logo
Opinion: Let's not worsen L.A.'s inequality when recovering from the fires

Opinion: Let's not worsen L.A.'s inequality when recovering from the fires

Yahoo28-01-2025
Among the countless homes lost in the Palisades fire, one was my mother's. For most of my life, that place was my refuge where I would return to feel safe. Now, like so many others, it bears the fire's uniform mark — a charred chimney in a sea of blue sky.
For the last four years, I worked on climate change in the Biden administration, focusing on mitigating climate risk so that communities would not have to face the indescribable grief Los Angeles is feeling. I traveled to more than 30 countries to invest U.S. funds in climate solutions and bolster community resilience. I saw firsthand how climate disasters land hardest on the most vulnerable, deepening the gulf between the haves and the have-nots. That is happening in the wake of the L.A. fires, too.
In Pacific Palisades, some schools and the public library burned while a real estate billionaire hired private firefighters to save his property. Across town in Altadena, the fires leveled one of L.A.'s most diverse communities, where Black and Latino families thrived after the end of redlining. California's recovery plan should aim to shrink such inequalities, not deepen them.
Read more: Column: Recovery will be tempered by hard decisions and, if we aren't careful, inequality
It would be a second calamity if the fires intensified the housing crisis. My Palisades neighbors and friends in Altadena, many of them already isolated from their support networks, are fearful that private equity firms will buy up and consolidate housing lots. State and city officials should work hard to prevent this, including by issuing moratoriums on foreclosures for fire-affected properties and, where people still have homes to return to but are experiencing financial hardship from the fires, barring evictions and rent hikes.
If handled carefully, this disaster can actually help solve the housing crisis by spurring the production of affordable units. The state should expand efforts such as the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, which promotes private investment in low-income rental housing. Apartment building lots should not be repurposed for single-family development, which would only worsen the homelessness crisis.
Our leaders must also protect the workers who will make recovery possible, including by providing resources and protections for 'second responders' — the largely immigrant day laborers who perform hazardous and essential debris removal and cleanup. One of the hard lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and from the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2001, is that health impacts play out in the months and years after the initial disaster from exposure to pollution and other dangers. Los Angeles County should therefore provide not only basic protective resources, like masks and breathing equipment, but also longer-term services such as Spanish language translation and training in disaster response and mental health counseling.
L.A. must also shore up serious weaknesses in air quality monitoring. Our local network of air monitors effectively measures air particulates and ozone, but it was not built for modern megafires and does not comprehensively measure the air toxins they produce. Parents are now unsure whether it is safe for kids to play outside or go back to schools near the burn zones. The state, which regulates air quality here through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, should update its monitoring to generate better data on pollutants that emanate from urban fires. It should also support innovative technologies to link real-time air monitoring to popular apps for tracking the fires and the weather, such as Watch Duty and AirCare.
Read more: Column: Los Angeles is a climate disaster. The fires will change nothing
Additionally, state and federal officials should reform our approach to insurance and risk management. In my travels around the world, I've seen data-driven insurance approaches that are vastly superior to the drawn-out claims processes that burden and frustrate victims in the U.S. Policies that use 'parametrics,' for example, trigger automatic payments in response to events such as a fire or flood. This provides better access to insurance and makes reimbursement faster.
Local and federal government should also support private sector-led solutions to expand insurance markets, mitigate risk and lower costs. California can use some of its significant resources to invest public money in early warning technology, rapid response capabilities and, when it comes time to rebuild, home hardening through the use of fire-resistant materials and design strategies. Funding those solutions now will return dividends in avoiding megafires later. The state should also dramatically expand support for community development financial institutions — lenders that support investment in underserved neighborhoods by providing patient, flexible credit to small businesses and entrepreneurs. I've seen the federal government use this type of investment to deploy billions through financial intermediaries around the world, supporting job creation and projects in developing economies.
Finally, the county, which contains both the Palisades and Altadena, should shepherd their respective recoveries together. By offering joint hearings, and opportunities for information sharing and collaboration, our leaders can maximize equality, efficiency and learning across Los Angeles.
My family was drawn to the Palisades in the 1970s because of its striking proximity to nature, wedged between the Pacific Coast and the Santa Monica Mountains chaparral. It inspires awe — and, when the Santa Anas come, fright. We settled here not in spite of that quality, but because of how its beauty and power render us more human.
Maybe that spirit helped create the community that took care of my family, and me, for decades. It still gives me hope that we can rebuild — and in doing so create opportunities for everyone.
Jake Levine most recently served as special assistant to the president and senior director for climate and energy at the National Security Council.
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These are the voters who should scare Democrats most
These are the voters who should scare Democrats most

Boston Globe

time12 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

These are the voters who should scare Democrats most

In dozens of interviews, working-class swing voters said they had misgivings about the Trump presidency -- but many also said they were just as skeptical of the Democratic Party. Five years ago, Raymond Teachey voted, as usual, for the Democratic presidential nominee. But by last fall, Teachey, an aircraft mechanic from Bucks County, Pennsylvania, was rethinking his political allegiances. To him, the Democratic Party seemed increasingly focused on issues of identity at the expense of more tangible day-to-day concerns, such as public safety or the economy. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Some of them turned their back on their base,' Teachey, 54, said. Advertisement Working-class voters like Teachey, who supported Biden in 2020 but either backed Trump last year or, as Teachey did, skipped the 2024 presidential election, help explain why Democrats lost pivotal swing counties like Bucks and vividly illustrate how the traditional Democratic coalition has eroded in the Trump era. Now, Democrats hope to bring these voters back into the fold for the midterm elections in 2026, betting on a backlash to Trump and his party's far-reaching moves to slash the social safety net. Sarah Smarty, a home health aide and an author who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 but flipped to President Trump last year, in Mifflin County, Penn. HANNAH YOON/NYT But in interviews with nearly 30 predominantly working-class voters who supported Biden in 2020 before defecting or struggling deeply with their choices last year, many had a stinging message for the Democratic Party. Advertisement Just because we have misgivings about Trump, they say, it doesn't mean we like you. 'I think I'm done with the Democrats,' said Desmond Smith, 24, a deli worker from Smithdale, Mississippi, and a Black man who said he backed Biden in 2020 at the height of the racial justice protests. But last year, disillusioned by what he saw as the party's overemphasis on identity politics and concerned about illegal immigration, he voted for Trump. Asked how Democrats could win him back, he said, 'Fight for Americans instead of fighting for everybody else.' An in-depth postelection study from Pew Research Center suggests that about 5% of Biden's voters in 2020 switched to Trump in 2024, while roughly 15% of those voters stayed home last year. Trump retained more of his 2020 voters than Democrats did, a crucial factor in winning the election. Polling on the current attitudes of those Biden defectors is limited, but it is clear the Democratic brand, broadly, continues to struggle. A Wall Street Journal poll released in late July found that the party's image was at its lowest point in more than three decades, with just 33% of voters saying they held a favorable view of Democrats. 'They're doing nothing to move their own numbers because they don't have an economic message,' said John Anzalone, a veteran Democratic pollster who worked on that survey. 'They think that this is about Trump's numbers getting worse,' he added. 'They need to worry about their numbers.' Certainly, anger with Trump, an energized Democratic base and the headwinds a president's party typically confronts in midterm elections could help propel Democrats to victory next year. Advertisement Democrats have had some recruitment success (and luck), and they see growing openings to argue that Trump's domestic agenda helps the wealthy at the expense of the working class, a message they are already beginning to push in advertising. There is no top-of-the-ticket national Democrat to defend or avoid, while Republicans have virtually no room to distance themselves from Trump's least popular ideas. But interviews with the voters whom Democrats are most desperate to reclaim also suggest that the party's challenges could extend well beyond next year's races. Here are five takeaways from those conversations. Biden's disastrous reelection bid fueled a trust issue. It hasn't gone away. Bielski, 35, an executive chef at a private club, said he had typically voted for Democrats until last year's presidential election, when he backed Trump. Democratic leaders had insisted that the plainly frail Biden was vigorous enough to run, and they had encouraged skeptical voters to fall in line. Instantly after he dropped out, they urged Democrats to unite behind the candidacy of Kamala Harris, who was then the vice president. That did not sit right with Bielski, who said he was already distrustful of Democrats who had pushed pandemic-era lockdowns. Harris, he said, 'wasn't someone that I got to vote for in a primary.' 'It almost seemed wrong,' continued Bielski, who lives in Phoenix. 'It was kind of like, OK, the same people that were just running the country are now telling us that this is the person that we should vote for.' After Harris became the Democratic nominee, some voters interpreted her meandering answers in televised interviews as an unwillingness to be straight with them. By contrast, while Trump gave outlandish and rambling public remarks riddled with conspiracy theories and lies, some said they had gotten the general sense that he wanted to tackle the cost of living and curb illegal immigration. Advertisement 'It was difficult to understand what her point of view was,' said Bruce Gamble, 67, a retired substation maintainer for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. Gamble said he voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump last year. Trump 'was able to communicate better to me,' he added, while Harris 'felt like she was talking over my head, so I didn't quite trust her.' Raymond Teachey, an aircraft mechanic in Bristol, Penn. HANNAH YOON/NYT Worried about paying the bills, they saw Democrats as too focused on cultural issues. Many in this multiracial group of voters said they thought Democrats had gone too far in promoting transgender rights or in emphasizing matters of racial identity. But often, they were more bothered by their perception that those discussions had come at the expense of addressing economic anxieties. 'It seemed like they were more concerned with DEI and LGBTQ issues and really just things that didn't pertain to me or concern me at all,' said Kendall Wood, 32, a truck driver from Henrico County, Virginia. He said he voted for Trump last year after backing Biden in 2020. 'They weren't concerned with, really, kitchen-table issues.' A poll from The New York Times and Ipsos conducted this year found that many Americans did not believe that the Democratic Party was focused on the economic issues that mattered most to them. 'Maybe talk about real-world problems,' said Maya Garcia, 23, a restaurant server from the San Fernando Valley in California. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and did not vote for president last year. Democrats talk 'a lot about us emotionally, but what are we going to do financially?' Advertisement She added, 'I understand that you want, you know, equal rights and things like that. But I feel like we need to talk more about the economics.' But in a warning sign for Republicans, a recent CNN poll found that a growing share of Americans -- 63% -- felt as if Trump had not paid enough attention to the country's most important problems. Marlon Flores, a technician at a car dealership in Houston. DESIREE RIOS/NYT 'America First' gained new resonance amid wars abroad. As wars raged in the Middle East and Ukraine, some working-class voters thought the Biden administration cared more about events abroad than about the problems in their communities. 'They were funding in other countries, while we do not have the money to fund ourselves,' said Smarty, 33, a home health aide and an author. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024, adding that she viewed Trump as a man of action. 'I would really like to see more jobs,' she said. 'I would like to see them take good care of people who are homeless in our area.' Bielski said that against the backdrop of overseas turmoil, Trump's 'America First' message resonated. But these days, he does not think Trump is living up to that mantra. 'We're getting into more stuff abroad and not really focusing on economics here,' he said. 'It doesn't seem like he's holding true to anything that he's promised.' Flores, 22, a technician at a car dealership, said the foreign policy emphasis -- and a sense that life was tough regardless of the party in power -- helped explain why he skipped last year's election as well as the 2020 presidential race. Advertisement 'No matter how many times have we gone red, or even blue, the blue-collar workers' have seen little progress, Flores said. President Trump at the White House on Aug. 11. Alex Brandon/Associated Press They worry about illegal immigration. But some think Trump's crackdowns are going too far. These voters often said they agreed with Trump on the need to stem the flow of illegal immigration and strengthen border security. But some worried about the administration's crackdown, which has resulted in sweeping raids, children being separated from their parents, the deportation of American citizens and a growing sense of fear in immigrant communities. Several people interviewed said they knew people who had been personally affected. Smarty, for instance, said her friend's husband, who had lived in the United States for 25 years, had suddenly been deported to Mexico. Her friend is 'going through some health problems, and they have kids, and that's really hard on their family,' Smarty said. 'I don't really feel that's exactly right.' They're not done with every Democrat. But they're tired of the old guard. Many of the voters interviewed said they remained open to supporting Democrats -- or at least the younger ones. 'Stop being friggin' old,' said Cinnamon Boffa, 57, from Langhorne, Pennsylvania. As she recalled, she supported Biden in 2020 but voted only downballot last year, lamenting that 'our choices suck.' Teachey thought there was still room for seasoned politicians, but in many cases, it was time to get 'the boomers out of there.' He is increasingly inclined to support Democrats next year to check unfettered Republican power. 'They're totally far right,' he said of the GOP. 'Honestly, I don't identify with any party.' This article originally appeared in

Meritage Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results; New Products & Innovation Cycle Ahead
Meritage Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results; New Products & Innovation Cycle Ahead

Business Upturn

timean hour ago

  • Business Upturn

Meritage Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results; New Products & Innovation Cycle Ahead

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich., Aug. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Meritage Hospitality Group Inc. (OTCQX: MHGU), one of the nation's premier franchise operators, today reported financial results for the second quarter ended June 29, 2025. Second Quarter 2025 Highlights Sales were $163.5 million compared to $172.4 million for the same period last year. Earnings from Operations were $3.0 million compared to $6.7 million for the same period last year. Net Earnings were $0.335 million compared to $3.0 million for the same period last year. Consolidated EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) was $7.5 million compared to $12.5 million for the same period last year. 'Our second quarter results reflect broader industry dynamics, including shifts in consumer behavior and intensified promotional activity across QSR. While mindful of the macroeconomic environment, we are energized by recent Wendy's leadership changes and fully aligned behind a strategic roadmap focused on knowing our customers better and reaching them more effectively, reducing programming complexity and increasing focus and strong collaboration. These initiatives are designed to unlock greater agility and long-term profitable growth for the brand,' stated Robert E. Schermer, Jr., the Company's CEO. Morning Belle Morning Belle, the Company's proprietary daytime-only concept, serving Breakfast, Brunch and Lunch, reported a same store sales increase of +16.9% in the second quarter as compared to last year. The strong sales growth was driven by seasonal menu introductions, new beverage line up, core-product innovations and higher guest frequency. Six-Month 2025 Highlights Sales for the six months were $318.1 million compared to sales of $335.2 million for the same period last year. Earnings (Loss) from Operations were $(0.7) million compared to $10.6 million for the same period last year. Net Earnings (Loss) were to $(4.0) million compared to $4.6 million for the same period last year. Consolidated EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure) was $9.7 million compared to $22.4 million for the same period last year. Meritage continues to strive for best-in-class operations through a performance-based culture committed to operational excellence, strategic acquisitions, and real estate development. The Company continues to explore strategic opportunities to maximize shareholder value and provide liquidity. About the Company Meritage Hospitality Group is one of the nation's premier restaurant operators, currently with 381 restaurants in operation located in Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. Meritage is headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, operating with a workforce of approximately 12,000 employees. As of June 29, 2025, the Company had fully diluted weighted average common shares outstanding of 6,694,304. The Company's current and publicly available information pursuant to amended SEC Rule 15c2-11 and FINRA Rule 6432 can be found at under the stock symbol MHGU/Disclosures or the Company's website, SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT Certain information in this news release, particularly information regarding future economic performance and finances, and plans, expectations and objectives of management, constitutes forward-looking statements. Factors set forth in our Safe Harbor Statement, in addition to other possible factors not listed, could affect the Company's actual results and cause such results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Please review the Company's Safe Harbor Statement at . CONTACT:Robert E. Schermer, Jr., CEOMeritage Hospitality Group Inc. 616-776-2600 ext. 1012

Sonya Massey shooting prompts Illinois law requiring disclosure of police recruits' backgrounds
Sonya Massey shooting prompts Illinois law requiring disclosure of police recruits' backgrounds

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Sonya Massey shooting prompts Illinois law requiring disclosure of police recruits' backgrounds

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) — Illinois law now requires that prospective police officers approve the release of personal background records in response to last summer's shooting of Sonya Massey, an unarmed Black woman, in her home by a sheriff's deputy who had responded to her call for help. Gov. JB Pritzker on Tuesday signed the legislation, which requires disclosure of everything from job performance reports to nonpublic settlement agreements. It resulted from indiscretions that came to light in the background of Sean Grayson, the ex-sheriff's deputy charged with first-degree murder in the case. Pritzker, surrounded by Massey's family in the state Capitol, said the first-in-the-nation law should serve as an example for other states as he let Massey's 'spirit guide us to action.' 'Our justice system needs to be built on trust,' the Democrat said. 'Communities should be able to trust that when they call the police to their home, the responding officer will be well-trained and without a history of bias or misconduct, and police officers should be able to trust that they are serving alongside responsible and capable individuals.' The legislation was sponsored by Sen. Doris Turner, a Springfield Democrat and friend of the Masseys, and Chicago Democratic Rep. Kam Buckner, who noted that Thursday marks the 117th anniversary of the three-day Race Riot in Springfield that led to the founding a year later of the NAACP. Who is Sonya Massey? Massey, 36, was a single mother of two teenagers who had a strong religious faith and struggled with mental health issues. In the early morning of July 6, 2024, she called 911 to report a suspected prowler outside her home in the capital city of Springfield, 201 miles (343 kilometers) southwest of Chicago. Grayson and another deputy searched but found no one. Inside Massey's house, confusion over a pot of hot water Massey picked up and her curious response to Grayson — 'I rebuke you in the name of Jesus' — which the deputy said he took to mean she wanted to kill him, prompted him to fire on Massey, hitting her right below the eye. What prompted the legislation? The 31-year-old Grayson was 14 months into his career as a Sangamon County Sheriff's deputy when he answered Massey's call. His arrest two weeks later prompted an examination of his record, which showed several trouble spots. In his early 20s, he was convicted of driving under the influence twice within a year, the first of which got him kicked out of the Army. He had four law enforcement jobs — mostly part-time — in six years. One past employer noted that he was sloppy in handling evidence and called him a braggart. Others said he was impulsive. What does the law require? Those seeking policing jobs must sign a waiver allowing past employers to release unredacted background materials, including job performance reports, physical and psychological fitness-for-duty reports, civil and criminal court records, and, even otherwise nonpublic documents such as nondisclosure or separation agreements. 'It isn't punitive to any police officer. The same kind of commonsense legislation needs to be done nationwide,' James Wilburn, Massey's father, said. 'People should not be able to go from department to department and their records not follow them.' The hiring agency may see the contents of documents sealed by court order by getting a judge's approval, and court action is available to compel a former employer to hand over records. 'Several departments need to pick up their game and implement new procedures, but what's listed here (in the law) is what should be minimally done in a background check,' said Kenny Winslow, executive director of the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police, who helped negotiate the proposal. Would the law have prevented Grayson's hiring? Ironically, no. Most of what was revealed about Grayson after his arrest was known to Sangamon County Sheriff Jack Campbell, who was forced to retire early because of the incident. Campbell was aware of Grayson's shortcomings and, as a result, made him repeat the state's 16-week police training course. Even an incident that didn't surface until six weeks after the shooting — a dash-cam video of Grayson, working as a deputy in a nearby county, ignoring an order to halt a high-speed chase and then hitting a deer with his squad car — would not have disqualified him, Campbell said at the time. 'We can't decide who they do or don't hire, but what we can do is put some parameters in place so that the information will be there and the right decision can be made,' Buckner said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store