India plans sweeping consumption tax cuts by October to boost economy
The federal government will propose a two-rate structure of 5% and 18%, doing away with the 12% and 28% tax that was imposed on some items, said the government official, who declined to be named as the plans are still private.
The plan is to bring '99%' of all the items that are in 12% category to 5%, the official said. That tax slab includes butter, fruit juices, and dry fruits, and any cuts to the basket could benefit the likes of Nestle to Hindustan Unilever to Procter & Gamble.
The tax cut plan comes amid growing tensions between New Delhi and Washington on steep U.S. tariffs on Indian goods. Modi on Friday made a public appeal to promote domestic products, and his supporters have been calling for boycott of American products.
Addressing the nation on its 79th independence day, Modi earlier said that the goods and services tax would be reformed and taxes lowered by Diwali, the Hindu festival of lights, set to be celebrated in October this year.
India PM Modi vows October cuts to goods and services tax
'This Diwali, I am going to make it a double Diwali for you. Over the past eight years, we have undertaken a major reform in goods and services tax. We are bringing next-generation GST reforms that will reduce the tax burden across the country,' Modi said.
The final decision will be taken by the GST (goods and services taxes) Council, which is chaired by the finance minister and has all the state's finance ministers as members, the official said. The council is set to meet by October.
Citi estimates that about 20% of items - including packaged food and beverages, apparel and hotel accommodation - fall under the 12% GST slab, accounting for 5-10% of consumption and 5-6% of GST revenue.
If most of these are moved to the 5% slab and some to the 18% slab, it could lead to a revenue loss of around 500 billion rupees, or 0.15% of GDP, potentially taking the total policy stimulus for households in the current 2025-26 financial year to 0.6%-0.7% of GDP, the brokerage said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pak-Afghan relations: winds of change?
Are we in for a radical change in Pak-Afghan relations after an unprecedented move by proponents of the former Northern Alliance, many of whom now embody the National Resistance Front (NRF) of Afghanistan, led by Ahmed Masood, the son of the late Ahmed Shah Masood? Or does a rude shock await the new Kabul regime through new alignments involving Tajikistan, the historical base of the Northern Alliance? But before delving into the Pak-Afghan issue, let's look at three critical developments in the current "world in flux". President Donald Trump's peace and tariffs offensives are indeed enforcing recalibration, if not major shifts, in global alliances. Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin — regardless of immediate outcomes — marks a defining moment both for their bilateral relations and the present turbulent geopolitics. Secondly, after China's upfront posturing on the tariffs issue forced Trump into extending the deadline for trade negotiations, Indian business executives and Prime Minister Narendra Modi are slowly upping the India card with their anti-America rhetoric. This is triggering calls across India for boycotting McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon and Apple, among others — all prompted by US tariffs on exports from India, which is the biggest market for Meta's WhatsApp and beverages like Pepsi, Coca-Cola or Starbucks. India, being the world's most populous country and the fourth largest economy, certainly sees value in leveraging its soft power vis-à-vis a strident Trump, not ready to bend - at least for now. Thirdly, and it relates to the messaging, Trump's policies on tariffs and conflict are radiating with a "sobering" effect on the smaller and weaker stakeholders across the globe. And one wonders if the Independence Day felicitations from the traditionally pro-India and anti-Taliban NRF, a successor to the Northern Alliance, also flow from President Trump's indirect messaging. The unprecedented NRF message (congratulations to Pakistan and its people on the occasion of the country's Independence Day) comes in the context of an argument that present Taliban government leaders often peddle in private; Northern Afghan groups would brand us as "pro-Pakistan if we shunned the historical Afghan position on the border issue." It is worth recalling that when the US launched its bombing of Kabul on October 7, 2001, in the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks in New York and Washington, their partner on the ground was Masood's Shoorae Nazar, then led by Marshal Faheem. Masood had been assassinated by Al-Qaeda militants disguised as journalists in his native Takhar province only two days before the 9/11 attacks. The entire politics of Shoorae Nazar was anti-Pakistan, pro-India, and they had always leveled allegations that sounded like coming from India. Most of their leaders lived in India before and after the 9/11 attacks. Even Masood Khalili, who was injured in the attack on Ahmed Shah Masood, was taken to India for treatment. It is nothing but ironic that following decades of acrimonious posturing, the successor to Shoorae Nazar — NRF — has extended an olive branch to Islamabad through an encouraging Independence Day message. Now that the late Ahmed Shah Masood's son has formally congratulated Pakistan, Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi also sent similar greetings to his Pakistani counterpart, Ishaq Dar, according to an official announcement from Muttaqi's office. The exchange of greetings also coincided with the celebration of "Victory Day" — when the Taliban regained power in Afghanistan on a Sunday, August 15, four years ago. Does the festive mood - a mix of hope and goodwill — around Pakistan's Independence Day, Afghanistan's "Victory Day", followed by the Afghan Independence Day on August 19 coupled with positive messaging from the NRF offer a chance to Afghans in general and to the Taliban regime in particular to build on their expression of goodwill for Pakistan? Can the development help Afghans embrace the reality of Pakistan as it has existed since 1947, abandon the old clichéd narratives that often belittle and accuse it of treating Afghanistan as a colony, and move on in favour of an equal-footed cordial relationship between the two uneasy neighbouring countries? Have the winds of change begun blowing to improve Pak-Afghan relations, or should the NRF felicitation gesture signal something ominous to Pakistan, particularly at a time when both China and Russia have courted the Taliban leadership, with Moscow recognising the Kabul regime to the displeasure of the Trump administration? How would Taliban leaders view the recently concluded Pakistan-Tajikistan Counter-Terrorism Exercises Dosti-ll (August 4-9) in a country that historically served as the base for Shoorae Nazar during the anti-Soviet jihad? Dushanbe, the capital, also symbolised the shelter and support (including from India) to Ahmed Shah Masood's militia in its fight against the Taliban until the 9/11 events, and continues to be the hub of NRF activities.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India's tipping point
It was a unique disruption. For a nation whose birth witnessed the displacement of 10-12 million on religious lines and the broad-day murder of 1- 2 million, political disruption usually means slaughtering a couple of thousand. But here was an ostracised man, after enduring an 11-year-long defamation campaign, claiming to set off a nuclear bomb in Indian politics with just one presentation. When Rahul Gandhi began, the tech support's ineptness was palpable. But he kept going. First, he explained the methodology and selection process for his research. Then came the information. The opposition leader in the Lok Sabha (lower house of parliament) told the audience that of the 543 constituencies, his team had chosen one in Karnataka for the audit. This Bangalore Central constituency includes seven Vidhan Sabha (provincial legislative assembly) segments. Out of these seven, six voted for Congress, but in one (Mahadevapura), the BJP outperformed Congress by a whopping 114,000 votes, changing the outcome of the Lok Sabha seat in favour of Modi's party. He then described the obfuscation tactics of the Indian Election Commission (ECI), which refused to hand over digital or machine-readable voter list data. The seven-foot-tall pile of paper that was given made it impossible to use optical character recognition, so it had to be done manually. It took forty of his team members six months to sift through all that data. But the results were stunning. In one Vidhan Sabha constituency, they found over a hundred thousand irregularities. Of these, 11,965 were duplicate voters, 40,009 had fake or invalid addresses, 10,452 were bulk voters with a single address, 4,132 had fake photos, and 33,692 had abuse of the first-time voter form. Given that Congress lost the Lok Sabha seat by 32,707 votes, the above irregularities could easily have played a part. And then he dropped another bombshell. In the state of Maharashtra, in the five months between the Lok Sabha elections (in which the ruling coalition performed poorly) and the Vidhan Sabha elections (which the ruling coalition swept), 10 million new voters were registered. The election commission was not prepared to share this data. I believe in Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. So, initially, I was sceptical. But could the election commission act more guiltily? You be the judge. First, it asked Mr Gandhi, who is mononymously called Rahul, to submit an affidavit under a clause that makes the investigation task impossible. Shortly afterwards, it shut down public access to its websites in states where the results are in contention ostensibly to block any further scraping of data. Rahul had already pointed to the undue haste by the ECI to destroy the CCTV footage even though, given today's compression and storage technology, there is no need to do that. This brought to mind the electronic voting machine case before the Lok Sabha elections, where the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and noted activist lawyers like Bharat Bhushan went to the Indian Supreme Court with the request to manually count the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs — the paper record of each vote). The court rebuffed the idea with extreme prejudice. During the past eleven years, the ECI has actively resisted calls for transparency regarding the election data. In a democracy, transparency is the linchpin of the system. It is the job of election bodies worldwide to ensure the transparency of their elections. And here you have this active opacity that fights back. So, Rahul was not wrong. With one presentation, he has delegitimised every election held after Modi took over. In the middle of all this, rumours spread that the Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar, who recently retired after overseeing the Lok Sabha elections, had fled to Malta. These days, Malta has entered our news cycles, too. But we will discuss that another day. Understandably, this has caused quite a stir in Indian politics despite the mainstream media, the government and the ECI's incredible efforts to trivialise the matter. When, without identifying the constituency, Rahul announced he would share evidence of electoral malpractice with the public, Modi took Amit Shah to meet the president and hinted at Shah being his successor at a ruling coalition meeting. It is common knowledge that Modi's seat from Varanasi is also in contention, where he lost during the first six rounds and then magically pulled ahead by 152,513 votes in the seventh. A small election showed that the draconian grip of the Modi-Shah duo was slipping. The elections of the Constitutional Club of India were recently held. This is a club of lawmakers. In it, a BJP candidate who fell out of Modi-Shah's favour managed to defeat another BJP candidate supported by the ruling duo. It is believed that Yogi Adityanath, the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh and the party's most popular leader after Modi, is making his presence felt. His supporters are openly defying Shah's dictates. Cracks within the coalition are also becoming visible. As I mentioned in previous pieces, immediately after the Lok Sabha election results, it was claimed that Modi had assured the RSS that he would step down as PM at 75. He turns 75 next month, but despite the Sangh's open signalling, no one expects him to leave just like that. That is why all parties involved will put maximum and unrelenting pressure on the duo to relinquish power. Rahul is already starting a padayatra (journey by foot) in Bihar. But he has already set a chain of events in motion that will likely lead to a nationwide agitation. It is said that when such agitations occur, the RSS, if it wishes, can choose to participate silently. It happened with Anna Hazare's anti-corruption campaign, after all. No wonder Modi lavished his party's ideological fountainhead (RSS) with high praise in his Independence Day speech. When Modi came to power, he had many sponsors. Western intelligence agencies from the Five Eyes countries and Mossad thought Congress actively resisted joining the Western camp. Indian billionaires were worried because of their mounting NPA debt liabilities. The Indian intelligence community wanted more autonomy. And the RSS wanted to spread its wings. One by one, Modi has offended all of them. His foreign and economic policies are teetering on the brink of disaster. The system's opacity has grown so much that it resembles what physicists call a black box. On top of that is the drubbing India received in the four-day war with Pakistan. There is no denying that Indian politics is entering a decisive phase. But life goes on. His surrogates and allies may likely feel the urge to terrorise his critics both at home and abroad. But they should heed this sincere advice: stop the aggression and start covering your tracks while you have time. The endgame will leave you with nothing but pain and regret.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Hezbollah vows to fight disarmament as Lebanon PM slams civil war ‘threats'
BEIRUT: Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem vowed Friday to fight government plans to disarm his group, with Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam accusing him of making 'unacceptable' threats to unleash civil war. Qassem gave a televised address after meeting with Iran's security chief Ali Larijani, whose country has long backed the Lebanese group. Hezbollah emerged badly weakened from last year's war with Israel, and the Lebanese government – under US pressure – has ordered the army to draw up a plan to disarm the group by the end of the year. Iran, whose so-called 'axis of resistance' includes Hezbollah, has also suffered a series of setbacks, most recently in its own war with Israel, which also saw the United States strike its nuclear facilities. 'The government is implementing an American-Israeli order to end the resistance, even if it leads to civil war and internal strife,' Qassem said. 'The resistance will not surrender its weapons while aggression continues, occupation persists, and we will fight it… if necessary to confront this American-Israeli project no matter the cost.' He urged the government 'not to hand over the country to an insatiable Israeli aggressor or an American tyrant with limitless greed', adding the state would 'bear responsibility for any internal explosion and any destruction of Lebanon'. President says Lebanon determined to disarm Hezbollah Prime Minister Salam later denounced the remarks, saying on X that they 'constitute an implicit threat of civil war'. He added that 'any threat or intimidation related to such a war is totally unacceptable'. Salam also hit back at Hezbollah's characterisation of the disarmament push as an American-Israeli effort. 'Our decisions are purely Lebanese, made by our cabinet, and no one tells us what to do,' he said. 'The Lebanese have the right to stability and security… without which the country will not be able to recover, and no reconstruction or investment will take place.' Before the war with Israel, Hezbollah was believed to be better armed than the Lebanese military. It long maintained it had to keep its arsenal in order to defend Lebanon from attack, but critics accused it of using its weapons for political leverage. Qassem said Friday that Hezbollah and its political ally Amal would not be organising any street protests against disarmament at this time, but threatened to do so in future. Iran's Supreme National Security Council chief Larijani was in Beirut this week, and held talks with Qassem as well as with President Joseph Aoun. Iran has expressed its opposition to the government's disarmament plan, and has vowed to continue to provide support, with Lebanese officials recently hardening their tone towards Hezbollah and its patron. Both the president and the prime minister took issue with Iran's recent statements during Larijani's trip, with Salam saying Lebanon rejects 'any interference in its internal affairs'.
