&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's Munir outreach, India tariffs aren't strategy — it's about a Nobel: Ex-NSA John Bolton
Much against the ongoing speculation that US President Donald Trump is rethinking the US's strategic position on India and Pakistan, his former National Security Adviser Ambassador John Bolton does not see it as a long-term review of America's policy. In an exclusive conversation with Firstpost's Bhagyasree Sengupta, Bolton said Trump's sudden courting of Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir, and his tariff tirade against India have nothing to do with 'strategic rethinking'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Bolton asserts that the apparent change in the US's ties with India and Pakistan is just about his ambition to win a Nobel Peace Prize.
In just a few days, India-US ties deteriorated significantly thanks sudden high tariffs imposed by Trump on Indian goods. On July 30, Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, effective from August 7. He argued that India is engaging in unfair trade practices by imposing barriers to market access, particularly in agriculture and dairy.
However, a day before the August 7 deadline, Trump signed an executive order, announcing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports. This is explicitly linked to India's continued purchase of crude oil from Russia amid the war in Ukraine.
US President Donald Trump has jeopardised decades of American efforts to bring India away from Russia and China, his former aide John Bolton. File image/AFP
This shocked many in India. Not only because India had strong ties with the US for decades, but also because the issue of India buying Russian oil was never brought up during the first six months of Trump 2.0. New Delhi soon called out the double standards, emphasising that it is China which buys more oil from Russia than India, and highlighting how the US still engage in trade with Russia without any such tariffs.
While all this was happening, New Delhi also started to pay attention to the growing proximity between Trump and Pakistani Army chief Asim Munir. The Pakistani field marshal has been to the US twice in the past two months. What was concerning was the fact that these visits came soon after the four-day military escalation between India and Pakistan. Munir eventually went on to use American soil to make nuclear threats to India.
Firstpost spoke to Ambassador Bolton, remains the longest-serving NSA in the Trump administration having served in the office from April 2018 to September 2019, understand what goes in Trump's mind when he takes such disruptive foreign policy deicisons. Bolton has also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations. Here's what he has to say on the matter:
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Imposing tariffs on India, holding summit with Russia
When asked if he was surprised by the sudden surge in tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Indian goods, Ambassador Bolton called out the duplicity of standards in that regard.
'Well, I think there are a lot of things that are very difficult to explain about what Trump's been doing. First, by all the reporting, which of course comes from leaks from both the US side and the Indian side, the two countries were very close to an agreement on tariffs. When Trump, sort of on his own, decided to go ahead and put the figure at 25 per cent, which is relatively high compared to some other agreements, higher than Pakistan, higher than Bangladesh, no explanation for that,' He said.
'Coming on very quickly was another 25 per cent imposed on Indian exports to the US because of the purchase of Russian oil and gas. Yet at the same time, within days, Trump was agreeing to a summit meeting with Putin in Alaska this coming Friday and not proceeding with his threat to impose tariffs on Russia or put further sanctions on Russia.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'During all this time, no sanctions were imposed on China for its even larger purchases of Russian oil and gas. So I think it's just typical of the confusion in the way Trump does business. But it's going to cause, I think, severe difficulties between the US and India at a time when we should be doing exactly the opposite,' he told Firstpost.
Trump tariffs India: Why now?
It has been over six months since Trump returned to the White House, and not once has the issue of India purchasing oil from Russia been brought up. When asked about the timing of the call, Bolton noted that the move had something to do with Trump's inability to reach a ceasefire in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.
'Well, for most of the first six months, what Trump was trying to do was use what he thought was his friendship with Vladimir Putin to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. Now I'll just tell you from my own experience,' Ambassador Bolton explained.
US President Donald Trump announced his tariffs on 'Liberation Day' on April 2. Reuters
'Putin doesn't see Trump as his friend. He sees them as somebody that he thinks he can manipulate in true, true fashion of a former KGB agent. And I think he's been pretty successful with it. But at some point toward the end of the first six months, whether intentionally or unintentionally, I think Putin pushed Trump a little too far, and Trump concluded that Putin wasn't interested in a ceasefire.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'That's what angered him. He threatened tariffs on Russian exports to the US and secondary sanctions or tariffs on countries that were buying Russian oil and gas. So all of these issues with the secondary sanctions have arisen within the past 30 or 45 days,' he explained.
Was a pressure mounting on Trump in the US Congress?
While speaking to Firstpost, Bolton noted that there was a legislation that was floating in the US Congress that proposed as high as 500 per cent tariffs and even greater secondary sanctions on countries that buy oil and gas from Russia.
'That [the legislation] was being pushed in Congress. But Trump never went forward with that. So I think the sanctions against India, the secondary tariffs, were really in part in an effort by Trump to keep control of the situation and not allow what Congress was doing to interfere,' Bolton said.
However, the former American NSA pointed out that even Trump could not keep control of conflicting priorities he was facing, i.e. how to stop the war in Ukraine and how to develop better trade ties and overall relationship with India.
'He couldn't make a decision between his priorities, and I think that's why India was being in effect singled out, not even Russia or China being sanctioned, just India. I just think it's typical of Trump's decision-making capabilities,' Bolton told Firstpost.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Is Trump holding grudges against India?
For over 27 times, Trump has taken credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan following the 4-day military escalation between the two nuclear-powered nations. However, India has maintained that the ceasefire between India and Pakistan was a bilateral decision and the US was not involved.
When asked if Trump is holding grudges because of India's denial on the matter, Bolton said he might not care that much about it. 'Well, it could be. I'm not sure he cares that much about what anybody's saying about the escalation after the terrorist attack in Kashmir, because it is part of Trump's campaign to get the Nobel Peace Prize.'
'I mean, he cites stopping a war between Serbia and Kosovo, which nobody in Serbia or Kosovo knew was starting or had happened, and several other things like that. I don't think it's so much a grudge against India in that regard.'
Students of an art school and their teacher carry a hand-drawn portrait of the US President Donald Trump as they celebrate the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, in Mumbai, May 10, 2025. AP
'I think he just loses sight of what he's doing, and he focuses on one thing at a time. He makes one decision at a time and doesn't consider the consequences,' he added.
Bolton admitted that even he was shocked by the Trump tariffs on India, given Trump's good relationship with the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'I thought Trump had a good relationship with Modi. So it just goes to show even in Trump's world, he views international relations through the prism of personal relations, and even a good personal relationship with Trump doesn't stop the chaos,' Bolton averred.
Handed China a gift
Soon after Trump announced the tariffs on India, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval met Russian President Vladimir Putin. It was announced that President .
Apart from this, PM Modi is reportedly going to visit China by the end of this month, his first visit since 2018. When asked if Trump just pushed India toward China and Russia, Bolton maintained that while ties with Moscow have been historical, Trump just handed a gift to China.
Bolton said, 'In terms of border disputes and China's general hegemonic ambitions, India would have been well within its rights to consider China the principal adversary. But when it comes to dealing with the US on trade, this [Trump tariffs] has given China a gift to say, 'look, you're in as much danger as we are. Why don't we get together?''
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enter a hall for the family photo before a plenary session of the BRICS 2024 Summit in Kazan, Russia, 23 October 2024. File Photo/Reuters
'I'm sure that's what Xi Jinping is going to be proposing. Russia is somewhat different, given the history. I think in India, there was a developing understanding that Russia grew closer to China. India was facing a problem with that Axis.'
'All of that has been reversed, or at least severely called into question. It's an example of how Trump thinks of one thing at a time and doesn't think of the consequences. So the one thing he was thinking of was a ceasefire in Ukraine, which he wasn't getting from Russia. He took steps that had probably even greater negative implications for the United States elsewhere, particularly with India,' the former US NSA explained.
The Asim Munir question
Soon after the India-Pakistan military confrontation, Munir met President Trump in the White House. He is currently in the US attending the farewell ceremony of the Centcom chief. Munir eventually used American soil to deliver nuclear threats to India.
During Trump's first term, we saw events like "Howdy Modi" and "Namaste Trump". So what changed? Bolton said it is all about a Nobel Peace Prize nomination.
Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir (L) and US President Donald Trump (R). PTI / AP
Not a strategic rethinking but a Nobel dream
While speaking to Firstpost, Bolton said Trump's affinity with Pakistan had nothing to do with 'strategic rethinking'. He said, 'I don't think this is any strategic rethinking by Trump because he doesn't do strategic rethinking. One thing Munir did was to offer to nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize, which has become an obsession with Trump.'
'It's part of a strategy of flattery, which often works with Trump as well. So my suggestion to Prime Minister Modi is that when he talks to Trump next, he should offer to nominate him twice for a Nobel Peace Prize and to keep nominating him until he gets it. Maybe that'll help,' he exclaimed.
Trump doesn't understand Pakistan: Bolton
When asked about Munir's recent nuclear threat against India during his second visit to the US, Bolton noted that while the US does not censor foreign leaders, it would be in the interest of everyone to see Pakistan retain a democratic government.
'I wouldn't conclude a closer Pakistani-US relationship, although frankly I think it's in the interest of everybody to see Pakistan retain a democratic government and not be under the military,' he said.
In recent months, the US under Donald Trump is cosying up to Pakistan. Representational image/Reuters
'But Trump doesn't understand Pakistan at all. He's been speaking in the past few weeks about the significant development of Pakistan's oil reserves, which comes as a complete surprise to people in Pakistan. It's just typical of Trump. He lives in many senses in a world of his own, a world he has created. I'm afraid because he does not think very much about what happens outside his world, he doesn't see the ramifications sometimes of what he says.'
Tariff helps no one
When asked about the anti-American sentiments brewing in India, Ambassador Bolton said, 'I don't think he [Trump] understands any of that. He sees these tariffs as a way of encouraging domestic US manufacturers of many products, which we buy largely from overseas for a variety of reasons, and that theory isn't going to work.'
'I think it's a difficult populist term to explain that tariffs hurt everybody and that in a trade war, there's never a winner,' Bolton remarked, insisting that ultimately American consumers are paying tariffs.
'It's a tax on Americans. Tariffs were understood in the 19th century in America as taxes because it was the principal revenue source for the Federal government. Nobody had any illusions about it,' Bolton asserted.
Demonstrators take part in a protest against US President Donald Trump's announcement of 50 per cent tariffs on Brazilian products, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 10, 2025. File Image/Reuters
'Trump thinks trade surpluses are like profits and trade deficits are like losses on a corporate balance sheet. Trade surpluses and deficits are not profits and losses,.' Bolton said.
'When you have a trade deficit, it means that you've been buying more products from another country than they've been buying from the United States. But that doesn't mean Americans are left worse off if they buy a widget from Pakistan that costs $100. They've indeed given $100 to a Pakistani company, but they have a widget. Trump doesn't seem to understand this.'
Secondary tariffs are not hurting Russia
When asked about Trump's reluctance to hold trade talks with India until it stops purchasing oil from Russia, Bolton emphasised that the whole thing is 'self-defeating'. He said, 'It is indicative of Trump's inability to prioritise among competing objectives.'
'It's a reality, especially for a country like the US, which has so many interests in so many places around the world that sometimes you have to decide what your priorities are. And Trump can't make up his mind on that. He's now fixed that he wants to show some toughness to Russia,' Bolton said.
'He hoped that this [secondary sanctions] would affect the negotiations that will take place in Alaska this Friday. But the fact is, it hasn't hurt Russia at all. India still buys oil from Russia. So tariffs hurt India, but don't hurt Russia.'
'The secondary tariff is not as effective as dealing with Russia directly, but I'm not sure anybody in the White House has explained that to Trump,' he added.
Undisciplined decision making
When asked if the overall modified tariffs were Trump's bid to divert people's attention from the Epstein Files, Ambassador Bolton simply said that these tariffs indicate Trump's poor decision-making capabilities.
'These tariffs are harmful not just in the existence of the tariffs themselves, but the uncertainty that they've created for decision makers in business and other governments who don't know what the tariff rate is going to be and therefore cannot plan effectively,' he said.
Mexicans protest after Donald Trump imposed tariffs on Mexico. File image/Reuters
'That's what Trump likes. He likes to be the centre of attention. So a couple of weeks ago, out of nowhere on a Sunday evening, he imposed a 17 per cent tariff on importing Mexican tomatoes. Nobody knew why. Somehow, somebody had gotten to him about Mexican tomatoes. This is the sort of undisciplined, poorly thought-out decision-making that unfortunately really constitutes a lot of the way Trump reacts,' he said.
Trump-Putin meeting: Alaska summit
When asked about his thoughts on the US-Russia summit in Alaska, where Trump will be holding talks with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, Ambassador Bolton thinks Putin will be very strategic.
'Well, I think Putin has seen the playbook, so it wouldn't surprise me if he came with a big plaque that said 'Here's my letter of nomination for you.' I think what Putin really wants to do is use his KGB training and try to get Trump back under his influence,' Bolton said.
'I do think he recognises he pushed Trump too far. Maybe he did it intentionally, maybe unintentionally. I don't know. It is a big win for Putin to come to the United States. He's a pariah leader of a rogue state that committed unprovoked aggression against Ukraine.'
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian leader Vladimir Putin before their closed-door meeting on July 16, 2018, in Helsinki, Finland. (Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP)
'On Friday, he's going to get to stand next to the President of the United States and get his picture taken on territory that used to be Russian. Nobody in Russia has missed the fact that we bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. So it's what Trump can do. I think a lot of people are going to be watching. But the main thing is to see if Putin emerges with Trump thinking that they're friends again,' Ambassador Bolton concluded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jaishankar To Visit Moscow, Meet Lavrov, As India-Russia Talks Intensify Amid US Tariff Pressure
As US–Russia tensions spike, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar will travel to Moscow on August 20-21 for talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. This comes after Washington raised tariffs on Indian exports to 50%, citing India's continued purchase of Russian crude. Days earlier, NSA Ajit Doval met Putin, who confirmed his visit to India by the end of 2025. With President Trump and Putin scheduled to meet in Alaska to address the Ukraine war, Moscow is using its deep ties with New Delhi to push back against Western economic pressure. The outcome of these talks could redefine India's role in the global power game.#india #russia #jaishankar #putin #lavrov #ajitdoval #modi #trump #tariffwar #russianoil #usindia #indiarussia #ukrainewar #geopolitics #eurasia #breakingnews #trending #trendingnow #toi #bharat #toibharat #indianews Read More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Chinese FM Wang Yi to visit India next week for border talks with NSA Doval
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is set to visit India on Monday to hold talks with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval under the mechanism of Special Representatives on the border issue, authoritative sources said. Wang is travelling to India days ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's planned trip to the Chinese city of Tianjin to attend the annual summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). The Chinese foreign minister is visiting India primarily to hold the next round of Special Representatives (SR) dialogue on the boundary question, the sources said on Wednesday. Wang and Doval are the designated SR for talks on the boundary issue. Doval travelled to China in December last year and held the SR talks with Wang, weeks after Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping decided to revive various dialogue mechanisms between the two sides at a meeting in the Russian city of Kazan.


Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's hold on Pakistan begins to hurt where it matters
India put the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan, signed in 1960, in abeyance following the Pahalgam terrorist attack in April, arguing Pakistan violated the treaty through unrelenting cross-border terrorism. Months after the action, India's hold on Pakistan has begun to hurt which is evident from incendiary statements by several Pakistani leaders. Speaking at a private dinner in Tampa, Florida, where he had gone to attend an American military function, a few days ago, Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir threatened India that his country would target dams with missiles, as per media reports. Munir told members of the Pakistani diaspora, 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir 10 missile sey faarigh kar dengey [we will destroy it with 10 missiles].' 'The Indus river is not the Indians' family property. Humein missilon ki kami nahin hai, al-Hamdulillah [we have no shortage of missiles, Praise be to God],' he said. Munir also threatened India with nuclear strike. After Munir's comments, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday warned that any attempt to block water flow into Pakistan would be a violation of the IWT and met with a 'decisive response.' Speaking at an event in Islamabad, Sharif declared, 'The enemy cannot snatch even a single drop of water from Pakistan. You threatened to stop our water—if you try, Pakistan will teach you a lesson you will never forget.' Last month, former Pakistan foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, who is the chairman of Pakistan Peoples Party, warned India over its unilateral suspension of the IWT. Speaking during the budget session of the National Assembly, said, 'India has two options: share water fairly, or we will take it from all six rivers.' Also Read | 'Enemy can't snatch even single drop of water': After Munir, Pak PM Shehbaz Sharif threatens India on Indus treaty India rejects international court jurisdictionPakistan has welcomed an international court's ruling interpreting design criteria for new run-of-river hydropower projects on the Western Rivers (Chenab, Jhelum and Indus), to be built by India, saying it vindicates its position on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), which India put in abeyance after the Pahalgam attack. India, however, has never recognised the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which reportedly ruled that India must "let flow" the waters of the Western Rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. India has instead focused on the neutral expert mechanism."The specified exceptions for generation of hydro-electric plants must conform strictly to the requirements laid down in the treaty, rather than to what India might consider an 'ideal' or 'best practices' approach," Pakistan's foreign office said Monday's ruling, Pakistan reiterated its commitment to implementing IWT and urged India to resume functioning of the same. India maintains IWT will remain in abeyance until Pakistan takes action against cross-border terrorism. Also Read | After Asim Munir's nuclear rant, Bilawal Bhutto threatens Pakistan could 'take back six rivers' from India Why are Pak leaders threatening India?Possibly, Pakistan has realised India's suspension of the IWT is not going to be reverted, which poses dire medium- and long-term challenges to the country. Under normal IWT operations, India shared vital water-flow data and alerted Pakistan to seasonal variations and flood risks. Now, India has halted such data sharing, severely impairing Pakistan's ability to anticipate floods or droughts. India no longer needs to follow design and operational restrictions for projects on the western rivers—Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab—meaning it can proceed unilaterally with dam construction and modifications. This includes reservoir flushing to clear sediment at projects like Kishanganga, potentially affecting downstream short-term capability is limited due to India's existing infrastructure, long-term construction of dams and reservoirs could significantly alter water availability for Pakistan in dry relies on Indus waters for 80–90% of its irrigated agriculture, which supports roughly 25% of its GDP and up to 37–45% of employment depending on the report. Also Read | 'We'll show them what's next': After Indus dam, Pak Army Chief Asim Munir now fixes target on RIL Jamnagar refinery In the long term, India could ramp up dams, storage, and diversion projects along the western rivers, consolidating significant upstream control. Pakistan, with limited storage capacity, may suffer perennial water shortages, especially in non-monsoon seasons. Domestic instability in Pakistan could intensify—impacting food security, rural livelihoods, trade competitiveness, and energy possible Pakistan has sensed India's long-term plans to restrict water flow and is alarmed at the Indian environment ministry panel has given 'in-principle' approval for diversion of over 847 hectares of reserved forest and 'jungle-jhari' land for construction of the ambitious 1,856-MW Sawalkot hydroelectric project in Ramban district of Jammu & Kashmir, TOI reported last month. Certain key green provisions were set aside for the purpose, keeping in view national interests. Though the final approval will be subject to grant of environment clearance for the project by the UT govt, the move shows the intent to swiftly take up the dam's construction for leveraging Chenab river's potential following suspension of the IWT. The Sawalkot hydroelectric project (HEP) is a major hydropower initiative, intended to harness the potential of the Chenab — one of the western rivers along with Indus and Jhelum whose waters currently flow unchecked to Pakistan despite India's right to use it for non-consumptive purposes, including hydro-power is also set to revive the long-stalled Tulbul Navigation Project in Jammu & Kashmir, PTI has reported recently, based on information from sources. A detailed project report for Tulbul is being prepared and is expected to take about a year to complete. This move, which comes right after the IWT suspension, underscores a significant policy shift: leveraging water resources as a means of strategic assertion. The work was restarted in 2010, with the then irrigation minister of J&K, Taj Mohideen, stating that Article 9 of IWT permitted such projects meant for non-consumptive use. In 2012, unidentified terrorists lobbed a grenade towards a bund raised by the workers for the project. Under the IWT, India was allocated the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas and Sutlej), while the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum and Chenab) were allocated to Pakistan, with limited rights for India. India is allowed to use water from the western rivers for non-consumptive purposes like navigation, power generation and limited storage. The Tulbul Project aligns with these permissible uses. With the IWT in abeyance, there can't be any challenge to this project. After the Uri Terror Attack in 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said "blood and water cannot flow together" during a high-level review meeting of the IWT. This was a clear signal that India might review or alter its commitment to the IWT in response to Pakistan's failure to curb cross-border terrorism. Nearly a decade later, Modi's indication has become a reality. India's revival of plans to build long-term projects on several rivers suggests it is not going to revert its decision. It also drives home the message in Pakistan that the suspension of the IWT was not a merely tactical move but a long-term strategic shift. Also, India's rejection of international court jurisdiction over IWT underlines this shift. That's what is bothering Pakistan's top leaders.