UK firms lose taste for US investment: Deloitte survey
Deloitte's survey of chief financial officers at major British firms showed a net balance of +2 per cent of respondents saw the US as an attractive place to invest, down from +59 per cent in late 2024 - shortly before President Donald Trump took office.
The report tallied with official US data last month that showed inward foreign direct investment fell sharply in early 2025, a drop that coincided with high business uncertainty over Trump's tariff plans.
By contrast, Deloitte said British company executives warmed to their own market, with the balance for the UK rising to +13 per cent from -12 per cent - ranking top with India for investment attractiveness.
The US remained more attractive than the rest of developed Europe or China, both of which had negative readings in Deloitte's survey.
'These results reveal a shift in sentiment with the UK now viewed as a leading global investment destination,' said Richard Houston, senior partner and chief executive of Deloitte UK.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'This renewed confidence, coupled with a rise in risk appetite, is welcome and underscores the considerable investment potential the UK offers.'
In 2023, Britain was the fourth-biggest direct investor into the United States by ultimate beneficial owner, with a position of US$636 billion, according to official US data.
The Deloitte survey showed British executives reported an uptick in business confidence compared with the previous survey published in April. While still subdued, the optimism index ticked up to -11 per cent from -14 per cent in the previous quarter.
British business surveys generally point to weak economic growth - a problem for finance minister Rachel Reeves, who is likely to raise taxes again at the next budget, according to market expectations.
Deloitte polled 66 chief financial officers and executives between June 16 and June 29, including 37 listed companies with a combined market value of £386 billion. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
UK builders find support in Labour's plan to upgrade roads and railways
[LONDON] British infrastructure firms stand to benefit from the Labour government's spending plans for roads, railways and energy projects, with strong order books expected to feed into improving outlooks during the upcoming earnings season. Companies including Balfour Beatty, Costain Group, Morgan Sindall Group and Kier Group are lined up to win orders after Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves announced £113 billion (S$196.4 billion) of funding for public infrastructure across the UK last month. That includes £39 billion to build affordable homes, £14 billion for the Sizewell C nuclear project in Suffolk and £15 billion for new transport infrastructure across the north and midlands. 'The general pitch will be quite healthy,' Investec Bank analyst Aynsley Lammin said. He highlighted that an array of energy, water and housing contracts is already in the works, while the commitments made in Reeves' spending review will brighten the outlook and provide visibility on a steady order pipeline. An improvement would be welcome. UK commercial building activity has been in contraction territory since January, according to S&P Global's overall construction PMI. The confidence level edged up to 48.8 in June, marking the slowest decline in construction output this year and reversing the downward trend. A reading below 50 indicates a reduction in activity. 'It might be too early for upgrades, but the risk is definitely on the upside,' Lammin said. 'At the very least it will be a strong underpinning, with expectations that margins and volumes will accelerate from next year.' Order books for listed UK infrastructure firms are at or near record levels already, according to Deutsche Numis analyst Jonathan Coubrough. While government spending pledges tend to take several years to convert into construction activity, secured projects like Sizewell C can have a faster impact, Coubrough said. He expects the nuclear project to contribute to solid order book growth in the upcoming earnings season, particularly for Balfour Beatty, which was awarded contracts worth as much as £400 million a year until 2030. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up High-speed rail project HS2 and BP and Equinor ASA's joint venture Net Zero Teeside Power – a gas-fired power station with carbon capture – will also support profit gains over this year and the next for Balfour Beatty, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Sonia Baldeira wrote in a note. The London-based firm is the 'clear market leader in energy and power markets,' and should see the fastest growth among its peers this year as power firms increase their grid investments, Coubrough said. He expects Morgan Sindall, Kier and Costain to benefit from upgrades to the UK's water infrastructure. Costain in particular is set to be a major beneficiary of AMP8, a regulatory overhaul of the UK water industry that aims to modernise infrastructure and address environmental challenges, according to Investec's Lammin. The company is working to deliver 260 kilometres of new pipelines to enhance drought resilience in eastern England, and recently entered an agreement with United Utilities Group to upgrade water and wastewater treatment sites as part of a £3 billion project that will last until 2030. Morgan Sindall is 'exceptionally well positioned' to deliver on the government's affordable housing commitments, Lammin said. It already raised its outlook for 2025 last month, with its construction division set to outperform revenue and profit expectations. Kier, which specialises in road, prison and hospital infrastructure, lifted its medium-term operating profit margin goal, showing confidence in its pipeline. Kier's ongoing turnaround is 'delivering solid results,' with a record £11 billion of orders in the fiscal first half supporting its move toward growth after a period focused on paring debts, BI's Iwona Hovenko said. Still, delays in planning approval, difficulties in securing funding and inflationary pressures might complicate the delivery of such projects and the steady earnings growth that is expected to come with them. 'The administrative process of planning and getting these things funded takes time and usually longer than everybody hopes for,' Lammin said. The biggest obstacle is engineering capability and human resources, according to Coubrough, particularly for complex projects such as power grid upgrades and tunnel projects. The shortage of skilled workers can in turn increase construction costs, worsening funding challenges. Another headwind, more short-term and unpredictable, is the macro backdrop, Lammin said, referring to the bond market's nervous reaction to the recent speculation about a potential departure of Reeves as Chancellor. The sharp market moves brought to the fore the fragility of Britain's economic position, as the government attempts to balance ambitious spending – in infrastructure and beyond – with fiscal discipline. Bond and equity markets recovered some of their losses after Prime Minister Keir Starmer quashed the speculation, giving Reeves his full backing. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
How Europe got stuck between Xi's China and Trump's America
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Responding to US tariffs, China limited global exports of rare earth magnets. European firms are also affected. BRUSSELS – It once looked to many as if US President Donald Trump could be a reason for Europe and China to bring their economies closer. His planned tariffs did little to distinguish the European Union (EU), a longtime ally of the United States, from China, the principal challenger to American primacy. It has not turned out that way. Instead, the EU finds itself in a geopolitical chokehold between the world's two largest economies. In Brussels, officials are trying to secure a rough trade deal with their American counterparts before Mr Trump hits the bloc with high, across-the-board tariffs that could clobber the bloc's economy. At the same time, EU policymakers are trying to prod their counterparts in Beijing to stop supporting Russia, to stop helping Chinese industry with so much state money and to slow the flow of cheap goods into the EU. But at a moment of upheaval in the global trading system, the bloc also needs to keep its relationship with China, the world's leading manufacturing superpower, on a relatively stable footing. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Construction starts on Cross Island Line Phase 2; 6 MRT stations in S'pore's west ready by 2032 Singapore New SkillsFuture requirements by April 2026 to mandate regular training for adult educators Singapore MPs should not ask questions to 'clock numbers'; focus should be improving S'poreans' lives: Seah Kian Peng Singapore Sequencing and standards: Indranee on role of Leader of the House Asia Australian Erin Patterson found guilty of all counts in mushroom murders case Singapore askST Jobs: Facing intrusive demands from your employer? Here's what you can do Singapore NUS College draws 10,000 applications for 400 places, showing strong liberal arts interest Singapore Life After... blazing biomedical research trail in S'pore: Renowned scientist breaks new ground at 59 Leaders from the EU are scheduled to be in Beijing for a summit in late July, plans for which have been in flux. Hopes for the gathering are low. Even as China pushes the idea that Mr Trump's hostility to multilateral trade is prodding Europe into its arms, Europe's problems with China are only growing. 'There is no China card for Europe,' said Ms Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at the Council on Foreign Relations. Tensions were on full display last week , when Mr Wang Yi, China's foreign minister, visited Brussels for meetings in the run-up to the summit. China portrayed the tone as productive and dismissed the notion that the two sides had conflicts. EU officials stressed lingering pain points, including trade imbalances. The EU recently moved to curb government spending on medical devices from China, arguing that Chinese government agencies had been treating European companies unfairly and that it was necessary to level the playing field. China announced on July 6 that it would retaliate . Yet the EU remains in a delicate dance with China. Economic ties between the two economies are extensive. Many European countries remain heavily dependent on China for industrial materials. European exports to China remain substantial, especially from Germany, which has long had close trade ties with China. But Europe's exports have been dwindling, even as Chinese imports into the bloc have been surging. As cheap products from the fast fashion retailers Shein and Temu flood into European markets, policymakers have been working to tighten restrictions on such imports. European leaders regularly complain that China's state-controlled banks subsidise the country's manufacturers so heavily that European companies cannot compete. Nor are Europe's complaints unique to trade. European Union officials are angry about China's support for Russia during the war in Ukraine, providing a market for Russian fuel and other products that has blunted the bite of European sanctions. The EU's aim cannot be to cut ties with China, according to the Danish foreign minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen. 'It is about engaging on a more equal footing and being more transactional in our approach,' he said, speaking at a briefing with reporters on July 4. As the US upends the global trading system in a bid to shrink its trade deficit, raise revenue and re-shore domestic manufacturing, the EU finds itself in a lonely place. It is a bloc of 27 nations that together make the world's third-largest economy. The EU was devised to promote commerce across borders and remains a powerful defender of free trade. Europe wants to 'show to the world that free trade with a large number of countries is possible on a rules-based foundation,' Ms Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union's executive branch, said at a news conference in June. The EU has already deepened its trading relationships with like-minded countries like Switzerland and Canada. Ms von der Leyen suggested that it could go a step further. It could pursue a new collaboration between the bloc and a trading group of 11 countries that includes Japan, Vietnam and Australia, but that notably does not include the US or China. Yet even as Ms von der Leyen tries to go on the offensive, EU officials have spent months on a far more defensive footing. That is because even as the EU takes issue with the policies coming out of the US and China, it is also being battered by — and torn between — the two. No matter the outcome of its trade talks with the Trump administration, the EU is expected to end up with higher tariffs on its exports to the US than it faced at the start of 2025. American officials have said repeatedly that 10 percent across-the-board levies are not negotiable. Officials are also likely to be compelled to make concessions to secure an agreement. Those include a possible commitment to taking a tougher stance toward China. The EU agrees with Mr Trump that China has pursued unfair trading practices. Yet the bloc can push China only so far, given how intertwined the economies are. China has recently offered the EU a damaging reminder of that reality. In response to US tariffs, China limited global exports of rare earth magnets, which are critical to producing a range of goods from cars and drones to factory robots and missiles. Because China dominates rare earth production, it can inflict serious pain on its trading partners with such limitations. European policymakers initially hoped that China's restrictions would mainly affect American companies. But European firms have also faced long delays in getting China to approve its purchases of rare earths. The slowdown is caused not only by logistical kinks as China works through a queue of applications. Instead, it appears to be tied to a longer-standing trade flashpoint between Europe and China. The Chinese government has for years required that foreign companies share or transfer technology to their Chinese partners as a condition for entering the China market. Recently, European carmakers and other companies have found themselves far behind their Chinese competitors, which have led the development of electric cars, solar panels and other technologies. Given that, EU officials have been pressing Chinese companies to transfer technology as part of the price of admission to the European market. The EU has also joined the US in restricting the shipment to China of equipment to make the fastest semiconductors, which have military as well as civilian applications. That has annoyed Chinese officials. China's minister of commerce, Wang Wentao, called for Europe to cancel controls on high-tech exports to China as part of discussions on a resumption of rare earth supplies. 'Minister Wang Wentao expressed the hope that the EU will meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote the compliant trade of high-tech products to China,' the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement in June. At the Beijing summit this month, European officials are likely to keep pushing Chinese officials for more consistent access to rare earths. Mr Jens Eskelund, the president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, said the chamber also wants the meetings to focus on trying to persuade Chinese officials on the need for more transparent and predictable regulations and to address how hard it has become for foreign companies to do business in China. But the outlook for meaningful changes, or anything that draws Europe and China closer, is dim. The tone coming from Europe is not positive. Ms von der Leyen, in a speech at the Group of 7 meeting in Canada in June, said China was engaged in a cycle of 'dominance, dependency and blackmail.' NYTIMES
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Stocks slip in Asia on US tariff confusion, oil skids
SYDNEY: Stock markets slipped in Asia on Monday (Jul 7) amid confusion as United States officials flagged a delay on tariffs but failed to provide much detail on the change, while oil prices slid as OPEC+ opened the supply spigots more than expected. The US is close to finalising several trade agreements in the coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by Jul 9, President Donald Trump said on Sunday, with the higher rates to take effect on Aug 1. "President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug 1, you will boomerang back to your Apr 2 tariff level," US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN. Trump in April announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate on most countries and higher "reciprocal" rates ranging up to 50 per cent, with an original deadline of this Wednesday. However, Trump also said levies could range in value from "maybe 60 per cent or 70 per cent", and threatened an extra 10 per cent on countries aligning themselves with the "Anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India and China. With very few actual trade deals done, analysts had always suspected the date would be pushed out, though it was still not clear if the new deadline applied to all trading partners or just some. "This renewed escalation in trade tensions comes at a time when major trade partners, including the European Union, India and Japan, are believed to be at crucial stages of bilateral negotiations," analysts at ANZ said in a note. "If reciprocal tariffs are implemented in their original form or even expanded, we believe it will intensify downside risks to US growth and increase upside risks to inflation." Investors have grown somewhat used to the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, and the initial market reaction was cautious. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both eased 0.3 per cent. EUROSTOXX 50 futures eased 0.1 per cent, while FTSE futures fell 0.2 per cent and DAX futures held steady. Japan's Nikkei lost 0.5 per cent, while South Korean stocks went flat. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan eased 0.6 per cent, as Chinese blue chips dropped 0.5 per cent. DOLLAR MIXED Safe-haven bonds were better bid, with 10-year Treasury yields down almost 2 basis points at 4.326 per cent. Major currencies were mixed as the dollar index nudged up to 97.071. The euro held at US$1.1771, just off last week's top of US$1.1830, while the dollar was a fraction firmer at ¥144.76. The dollar has been undermined by investor concerns about Trump's often chaotic tariff policy and what that might do to economic growth and inflation. The same worries have kept the Federal Reserve from cutting rates, and minutes of its last meeting should offer more colour on when the majority of members might resume easing. It is a relatively quiet week for Fed speakers with only two district presidents on the docket, while economic data is also sparse. The Reserve Bank of Australia is widely expected to cut its rates by a quarter point to 3.60 per cent at a meeting on Tuesday, the third easing this cycle, and markets imply an eventual destination for rates of 2.85 per cent or 3.10 per cent. New Zealand's central bank meets on Wednesday and is likely to hold rates at 3.25 per cent, having already slashed by 225 basis points over the past year. In commodity markets, gold slipped 0.3 per cent to US$3,324 an ounce, though it did gain almost 2 per cent last week as the dollar fell. Oil prices slid anew after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and their allies, a group known as OPEC+, agreed on Saturday to raise production by a larger-than-expected 548,000 barrels per day in August. The group also warned that it could hike by a similar amount in September, leaving analysts with the impression it was trying to squeeze lower margin producers and particularly those pulling oil from US shale. "We see OPEC+ targeting Brent oil futures around US$60 to US$65 per barrel as a result," said Vivek Dhar, an analyst at CBA. "This would challenge the economics of US shale oil supply growth and prevent non-OPEC+ supply growth from taking market share in coming years."
