logo
Recession indicators: How do we know if the economy is in trouble?

Recession indicators: How do we know if the economy is in trouble?

CTV News18-05-2025

Bank towers are shown from Bay Street in Toronto's financial district, on Wednesday, June 16, 2010. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrien Veczan
As a global trade war marches on, economic uncertainty has sparked fears of a recession on the horizon, bringing layoffs, bankruptcies and deepening affordability challenges with it.
But for as long as there have been hard times, there have been a mountain of strategies to try and see them coming. And while economists routinely track hard data like GDP, unemployment and inflation, analysis can fold in all kinds of indicators -- including some that seem obscure, or strangely specific.
From cardboard boxes, lipstick and men's undergarments to law school entrance exams, here are some supposed signs the economy might be on track to contract:
Could there be a recession?
As defined by the C.D. Howe Institute, an economic recession is a "pronounced, persistent, and pervasive decline in aggregate economic activity," and while it isn't always the case, a market is typically considered in recession if it's gone through at least two consecutive quarters with a decreasing gross domestic product (GDP).
Economists rely on a variety of financial data to predict recessions, including GDP performance, total sales of goods, unemployment rates and the yield curve, or the difference in interest rates on shorter versus longer-term bonds.
The path ahead for Canada's economy is unclear, as predictions differ as to whether the country is headed for a recession in the next two years. RBC's May update shows slowing growth heading into 2026, but TD Bank's and Deloitte's spring outlooks forecast back-to-back quarters of contraction in the near future.
'The trade conflict has made the outlook for the Canadian economy highly uncertain‚" reads a recent Bank of Canada report that found that the economy could be facing a yearlong recession, should the trade war's impacts linger.
Uncertainty clouds predictions of the future for an economy already in trouble before the trade war, says University of Ottawa economics professor and Canada research chair Isabelle Salle.
'Tariff(s) and this uncertainty shock just added to existing problems, at the worst time possible,' she told CTVNews.ca in an interview Thursday. '(With) uncertainty, you cannot easily put probabilities attached to the different scenarios. You really have to operate with just options.'
Salle says that unlike the financial crisis of the late 2000s, which had a more identifiable impact and response, not only do we not know how bad things could get in the coming months, it's also hard to know the solution.
'We don't know exactly what is going to be the size of the shock, how long it's going to last, but we're also not sure what is this shock … Is it a supply shock? Is it a demand shock? Is it a bit of the two?' she said.
'This is a little bit more complicated, I would say, than the 2007 crisis.'
Economic anxiety
Aside from the recent hard data, also key are forward-looking indicators like consumer confidence surveys, where large numbers of people are asked how they feel about the economy's health and future.
At last tally, the Bloomberg-Nanos Canadian Confidence Index showed a positive rebound, following notable declines amid the recent height of trade tensions. Rated at 48.59 as of May 9, the index has nearly returned to the 50-point benchmark, which signifies a net-neutral opinion among consumers.
'After a consistently negative trajectory since the election of U.S. President Trump, consumer confidence is improving in the period following the election of the Mark Carney government,' said data scientist Nik Nanos, in a release.
Walid Hejazi, a professor of economic analysis and policy at the University of Toronto, notes that in hard economic times, consumer confidence can add fuel to the fire.
If consumers fear a recession is coming, he explains, they may reduce their spending to prepare, but reduced consumer spending makes the economy slow down even more.
'That, in and of itself, makes a recession more likely,' he said in a Thursday interview with CTVNews.ca. 'That's where that self-fulfilling (prophecy) comes in.'
Lipstick, underwear, cardboard boxes
But recession indicators don't stop at broad aggregates of business performance and public opinion. Some economic signals can be far more niche, and even bizarre.
Among modern economics' oldest indicators is "hemline theory," which holds that the market shifts toward shorter skirts in times of plenty (think: the Roaring 20s) and longer ones amid economic downturns (the Great Depression).
While some academic research has debated on the statistical significance between skirt length and overall economic health, the idea of working backwards from consumer trends has caught on.
It's often said that as the economy recedes, shoppers cut back on big-ticket luxuries like cars or gadgets, but spend more on small nonessentials, a form of retail therapy commonly known as the "lipstick effect."
Conversely, former U.S. central banker Alan Greenspan popularized the "men's underwear index': a recession indicator based on the idea that, when money is tight, men delay purchases of the one item of clothing seen least often in daily life.
Hejazi says phenomena like these can help illustrate correlation versus causation, but they can also be instructive examples of how the economy impacts not just our total spending, but also where it's concentrated.
'There seems to have been some fundamental change in people's spending patterns, and many people think it's probably because of the huge crisis we have in affordability,' he said.
Salle notes that Canada's economy is particularly reliant on consumer forces.
'Household consumption is a big, big, big deal of the GDP,' Salle said. 'We know that if you are going to cut on your budget, or postpone your consumption because you think it's going to be hard, and you better save, you are not going to cut, necessarily, on your food first.'
But it's not just about purchases; some behaviours understood to be market-driven can run deeper. A recent spike in applications for law-school entrance exams, for example, may signal to some that young professionals are seeking recession-proof careers, or at least a few years of school to wait it out.
According to economist Andrew Lawrence's 'skyscraper index,' the completion of a new world's tallest building is often followed by financial crisis, as such huge projects 'seem to mark a very large economic boom that typically ends in large recession,' he told the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat in a 2012 interview.
Jeffrey Kleintop, a strategist at financial services firm Charles Schwab, has examined sales of cardboard boxes as an indicator for the health of global manufacturing. All of those goods need to be shipped in something, after all; a drop in sales for packing materials may connote coming trouble for goods of all kinds.
While many indicators are based on logical, or at least linear market trends, others track phenomena completely divorced from dollars and cents, such as whether this Lunar New Year sparked a year of the dragon, who won the Super Bowl or even whether Groundhog Day predicted six more weeks of winter.
In a blog post early last year, Kleintop wrote that the popularity of "market folklore" makes for a 'testament to the very human desire for an easy answer,' despite its dubious relationship with accuracy.
U of T's Hejazi notes that even some of the most trusted indicators can be misleading, and often disagree with one another.
'Leading indicators are not determinative,' he said. 'They predict, but they don't always get it right.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall
Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall

Globe and Mail

time39 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and three of her ministers got an earful on Wednesday night from southern Alberta locals at a rowdy, hours-long town hall to discuss the province's coal policy. About 500 people, dressed in cowboy hats, belt buckles, and jeans, packed a community hall in Fort Macleod, Alta., for an event marked by heckling, competing applause and placards. 'If we are not prepared to look and find middle-ground solutions to allow for industries to proceed while reducing our environmental footprint, you're going to find that different industries become the next on the hit list,' Smith said through a chorus of protesting voices and verbal jabs. 'Banning industries is just not something we are going to do.' The premier and her ministers of energy, environment and agriculture took questions and were shouted down on several occasions by attendees as they defended changes to the province's coal policy. Many in the crowd held small placards reading 'lie' and 'false,' raising them each time they disagreed with a statement. There was a notable group that came in support of the province's coal policy, frequently applauding the ministers and shooting back at other crowd members. Many attendees carried notebooks and pens, keenly taking notes throughout. The town hall came weeks after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Northback Holding Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled that the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed the potential economic benefits. Alberta regulator approves controversial coal exploration applications at Grassy Mountain Late last year, the project was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines because Northback's application was considered an 'advanced' proposal. The issue has been polarizing in southern Alberta, where the debate has primarily revolved around the economic implications of development against environmental effects. A non-binding referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support the nearby coal project. Despite frequent pushback over the two-and-a-half-hour event, Smith rarely chose to get into back-and-forth discussions with attendees. She defended the province's approach to coal developments, pitching responsible development that prioritizes environmental standards. Smith also frequently cited a lawsuit by five coal companies that say they're owed $15 billion by the province in lost revenues and sunk costs. She argued again on Wednesday that she had taxpayers in mind when the province lifted its moratorium on coal mining and development on the eastern slopes. 'If we do nothing, then we are told we'll likely lose those cases and have to pay ($15 billion).' An energetic Brian Jean, the province's energy minister, frequently challenged the boisterous crowd and at times trotted offstage to hand his business card to those asking questions. 'I live in the oilsands. You can't tell me what I'm concerned about and what I'm not concerned about. I'm very concerned about our earth and our planet,' he said. Coal mines on Alberta's eastern slopes are poisoning fish populations, study says Several questions returned to a new study by Alberta government scientists, yet to be peer reviewed, which recently said old coal mines on the eastern slopes are poisoning fish and any further coal mining there would result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake. Asked about the report, Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the province is looking into the issue and is waiting for it to be confirmed by the peer-review process. She said further studies to be released later this year are being conducted. 'We want to understand what is happening there so that we can prevent that from happening in the future.' The premier also jousted with protesters while speaking to reporters before the town hall. When a group gathered behind her and started yelling, she turned around and asked them to let her finish the interview. 'I'm looking for a little bit of courtesy,' she said. The event was scheduled to last two hours, but Smith asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out.

Xtract One Technologies Inc. Announces $7 Million 'Bought Deal' Public Offering
Xtract One Technologies Inc. Announces $7 Million 'Bought Deal' Public Offering

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Xtract One Technologies Inc. Announces $7 Million 'Bought Deal' Public Offering

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THE U.S. NEWSWIRE OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS IS ACCESSIBLE AND PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE ON SEDAR+ WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS TORONTO, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- June 11, 2025 – Xtract One Technologies Inc. (TSX: XTRA) (OTCQX: XTRAF) (FRA: 0PL), a leading technology-driven threat detection and security solution that prioritizes the patron access experience by leveraging AI, (the " Company" or " Xtract One") is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement with Ventum Capital Markets (the " Underwriter") pursuant to which the Underwriter has agreed to purchase 18,000,000 units (the" Offered Securities") from the treasury of the Company, at a price of $0.39 per Unit (the ' Issue Price ') and offer them to the public by way of prospectus supplement for total gross proceeds of $7,020,000 (the " Offering"). Each Unit will consist of one common share of the Company (each a ' Common Share ') and one common share purchase warrant (each full warrant, a ' Warrant ' and collectively the ' Warrants '). The Company has granted the Underwriter an option to purchase up to an additional 15% of the Offered Securities at the Issue Price. The Over-Allotment Option may be exercised in whole or in part to purchase Offered Securities as determined by the Underwriter upon written notice to the Company at any time up to 30 days following the Closing Date (the ' Over-Allotment Option '). The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Offered Securities will be offered (i) by way of a prospectus supplement to the base shelf prospectus of the Company dated February 6, 2024 (the ' Base Shelf Prospectus ') to be filed in all provinces and territories of Canada, except Quebec (the ' Prospectus Supplement '); (ii) may be distributed in the United States to Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ' U.S. Securities Act ')) pursuant to an exemption under Rule 144A; and (iii) may be distributed outside Canada and the United States on a basis which does not require the qualification or registration of any of the Company's securities under domestic or foreign securities laws. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to sell any of securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. The Offering is expected to close on or about June 18, 2025, or such other date as the Company and the Underwriter may agree, and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the securities regulatory authorities and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Access to the Prospectus Supplement, the Base Shelf Prospectus and any amendments thereto are provided in Canada in accordance with securities legislation relating to procedures for providing access to a shelf prospectus supplement, a base shelf prospectus supplement and any amendment to such documents. The Base Shelf Prospectus is, and the Prospectus Supplement will be (within two business days from the date hereof), accessible through SEDAR+ at An electronic or paper copy of the Prospectus Supplement, the Base Shelf Prospectus and any amendment thereto may be obtained, without charge, from Ventum Financial Corp., or email at ecm@ by providing the contact with an email address or address, as applicable. About Xtract One Xtract One Technologies is a leading technology-driven provider of threat detection and security solutions leveraging AI to deliver seamless and secure experiences. The Company makes unobtrusive weapons and threat detection systems that are designed to assist facility operators in prioritizing- and delivering improved 'Walk-right-In' experiences while enhancing safety. Xtract One's innovative portfolio of AI-powered Gateway solutions excels at allowing facilities to discreetly screen and identify weapons and other threats at points of entry and exit without disrupting the flow of traffic. With solutions built to serve the unique market needs for schools, hospitals, arenas, stadiums, manufacturing, distribution, and other customers, Xtract One is recognized as a market leader delivering the highest security in combination with the best individual experience. For more information, visit or connect on Facebook, X, and LinkedIn. About Threat Detection Systems Xtract One solutions, when properly configured, deployed, and utilized, are designed to help enhance safety and reduce threats. Given the wide range of potential threats in today's world, no threat detection system is 100% effective. Xtract One solutions should be utilized as one element in a multilayered approach to physical security. For further information, please contact: Xtract One Inquiries: info@ Media Contact: Kristen Aikey, JMG Public Relations, 212-206-1645, kristen@ Investor Relations: Chris Witty, Darrow Associates, 646-438-9385, cwitty@ Forward-Looking Information This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. All statements that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding the anticipated completion of the Offering, intended use of proceeds from the Offering, future estimates, plans, programs, forecasts, projections, objectives, assumptions, expectations or beliefs of future performance, are 'forward-looking statements'. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as 'plans', 'expects' or 'does not expect', 'is expected', 'estimates', 'intends', 'anticipates' or 'does not anticipate', 'believes', or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results 'may', 'could', 'would', 'might' or 'will' be taken, occur or be achieved. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be materially different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the Company's limited operating history and lack of historical profits; risks related to the Company's business and financial position; fluctuations in the market price of the Company's Common Shares; that the Company may not be able to accurately predict its rate of growth and profitability; the failure of the Company and/or the Underwriter to satisfy closing conditions to the Offering; whether the Over-Allotment Option will be exercised; the failure of the Company to satisfy certain TSX additional listing requirements in respect of the Offered Securities; the failure of the Company to use any of the proceeds received from the Offering in a manner consistent with current expectations; reliance on management; the Company's requirements for additional financing, and the effect of capital market conditions and other factors on capital availability; competition, including from more established or better financed competitors; and the need to secure and maintain corporate alliances and partnerships, including with research and development institutions, clients and suppliers. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important risk factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other risk factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. The Company has no intention to update any forward-looking statement, even if new information becomes available as a result of future events, new information or for any other reason, except as required by law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store