Pro-Duterte remarks falsely attributed to Philippine news anchor
It ascribes the quote to De Castro, a longtime anchor at Philippine broadcaster ABS-CBN and a former vice president of the country. The post includes a screenshot of De Castro during his nightly programme TV Patrol (archived link).
"Duterte is gone, and the drug problem is coming back. Crime is rising again. Ask yourself was he really the problem, or was he the only one brave enough to fix it?" the post goes on to say, before ending with a call to bring the 79-year-old former leader home.
Image
Screenshot of false Facebook post taken on March 25, 2025
Similar Facebook posts surfaced after Duterte's stunning arrest and swift transfer to the custody of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague to face charges linked to his anti-narcotics campaign (archived link).
Rights activists say tens of thousands of mostly poor men were killed in his government's crackdown, often without proof they were linked to drugs.
"Very well said, Kabayan Noli De Castro," read a comment in one of the circulating posts, using De Castro's nickname and indicating the user believed the remarks were his.
"You're right, sir Noli De Castro. He really is like a father to us. He's old, he doesn't deserve this type of stress anymore," another wrote.
But the veteran broadcaster never made the supposed statement.
ABS-CBN shared a post from De Castro's Instagram account on March 17, where he shared screenshots of the posts stamped with text that said "FAKE" (archived links here and here).
Image
Screenshot of Noli De Castro's Instagram post taken on March 26, 2025
The same post was also shared on De Castro's Facebook page (archived link).
A reverse image search found the photo in the post was taken from a segment of a March 14, 2025 broadcast of ABS-CBN's evening news programme TV Patrol (archived link).
At the 59:41-mark of the hour-long newscast, De Castro introduced the report and can be heard saying in Tagalog: "For the first time, the International Criminal Court released details about former president Rodrigo Duterte's charge of crime against humanity, which became the basis of his arrest."
Nowhere in the segment -- or in the entire newscast -- did he make the supposed remarks shared in the false posts.
Image
Screenshot comparison of the false post (left) and the March 14 TV Patrol segment (right)
AFP has debunked pro-Duterte misinformation flooding social media following the former president's arrest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
The possible countries that could host a Zelenskyy-Putin summit
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been pursuing direct talks with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin almost since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has always refused. But with a recent push from Donald Trump, the possibility of a meeting is closer than ever. The question now is not only when, but where? The International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Putin for the abduction of Ukrainian children limits the choice of location as he risks arrest in any of the court's 125 member states if he steps foot into their territory. Some of them are ready to make an exception though and have promised not to arrest Putin if he comes for a meeting which could put an end to the war against Ukraine. Switzerland is a possible option. The country's foreign minister said the country would be ready to host Putin for any possible peace talks despite the ICC arrest warrant. Despite its neutral status, Switzerland is a signatory to the Rome Statute that founded the court but Ignazio Cassis said that provided Putin was coming for peace purposes, the country could receive him. "This has to do with our diplomatic role, with international Geneva as (the European) headquarters of the United Nations," Cassis said. French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly supports the idea of Geneva as a potential location for the talks following a White House meeting with European leaders on Monday. Austrian Chancellor Christian Stocker offered his country - also an ICC signatory - as a potential venue, saying Vienna supported any initiative leading to a just and lasting peace that protects Ukrainian and European security interests. "As proud host of (the) OSCE and many other International Organisations we stand ready to offer our good services," he said in a post on X. A country in the Middle East could be a solid compromise location. In March, Saudi Arabia hosted a US delegation for the talks first with Ukrainian and then with Russian officials. Qatar and the UAE are possible options Euronews' correspondent in Doha, Aadel Hallem, says despite being a relatively small Gulf state, Qatar has a seat at the international table and is frequently called upon to be a go-to mediator in several international conflicts. Those mediation efforts include Russia and Ukraine, specifically when it comes to the return of Ukrainian children, forcefully deported to Russia. Even when it was caught in the crossfire between the US, Iran and Israel in June, where missiles were intercepted in its airspace, Qatar was still relied upon to broker peace and de-escalate tensions. In 2020 Qatar hosted historic talks between US officials and the Taliban, which led to the Doha Agreement and eventually paved the way for the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. More recently, Qatar continues to mediate talks between Israel and Hamas, which has led to several temporary ceasefires and delivered humanitarian aid into Gaza. Qatar believes mediation efforts are a core tenet of its foreign policy and a clear indicator of its soft power. Similar to Qatar, the United Arab Emirates has deliberately shaped its role as a diplomatic broker, a state able to move between rival powers while maintaining credibility with both, says Euronews correspondent in Dubai, Toby Gregory, adding that this strategy has extended directly to Russia's war in Ukraine. Earlier this year, Emirati officials helped arrange exchanges that brought home Ukrainian prisoners of war, along with children taken to Russia. It was a reminder that the Emirates can act where others have limited reach. At the same time, Abu Dhabi has preserved its dialogue with Moscow. Earlier this month, President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan travelled to Russia for talks with Vladimir Putin, a meeting that highlighted the trust both sides place in the relationship. The only meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin Since Zelenskyy became president of Ukraine in 2019, his direct communications with Putin have been limited as Russia had already been occupying Ukrainian territory in the east and in Crimea. The two presidents have had only two phone calls and a single face-to-face meeting, all in 2019. Zelenskyy and Putin met for the first and only time in Paris, during a Normandy Format Summit, in the presence of the leaders of Germany and France. Behind closed doors, the two reportedly discussed issues that still remain relevant now, albeit on an even bigger scale; a prisoner exchange and ceasefire in eastern Ukraine. In the spring of 2021, as Russia started massing troops near Ukraine's borders ahead of its full-scale invasion, Zelenskyy offered to meet with Putin "anywhere in Donbas," the eastern region in Ukraine which Russia has been trying to fully occupy and annex for over a decade now. Putin declined, denying that Russia was a part of the conflict and instead invited Zelenskyy to Moscow. The meeting never happened. As Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, Zelenskyy again called for talks. Putin again rejected any dialogue on a presidential level, sending only a low-level delegation for the first attempted negotiations close to the Belarus border. Later, after the revelations of Russian forces' mass atrocities in Bucha - Ukraine's government says 458 civilians were killed - and other settlements around Ukraine's capital, Kyiv hardened its stance on communications with the Kremlin. Following Donald Trump's return to the White House, Ukraine's president renewed his push for direct talks with Moscow, now with the support of the US administration. In May, Zelenskyy made a surprise announcement that he was willing to meet Putin in Türkiye. Ukraine's president even travelled to Türkiye, but Putin didn't appear, instead sending a low-level delegation again. Actively trying to mediate between Kyiv and Moscow, Donald Trump has insisted that the meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin must take place. But the format remains unclear. One possibility is they will initially be bilateral, between Zelenskyy and Putin, and then include Trump later. That format could allow Trump to maintain his position of peacemaker in the case the meeting doesn't bring any tangible results. According to US media, Trump intends to leave Russia and Ukraine to organise a meeting between their leaders without playing a direct role for the time being, according to administration officials familiar with the situation, taking a step back from the negotiations to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine. But Trump reportedly told advisers that he does intend to host a trilateral meeting with the two leaders, but only after they have met first.
Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
Social media sites accused of pushing suicide-related content to teens
Social media platforms continue to push teenagers toward content about suicide, self-harm, and 'intense depression,' a new report has found. The UK-based Molly Rose Foundation created TikTok and Instagram accounts posing as a 15-year-old girl who had previously engaged with this kind of content. Nearly every video that came up on the two platforms were related to suicide, depression, or self-harm, the group said. TikTok's For You Page, for example, regularly recommended videos that 'explicitly promoted and glorified suicide' and recommended specific suicide methods, the report said. On Instagram, the fake users were most likely to see this kind of content on Reels, the platform's short-form video feature. 'Harmful algorithms continue to bombard teenagers with shocking levels of harmful content, and on the most popular platforms for young people this can happen at an industrial scale,' said Andy Burrows, the Molly Rose Foundation's chief executive. The tests were run in the weeks before the UK Online Safety Act's child safety rules came into effect in late July. Among other measures, the law requires social media sites to 'rapidly remove illegal suicide and self-harm content' and 'proactive protect users' from illegal content on these topics. But the foundation said the latest findings indicate little has changed since 2017, when 14-year-old Molly Russell died by suicide in the UK. A coroner ruled that exposure to harmful content online contributed in a 'more than minimal way' to her death. The group called on the UK communications regulator Ofcom to take additional steps to protect young people from harmful content online, and for the government to strengthen the Online Safety Act. A TikTok spokesperson disputed the findings, telling Euronews Next they 'don't reflect the real experience of people on our platform, which the report admits'. The spokesperson said TikTok proactively removes 99 per cent of content that violates its standards. Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Last year, Instagram rolled out 'Teen Accounts' with built-in safety features, such as restrictions on teens' access to sensitive content. If you are contemplating suicide and need to talk, please reach out to Befrienders Worldwide, an international organisation with helplines in 32 countries. Visit to find the telephone number for your location.
Local France
15 hours ago
- Local France
OPINION: France's 'block everything' movement is reminiscent of the rise of the Yellow Vests
How France loves to caricature itself. In July the Prime Minister asked the country to work harder to pay off its debts. Response? The threat of a nationwide sulk - a sulk, not a strike - from September 10th when everyone is urged to stay at home. No work; no shopping; no school; no fun. In its more extreme form, the Bloquons-tout (block everything) movement calls for an open-ended, popular lie-in starting on the second Wednesday in September. READ ALSO : What do we know about the call to 'blockade France' on September 10th?✎ 'We are shutting up shop. We refuse to produce, to consume, to run, to serve…when the country is brought to a halt, the real power will appear. It is in our hands.' Advertisement The first demand of the more radical 'Bloquers' is to be paid by the state for staying in bed indefinitely. Others, less ambitious, seem to envisage only a one-day protest. The movement began in May in a Far Right, anti-EU, anti-Macron, pro-Russian account on social media. It has since spread to elements of the extreme Left. The online popularity of the idea has exploded since the Prime Minister François Bayrou called last month for radical action to reduce France's runaway budget deficit. He has proposed €44 billion in spending cuts and increased taxes in 2026 but most of the popular anger is directed at his vague plan to abolish two out of the eleven French bank holidays . The block-the-country movement is reminiscent of the rise of the Gilets Jaunes (yellow vests), the anti-Macron and anti-politics revolt which began in rural and outer suburban France in 2018. Like the GJs, the protest has incubated on social media. Like the GJs, the blockers reject all leaders, political parties and trades unions. Some of those involved appear to be ex- Gilets Jaunes . Other former GJs are dubious or hostile, suspecting that the 'blockers' are not as non-political as they claim. Unlike the yellow-vests, the movement does not favour public demonstrations or blockages of streets and roundabouts. It believes that the people should arise by doing nothing. Apart from being paid to stay at home, the demands of the movement are vague. Like the yellow vests, they want all political decisions to be made by online referenda. They want higher pay for all. Some of the block-all accounts reject big business, echoing the anarcho-Left. Other accounts attack the EU and migration, copying the Far Right. The only political party to support the September 10th movement so far is Jean-Luc Mélenchon's Far Left La France Insoumise (France Unbowed). Mélenchon has rarely seen a protest that he does not like. He refuses to accept that this one began on the Far Right which he claims to abhor. Marine Le Pen's Far Right Rassemblement National is observing events cautiously. Some of her party barons say that the anti-state rhetoric of the movement is more reminiscent of the Far Left, than the nationalist right. They will no doubt attempt to hijack the protests if they are successful - just as they tried and failed to hijack the Gilets Jaunes . Advertisement How seriously should the sleep-in revolt be taken? It seems to have all the weaknesses of the yellow vests and none of the strengths. Because the Gilets Jaunes mistrusted leaders, they squandered their initial success. An apolitical rural-suburban movement was eventually taken over by the urban, alternative Left. The yellow vests' initial power came from the fact that they were a social club as well as a social movement. Blocking roundabouts while grilling sausages with the neighbours or with strangers was fun. The 'blockers' plan to stage a revolution at home is unlikely to generate the same camaraderie or excitement. Initial soundings by the French security services, reported in the French media, suggest that the movement's numbers are growing fast but they are not exploding as the online support for the Gilets Jaunes did in the summer of 2018. Pro-blockage sites are popping up on Facebook, TikTok, X, and Instagram. Support is now in the tens of thousands but not the hundreds of thousands, as it was for the yellow vests. And yet… Advertisement Many mainstream commentators, myself included, were doubtful about the strength and staying power of the Gilets Jaunes in 2018. They lasted, in diminished form, until the Covid pandemic of early 2020. For a few weeks in 2018-9, they threatened to overturn French politics-as-usual. Whatever the success or failure of the mass sleep-in from September 10th, the rise of the blockers is a reminder that conventional French public life has become dangerously fragile. Prime Minister Bayrou is a man who believes that he understands the public mood. He appealed to the people over the heads of politicians and parties last month to wake up to the dangers of an accumulated debt of 114 percent of GDP. The most notable response so far has been an appeal by the people to the people to stay in bed.
