Joe Rogan Slams Kash Patel Over Epstein Files: ‘Everyone Knows It Doesn't Make Any Sense'
Joe Rogan isn't holding back about Kash Patel's past comments on the Epstein case a month after he guested on the podcast.
The 'Joe Rogan Experience' host slammed the FBI director alongside his latest guest, former CIA agent Mike Baker, on Friday's episode. Rogan explained that Patel's discussion about the Epstein files last month doesn't make 'any sense' to him.
More from TheWrap
'The Basement Yard' Host Joe Santagato Has His Sights Set on Stand-Up After 2nd Comedy Tour
Joe Rogan Slams Kash Patel Over Epstein Files: 'Everyone Knows It Doesn't Make Any Sense' | Video
Paramount-Skydance Merger Expected to Close Aug. 7
'Rick and Morty' Spinoff 'President Curtis' Set at Adult Swim
'The Epstein stuff is so crazy, because when Kash Patel was on here and he was like, 'There's no — there's nothing,' I was like, what are you talking about?' he recalled. 'Yeah, I didn't even know what to say.'
He later continued: 'People were like, why didn't you push back more? My thought was like, I'm just going to put this out there and let the Internet do its work because there's nothing I could — the guy's saying there's no tapes, there's no video. That doesn't make any sense. Everyone knows it doesn't any sense.'
Since Patel guested on the show, the DOJ and FBI released a memo that there was no substantial evidence regarding a client list created by the late, disgraced financier. The news of a lack of a list came months after Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News that she was in possession of a list of that very nature.
'It's sitting on my desk right now to review,' she said back in February. 'That's been a directive by President Trump.'
Patel was equally cagey about the list when Rogan asked him about it in June. The host also wondered if there was video of the island Epstein reportedly flew his clients to. 'Not of what you want,' he replied.
The FBI director also maintained his opinion that Epstein did commit suicide in prison — a detail that many conspiracy theorists combat. They point to a possibility that powerful people on this supposed client list had Epstein killed to keep him quiet.
The post Joe Rogan Slams Kash Patel Over Epstein Files: 'Everyone Knows It Doesn't Make Any Sense' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Trump Claims Epstein ‘Stole' Workers From Him
President Donald Trump said he cut ties with Jeffrey Epstein because Epstein repeatedly poached his employees—the first time he's cited that as a reason for their falling out as he seeks to distance himself from the convicted sex offender amid a persistent saga that's led to a break with Trump's base. President Donald Trump gestures as he meets British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for bilateral talks ... More at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 28, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. (Photo by) Getty Images Trump said 'for years, I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein' because 'he stole people that work for me,' the president told reporters Monday during his visit to Scotland. Previous reports have suggested Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein made advances towards another member's teenage daughter and that Epstein and Trump had a falling out when Trump outbid Epstein for a Palm Beach mansion in 2004. Trump gave the new reason he said Epstein became 'persona non grata' to him as the blowback surrounding the Justice Department's decision not to release additional documents related to its Epstein investigation has continued for a month, bringing renewed attention to Trump's own personal relationship with Epstein. Trump on Monday also repeated a claim he made last week that he never went to Epstein's island in the Caribbean, Little Saint James, telling reporters he was invited but 'turned it down' and claiming, without evidence, former President Bill Clinton went there dozens of times, despite Clinton denying previously he ever visited the island.
USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
What to know about First Amendment issues in Trump's lawsuit against Wall Street Journal
Trump filed the lawsuit on July 18, accusing WSJ of defamation. President Donald Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, filed in South Florida, raises potential First Amendment concerns regarding freedom of the press, speech and accountability. The Wall Street Journal reported July 17 about a leather-bound birthday book given to the late multi-millionaire investor and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003 for his 50th birthday, with letters from friends and family — and one of them bearing Trump's signature. The president's attorney in Miami promptly filed a federal lawsuit against the Journal, its publisher, its parent company, two executives and the two reporters who wrote the story. The suit is significant because it presents challenges to multiple First Amendment issues: defamation, freedom of press, freedom of speech and state laws that are meant to protect speech from costly lawsuits. The federal filing comes at a time of nationwide clamor to pressure the Trump administration to release documents related to Epstein's case, where online conspiracy theorists and even Democratic and Republican members of Congress alike have encouraged releasing more information. Here's what to know about the suit at a time when Trump has been scrutinized nationally for deflecting focus away from the Epstein matter: WSJ may SLAPP Trump's $10 billion lawsuit away Florida is one of 38 states with anti-SLAPP laws in place, which are meant to protect free speech. SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, a type of lawsuit intended to intimidate, silence, or punish critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense, even if the case lacks merit. SLAPPs are often used against individuals or organizations who speak out on matters of public interest, such as journalists, activists, or whistleblowers. Traditionally, whether anti-SLAPP state laws apply in federal court is a topic of controversy, but attorneys for the Journal could argue for Trump to pay its attorney fees using Florida's anti-SLAPP provision. But the complaint against the Journal, in which Trump is requesting strikingly high damages of $10 billion, would fall under Florida's anti-SLAPP law, said David Keating, the president of the Institute for Free Speech. A representative of the Wall Street Journal declined comment on the case, including questions of whether the newspaper would use the state anti-SLAPP law. A request for comment to Trump's attorney who filed the lawsuit, Alejandro Brito, is pending. The nitty-gritty in this Florida case This case was filed in the U.S. Southern District of Florida court by Trump's attorney in Miami, Alejandro Brito. He also filed a 2023 lawsuit against Trump's then-attorney Michael Cohen for $500 million, saying Cohen violated attorney-client relationship. Trump dropped the lawsuit months later. Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles will be presiding over Trump's lawsuit against the Journal. Gayles, who was the first openly gay Black man appointed as a federal judge, also oversaw Trump's case against Cohen. A potentially short-lived lawsuit? The Journal's case could have a similar fate to Cohen's – and end promptly in Trump's team potentially filing for dismissal. Cases involving the First Amendment have more complexity in proving whether defamation or libel are at play, said Lyrissa Lidsky, a First Amendment law professor at the University of Florida. Lidsky said Trump's litigious background demonstrates a history of using suits strategically against his critics. She said the Journal's main battle is demonstrating the steps reporters took in verifying the reliability of the sources they used in the story. "He knows that the filing of a defamation lawsuit could be a symbolic way to contest the truth that has been written about you, even if you never end up making it to trial," Lidsky said. The First Amendment protects the press to write and publish without fear of government retaliation, but defamation is not protected by the First Amendment. Defamation is the act of making a false statement about someone that harms their reputation. A person who claims defamation usually asks for financial damages from the person who defamed them. Public officials have a higher bar in libel cases under the U.S. Supreme Court's New York Times v. Sullivan case. They have to prove "actual malice," meaning a news organization knew the information was false and acted with reckless disregard for the truth. In many cases, journalists and media outlets are accused of defamation when it comes to news on high-profile court cases. Trump previously sued outlets like CNN, New York Times and the Washington Post for defamation over the past five years – and most of these resulted in dismissal. This reporting content is supported by a partnership with Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. USA Today Network-Florida First Amendment reporter Stephany Matat is based in Tallahassee, Fla. She can be reached at SMatat@ On X: @stephanymatat.
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump talks Gaza, Epstein island invite
It's Monday. How is everyone in the House enjoying the first real day of recess? Hopefully you're right behind them, Senate staffers! In today's issue: Trump says he refused Epstein invite Trade deadline week is here Timeline for Putin shortened US to set up food centers in Gaza Booker coaches Dems on social media Trump loves an AMA*: * AMA = Ask Me Anything President Trump met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer this morning in Scotland. Trump took questions from reporters, making news on a wide range of topics. Here are the highlights: What was top of mind for Trump?: ♦️ The humanitarian crisis in Gaza 🔷 The Jeffrey Epstein scandal 🔶 The war between Russia and Ukraine ♦ ️ First, I'll start with the Gaza situation: Trump announced the U.S. will work to set up 'food centers' in Gaza to help alleviate the starvation, describing the humanitarian crisis amid the Israel-Hamas war as 'real starvation.' Starmer chimed in, arguing Israel needs to be pressured to end the 'humanitarian catastrophe.' The U.K. prime minister called the starvation 'intolerable' and the images of malnourished Gazan children 'revolting.' 🔷 OK, now the Jeffrey Epstein scandal: Trump told reporters he turned down an offer to visit convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 's private island. In Trump's words: 'I never went to the island and [former president] Bill Clinton went there supposedly 28 times. I never went to the island but [former Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers, I hear, went there, he was the head of Harvard. And many other people that are very big people, nobody ever talks about them. I never had the privilege of going to his island and I did turn him down. But a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.' Trump also launched into a fiery tirade about reports detailing his alleged past relationship with Epstein. He pushed back on The Wall Street Journal's reporting detailing a message and drawing he allegedly contributed for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. 'I don't do drawings. I'm not a drawing person,' Trump said. 'I don't do drawings of women, that I can tell you.' 📹 Watch the clip And when asked whether he would consider a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, Trump said it would be 'inappropriate' to discuss a pardon for Epstein's accomplice 'right now.' 🔶 Trump shortened Putin's ceasefire deadline: Trump said he's no longer interested in simply talking with Russian President Vladimir Putin — he wants Moscow to quickly agree to a ceasefire in the Ukraine war. 'He talks — we have such nice conversations, such respectful and nice conversations, and then people die the following night,' Trump said. For reference, Trump announced earlier today he would shorten Russia's deadline to end its war with Ukraine to 'about 10 or 12 days from today.' 📹 Watch the Starmers welcome Trump Forget Infrastructure Week, it's a trade deadline week: After months of delays, President Trump 's long-awaited tariffs are scheduled to take effect at the end of this week. Quick primer: Trump announced tariffs on dozens of other countries on April 2. A week later, he lowered the tariff rates for 90 days. But as the 90-day deadline neared, he pushed the deadline to Aug. 1. In that time: Trump has cut several trade deals, including with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and the United Kingdom. What about China?: 'The U.S. and China announced in late May the contours of a deal to stave off a trade war between the two countries temporarily. The U.S. reduced its tariff rate from 145 percent to 30 percent, and China reduced its rate from 125 percent to 10 percent.' The Hill's Sarah Fortinsky pulled together a list of the trade deals Trump has made ahead of Friday's deadline and their specifics. ⏱️ ON CAPITOL HILL The boss doesn't want a shutdown, folks: 'Senate Republicans say President Trump has made it clear he doesn't want a government shutdown, and they're urging House GOP lawmakers to tone down their approach to the Sept. 30 funding deadline,' The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports. Remember how House Republicans jammed a partisan funding bill through Congress in March? Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) reluctantly voted for it to avoid a shutdown. He faced a lot of blowback after. But as Bolton points out, the political dynamics are *much* different now: 'Schumer is under heavy pressure to fight harder against Trump and his MAGA allies, heightening the chance of a shutdown if Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) tries to use the same playbook.' ➤ INTERESTING READ — CORY BOOKER, THE SOCIAL MEDIA Semafor's Burgess Everett writes today, 'How Cory Booker convinced his party to get extremely online.' Excerpt: 'He used to 'live on Twitter,' now X, but has soured on it. Lately Instagram is his 'happy place.' He believes children should not be on social media. On a political level, however, Booker looks at it as a professional obligation. He's invited platform executives to talk to Senate Democrats about how their algorithms work.' Lol: 'I wouldn't say he works me over; it's not like I'm under duress,' Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said. 'He'll call me up or text me and say, 'Hey, you did this on social. But if you do that, you know you'll get more engagement.'' ➤ NEW BILL ON THE HILL: A House GOP bill would rename the Kennedy Center for Trump, stripping former President John F. Kennedy 's name from the D.C. landmark. What would the new name be?: 'Trump Center for the Performing Arts.' Keep in mind: House Republicans on the Appropriations Committee approved an amendment earlier this month to rename the Kennedy Center's famed opera house the 'First Lady Melania Trump Opera House.' Vance is on a PR trip: Vice President Vance is on the road in his home state of Ohio today to promote President Trump 's 'big, beautiful' law. He's in Canton today to talk about the benefits of the bill. Keep in mind: Some of the controversial provisions in the bill, such as the cuts to Medicaid and food stamps, are a harder sell for some constituents. So, Vance is making the rounds to sell its benefits to the American people. FWIW: Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he thinks Vance would make a 'great nominee' for the Republican Party in 2028 if he decides to run. But keep in mind, Rubio was asked whether *he* would run. He sidestepped the question and pivoted to Vance. *Mentions 2028 and braces for hate mail*: I know we're only halfway through 2025, but there's already speculation building about the 2028 presidential race. Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) is traveling to New Hampshire next month, speaking at a 'Politics & Eggs' event hosted by the New England Council and the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College, which is known as a rite of passage for any presidential hopeful. 12:25 p.m.: Trump arrives in Aberdeen, Scotland. 🐝 INTERNET BUZZ 🍫 Celebrate: Today is National Milk Chocolate Day. 👋 AND FINALLY… To leave you with an incredible realization, did you know bugs can actually help your golf game? …Well, depending on how you define 'help.' 😉
