Donald Trump's threats: ‘Taco' trade gives way to paradox
Donald Trump
reportedly showed lawmakers a letter firing
Federal Reserve
chairman,
Jerome Powell
, briefly dipping before regaining losses once the US president said a dismissal was 'unlikely'.
Was Trump really considering firing Powell or just floating a distraction?
[
Will Donald Trump fire Jerome Powell? 'I don't rule out anything. But it's unlikely. Unless …'
]
With the Fed chair's term ending in eight months and a dismissal likely to spark market mayhem, the smarter bet is on a bit of headline-chasing mischief that helped bump the
Jeffrey Epstein
scandal – which has riled Trump's Maga base – off the front pages.
It may also have been a warning shot to Powell's eventual successor: follow my lead and keep interest rates low or else.
READ MORE
Still, the point that Trump keeps returning to these extreme ideas – sacking Powell, imposing large
tariffs
and other headline-grabbing gambits – should give investors pause.
Markets have bought into the Taco (Trump Always Chickens Out) trade. However, the man who coined that moniker, Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong, now warns this leads to the Taco paradox: 'The less the market believes Trump's threats, the more likely they are to be true.'
That is, the risk is the Taco trade backfires – with markets' casual response to Trump's threats causing him to believe the sky will not fall when he actually does follow through with a reckless move.
It's a dizzying feedback loop, but the lesson is clear: in trying to predict Trump's moves, the market may be changing them, sometimes to its own peril.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
10 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Mission. The CIA in the 21st Century by Tim Weiner: Tale of an evolving agency
The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century Author : Tim Weiner ISBN-13 : 978-0008606596 Publisher : William Collins Guideline Price : £25 In a world increasingly controlled by the secret services, this recent history of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is probably a better indicator of future events than the words of politicians. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Tim Weiner illuminates the moral and legal grey zone of the United States's most famous clandestine organisation through his lifelong specialism in intelligence. The effectiveness of the CIA has yo-yoed over the last 25 years, falling under George Bush jnr and 9/11, and peaking under former president Barack Obama, whose decisiveness and perception surprised the 22,000 staff. Unfortunately, the hallmarks that made George W's eight years so fraught – the policy vacuum, blame culture and estrangement from reality – are all present again, as described in the prologue, Autocracy in America, written two months into the start of the current presidency. Newly appointed CIA director John Ratcliffe, from Texas, has 'promised to align the CIA with Trump's view of the world'. Loyalty tests ('Wasn't the 2020 election stolen?', for instance) filter candidates for top appointments; and the new posse seems willing to effectuate Donald J's dreams for Greenland, Canada and elsewhere. READ MORE As well as charting the 80-year old agency's highs (under 'beloved' Bush snr) and lows (with Richard Nixon, seeking rescue from Watergate), The Mission traces the expansion from the core work of espionage to political warfare, paramilitarism, training other agencies (Jordan and Iraq), and, most controversially, into running 'black sites' such as Guantánamo, 'enhanced interrogation techniques' (torture) and assassination without the justification of self-defence. In 2022, former presidentJoe Biden even outsourced negotiations with Russia 'to prevent a nuclear war' to his CIA director Bill Burns. A fascinating account informed by scores of interviews, The Mission traces the CIA's loss of direction after the cold war. 'How could it be great without its great enemy?' Espiocrats and the bizarre – the 'rampant' sex in desperate situations such as the Baghdad outstation – pervade the tale. Weiner and his wife, Kate Doyle (descended from Robert Emmett's brother Thomas) were in Galway in June, and although the country is not mentioned, Irish intelligence chiefs will, no doubt, read The Mission to help frame reactions if, as Weiner hypothesises, Trump makes the CIA go rogue again and carry out plans to 'rebuild the secret prisons, overthrow a sovereign nation, or assassinate his political enemies'. Neasa MacErlean is the author of Telling the Truth is Dangerous: A history of Robert Dudley Edwards
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump's global tariff agenda puts Ireland's pharmaceutical industry at serious risk
The whole world is in thrall to the whims of Donald Trump's tariff agenda, as it has been since the 47th president of the United States' swearing-in last January. We've learned a few uncomfortable truths along the way. Much of the early outcry from America's allies and trading partners surrounded the lack of economic logic to the imposition of tariffs – which are effectively a tax for Americans on foreign products, in theory making them less attractive to US consumers and heightening the allure of their own domestic suppliers. Critics said that the new regime would disrupt the world economy needlessly and perhaps bring about a global recession. That may well come to pass. The problem is that in this stand-off America has the greater wherewithal in terms of raw economic power. It holds the cards as Trump himself might say. And nations worldwide are beginning to fall into line, the EU just the latest after agreeing to a blanket 15% tariff on goods and services going forward. After President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump agreed the trade deal, the spin is that the pain of those tariffs is worth it in order to avoid a global trade war. Also, 15% is better than 30% or worse, is the thinking. Photo:The spin is that the pain of those tariffs is worth it in order to avoid a global trade war. Also, 15% is better than 30% or worse, is the thinking. Whether that represents capitulation in the face of bullyboy tactics, given that little or nothing has been asked of the US in return, is a separate conversation. Ireland's pharmaceutical industry Here in Ireland we have a bigger problem though, and that problem is the pharmaceutical industry. That industry contributes massively to the economy here via billions of euro in corporation tax contributions, with about 90 companies employing 50,000 people in highly-paid roles. A total 30,000 of those jobs are with American firms. Should foreign pharmaceutical concerns exit Ireland the impact on the country would be catastrophic. The industry globally had pleaded with Trump for it to be exempted from any tariff regime, ostensibly for altruistic reasons – that lifesaving medicines shouldn't be subject to capricious taxation. At an EU level, the industry asked that the bloc not apply reciprocal tariffs, one wish that has at least been granted. Pfizer is one of the massive American pharmaceutical companies holding bases in Ireland, in this case Cork. File picture: Dan Linehan Oddly enough, in Trump's world of permanent grievance where everyone has been making a sucker of the United States for decades, the outsize presence the US pharmaceutical industry holds in Ireland is one situation on which he indisputably has a legitimate point. Drug prices in the US can retail for as much as five times what an EU citizen would pay. Meanwhile, American pharma firms make a pretty penny avoiding American tax by basing themselves here. Trump's protectionist agenda demands that those jobs and companies should return home. The Government has been worrying about and planning for a worst-case scenario in terms of tariffs on pharmaceuticals for months. Reaction from the pharma companies But what of the pharma industry itself? The official line from the Irish Pharmaceutical Healthcare Association (IPHA), the industry's lobby group here, is that it is reviewing the announcements coming out of Washington as and when they happen 'as key implications for the pharmaceutical sector remain uncertain'. A stance it's hard to argue with given the whole world has grown used to the haphazard nature of the Trump administration's demands. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) notes that tariffs are 'a blunt instrument that will disrupt supply chains, impact on investment in research and development, and ultimately harm patient access to medicines on both sides of the Atlantic'. It added that if the goal is to rebalance trade and ensure a 'fairer distribution' of how pharmaceutical innovation is financed, then 'there are more effective means than tariffs that would help'. Impact on pharma in Ireland The IDA, the body with prime responsibility for attracting foreign investment to Irish shores, says of the pharma implications that it 'welcomes' the deal made between Europe and the US, arguing it provides 'much-needed certainty for Irish, European and American businesses who together represent the most integrated trading relationship in the world'. 'We are very much reliant (on the US market), there's no arguing with that,' says one industry insider. Last year a massive €44bn in pharmaceutical products were exported directly from Ireland to the US. 'But when you stand back €100bn was exported globally. So half went to America, but it's not like all business went there, though it is certainly the biggest partner,' says the source. That doesn't mean that those massive American companies holding bases here – MSD, Pfizer, ELI Lilly, Johnson and Johnson etc – are about to up sticks on the back of the new tariff regime. 'They are not going to leave today or tomorrow, no. But it could definitely impact future investment decisions,' the source says. One of the problems is that a great deal of uncertainty still surrounds the 15% tariff agreement, particularly with regard to pharma. One of the Eli Lilly production buildings at its state-of-the-art facility in Dunderrow, Kinsale, Co Cork. For starters, most people concerned thought that the pharmaceutical industry wasn't to be included in the deal. Then about two hours after the deal was agreed European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said it would be included, a point Trump appeared to back up. The following day the White House produced a 'fact sheet' describing how the new regime would work, and affirming the 15% rate for pharma. Except that the same sheet stated that the European Union would pay the tariff – which isn't how tariffs work. Then there is the Section 232 investigation which the US Department of Commerce initiated into the pharma industry in April – aiming to establish if how the pharmaceutical system worldwide currently functions impacts negatively on the US from a national security standpoint. Should the answer arrived at be a 'yes', then additional tariffs on pharma may well follow (such investigations typically take a minimum of six months to conclude, so we'll probably get an answer sometime towards the end of the year). 'Pharma plans in the long-term,' says Aidan Meagher, tax partner specialising in life sciences with consultants EY, noting that most pharma manufacturers will have been planning for this scenario for months and will have frontloaded stock into the American market, thus negating immediate impacts in the near term. He says that companies will be likely looking at 'dual sourcing' initiatives, supplying the American market from within the US itself and using Irish operations for its trade around the rest of the globe. 'Ireland needs to up its game' But Meagher says that it would be 'remiss' of Ireland, and the pharma industry here, to take a 'wait and see' approach, perhaps with the supposition that Trump's policies will last for the remaining three-and-a-half years of his term, and no longer. 'It is all about the next investment. A lot of these drugs only have patent protection for a certain life or longevity. Ireland needs to maintain investment and to incentivise the right kind of activity in terms of attracting that innovation,' he says. That means thinking outside the box in terms of tax credits for research and development, and improvements to infrastructure, particularly housing, Meagher says, areas in which we are notably lagging behind in terms of international competition. But he argues that the situation is far from a doomsday scenario. 'It's not as simple as that, it's a whole range of business factors that need to be considered – it's all about impacts for specific companies,' he says. 'It's not all necessarily doom and gloom. Companies have had plenty of time to consider this. And pharma companies are long-term thinkers. Ireland has had just two issues with the FDA (the US food and drug administration, responsible for approving new drugs) in its history. "The country has a strong reputation. These countries have invested significantly and Ireland is the owner of a lot of valuable intellectual property.' But it's certainly not a time to be complacent, Meagher argues. 'We have dropped down the competitiveness radar, and our competitors now aren't in the EU – they're in Switzerland, Singapore and the US itself. We need to be a top competitor for inward investment, and R&D and infrastructure will be critical. That is where Ireland needs to up its game.'
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Data credibility fears fuelled after Trump orders firing of labour official
Sharp downward revisions to jobs data on Friday, followed by Donald Trump 's sudden order to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics , stoked investor fears about the integrity of economic data and the Fed's ability to read the true state of the US economy. News of a surprise weakening in the US labour market last month jolted investors, while revisions to job figures for the past two months raised worries the US central bank may have been flying blind in recent months and may need to play catch-up with interest rate cuts, investors said. Fed governor Adriana Kugler's early resignation from her term on Friday also potentially shakes up what was already a fractious succession process for Fed leadership amid difficult relations with Mr Trump. The US president on Friday renewed his call for Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to resign. 'Powell should resign, just like Adriana Kugler, a Biden Appointee, resigned,' Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social. READ MORE 'Kugler's resignation allows the president to further shape the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] in his own image,' said Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 73,000 jobs in July after rising by a downwardly revised 14,000 in June, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its employment report on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls increasing by 110,000 jobs after rising by a previously reported 147,000 in June. The report comes two days after the US central bank left unchanged its benchmark interest rate and avoided signalling imminent rate cuts, dialling back market expectations for an easing at the next policy meeting in September. That changed dramatically on Friday, with odds for a 25 basis point cut in September jumping to about 81 per cent after the data from 38 per cent on Thursday, according to CME Group data. 'The Fed's job is becoming increasingly difficult based on the deterioration of the economic data,' said Matthew Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments. 'These revisions are massive and really are a game changer to the Fed's reaction function, and so I think this Fed meeting is one that they'd like to revise.' Mr Trump on Friday said, without evidence, that numbers contained in the July jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics were rigged. 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. He ordered that the commissioner of the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics Erika McEntarfer be fired after the data release. 'It's definitely a case of shooting the messenger,' said Dean Smith, chief strategist at FolioBeyond. 'Firing the head of BLS is not going to improve data collection and dissemination ... it's going to undermine confidence in the data going forward,' he said. Revisions for May and June came in well above the norm, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said. It gave no reason for the revised data but noted that 'monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors.' May's nonfarm payroll gain was slashed by 125,000, from 144,000 to just 19,000, while June's downward revision was by 133,000. In total, employment over the two months is now 258,000 lower than initially reported. 'It is painfully obvious that the US government has an improper model for payroll calculations,' said Michael Green, portfolio manager at Simplify Asset Management. 'If you don't have reliable data, you make bad policy.' Spencer Hakimian, founder of macro hedge fund Tolou Capital Management, said lay-offs across several government departments, part of Mr Trump's plans to reduce wasteful government spending, have prompted him to rely more heavily on alternative measures of economic strength than just government data, such as credit card data, and data from Truflation, an independent inflation index alternative to official government inflation measures. Mr Powell said in a press conference on Wednesday the labour market remained strong, and that the central bank was still in the early stages of grasping how Mr Trump's overhaul of import taxes and other policy shifts would play out for inflation, employment and economic growth. 'Had those figures been the initial prints a month or two ago it would have significantly changed the labour market narrative over the entire summer,' said Adam Hetts, global head of multi-asset and portfolio manager at Janus Henderson Investors, in a note. Treasury yields, which move inversely to bond prices, dropped on Friday, with benchmark 10-year yields down by a whopping 15 basis points to 4.22 per cent – their biggest daily drop since April. Two-year yields were down by about 25 basis points to 3.69 per cent, registering their biggest daily decline since August last year. Stocks declined too, also weighed on by Mr Trump's latest tariffs salvo. The benchmark S&P 500 index lost 1.6 per cent, bringing stocks to their lowest since early July. The deterioration in the labour picture comes amid steep US tariffs on large trade partners that – while not as high as feared earlier this year – are still largely expected to worsen inflation and slow economic activity. (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
