Stocks will rally despite extended dollar declines, markets survey finds
US equities will put the worst of this year's trade-war turmoil behind them and rally to fresh highs in 2025, according to a survey of Bloomberg subscribers who attended a panel discussion on macro trends.
The S&P 500 will climb to 6,500 — a better than 9% increase from Thursday's close — by year-end, according to 44% of the 27 responses in a Markets Live Pulse survey.
The index was seen reaching that level by the first half of next year by 26% of participants, with 11% saying it would happen in the second half and the remainder estimating 2027 or later.
A rally to 6,500 would likely mean the market fully moves on from concerns that President Donald Trump's tariffs may severely damage the economy. It would represent a substantial recovery from the impact of the trade war, which currently has the US benchmark hovering just above its starting level for 2025.
Expectations for the dollar are gloomier, with 68% of the 25 respondents to that question forecasting the US currency will keep falling at least until the first half of next year. That includes the 40% of participants who expect the depreciation trend to extend into 2027.
The MLIV panel discussed both whether US exceptionalism in equities was past its use-by date, and the potential that concerns about how sustainable the dollar's haven role has become.
The survey responses may be taken to signal doubts that US equities will be knocked from their perch anytime soon, especially given the still-positive impacts from the AI boom expected to feed through into corporate earnings.
The dollar's downtrend is seen as far more sustainable. That signals respondents may be leaning into the idea that the currency channel will go on being the clearest expression of concerns regarding US assets in general.
If investors are going to be demanding a greater premium to put their money into the US that will come via a lower US dollar level, rather than via sustained, serious declines in nominal asset prices.
As for Treasuries, responses were more evenly split. A modest majority, 56% of the 25 who answered that question, expected the 10-year yield to end 2025 at 4.6% or above. That included the 24% of the total who forecast it would be above 5%. The yield was at 4.39% on Thursday. Some 20% saw it dropping below 4%.
The MLIV Pulse survey was conducted among Bloomberg clients immediately after MLIV's Money & Macro panel held Thursday on How to Trade the New Markets Regime. Sign up for future surveys here.
Reynolds writes for Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Idaho senators should protect school choice in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is now moving through the U.S. Senate, and conservative Christians are thrilled with many of the provisions that have been included so far. Although we don't yet know how the Senate version of the bill will shake out, it's worth noting that the version passed by the House late last month fulfills many of the pro-family policies made by the Trump administration. These include an expansion to the child tax credit for working families, tax benefits for adoptive parents and making permanent the Trump personal income and business tax cuts that fueled the above-average economic growth America experienced before the pandemic derailed international markets. However, one provision in particular that would improve educational access and outcomes for all students has flown under the radar so far. The provision would help more than one million students across the country access the educational support they need by creating special tax benefits for private donations to scholarship-granting organizations. It is modeled after the Educational Choice for Children Act, a federal proposal that has been introduced multiple times over the past several years and has earned the support of Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, as well as other conservative stalwarts like Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, and Sen. Tim Scott, R-South Carolina. Scholarship-granting organizations already exist in many states, providing scholarships directly to students for tuition, tutoring, special needs services, education technology and curriculum materials. The provision offers both a supplement and alternative for students in states like Idaho, which has already begun moving down the road to more universal school choice programs by offering a new $5,000 refundable tax credit paid directly to the private school and homeschool families. Some parents — particularly within the homeschooling community — have voiced concerns that new school choice initiatives, such as Idaho's refundable tax credit, might jeopardize their educational freedom. After all, government money usually comes with strings attached. When you take the government cheese, you have to step into the regulatory mousetrap. And even if those restrictions aren't imposed right away, the door remains open for future state and federal mandates. Importantly, the ECCA provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill addresses these concerns by making sure no government funds go to the organizations, schools, or families involved — thereby avoiding another opportunity for government regulation. Instead, the ECCA establishes tax incentives for private donations to scholarship-granting organizations, which then award scholarships directly to students. Because this is private money — not government dollars — families can freely choose the best educational options for their children without government interference. All of this explains why the ECCA is supported by homeschool freedom advocates, including the Home School Legal Defense Association. In fact, the ECCA model helps ensure that parents remain in control of their children's education, consistent with biblical principles like Ephesians 6:4, which commands fathers to bring up their children in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. Not only would the ECCA provision in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' help parents fulfill this biblical responsibility, but it would also expand educational opportunities for children currently stuck in failing public schools, no matter the state in which they live. Nationwide school choice which empowers parents while also protecting educational freedom is a high priority for Trump — and it should be just as high a priority for our legislative branch as they set education policy. With that in mind, we call on the U.S. Senate to keep the ECCA provision in whichever version of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' they adopt. Our children — and their families — deserve it. Blaine Conzatti is the president of Idaho Family Policy Center.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump loyalty is now part of job application
More than six million Americans are still looking for work, according to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Amid ongoing economic uncertainty, the federal government remains one of the country's most active employers, with open roles for nurses, actuaries, physicists, engineers and IT professionals listed at But prospective applicants may notice something different about the application process in 2025. Alongside typical questions about experience and qualifications, some federal job forms now ask about an applicant's alignment with presidential policy priorities, raising concerns about political screening in what are supposed to be nonpartisan civil service roles. Under guidance issued by the Chief Human Capital Officers Council (CHCOC), part of a broader federal hiring overhaul, applicants may be asked to explain how they would help implement specific executive orders or initiatives. One question currently being used reads: 'How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.' This directive is connected to an executive order President Donald Trump that emphasizes 'merit-based' hiring over previous diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations. The administration stated that these changes are intended to root out political bias and ensure a more ideologically aligned workforce. Critics argue that these practices resemble loyalty tests, particularly as questions of commitment to the Constitution and the President's policies appeared in job applications. Earlier this year, multiple government agencies experienced layoffs of employees who were seen as insufficiently aligned with current leadership, even in traditionally apolitical roles. Historical parallels have been raised. During the McCarthy era in the 1950s, public servants and private citizens alike were pressured to prove their loyalty to the U.S. government to root out suspected communists. Accusations and investigations often targeted personal beliefs rather than actions, leading to widespread firings, blacklisting and surveillance. Civil service roles in the U.S. were originally designed to serve the Constitution and the public, not individual officeholders. Federal employees take an oath to uphold the Constitution, a foundational distinction meant to separate American governance from monarchic or authoritarian systems. Whether the latest hiring guidelines are a temporary shift or a lasting transformation of the federal workforce remains to be seen. For now, job seekers interested in federal positions may want to prepare answers not just about their skills but about their stance on presidential policy.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's travel ban goes into effect on Monday. What's going to happen at MIA?
A Trump administration travel ban that severely restricts the entry of nationals from Haiti, Cuba, and Venezuela into the United States starts Monday, and it's yet unclear about how the policy will affect operations at Miami International Airport. There are still questions about who will be allowed into the U.S. under the ban — the State Department has said that travelers from the three affected nations will be able to keep their valid, current visas, but it's up to the Department of Homeland Security to decide whether to let people in at ports of entry. 'Confusion and frustration': Trump travel ban is unclear on who can visit the U.S. MIA is a major point of transit between the United States and Latin America and the Caribbean. It receives hundreds of flights from the region daily, including flights directly from Haiti and Cuba. On Friday, at least 14 commercial and charter flights were landing in Miami from Havana, according to flight information from the airport. A charter flight landed from Cap Haitien, a city on Haiti's northern coast. And while there are no direct flights between Venezuela and the U.S., many Venezuelans travel to Miami through third countries that offer non-stop flights to South Florida, including Colombia, Panama, Ecuador and Mexico and the Dominican Republic. The new Trump travel policy is raising questions about what will happen at the major hub on Monday, including as to whether border agents will turn around tourists and travelers when they arrive in Miami on Monday despite having valid visas. It's also unclear whether airlines have received any guidance on the matter. The Miami Herald reached out to several major airlines that service MIA. A Delta Air Lines spokesperson referred the Herald to U.S. Customs and Border Protection in response to questions about whether Haitians, Cubans, and Venezuelans on tourist and business visas will be allowed into the United States. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday that 'fully restricts and limits the entry' of Haitian nationals and 'partially restricts and limits' the entry of Cuban and Venezuelan nationals, as well as citizens of over a dozen other countries. The travel ban is the latest federal government move targeting legal immigration from Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela, all large sources of immigration into the U.S.
