logo
Packed Pacs: how billionaires in the US are bankrolling Republicans at the state level

Packed Pacs: how billionaires in the US are bankrolling Republicans at the state level

Yahoo05-03-2025

Billionaires are increasingly bankrolling Republican candidates in state legislative races across the US to push a rightwing agenda and gain long-term hegemony.
The concerted effort shows that Donald Trump ally Elon Musk, currently throwing his weight behind a candidate for Wisconsin's state supreme court, is far from alone in seeking to build influence at the grassroots.
Related: Elon Musk's quest for power has a new target: Wisconsin's supreme court
According to a research document obtained by the Guardian, the contributions are not limited to federal elections but extend to state-level campaigns and aim to influence policy at the state level. Priorities include dismantling government, targeting 'culture war' issues – particularly abortion – and advancing school privatisation.
In Virginia, for example, donors Thomas Peterffy and Jeff Yass contributed significantly to Governor Glenn Youngkin's political action committee (Pac) Spirit of Virginia. Peterffy gave $3m while Yass added $2m. Spirit of Virginia spent more than $8m supporting Republican candidates in the 2023 Virginia general assembly elections.
Democratic state house leader Don Scott was quoted by the Axios website as saying that Republicans were relying on 'nameless, faceless, out-of-state mega-donors who have been pouring millions into the Commonwealth to push right-wing policies with no regard to what Virginians actually want'.
In Michigan, the DeVos family, including former education secretary Betsy DeVos, donated more than $4.4m to state Republican candidates and causes in 2024. More than $1m combined went to the Michigan house and senate Republican Pacs.
The DeVos family is known for promoting 'school-choice policies', specifically the expansion of charter schools. The Bridge Michigan news site reported 'no individual has shaped school policy as much as Betsy DeVos', contributing to Michigan having 'some of the nation's highest concentrations of charter schools run by for-profit companies'.
In Wisconsin, Diane Hendricks and Elizabeth Uihlein contributed a combined $7m to Republican legislative campaign committees in 2024. Hendricks has a long history of influencing Wisconsin politics, including pushing for 'right-to-work' legislation. The Uihleins have backed efforts to make it harder to receive unemployment benefits, oppose Medicaid expansion and create barriers to voting.
In Pennsylvania, Yass, who is the state's wealthiest billionaire, funded Pacs that reportedly spent nearly $4.4m to unseat Pennsylvania house Democrats. Yass-affiliated Pacs supported candidates who sponsored a near-total abortion ban. Since the 2018 cycle, these Pacs gave '$370,000 to bill sponsors and cosponsors' of such legislation.
Yass also prioritises spending public funds on private education and is Pennsylvania's biggest 'school choice' donor. He told Philadelphia Magazine last year that it would be a 'good thing' if public schools 'shut down', adding: 'There is no possible way a government monopoly could be a better approach to schools than market competition.'
Republicans in Pennsylvania pushed a constitutional amendment to ban abortion in 2021 and 2022 but without success.
In Arizona, Earl 'Ken' Kendrick (owner of the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team) and his family contributed more than $200,000 to Republican legislative candidates and Pacs during the 2024 cycle. The Kendrick family supported the retention of far-right, anti-choice judges on the state's supreme court. Legislative Republicans referred a proposal to the ballot to attempt to make these positions lifetime appointments.
Related: 'Partisan politics': how efforts to overturn the Johnson amendment could upend campaign finance
State legislative chambers, once regarded as sleepy backwaters, have become partisan battlegrounds in recent years as they have a huge impact on issues ranging from book banks to transgender rights to voting laws.
On an otherwise disastrous election night last November, Democrats held their own at state level, emerging with more legislative majorities than they managed in 2016 or 2020. In Pennsylvania, for example, they held off a red wave to defend a one-seat majority in the state house.
But that appears to be spurring on a small group of super-rich donors aiming to reshape state-level politics with a focus on issues including abortion, education and labour rights. Critics say such contributions raise questions about the role of money in politics and the influence of billionaires on the democratic process.
Bernie Sanders, an independent senator currently on a 'Fighting Oligarchy Tour' across the country, told last year's Democratic national convention in Chicago: 'Billionaires in both parties should not be able to buy elections, including primary elections. For the sake of our democracy we must overturn the disastrous Citizens United supreme court decision and move toward public funding of elections.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Baird Lowers Tesla (TSLA) to Hold, Citing Valuation and Robotaxi Risk
Baird Lowers Tesla (TSLA) to Hold, Citing Valuation and Robotaxi Risk

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Baird Lowers Tesla (TSLA) to Hold, Citing Valuation and Robotaxi Risk

Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the 10 best tech stocks to buy according to billionaires right now. On June 9, Ben Kallo of Robert W. Baird downgraded Tesla from Buy to Hold mainly on valuation concerns, while keeping his price target unchanged at $320. In his view, much of the recent upside in the stock, up over 20% since Q1 earnings, has already factored in the excitement around Tesla's planned robotaxi service and the prospect of a lower-cost electric vehicle. Hadrian / Kallo cited two key areas of concern behind the downgrade. First, he flagged elevated market expectations ahead of Tesla's upcoming robotaxi event, which he believes could be difficult to meet. Second, he raised questions around 'key-man' risk, pointing to ongoing uncertainty tied to CEO Elon Musk's central role in the company's strategic direction. While Musk has resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it may still take time for him to recoup investor confidence. While Kallo still considers Tesla a core long-term holding, he expressed skepticism about the near-term ramp-up of the robotaxi program, describing current projections as potentially too ambitious. He also noted that Elon Musk's political affiliations, particularly his perceived alignment with former President Trump, could introduce additional headline and regulatory risk moving forward. Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is an EV manufacturer and clean energy company known for its innovative approach to sustainable transportation and energy solutions. It designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, battery energy storage systems, solar products, and related services. It currently manufactures five different consumer vehicles: the Model 3, Y, S, X, and the Cybertruck. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Morgan Stanley Sees 8.8% EPS CAGR for Centene (NYSE:CNC), Initiates Coverage with $70 target.
Morgan Stanley Sees 8.8% EPS CAGR for Centene (NYSE:CNC), Initiates Coverage with $70 target.

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Morgan Stanley Sees 8.8% EPS CAGR for Centene (NYSE:CNC), Initiates Coverage with $70 target.

Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC) is one of the 8 cheap beginner stocks to buy right now. On June 9, Morgan Stanley analysts began covering Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC) with an Overweight rating and a $70 price target. The analysts emphasized Centene's status as a prominent managed care provider, particularly within the Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and Individual Exchange programs. Centene's robust footprint in the Medicaid market is a significant asset, the analysts pointed out, despite the program's difficulties, which include financing instability and state rate-member acuity mismatch. In order to support long-term growth, they also highlighted possible expansion prospects in the ICHRA market and D-SNP integration. Morgan Stanley also highlighted the possibility of ongoing cost reductions along with faster growth in better margin categories, which might eventually result in margin increase. The firm predicts that over the next three years, these elements combined with capital deployment will sustain an EPS compound annual growth rate of 8.8%. Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC), headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a managed care company that serves as a middleman between government-sponsored and privately insured healthcare programs. While we acknowledge the potential of CNC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

It's a common workplace problem: Things got heated during a disagreement. Now what?
It's a common workplace problem: Things got heated during a disagreement. Now what?

Business Insider

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

It's a common workplace problem: Things got heated during a disagreement. Now what?

Last week saw Elon Musk and President Donald Trump go from bromance to breakup. The scale and potential repercussions of the argument between the commander in chief and the world's richest man, who was until recently a special government employee and White House advisor, were much different than those of the average person. But, while the pair's relationship is not analogous to the everyday superior and subordinate, the conflict raises the familiar question: how do you navigate a tense relationship at work? Business Insider spoke with five experts in workplace culture and conflict resolution, from career coaches to behavioral neurologists, to get their best tips. "First things first: to the extent that you can, take a walk around the block, get a cup of coffee, draft an angry email — but don't send it, because you'll probably regret it the next day," Kathryn Landis, an executive coach and New York University professor of marketing and public relations, told Business Insider. Then, as soon as you've cooled down, set a time on the calender to talk face-to-face. Letting a workplace conflict fester is a common mistake, Marlo Lyons, a career coach, told BI. "That creates awkwardness, it creates distance, and it's never going to end well, so you just have to ask for a quick one-on-one," Lyons said. "It doesn't have to be a long, drawn-out conversation, but you really want to show that you respect the relationship by having that conversation sooner than later." Don't pretend there's not a problem Once you've started the conversation, it's important to avoid "the tendency to over-apologize because you're understandably anxious about your job," negotiation expert and senior fellow at Harvard Law School Robert Bordone told Business Insider. But, while you want to cool things off, you should still try to " manage up" and speak your mind about what's bothering you, each of the experts agreed. "The danger in just saying mea culpa is you might get out of the situation, but you're in something that's unhealthy — and from your boss's perspective, they don't even know how unhappy you are because you never told them," Bordone said. "Then you're setting up a longer-term bad pattern that doesn't serve you, the boss, or the organization's interest." Ryan Leak, an executive coach and the author of "How to Work With Complicated People: Strategies for Effective Collaboration with (Nearly) Anyone," suggested rehearsing a few phrases to overcome the tension. The first is practicing some intellectual humility and acknowledging out loud, "I could be wrong," Leak said. "When you subscribe to the 'I could be wrong' mantra, what you're saying is, 'Hey, I've got a story in my head that I fully believe, but I'm also going to make space for your story, because I realized that my story feels very true to me, but at the same time, it's only one side of story,'" Leak said. You want to strike a collaborative tone and "focus on the 'in-group' element," said behavioral neurologist Joel Salinas, because you're both on the same team. Bordone, the Harvard negotiation expert, and Salinas are coauthors of the book "Conflict Resilience: Negotiating Disagreement Without Giving Up or Giving In." Salinas added that it's also important to show that you're interested in learning from the experience to do better in the future and that you want to work on a resolution together. Leak suggested making that desire explicit with the phrase "I want us to have a thriving working relationship." "It's OK to be a little bit vulnerable and say, 'Hey, let's have this really awkward conversation that I've been ignoring for a very long time, because I do want to have a thriving working relationship with you. And so, how do we move forward with that?'" Leak said. From there, you can lay out what bothered you in the initial conflict and what you need from the relationship, Leak added. From there, let it go — or plan for your exit While the initial conversation may be challenging, the really difficult part comes next, said career coach Lyons. You've got to try to let it go. "You've got to start that conversation, but then you need to continue the relationship without harping on it," Lyons said. "You don't want to harp on it in every one-on-one. You're trying to reconnect with them, reconnect with the mission, reconnect with what the performance expectations are." Just because you've cleared the air doesn't mean this time there won't be tension in the future. So when you find yourself getting riled up again, try to take your emotions out of it and turn your boss's bad habits into a game. "If you know the other person is going to come back at you with some kind of dig or loaded comment, turn it into a game," Landis, the NYU professor, said. "Try to count how many digs it takes for her to say something nice. Make it a game and it becomes less personal." Of course, if it gets to that point, you should probably also brush up your résumé — and always stay networking, Landis added. Going scorched earth may feel good in the short term, but depending on your industry, you may need that person later, so think long-term when planning your exit, and try to keep your composure even if you find the differences irreconcilable. At the end of the day, remember conflicts are "very natural" and some disagreement is inevitable in any relationship, said Salinas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store