STFI demands scrapping of NEP-2020
The inaugural session, chaired by Bharti, featured prominent academics including Professor Pavitra Sarkar, former Vice Chancellor of Rabindra Bharati University, Calcutta University's Professor Samuel Chakraborty, Jadavpur University's Professor Siddhartha Dutta, and Professor Abdul Kafi. The speakers voiced strong opposition to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, citing its adverse impact on public education and its alignment with privatization and corporatization agendas.
They expressed alarm over the closure of thousands of government schools nationwide, attributing the trend to pro-privatization policies of both Central and State governments. The speakers highlighted a sharp decline in student enrollment in public schools, juxtaposed with the growth of private and corporate institutions. They criticized the central government's push for 'one nation, one curriculum,' arguing that such homogenization undermines India's linguistic and cultural diversity.
The conference emphasized the need to foster a scientific temper and rational thinking in education, urging teachers to actively counter superstitions and unscientific beliefs. A key demand was the allocation of 6% of GDP and 10% of the national budget to the education sector, in line with recommendations from earlier education commissions.
Concerns were also raised about the functioning of the National Testing Agency, which was accused of disregarding state autonomy in educational matters. Speakers noted that many teaching positions remain vacant, with contract and temporary staff filling the gaps, leading to deteriorating conditions in government schools. The rise of private universities—now comprising 50% of higher education institutions—was cited as a threat to the public education system.
In the afternoon session, STFI Vice President and TS UTF State President Chavaravi introduced a resolution opposing NEP-2020, calling for a new education policy rooted in constitutional values and scientific principles. The conference saw participation from 560 STFI Central Committee members and representatives from across India, including 38 delegates from Telangana. Key leaders from TS UTF, including Chavaravi, A. Venkat, C.H. Durgabhavani, and T. Lakshma Reddy, were present alongside district-level office bearers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘A short-sighted approach': Parliamentary panel recommends BElEd programme's continuation
A parliamentary panel has recommended the continuation of the Bachelor of Elementary Education (BElEd) programme, a four-year course in elementary teacher education, which the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) has proposed to scrap. The committee, headed by Congress leader Digvijaya Singh, reviewed NCTE's functioning in its report. Earlier this year, NCTE issued draft regulations that lay down norms and standards for teacher education programmes. The draft regulations said that the BElEd programme, a four-year course introduced in 1994-95 that focused on teaching at the elementary level (classes 1 to 8), will be discontinued from 2026-27 onwards. It said institutions that were offering the programme will have to transition to the new Integrated Teacher Education Programme (ITEP) by the 2026-27 academic session. ITEP is a four-year programme (BA BEd/ BSc BEd/ BCom BEd) after Class 12, which has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. NEP calls for a four-year integrated BEd degree to be the minimum qualification for teaching by 2030. The Union Education Ministry's Department of School Education and Literacy told the committee that BElEd is a 'high faculty demand programme' because it demands 16 faculty members for a batch of 50 students. In contrast, for ITEP, the faculty requirement has been 'brought down' to nine, the Department told the committee. The department also pointed out that 'even after three decades,' BElEd remained confined to a few colleges in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. BElEd is being offered in 99 institutions, 'and it is struggling to expand', the Department told the committee, adding that a proposal for its discontinuation is under consideration, and the government is yet to take a view on the matter. The committee has recommended that NCTE address the limitations of the BElEd programme, if any, by upgrading its curriculum and encouraging more institutions to offer it. It has suggested that the NCTE leverage the 'established history and expertise' of the programme, instead of scrapping a 'reputed, well-established and internationally acclaimed programme' which has been run effectively for more than 30 years. Noting that BElEd has served as a rigorous, research-based and socially conscious route for training elementary school teachers, particularly for urban poor and rural students, the committee has recommended that states be allowed to continue offering the programme, and the faculty and infrastructure developed for it be preserved. It has also suggested the 'replication of the program in additional institutions under ITEP.' The committee has also called for a review of the draft regulations that NCTE issued earlier this year, and pointed out that the Department of School Education and Literacy should hold consultative meetings with state governments before it arrives at changes in the structure of teacher education, since education is in the concurrent list of the Constitution. 'It is also recommended to allow multiple programmes and models of teacher education and not to shut down successful existing programmes,' the committee's report noted. The committee has also called for filling vacancies for school teachers. 'The Committee observes that there are around 10 lakhs vacancies of teachers in Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) funded schools in various States and there are around 7.5 lakh vacancies at elementary and primary levels,' the report stated. 'The Committee notes that there is no improvement in filling up of vacancy positions in these SSA funded schools of the State Governments in spite of repeated recommendations of the Committee…to fill up the vacancies in a time bound manner, rather it is worsening day by day due to retirements of teachers and due to absence of a permanent recruitment policy,' it added. In April this year, eminent professors of education from across the world, including Prof Michael Apple at the University of Wisconsin, Prof William Pinar at the University of British Columbia, and Prof Robin Alexander, Fellow of Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, had written to Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan asking that the plans to discontinue BElEd be cancelled.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
NEP 2020 implementation needs states' full confidence: Parliamentary committee
The Parliamentary committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports has stressed the need for stronger cooperation between the Union government and states to ensure the smooth rollout of the National Education Policy (NEP). The panel has urged the Ministry of Education to create a clear mechanism for working with states, especially those that have expressed reservations about parts of the its report, the committee said the NEP's success depends on building complete confidence among state governments, given that education falls under the concurrent list of the the Ministry of Education acknowledged the role of states, the committee noted that it had not explained the exact modalities of engagement with those opposing certain provisions, particularly in higher education. The report said that without a structured process to address these differences, the policy's objectives risk delays or uneven committee also flagged the absence of an organised institutional channel to collect feedback on NEP present, universities are left to decide how to send their inputs, with no formal route for their observations to reach policymakers. The panel described this as a gap in the system, considering the NEP's role in shaping the country's education address this, the committee recommended the creation of a centralised nationwide tracker at the university a tool, it said, could be used to monitor progress on policy adoption, identify bottlenecks, and provide real-time updates to both state and central further called for a formal feedback mechanism that would allow all stakeholders, including universities, faculty, and students, to share their experiences and propose the panel argued, would ensure that the NEP evolves in response to ground realities rather than remaining static.'The committee reiterates, in the strongest possible terms, the need for a structured system for gathering input from all sides,' the report NEP, introduced in 2020, aims to overhaul India's education system, with reforms spanning school to higher education. Four years on, the debate now centres not on its vision, but on the mechanics of making it work in a diverse federal setup.(WITH PTI INPUTS)- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Parl panel flags ANRF's limited focus; seeks parallel push for humanities research
A parliamentary panel, flagging the Anusandhan National Research Foundation's (ANRF) limited focus on science, technology, agriculture, and health, on Monday recommended the Centre to launch a parallel initiative to promote humanities and social sciences research in higher education and to allocate a portion of Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) funds specifically for research. The committee has criticised the ministry for ignoring its recommendations on tailored teacher training. (Representative file photo) Set up in 2023 in line with National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, ANRF promotes research, innovation and entrepreneurship across various fields of science, engineering, and technology. Launched in 2017, HEFA funds infrastructure and research in higher educational institutions through loans. Parliamentary standing committee on education, women, children, youth and sports in its report on review of the government's response to its September 2023 recommendations on NEP implementation in higher education, stressed that its call for research support was meant to be broad-based, covering humanities and social sciences, which it said are vital to social, cultural, and economic progress. 'However, it is concerned by the ANRF's limited focus on science, technology, agriculture, and health technology…Therefore, the committee recommends a parallel initiative to support humanities and social sciences research in higher education.' Also Read:Blueprint for becoming a global knowledge power While ministry in its action taken response stated that around 2500 HEIs and 300 universities have established Research and Development (R&D) cells at their campuses and 14,518 Institution's Innovation Council (IICs) have been set up in 28 states and 9 UTs, the panel asked the ministry to provide a report on the progress made in universal establishment of R&D cells in all HEIs. While the education ministry said HEFA funds support research facilities and provides grants to 2500 higher education institutions (HEIs) through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), the panel reiterated its call to earmark a fixed share for research and innovation to ensure consistent funding. 'The ministry has unfortunately not acknowledged this recommendation in its response. The committee therefore, reiterates this recommendation,' the committee said in its latest report. The committee has criticised the ministry for ignoring its recommendations on tailored teacher training and incentives for those working in marginalised communities, as well as on research and innovation in this area. It reiterated that training materials should meet community-specific needs, incentives should be provided, and a dedicated centre be set up to conduct community-focused education research to guide policy, curriculum, and teacher training. The panel has called for 'synergized collaboration' between ministry and states for successful implementation of the NEP 2020. It also asked the ministry to develop a formal feedback mechanism for stakeholders on the Multi Entry and Multiple Exit (MEME) scheme and other NEP initiatives, and the creation of a central tracker to monitor the policy's implementation in higher education.
