logo
South Korea vote: Who will run Asia's fourth largest economy?

South Korea vote: Who will run Asia's fourth largest economy?

Eyewitness News21-05-2025

SEOUL - Since US President Donald Trump began his second term, key Asian ally South Korea has not had an elected leader -- meaning crucially, no one to bargain with Washington on tariffs.
With the country now set to vote in a presidential election on June 3, the new leader will need to juggle finding ways to stay out of Trump's trade wars with keeping both Washington -- Seoul's main security partner against the nuclear-armed North -- and neighbouring Beijing happy.
Who's in the running?
There are two main contenders for the top job: front-runner ex-opposition leader Lee Jae-myung and conservative Kim Moon-soo.
Lee, a charismatic former child factory worker turned human rights lawyer, has been dubbed "South Korea's Bernie Sanders" for his strong support of a basic income, advocating measures like direct cash payments to spur economic growth.
But he's been dogged by a string of scandals, although a court recently delayed a retrial which could have derailed his bid for office.
Kim was once a labour and pro-democracy activist fighting military authoritarian regimes, but he shifted his views after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Kim is solidly in second, trailing Lee by 22 percent, according to the most recent Gallup poll.
Economic priorities?
Both candidates have made the economy their top priority, but their approaches are sharply different.
Lee's first pledge is to make South Korea "a global economic powerhouse" -- and it seems, analysts say, he's taking his left-wing party more to the centre.
Lee's Democratic Party previously "emphasised labour rights and distribution, but now it is leaning toward economic growth," said Kim Yong-jin, a professor at Sogang University.
Kim's conservative People Power Party, on the other hand, tends to focus more on "corporate policies rather than the national policies," he added, with their candidate emphasising his pro-business approach.
Branding himself as the "job president and economy president", Kim has repeatedly emphasised that "the key to an economic overhaul is regulatory reform", ironically for a former labour activist.
What about the US, China?
South Korea's next leader will need to carefully balance its relationships with main security ally Washington and key trading partner and neighbour Beijing.
Front-runner Lee claims he's not in a rush to strike a new tariff deal with the United States, saying he will be "prioritising national interests" above quickly sorting things out with the White House.
In contrast, Kim says the most important thing for export-focused South Korea is to maintain a good relationship with Trump.
"I have a very friendly and trusting relationship," with the US leader, he said, vowing to "immediately" hold a summit if elected.
Lee has often been accused of being too China-friendly, saying in 2024 that Taiwan was "none of our business" -- a message his opponent says is "alarming".
But neither candidate is really bringing fresh ideas on balancing these key foreign policy ties, said Park Seung-chan, a professor of Chinese studies at Yongin University.
"Our past approach of simply siding with the stronger power is no longer viable," he said.
What are the stakes?
Already hit by 25 percent tariff on automobiles -- a key export -- South Korea is "highly sensitive" to tariffs, Park Sang-byung, a political commentator, told AFP.
South Korean officials are currently in Washington trying to negotiate a "trade package" aimed at preventing new levies, but progress has been slowed by the lack of an elected leader.
With export performance and economic growth rate "already facing significant concerns, if we do not actively respond to Trump's tariff war, South Korea could find itself in a very difficult situation," said Park.
Does it matter who wins?
At this point, anyone is better than no one, experts say.
Following ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol's disastrous declaration of martial law and the impeachment, South Korea has cycled through two acting presidents, one of whom was the finance minister, and is now on its third.
"A country needs its CEO, the president, and right now South Korea is desperate," Kim Dae-jong, a professor at Sejong University, told AFP.
"Typically, the president determines about 90 percent of a country's fate," said Kim.
Until there is a new leader in place, all negotiations are at a halt, with vice trade minister Park Seung-taek saying it is "theoretically impossible" to sort things out until after the election.
Without a president -- or even a finance minister -- it is a "major crisis" for South Korea, "a situation where a lack of leadership is a serious problem," Kim added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Koreans rally for presidential hopefuls days before vote
South Koreans rally for presidential hopefuls days before vote

eNCA

time7 hours ago

  • eNCA

South Koreans rally for presidential hopefuls days before vote

Thousands of supporters of South Korea's two leading presidential candidates rallied in Seoul on Saturday, three days before a vote triggered by the ex-leader's disastrous declaration of martial law. Tuesday's election caps months of political turmoil sparked by Yoon Suk Yeol's brief suspension of civilian rule in December, for which he was impeached and removed from office. All major polls have put liberal Lee Jae-myung well ahead in the presidential race, with a recent Gallup survey showing 49 percent of respondents viewed him as the best candidate. Kim Moon-soo, from the conservative People Power Party (PPP) that Yoon left this month, trailed Lee on 35 percent. Organisers from both camps told police they expected tens of thousands of supporters to rally in Seoul on Saturday. In Seocho, in the south of the capital, Lee supporters gathered holding signs condemning Yoon's "insurrection". "I believe the outcome of the presidential election is already decided," Lee Kyung-joon, a Lee supporter, told AFP. "I came to today's rally to help condemn the forces involved in the martial law attempt," he said, referring to ex-president Yoon's political allies. Yoon is on trial for insurrection and Kwon Oh-hyeok, one of the organisers of Saturday's rally, said a Lee Jae-myung victory in Tuesday's vote was crucial to holding him accountable. "Isn't the People Power Party's decision to run in the snap election -- triggered by Yoon's removal from office -- an insult and a betrayal of the people?" Kwon told rally participants. "Fellow citizens, we must win by a landslide to deliver the justice this moment demands." In Gwanghwamun Square on the other side of town, conservatives -- including supporters of disgraced ex-leader Yoon -- filled the streets holding signs that read "Yoon Again" and "Early voting is invalid!" Yoon's martial law attempt, which he claimed was necessary to "root out" pro–North Korean, "anti-state" forces, emboldened a wave of extreme supporters including far-right YouTubers and radical religious figures. AFP | Pedro Pardo Many have spread unverified content online, including allegations of Chinese espionage and fraud within South Korea's electoral system. That sentiment was on full display at Saturday's conservative rally, where protesters called for the dissolution of the National Election Commission over a series of mishaps during the two-day early voting period this week. "People believe the root of all these problems lies with the National Election Commission, and that it should be held accountable," protester Rhee Kang-san told AFP. Ex-president Yoon sent a message to the conservative rally through a group led by a far-right Christian figure, which was read aloud by a supporter on his behalf. "Our country is now facing a grave and unprecedented crisis," Yoon's message said, urging people to vote for the PPP candidate Kim. "If we miss this opportunity, we may have to pay a heavy price in time and sacrifice, and the restoration of free democracy and a normal state may no longer be possible," the former president said, according to supporter Lee Dong-ho, who read the message aloud and shared it with AFP. - Deepening polarisation - Both frontrunner Lee Jae-myung of the liberal Democratic Party and conservative challenger Kim have cast the race as a battle for the soul of the country. More than a third of those eligible cast their ballots in early voting on Thursday and Friday, according to the election commission. AFP | ANTHONY WALLACE Overseas voting reached a record high, with nearly four-fifths of the 1.97 million eligible voters casting their ballots last week. Experts say that, regardless of who wins, South Korea's polarisation is likely to deepen. If Lee wins, the conservatives "will do whatever it takes to undermine him and his government, whether their logic makes sense or not", political analyst Park Sang-byung told AFP. "Unless the PPP distances itself from Yoon's extremist base, it could turn to misinformation -- such as unfounded claims of election fraud -- to mobilise the right against Lee. That's a troubling prospect," he said. Whoever succeeds Yoon will also have to grapple with a worsening economic downturn, one of the world's lowest birth rates, the soaring cost of living and bellicose neighbour North Korea. He will also have to navigate a mounting superpower standoff between the United States, South Korea's traditional security guarantor, and China, its largest trade partner. By Claire Lee

Trump tariffs stay in place for now after court reprieve
Trump tariffs stay in place for now after court reprieve

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Trump tariffs stay in place for now after court reprieve

US President Donald Trump. Image: AFP US President Donald Trump celebrated a temporary reprieve for his aggressive tariff strategy on Thursday, with an appeals court preserving his sweeping import duties on China and other trading partners -- for now. The short-term relief will allow the appeals process to proceed after the US Court of International Trade barred most of the tariffs announced since Trump took office, ruling on Wednesday that he had overstepped his authority. Welcoming the latest twist in legal skirmishes over his trade policies, Trump lashed out at the Manhattan-based trade court, calling it "horrible" and saying its blockade should be "quickly and decisively" reversed for good. Asian shares fell on Friday, reversing a rally across world markets the previous day, as the judicial wrangling around Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs fanned uncertainty. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said after Thursday's appeals court ruling that trade talks with China were "a bit stalled" and Trump might need to speak to President Xi Jinping in order to iron out tariffs between the world's two biggest economies. "I think that given the magnitude of the talks, given the complexity, that this is going to require both leaders to weigh in with each other," Bessent told Fox News after the ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, known as an administrative stay. Washington and Beijing agreed this month to pause reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, a surprise de-escalation in their bitter trade war following talks between top officials in Geneva. Asked about Bessent's comments at a regular news conference on Friday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said Beijing had "stated its position on the tariffs issue many times" in an apparent reference to the Asian manufacturing giant's fury at the levies. Trump has moved to reconfigure US trade ties with the world since returning to the presidency in January, using levies to force foreign governments to the negotiating table. However, the stop-start tariff rollout on both allies and adversaries has roiled markets and snarled supply chains. The White House had been given 10 days to halt affected tariffs before Thursday's decision from the appeals court. The Trump administration called the block "blatantly wrong," expressing confidence that the decision would be overturned on appeal. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the judges "brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump." Leavitt said the Supreme Court "must put an end" to the tariff challenge, while stressing that Trump had other legal means to impose levies. A separate ruling by a federal district judge in the US capital found some Trump levies unlawful as well, giving the administration 14 days to appeal. 'Hiccups' Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told Fox Business that "hiccups" sparked by the decisions of "activist judges" would not affect talks with trading partners, adding that three deals were close to finalization. Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro told reporters after the appellate stay that the administration had earlier received "plenty of phone calls from countries" who said they would continue to "negotiate in good faith," without identifying those nations. Trump's import levies are aimed partly at punishing economies that sell more to the United States than they buy. The president has argued that trade deficits and the threat posed by drug smuggling constituted a "national emergency" that justified the widespread tariffs -- a notion the Court of International Trade ruled against. Trump unveiled sweeping duties on nearly all trading partners in April at a baseline 10 percent, plus steeper levies on dozens of economies including China and the European Union that have since been paused. The US trade court's ruling quashed those blanket duties, along with others that Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately using emergency powers. However, it left intact 25 percent duties on imported autos, steel and aluminum. Beijing -- which was hit by additional 145 percent tariffs before they were temporarily reduced to make space for negotiations -- reacted to the trade court decision by saying Washington should scrap the levies.

Macron urges Asia, Europe to unite to resist 'spheres of coercion'
Macron urges Asia, Europe to unite to resist 'spheres of coercion'

eNCA

timea day ago

  • eNCA

Macron urges Asia, Europe to unite to resist 'spheres of coercion'

French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday urged Europe and Asia to build a new alliance to hold off big powers seeking to build "spheres of coercion", in a swipe at China and Russia. Macron was speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's major annual defence and security conference, as Russia defies diplomatic pressure for a ceasefire in Ukraine and capitals fret about Beijing's growing assertiveness on Taiwan and the South China Sea. Macron urged the international community to unite in the face of countries seeking to grab territory and resources. "We have a challenge of revisionist countries that want to impose -- under the name of spheres of influence -- spheres of coercion," Macron said. "Countries that want to control areas from the fringes of Europe to the archipelagos in the South China Sea... that want to appropriate resources, whether fishing or mineral and crowd out others for their benefit." Defence chiefs and officials from around the world are attending the annual forum that has in recent years become a barometer of US-China relations. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will address the conference on Saturday after President Donald Trump fired a fresh salvo in his tariff battle with Beijing, which has roiled global money markets. But unusually, China has not sent its defence minister to Shangri-La, and will instead be represented by a senior officer from its People's Liberation Army's National Defence University. Since 2019 Beijing has regularly sent its defence minister to the Shangri-La meet, occasions that offered rare opportunities to hold face-to-face talks with US counterparts. - 'Build a new alliance' - AFP | MOHD RASFAN Macron's speech came at the end of a tour of Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore, which he used to present France as a reliable alternative for a region caught between Washington and Beijing. Asian countries have found themselves torn between Washington's tariff threats on one hand and Beijing, a major trading partner that has become increasingly forthright in territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Tensions between Washington and Beijing have ramped up since Trump returned to office in January, off the back of an escalating trade standoff, intensified technological rivalry, and strategic military posturing. Macron urged leaders at the conference to "build a positive new alliance between Europe and Asia, based on our common norms, on our common principles". "Our shared responsibility is to ensure with others that our countries are not collateral victims of the imbalances linked to the choices made by the superpowers," he said. Macron urged China to stop its ally North Korea from sending forces to help Russia's war in Ukraine if Beijing "doesn't want NATO being involved in Southeast Asia or in Asia". He warned Asian leaders against seeing the war in Ukraine as a distant problem with no relevance to them. "If we consider that Russia could be allowed to take a part of the territory of Ukraine without any restriction, without any constraint, without any reaction of the global order, how would you phrase what could happen in Taiwan?" he said. "What would you do the day something happens in the Philippines?" - 'Kill our credibility' - Macron also weighed in on the war in Gaza, warning that abandoning the shattered Palestinian enclave would kill the West's credibility with the rest of the world. "If we abandon Gaza, if we consider there is a free pass for Israel, even if we do condemn the terrorist attacks, we will kill our credibility," he said. His comments came as Israel accused him of undertaking a "crusade against the Jewish state" after he called for European countries to harden their stance on Israel if the humanitarian situation in Gaza did not improve. Beyond the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, the recent clashes between India and Pakistan will lurk in the shadows of the conference, which runs until Sunday. An April 22 attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir triggered some of the worst cross-border clashes between the nuclear-armed neighbours in years, with at least 70 people killed. Muslim-majority Kashmir is claimed in full by both countries, which have fought multiple wars over the Himalayan territory since their 1947 independence from Britain. New Delhi accused Pakistan of backing the attack, a charge Islamabad denies. Neither side has sent their defence ministers, instead dispatching senior military delegations. No meeting between the two sides has been announced. By Damon Wake And Francesco Fontemaggi

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store