's a reminder of how far kindness and humility can go in an industry where gatekeeping and egos still often get in the way. As per her X bio and LinkedIn, she is a graduate from VIT, with a in Computer Science. She joined Google just a couple of weeks back and shared a note on LinkedIn. Arpita Das shared that she has joined Google as an SDE II, where she's working on Gemini at Google DeepMind. She called it an incredible opportunity and is excited to be part of a team pushing the boundaries of AI, she said she's grateful to be learning from some of the best minds in the field.
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Is ChatGPT making us outsource thinking?
Back in 2008, The Atlantic sparked controversy with a provocative cover story: Is Google Making Us Stupid? In that 4,000-word essay, later expanded into a book, author Nicholas Carr suggested the answer was yes, arguing that technology such as search engines were worsening Americans' ability to think deeply and retain knowledge. At the core of Carr's concern was the idea that people no longer needed to remember or learn facts when they could instantly look them up online. While there might be some truth to this, search engines still require users to use critical thinking to interpret and contextualise the results. Fast-forward to today, and an even more profound technological shift is taking place. With the rise of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, internet users aren't just outsourcing memory – they may be outsourcing thinking itself. Generative AI tools don't just retrieve information; they can create, analyse and summarise it. This represents a fundamental shift: Arguably, generative AI is the first technology that could replace human thinking and creativity. That raises a critical question: Is ChatGPT making us stupid? As a professor of information systems who's been working with AI for more than two decades, I've watched this transformation firsthand. And as many people increasingly delegate cognitive tasks to AI, I think it's worth considering what exactly we're gaining and what we are at risk of losing. AI and the Dunning-Kruger effect Generative AI is changing how people access and process information. For many, it's replacing the need to sift through sources, compare viewpoints and wrestle with ambiguity. Instead, AI delivers clear, polished answers within seconds. While those results may or may not be accurate, they are undeniably efficient. This has already led to big changes in how we work and think. But this convenience may come at a cost. When people rely on AI to complete tasks and think for them, they may be weakening their ability to think critically, solve complex problems and engage deeply with information. Although research on this point is limited, passively consuming AI-generated content may discourage intellectual curiosity, reduce attention spans and create a dependency that limits long-term cognitive development. To better understand this risk, consider the Dunning-Kruger effect. This is the phenomenon in which people who are the least knowledgeable and competent tend to be the most confident in their abilities, because they don't know what they don't know. In contrast, more competent people tend to be less confident. This is often because they can recognise the complexities they have yet to master. This framework can be applied to generative AI use. Some users may rely heavily on tools such as ChatGPT to replace their cognitive effort, while others use it to enhance their capabilities. In the former case, they may mistakenly believe they understand a topic because they can repeat AI-generated content. In this way, AI can artificially inflate one's perceived intelligence while actually reducing cognitive effort. This creates a divide in how people use AI. Some remain stuck on the 'peak of Mount Stupid,' using AI as a substitute for creativity and thinking. Others use it to enhance their existing cognitive capabilities. In other words, what matters isn't whether a person uses generative AI, but how. If used uncritically, ChatGPT can lead to intellectual complacency. Users may accept its output without questioning assumptions, seeking alternative viewpoints or conducting deeper analysis. But when used as an aid, it can become a powerful tool for stimulating curiosity, generating ideas, clarifying complex topics and provoking intellectual dialogue. The difference between ChatGPT making us stupid or enhancing our capabilities rests in how we use it. Generative AI should be used to augment human intelligence, not replace it. That means using ChatGPT to support inquiry, not to shortcut it. It means treating AI responses as the beginning of thought, not the end. AI, thinking and the future of work The mass adoption of generative AI, led by the explosive rise of ChatGPT – it reached 100 million users within two months of its release – has, in my view, left internet users at a crossroads. One path leads to intellectual decline: a world where we let AI do the thinking for us. The other offers an opportunity: to expand our brainpower by working in tandem with AI, leveraging its power to enhance our own. It's often said that AI won't take your job, but someone using AI will. But it seems clear to me that people who use AI to replace their own cognitive abilities will be stuck at the peak of Mount Stupid. These AI users will be the easiest to replace. It's those who take the augmented approach to AI use who will reach the path of enlightenment, working together with AI to produce results that neither is capable of producing alone. This is where the future of work will eventually go. This essay started with the question of whether ChatGPT will make us stupid, but I'd like to end with a different question: How will we use ChatGPT to make us smarter? The answers to both questions depend not on the tool but on users. (The Conversation)
