logo
Age verification comes to X – and you might not be able to verify at all

Age verification comes to X – and you might not be able to verify at all

Tom's Guide2 days ago
Following the introduction of the Online Safety Act, Britons are finding that a number of websites and apps are asking them to verify their age.
X is one of those sites, and along with Reddit, Spotify, and even Wikipedia, it is requiring users to submit proof of age in order to see certain content – but age verification on X is complex to say the least.
Demand for the best VPNs has skyrocketed in the UK, with major providers seeing huge spikes in sign ups. Brits are searching for ways to bypass age verification checks in response to their perceived cybersecurity risks, and many are trying to get around age verification on X due to how confusing the system is.
Many users are reporting they can't verify their age at all, and others are reporting that only X Premium subscribers can verify their age. Below, we lay out everything you need to know.
NordVPN: Our #1 VPN overallWe've tested dozens of VPNs, and we consider NordVPN the best for most people. This is because it boasts super fast speeds, has top-tier privacy and security, and has great unblocking power.
Tom's Guide readers can get a 2-year deal for £2.31 / $2.91 per month (£64.56 / $81.36 up front pre-tax). This exclusive deal comes with an extra 4 months of protection and Amazon gift cards worth up to $50 with NordVPN Plus and higher plans. All plans come with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
As it stands, X users in the UK that have not verified their age will either not see content deemed 18+ on their timeline, or will see a message that reads: "Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age."
X's Age Assurance policy lists the ways in which age verification can take place. One method is using "highly reliable signals" such as:
X verifies users automatically using these signals, and no further action is required. Additional steps that don't require user action are email address and network-based connections.
Not every X user can be automatically verified in this way. X offers two methods for user-involved verification:
X states "these measures should be made available in the following weeks," so it isn't clear whether this can currently be done.
There is also a suggestion that user-involved age verification can only be accessed by subscribing to X Premium.
X's ID Verification policy states "ID Verification is available globally for X Premium" and doesn't make reference to age verification for non-subscribing users.
Despite this, some users on Reddit are saying that two types of ID are required, even after purchasing X Premium. Another user reported that the ID verification systems are "offline."
A Reddit user in Spain said even after verifying their ID and subscribing to X Premium, they are still receiving the "due to local laws" message.
This implies that, at the time of writing, anyone who fails the "highly reliable signals" part of X age verification is unable to verify their age at all.
If it is true that X users on a free plan are physically unable to verify their age without subscribing to X Premium, this is worrying.
A two-tier system is being created where content is censored to those who can't or won't pay. This can be seen as internet censorship and corporate greed.
Even if an X user can verify their age, it's still a potential privacy risk. The data being handed over is highly sensitive and consequences could be catastrophic if there was a data breach.
People see it as an attack on privacy and there are strong opinions on either side of the debate.
X says it uses Au10ticx, Persona, and Stripe for ID verification, with Stripe being used for creators in the US.
Questions are being asked about how any data submitted is stored – and how securely.
X says "we collect an image of the ID and the selfie, which include face data and data extracted from the ID."
It says it "prioritizes your privacy" and adds that "third-party providers will also be bound by strict data protection standards."
In its age verification policy it says "Au10tix and Persona delete images of the IDs, selfies and data extracted from the ID after 30 days. This helps X provide you an opportunity to appeal a verification decision and for X to review your appeal."
However it says "Stripe will retain the data as long as the user remains a creator."
As mentioned, demand for VPNs in the UK has soared. Users believe connecting to a server in another country can help them avoid age verification checks.
OFCOM has discouraged the use of VPNs to bypass checks This increased attention on VPNs has led some to ask whether the UK government will ban VPNs.
In the case of X, user reports suggest that VPNs alone can't unblock content on the app. There is an option within X's settings to change your location and if this is set to the UK, content will be blocked regardless of whether you use a VPN or not.
Originally, it appeared as though changing this location was enough to avoid the checks and unblock content – but this no longer seems to be the case.
Experiences vary, but users who have had success in avoiding age checks and unblocking content report having to change their in-app location and use a VPN at the same time.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reddit (RDDT) Climbs 26% on Strong Earnings
Reddit (RDDT) Climbs 26% on Strong Earnings

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Reddit (RDDT) Climbs 26% on Strong Earnings

We recently published Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is one of the companies that stood stronger last week. Reddit saw its share prices surge by 26.04 percent week-on-week as investors took heart from a strong earnings performance in the second quarter of the year. In its updated report, Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) said it swung to a net income of $89 million from a $10 million net loss in the same period last year, while revenues expanded by 78 percent to $500 million from $281 million year-on-year. In terms of market share, the US contributed $409 million, marking a 79-percent increase year-on-year, while the international market amounted to $91 million, or a 71-percent jump from a year earlier. For the third quarter of the year, Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is targeting to hit $535 million to $545 million in revenues, or a 53 percent to 56 percent surge from the $348.4 million actual revenues in the third quarter of 2024. 'Reddit is built for this moment. In a world where connection is increasingly rare, our communities show how valuable human conversation and knowledge really are,' Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT)Co-Founder and CEO Steve Huffman said. Copyright: rvlsoft / 123RF Stock Photo 'We're focused on growing globally, scaling sustainably, and making Reddit the most trusted place on the internet.' While we acknowledge the potential of RDDT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤

Couple on a ‘Tight' Budget While Wedding Planning. Then Groom Buys Pricey Present for Sister Without Asking
Couple on a ‘Tight' Budget While Wedding Planning. Then Groom Buys Pricey Present for Sister Without Asking

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Couple on a ‘Tight' Budget While Wedding Planning. Then Groom Buys Pricey Present for Sister Without Asking

The 29-year-old woman is worried about her finances after her fiancé agreed to pay for his sister's wedding dressNEED TO KNOW The 29-year-old woman is worried about her finances after her fiancé agreed to pay for his sister's wedding dress When they talked about it, her fiancé told her she was being "selfish" People agreed with the woman, telling her that she needs to have a conversation with her fiancé about their financesA bride was left stunned after her soon-to-be husband offered to pay for his sister's wedding dress before she even bought her own. On Reddit, the 29-year-old woman explained that she and her 30-year-old fiancé are currently planning their wedding. Since their "budget is tight," they've "been trying to be smart about every expense." Recently, her fiancé's 25-year-old sister "announced she's getting married next year, and in the same conversation, casually asked him if he could help pay for her dress." The man immediately said yes, without even discussing it with the poster. 'We haven't paid for my dress yet. We haven't even locked down our venue deposit. But somehow, he's financially committing to his sister while I'm trying to make our wedding work on a spreadsheet,' the woman writes. When she brought it up to her fiancé, he told her that she was being 'selfish' and that 'family helps each other.' "I get that but isn't our wedding the priority right now?" she questions. While the woman is trying to understand her fiancé's position, she 'feels like this was a major decision made without me that affects both of us.' People in the comments section reassured the woman that she's not overreacting and urged her to have an honest conversation with her fiancé about their finances in anticipation of their big day. 'When you are in a relationship and finances have merged, these things need to be a joint discussion and choice," one commenter wrote. "Whilst family does help and support each other it cannot be at your detriment. "You need to have an honest and open conversation with your partner which is non accusatory and emotion based. Seek boundaries and acknowledgement during this conversation and revisit it after a few days to ensure you are on the same page moving forward," they continued. "How you approach money and familial obligations are so key to your relationship so it's best to ensure you are on the same page moving forward." Another person echoed this sentiment, noting that her fiancé's hasty decision was "a red flag." "You are struggling financially to pay for your own wedding and he's committed to paying for his sisters dress? That' just stupid," they wrote. "What happens when you are married and your money goes to his family? Think long and hard and explain to him that unless he stops being a doormat the wedding is off. Family helps family when they can. They don't help when they are on a tight budget themselves.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum
Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum

'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around,' the woman saidNEED TO KNOW A woman moved into a shared apartment with two roommates who agreed to share cleaning responsibilities However, she was left unimpressed when one of her roommates began using a Roomba instead of a regular vacuum cleaner 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she saidA woman who recently moved into an apartment in Boston with three other PhD students is unsure if she 'overstepped' after buying a vacuum cleaner without discussing it first. On Monday, July 28, the woman explained in a post on Reddit's "Am I The A--hole" forum that she is living with two other women in their mid-twenties, whom she didn't know before moving in. She said they all discussed splitting up the responsibility of keeping the apartment clean prior to the arrangement. However, she was unaware that the vacuum one of her roommates would be bringing was a Roomba. The woman said robot vacuums are ideal for light maintenance if used frequently, but are unsuitable for vacuuming the entire apartment. 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she explained. Complaining about her roommate, the woman continued, 'She also only wants to run it every other week, which doesn't really keep up with the dust and dirt of three people. 'The Roomba also hasn't mapped the apartment well due to its infrequent use,' she said. 'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around.' The woman said that when she tried to discuss her concerns with her roommate, the Roomba owner disagreed on the need to have a separate regular vacuum cleaner. In an attempt to avoid an argument, the woman said she bought her own regular vacuum that had a bag and an allergy filter to use in her bedroom and shared areas. 'When I brought it home, she was annoyed and said I had gone behind her back and broken our agreement,' the woman said of her roommate. 'I didn't see it that way, and shared that I'm not asking anyone else to use it or share costs. I just wanted to be able to clean the apartment to a level that works for me." 'Our other roommate said she doesn't really have a preference and doesn't care, so it seems like she is currently steering clear of this,' she continued. 'There's no blame or fault to be found in her at all; I totally understand why she might want to stay neutral." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'I don't want to be the problem roommate, but now I'm wondering if I overstepped. AITA [am I the a--hole?],' the woman asked. Responses to the post reassured the woman that her views on the Roomba were fair. One person said her roommate was 'acting like a child,' while another argued there should be no issue with the addition of the vacuum because the Roomba can still be used. 'This is absurd. You are allowed to buy whatever you want for your shared apartment. Roommate sounds like a problem now and future,' someone else chimed in. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store