Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act
MPs including Sir Iain Duncan Smith, Mark Francois and Stuart Anderson joined former soldiers as the Act was debated inside the House of Commons on Monday.
They marched to Parliament Square in Westminster, brandishing regiment flags and Union flags, and were flanked by a motorbike procession.
The debate comes after more than 165,000 people signed a petition calling for the Government to keep the Legacy Act, which was put in place in 2023 by the former Conservative government to halt all but the most serious allegations involving Troubles-related cases from being investigated any further.
The Labour Government announced it would repeal and replace the Northern Ireland (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 following criticism over immunity for soldiers by human rights groups.
Veterans and MPs alike said they feared this would open up soldiers to being prosecuted for acts and create a 'two-tier' justice system, in which IRA soldiers are given immunity but British troops are open to prosecution.
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said he feared it would dissuade people from joining the Armed Forces because they could be 'persecuted' further down the line.
He said: 'We all know we need more people in our Army, our Navy, our Air Force.
'Fundamentally, this is about us as a country, recognising that we live in a time of heightened threat…When that is happening, we will be strengthening our Armed Forces. The last thing we want to do is be going after them again for what they did decades ago. What message is that going to send to all the young people whom we want to join the Army in future?'
Sir Iain, the former leader of the Conservative Party who served in Northern Ireland, told the PA news agency that veterans were angry about the potential changes to the legislation.
He said: 'They feel they served their country. They did what they could do. They did their best. It was difficult, I can promise you now, I patrolled the streets.
'We see the pursuit of Northern Ireland veterans whose cases were heard previously and settled.
'They are the ones being pursued yet again in the courts under the arrangements and this is wrong.
'You don't see any of the IRA being pursued.
'Right now this is a very one-sided arrangement with the British soldiers who didn't ask to go there.'
Mr Francois, a shadow junior defence minister who backed the petition, added: 'What the Government is doing is wrong.
'They're not treating veterans who were there to uphold the law in Northern Ireland the same as they are treating alleged terrorists.
'There should be no moral equivalence between the veterans and the terrorists.'
Aldwin Wight, 72, a former special forces commanding officer who lives in Cornwall, said: 'These are people we've served with.
'They're very close to us, and seeing them caught up in this sort of endless doom loop of legislation is not good.
'We're in a fairly dark situation at the moment in security terms and therefore there are going to be incidents and you've got to have people who are willing to step forward and take on the hard tasks.
'And you don't want to do that as it were, with your solicitor in your pocket.
'You want to do it with a clear operational view of what you're doing.'
Denise Walker, 58, a veteran in the catering corps, came down from Glasgow to protest.
She said: 'This has led to our servicemen fearing that we're going to be up for prosecution again.
'At the end of the day, this Government sent us over there to do a job on their behalf.
'We followed their orders to the letter.'
David Holmes, a 64-year old veteran who runs the Rolling Thunder veteran motorbike group which protested, said: 'I spent years campaigning with this.
'We worked with the previous government. We found a good solution.
'People want closure, but actually to put 70 and 80-year-old soldiers in the dock for doing their job they were asked to do by the government on what is basically trumped up charges (is wrong).
'The only evidence is they were there at the time.'
Northern Ireland Secretary, Hilary Benn, said: 'The Legacy Act has been rejected in Northern Ireland and found by our domestic courts to be unlawful, not least because it would have offered immunity to terrorists. Any incoming government would have had to repeal unlawful legislation and it is simply wrong for anyone to suggest otherwise.
'This Government's commitment to our Operation Banner veterans is unshakeable. Their professionalism and sacrifice saved countless lives in Northern Ireland and across the United Kingdom, and ultimately helped bring about peace. The Legacy Act did nothing to help our veterans – it offered only false and undeliverable promises.
'I and the Defence Secretary are engaging with our veterans community and with all interested parties over future legislation, and we will ensure that there are far better protections in place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
CalMac pays out £460,000 to delayed ferry passengers
CalMac has paid out more than £460,000 in compensation to passengers because of delays and cancellations to its services since April last state-owned ferry operator paid £432,735 in compensation to travellers in 2024-25, with a further £33,792 paid out in May and June this marks a 37% rise on compensation payments in 2023-24, but a slight fall from 2022-23, when the operator paid £454,000 to delayed passengers, according to figures obtained by the Scottish Liberal Democrats.A Transport Scotland spokesperson said just over 5% of sailings on the network had been cancelled over the last 10 years. Lib Dem transport spokesman, Jamie Greene, accused the Scottish government of "letting the ferry network deteriorate".He pointed to reliability issues within the CalMac fleet and delays in new vessels going into service. The Glen Sannox ferry, built by Port Glasgow shipyard Ferguson Marine, was delivered years late and over sister ship, the Glen Rosa, will now not be delivered until early next year due to a series of the MV Caledonian Isles, which has not sailed since January last year, could be out of action for a further four months in order to undergo further Lib Dems have launched a consultation on the future of the country's ferry who represents the West Scotland region, said staff and passengers had been "let down" by the SNP's management of the networkHe added: "The SNP government took control of the company and broke their promise to deliver new ferries on time and on budget, which would have reduced the massive bills we are now seeing for compensation and repairs."All of this has created a grim new norm for my constituents along the west coast, from losing business to missing hospital appointments." Data obtained by the Lib Dems via freedom of information request showed more than 7,000 compensation claims had been lodged by passengers over a two-year period between April 2023 and April operator has paid out a total of £1.9m in compensation since the 2017-18 financial said it expected to welcome an additional 13 vessels to its fleet by said, when delays and cancellations did occur, staff worked to find alternative routes or sailings for passengers.A spokesperson added: "We're operating more sailings than ever before, with many of our vessels stretched to their limits."It is no secret that our fleet is ageing and that this can lead to higher levels of technical problems."This is why we are looking forward to welcoming 13 new vessels to the CalMac fleet by 2029, which will lead to less technical problems and cancellations, giving passengers a more reliable service." A Transport Scotland spokesperson said those new vessels would be able to "operate in more challenging sea and weather conditions".They added: "Between January 2015 and June 2025 CalMac have operated over 1.6 million sailings, with just 5.5% of scheduled sailings cancelled. Of those cancelled sailings, 25% were for technical reasons whilst more than double was due to the weather at 60%."In the coming year, the Scottish government intend to invest over £530m maintaining and enhancing our networks and strengthening resilience of services on the west coast and northern isles."This represents a near 23% increase on 24-25 funding levels."
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home secretary defends Palestine Action arrests: ‘More than a regular protest group'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has defended the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, stating it is more than a regular protest group. Ms Cooper argued that Palestine Action has engaged in an escalating campaign of violent criminality, distinct from lawful protest. She cited counterterrorism intelligence indicating the group met the criteria for proscription under the 2000 Terrorism Act, with disturbing information about future attacks. The Metropolitan Police reported over 700 arrests since Palestine Action was banned on 5 July, with 60 more people to be prosecuted for supporting the group. The first three charges in England and Wales under the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action have been confirmed, with more prosecutions anticipated.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Boris Johnson's ‘jet zero' dreams have failed to take off
For those flying south this summer, the prospect of 'green fuel' one day powering their planes down to the south of France or the Med may mean a little less guilt over their climate-destroying air travel. British factories pumping out climate-friendly aviation fuel have long been a pipe-dream for the aviation industry and some holidaymakers, and it seemed one step closer six years ago when British Airways announced plans for the UK's first factory to convert waste into jet fuel. The futuristic plant, to be built by fuels firm Velocys on a field near the Humber estuary, in north Lincolnshire, would see household rubbish destined for landfills turned into thousands of tonnes of green plane fuel, powering the airline into a sustainable future. Alex Cruz, then-chief executive of BA, said the fuel – known as sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) – would be a 'game-changer for aviation'. But six years after British Airways' Velocys announcement – and a year after the SAF plant should have gone into production – that dream seems as far away as ever. Velocys' Humber estuary site remains as an empty field – a recent image shows that the only structure on it is a portaloo. The failure of the plan highlights the difficulty green aviation has faced getting off the ground, made worse by a government push to force airlines to use more green fuels. On the back of promises for airlines to use SAF, in 2022, then-prime minister Boris Johnson announced a new policy – known as 'jet zero' – to enforce a minimum threshold of green fuel use. By 2050, he claimed, flying would be zero-carbon, adding: 'Sustainable fuels and fully electric planes will achieve guilt-free flying for years to come.' Under the policy, still in force, British airlines must this year fuel their planes with a minimum of 2pc SAF, ratcheting up to 10pc by 2030 and 22pc by 2040. That fuel should also be pumping out from a minimum of five new SAF plants, which, Johnson's policy promised, would be operating by now, creating jobs and helping make the UK 'a clean energy superpower'. Barely any of that has come to pass. For BA's partner Velocys – which is yet to sell any green jet fuel to any airline – it ran out of money last year and was taken over by a private consortium. Its leadership team says its plans are only delayed, but similar promises by other UK would-be SAF producers have also so far come to nothing. It means the only company making SAF in the UK is the Phillips66 refinery on Humberside – and its output is just 20,000 tonnes a year. That's about 0.2pc of the 11 million tonnes of aviation fuel Britain consumes annually. So how are UK airlines meeting their obligation to add 2pc SAF to their fuel tanks? Most of it is being imported, generating jobs not in the UK but mostly in Finland, the Netherlands, the US and Holland. That gap is set to worsen, says the Aviation Environment Federation. It points out that by 2030, the UK's SAF obligation will have soared to 10pc, or 1.2 million tonnes, of green fuel – all or most of which will be imported. 'While a number of plants are making progress, the expected amounts they will produce are insufficient to meet the mandate', it says. Those imports will not just dash the opportunity for more UK jobs, but also mean flight costs will take off, say experts. Simone Burgin, a biofuels analyst with Argus Media, said SAF is already far more expensive than conventional jet fuel. 'The European price for SAF stood at $2,280 (£1,681) per metric tonne on Aug 13 – more than three times the price of conventional jet fuel.' Those high costs are inherent to the way SAF is made – using vast amounts of heat at high pressure to break down waste cooking oil, animal fats, wood, plastics or other organic materials into the smaller molecules needed for jet fuel. But inflated pricing is adding to that, says the International Air Transport Association (IATA), which represents 340 global airlines. It says fuel suppliers are stoking their profit margins with 'compliance fees'. 'The fees being imposed on airlines are over twice the prevailing market price premium of SAF. In the EU, airlines face an additional $1.3bn in excess surcharges in 2025. The impact of the compliance fees in the UK is even higher.' It all suggests Britain's demand that airlines add SAF to their fuel is doing little to save the planet and nothing for UK jobs, while making aviation increasingly expensive. Greenhouse gas emissions from UK-based international aviation are surging – equating to 37 million tonnes in 2024 – more than double the 16 million tonnes seen in 1990, and set to grow even faster in the next two decades. The 300 million passengers who pass through UK airports annually is expected to hit up to 500 million by 2050, with 10 airports planning major expansions. And globally, aviation emits around a billion tonnes of CO2 and rising – so what difference can SAF really make? Airlines and aircraft manufacturers point out that it's still early days for SAF – and as manufacturing steps up, so prices and emissions may decline. But they too are worried by the lack of realism from a Government that is telling them to use ever more SAF, but doing little to help ensure homegrown supplies. Jonathon Counsell, sustainability director at IAG, which owns British Airways, said the current plans for boosting SAF output were too weak to meet UK and EU decarbonisation targets. Airlines want some of the taxes they pay to be deployed to support SAF production. 'SAF is a critical lever to get to net-zero, and to achieve this, the industry needs increased Government support, as mandates alone are not enough,' he said. 'Greater support is essential to bridge the cost gap between SAF and traditional jet fuel, alongside stronger incentives to accelerate production at the scale required to ensure a long-term, affordable supply.' The Department for Transport, which is steering the policy, points out that next year will see the introduction of its 'revenue certainty mechanism' under which companies that build SAF plants will get a guaranteed minimum price, funded by a levy on airlines. But that levy would add to costs in an industry with a slim profit margin of 3pc to 4pc – and so would go straight on to ticket prices. Tim Alderslade, the chief executive of Airlines UK, said global SAF supply had doubled last year to one million tonnes and was expected to double again this year. 'Like any brand-new industry, progress will be uneven, and there will be failures. There also remains much to do to ensure UK airlines have access to the growing volumes of 'advanced' SAF needed to meet the UK mandate.' Ryanair, Europe's largest airline, puts it more bluntly: 'SAF production needs to be incentivised by governments.' It said the environmental taxes it pays annually need to be reinvested to 'accelerate the decarbonisation of the sector'. A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'Not backing SAF is not an option – it is a core part of the global drive to decarbonise aviation. 'There are encouraging signs that the SAF mandate will be met, and we will continue to support the production and use of SAF as the technology matures.' A Velocys spokesman said the company was seeking to licence its technology to SAF producers worldwide to help them produce more fuel. He said the amount of money required for the Humber estuary plant was 'beyond investment appetite' and investors 'remained concerned about the pace of regulatory change' but that it hoped to bring the site to fruition in the 'near term'. For sunseekers hoping to cleanse their conscience with green fuel, a guilt-free future still seems some way off.
