Where is ‘Weapons' filmed? Behind the filming locations of 2025's best horror.
Weapons starts off on one such gloomy night in Newport, more specifically at 2.17 am in the night when 17 elementary schoolers step out of their house, their arms stretched out, transfixed by an invisible power of sorts.
What happens next is a town crumbling into chaos. The school turn into a hunting ground for the missing children's teacher (Julia Garner). The liquor store attracts all sorts of eerie visitors. And a particular gas station hosts a blood-oozing, eye-popping altercation that is crowd-pleasing shlock at its finest.
The burning question is: what happened to those children at 2.17 am? Once you know the answers, the question remains: is Maybrook, Pennsylvania real?
Where did they film Weapons?
It turns out that Maybrook is actually Atlanta, Georgia. Cregger's brief to production designer Tom Hammock was to create 'a small New Eastern town'.
For inspiration, Hammock studied the communities outside cities like Philadelphia, Cleveland and Cincinnati.
The production designer, who worked on Ti West's stylish gonzo horror X and the ultra-maximalist Godzilla x Kong films, stuck closer to reality with this one. '[Zach] wanted everything to appear as normal as possible. He wanted the audience to buy into this town as being the most normal place in the world.'
Principal photography began in May 2024 in Atlanta, wrapping in July. But filming in midsummer in Georgia is a sweaty affair, especially on soundstages without air-conditioning. To combat the heat, dozens of yards of tubing were installed to supply A/C.
Where is the real Maybrook Elementary school?
Maybrook's local elementary turns into a disturbing sight after the mass disappearance. While classes resume, the school is shrouded in memorial flowers, photographs, and banners to commemorate 'the Maybrook 17'.
This school from Weapons is actually Brockett Elementary in Tucker, a city in Georgia a few miles outside Atlanta. The school's mascot, a friendly-looking bobcat giving a thumbs up, looks reassuring after the gory chaos of Weapons.
On the busiest days of filming, the production would be home to more than 170 children. Child labour coordinators were enlisted to keep the kids engaged when not filming.
Now, coming to that gas station scene…
While the trailers and promos of Weapons were deliberately ominous, the film didn't pull back from teasing that shockingly entertaining gas station scene. The one with a bloodied Benedict Wong running in a fit of unhinged frenzy and pinning down Julia Garner.
They filmed that sequence in unnerving daylight at a BP gas station in Covington, Georgia. The Weapons crew filmed there for three days, utilising both the filling stations and the adjacent To Go convenience store. Hopefully, those blood stains on the forecourt got hosed down.
Who stars in Weapons?
Julia Garner, the Ozark actress who was last seen as Silver Surfer in Fantastic Four: First Steps, leads the cast as Justine, the troubled teacher of the class that went missing.
The cast also includes other MCU veterans like Thanos actor Josh Brolin and Benedict Wong who played the sorcerer Wong in Doctor Strange. Brolin stars as a grieving father driven to the brink of desperation while Wong plays the principal of Justine's school.
Austin Abrams (Wolfs, Euphoria) stars as a homeless junkie who is chased by an adulterous short-tempered cop played by Alden Ehrenreich (Solo: A Star Wars Story, Fair Play). Newcomer Cary Christopher also shines as Alex, the only student in the class who doesn't disappear.
Where can I watch Weapons?
It's in cinemas worldwide now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Bianca Censori flashes huge smile in tiny outfit on date with Kanye West
Bianca Censori looked uncharacteristically smiley as she stepped out for a family dinner with husband Kanye West yesterday. The Australian model, 30, has attracted media attention on multiple occasions since marrying the 48-year-old rapper in a private ceremony in 2022. Once an architectural designer for his brand, Yeezy, she's now synonymous with revealing outfits, having exposed some serious skin on both red carpets and during casual outings with her other half. Typically, while Bianca wears very little on her body, she always has a stoic expression plastered across her face, seldom smiling, even for paparazzi at major A-list events. But when grabbing food with Ye in Los Angeles, California, on Thursday, she couldn't have appeared happier. Whether breaking character was due to the company she was keeping or something else, we'll never know, but we're sure some good food helped with her mood, as the A-list lovebirds dined at Denny's. Along with showcasing her pearly whites, however, Bianca also displayed her lean physique, opting to go braless in a tiny ensemble. She wore a super low-cut, baby blue cami top with spaghetti straps, teamed with a pair of tight-fitting micro shorts. Bianca also wore her raven locks in a natural, straight style in a hairdo that has seen her likened to Ye's ex-wife and mother of his children, Kim Kardashian, in the past. In contrast, during their outing, the Gold Digger hitmaker was, as usual, fully clothed, sporting a black tracksuit and a stern expression. It's believed the couple were grabbing a bite to eat after a screening of the hit new horror mystery flick Weapons, which stars Julia Garner and Josh Brolin. Bianca and Ye appeared content in one another's company during their day date, chatting while walking. And after photos of them surfaced online, people had plenty to say, with one Instagram commenter, @virgoskye, hoping Bianca's more vibrant appearance was a 'good sign', after fans previously expressed concern for the nature of her relationship with Ye. Other social media users were taken aback by Bianca's ever-so-slightly more reserved attire, noting it was the 'most clothes [they've] seen her in'. 'She is a beautiful girl truly!', @ said. While @mizzlindzy said, 'I'm convinced he's exploiting her', others defended Ye against such allegations, as @ash_belize penned: 'If they are happy. Who cares 🤷🏽♂️ let them live.' Fans have become accustomed to seeing rather a lot of Blanca in recent years, whether it be her totally nude Grammys dress, some skimpy lingerie, or exposing her body in a photoshoot for Ye's Insta. In the past, particularly after igniting rage with Bianca's sheer Grammys look, Ye has admitted to having 'dominion' over his wife. Having been accused of 'abusive' and 'controlling' behaviour earlier in the year, the artist took to X with a rant but also insisted that he would not make her wear something she felt uncomfortable in. The divisive rap star added at the time that 'anyone who called my wife's Grammy look a stunt is dumb and laaaame [sic]'. 'She been dressing naked for 2 years. Now all of a sudden it's a stunt. Every single b***h on the planet wish they had her bravery body platform and access to money and a husband that supported they personal expression,' he continued. Meanwhile, the spouses have long been fighting off rumours of divorce, having parted ways just months back. But, they seemingly patched up their issues and got back together. On his latest album, WW3, Ye hinted at a brief split in his lyrics of a track titled Bianca. He sang: 'My baby she ran away / But first she tried to get me committed / Not going to the hospital 'cause I am not sick I just do not get it. 'She's having a panic attack and she is not liking the way that I tweeted / Until Bianca's back I stay up all night I'm not going to sleep / I really don't know where she's at.' More Trending He also rapped that she left him after he installed a tracking app on her phone, pleading for her to go back to him. Of course, it didn't take long for fans to begin digging into the words, but Ye and Bianca soon quashed speculation that they were heading for a legal separation, having posed together for photos on social media and on public outings. It now appears they are more united than ever—publicly, at least—with Bianca spotted stepping into the stepmother role with Ye's young kids North, 12, Saint, nine, Chicago, seven, and Psalm, six. Reality star Kim's co-parenting struggles with her ex are no secret, but it seems her children give their dad's new wife the stamp of approval. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More »
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Weapons star Julia Garner looks unrecognizable as she transforms into convicted crypto fraudster for new show
Julia Garner looked dramatically different from her usual self when she was spotted in Vancouver, Canada, on Wednesday. The 31-year-old actress — who currently stars in the record-breaking horror hit Weapons — traded in her standard tightly curled blond locks in favor of long wavy brunette hair as she got into character as the convicted cryptocurrency fraudster Caroline Ellison. Garner — who has been cast as Madonna in a long-delayed biopic — was joined by her costar Anthony Boyle, who plays the FTX cryptocurrency exchange founder and convicted felon Sam Bankman-Fried, as they filmed scenes for the upcoming Netflix adaptation of The Altruists, which details the collapses of the exchange and their intimate relationship. Garner mimicked Ellison's ultra-casual style with a tan-and-green pullover atop a simple white shirt. Her costume included black Asics trainers, and she appeared to be made up modestly. In another shot, the Ozark star was outfitted with thick black plastic-frame glasses to mimic Ellison's prominent eyewear. Boyle was also dressed casually, in line with how Bankman-Fried was normally attired before he began regularly wearing suits for his court dates. The Irish actor sported a mass of messy dark curls and wore a pale-gray sweatshirt over a burgundy T-shirt, along with rumpled khakis and white athletic shoes. The Altruists is written and executive produced by Graham Moore, who also serves as co-showrunner with EP Jacqueline Hoyt. Barack and Michelle Obama are also executive producers via their production company Higher Ground, which has a multi-year deal with Netflix. FTX, which is now bankrupt, was a cryptocurrency and exchange and hedge fund that was founded by Bankman-Fried and Gary Wang in 2019, before its collapse just three years later. Ellison, who served as the CEO of FTX's sister company, the crypto trading company Alameda Research, testified that she had worked with Bankman-Fried to illegally funnel customer funds from FTX into Alameda, which were used to pay off the trading company's loans. After the misuse of funds was first reported on, the rival cryptocurrency exchange Binance announced it was selling all of FTX's crypto coins that it held, which led multiple FTX investors to try to withdraw their funds. In addition to propping up Alameda, Bankman-Fried was accused of using billions in customers' money to fund his lavish lifestyle, which allowed him to gain influence with other high-profile industry figures and politicians. Ellison managed to secure a plea deal in exchange for testifying against Bankman-Fried and other FTX executives, under which terms she pleaded guilty in December 2022 to charges of wire fraud, multiple counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit commodities fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. She received a relatively light two-year prison sentence, and according to the Bureau of Prisons, she is currently slated to be released in April of 2026. However, Ellison will also be required to pay $11 billion in fines. At his trial, Bankman-Fried pleaded not guilty to seven counts of fraud and conspiracy, but a jury convicted him of all the charges in November 2023. In March 2024, he was sentenced to 25 years in prison and required to pay over $11 billion in fines, though he is currently appealing his conviction. Garner's turn playing Ellison on screen comes after she starred in the horror hit Weapons. The film was well-reviewed, earning an impressive 87 percent fresh rating from the most prestigious critics surveyed by Rotten Tomatoes, and it has so far earned an impressive $100 million at the global box office against a relatively modest $38 million budget since debuting in theaters on August 8. The film, which is written and directed by Barbarian filmmaker Zach Cregger — formerly a member of the sketch comedy troupe The Whitest Kids U Know — stars Garner as a third-grade teacher who arrives at school one day to find that only one of her students has showed up for class. Police discover that that the other 17 children all mysteriously woke up and ran out of their homes into the night at exactly 2:17 a.m., but where they went — and what happened to them — remains a mystery. Josh Brolin, who is also an executive producer on Weapons, costars as a parent who lashes at at Garner's character after his son was one of her students who disappeared. The large cast also features Alden Ehrenreich, Marvel star Benedict Wong, Euphoria actor Austin Abrams and Oscar-nominee Amy Madigan. Garner has had back-to-back blockbusters in just weeks, as she also starred as the Silver Surfer in Marvel's Fantastic Four reboot.
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Hit horror Weapons doesn't have a deeper meaning but that's OK
For years now, horror fans and critics have grown increasingly and understandably impatient with the tendency of genre films to orient their scares toward a clearly conveyed central metaphor. The real monster in these movies is parenthood, personal trauma or that old horror-movie standby, grief. Writer-director Zach Cregger is no stranger to this line of thinking; his 2022 horror movie Barbarian is very much a spooky-creature-in-the-basement movie for the #MeToo era. Now Cregger has returned with a movie that may well stymie anyone who has been trained by the last decade to search for an easy-to-track allegory within their viscerally depicted fears. His new movie Weapons has received mostly rave reviews and positive audience response. But at least a few critics and fans are pivoting from complaining about obvious metaphors to ask … is that all there is? Is Weapons actually about anything? (To further delve into this question, of course, we'll need to go full spoiler mode, so if you want to see the movie and haven't yet, turn back now.) The movie certainly alludes to plenty of hot-button issues. It springs from a chilling premise: one night in a small town, 17 children from the same third-grade class wake up at 2.17am, leave their houses, and disappear into the night. Parents are understandably distraught, and in looking for someone to blame seem to land on the students' teacher Justine (Julia Garner), who is as puzzled and disturbed about this as anyone else. When Archer (Josh Brolin) angrily demands to know what was 'going on' in his missing son's classroom, convinced that Justine must have played some role in this tragedy, there are unmistakable echoes of social panics in an era where parents feel empowered to dictate what their children learn about at school. The fact that the movie's school shutters, then must reopen before the disappearance is solved or its pain is at all healed recalls Covid-era school closures. And when Archer has a dream where he sees a giant AR-15 materialize in the sky above the town, it seems like an obvious reference to school shootings that have devastated so many classrooms over the past quarter-century. Or is it? Cregger actually says no. I co-host a horror podcast, and in our interview with the film-maker, he unequivocally said he was not thinking of school shootings when he wrote the movie. For him, that's not at all what it's about. (Though he did stress that he welcomes people's interpretations, and in fact wanted to make something with that kind of flexibility.) He wouldn't say precisely how he personally interprets the story, but he has mentioned repeatedly that it was something he started writing out of – hey! – grief, even if the movie itself may be more ambiguous as to its thematic aims. This leaves Weapons open to the charge that it's not about much of anything – that it's all great hook and solid technique in service of a thrill ride where some stray inspiration from Paul Thomas Anderson's Magnolia is more superficial homage than thematic link. The real question, though, is how bad of an offense this is supposed to be. Plenty of great horror movies are principally concerned with the visceral experience of watching them in the dark, rather than the talking points or takeaways they might hand over to the viewer in broad daylight. Subtext shouldn't have to be plainly visible at first glance. Indeed, some of the skepticism over Weapons seems to stem from the fact that it turns out to be … a horror movie. The children in the movie are enchanted by a witch. The movie doesn't say whether she's always been a witch, or has turned to witchcraft in the face of a debilitating illness. But that's why she takes control of these children, and various other adults at her convenience: to sap their life force, attempt to heal herself, and, in the meantime, use her control to make her victims do her bidding. So yeah, pretty witchy stuff, and her comeuppance has the gory satisfaction of a Brothers Grimm story fed through a powerful amplifier. That wild, almost fanciful ending may strike some as reductive, especially when its first half plays more like a dark mystery like David Fincher's Zodiac, or at least Seven. But is the spectacle of brainwashed children being turned against their older captor and ravenously destroying her so devoid of opportunities for interpretation? It's not even that Weapons is demanding a lot of work from the audience – and that might be exactly what rankles some about it. Most of what happens in the movie is unambiguously explained; it's the meaning that's left up to the audience, and maybe some sense an incongruity between those two approaches. That's a fair-enough critique, as is a thoughtful consideration that concludes none of the movie's interpretations hold up to much scrutiny. But it's hard to fault Cregger for making a horror movie that is more concerned with its own scary, twisty immediacy than its optics as a social critique. At the same time, maybe the discourse over the meaning of Weapons suggests that the eye-rolling about 'metaphorror' has been overblown, too. Countless horror classics could very much be described as driven by metaphor. Some are murkier or more interpretative than others, but having a central idea and conveying it clearly isn't a marker of hackdom. It's just something that some hacky movies have done, often directly imitating very good ones. Think of Get Out, which may have been thornier than it was given credit for, but still has a trackable central conceit that's not exactly obtuse; then think of heavy-handed Get Out knockoffs like Antebellum and Blink Twice with too much visible effort and too little inspiration. Jordan Peele himself followed a path not unlike Cregger's when following up Get Out; his movies Us and Nope are immediately engaging visceral experiences with more allusions and evocations than clear signaling of a central metaphor. They may be more successful in that realm than Weapons, but then, that's true of most movies when compared with Peele's output. It's the prescriptiveness – give us a meaning, or kill all metaphors – that goes against the nature of horror in general. The combination of the concrete and slippery is what makes horror such a compelling field; there may not be a genre better suited to blurring the lines between reality and a heightened dream state. There's no single correct way to have a nightmare.
