logo
As a cell phone expert, these are the 5 carriers I don't recommend

As a cell phone expert, these are the 5 carriers I don't recommend

Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
I've spent a significant portion of the past few years reporting on and testing various wireless service providers operating in the US market. As you might imagine, this has allowed me to form clear recommendations for just about every need — family plans, customer service, pricing, and more.
Considering postpaid and prepaid options together, there are dozens of choices available, yet only a handful of providers truly stand out enough to recur regularly in my recommendations. Some carriers are excluded because they don't offer anything unique enough, others because they simply target too narrow of a niche.
After digging into reader comments on my coverage and Android Authority's mobile service content in general, I noticed certain brands were frequently mentioned, with readers wondering why they were left out. Indeed, some carriers can be useful in specific situations but don't often make mainstream recommendation lists due to limited appeal.
Here's a closer look at a few commonly mentioned alternatives that I typically don't highlight, examining who they're for and whether you're better off skipping them.
Boost Mobile
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
I remember a comment in my best US carrier guide earlier this year asking why Boost Mobile doesn't get more attention from us, or really from the media in general.
I understand the confusion. On paper, Boost sounds appealing, with unlimited plans starting as low as $25 per month and premium postpaid options offering yearly flagship upgrades for iPhones or Galaxy devices at just $65 monthly. These prices significantly undercut Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile. However, looking deeper reveals issues.
One challenge is Boost's unclear identity. While it now operates as a genuine postpaid provider with prepaid options, many still associate it with its budget prepaid legacy. Beyond perception, network consistency is a major concern.
Boost sounds great on paper, but the reality is often not as appealing.
Boost has its own 5G network through Dish Network, but coverage outside these areas depends entirely on rivals like AT&T and T-Mobile. Coverage inconsistencies result from differing SIM card options based on Dish's native reach and various roaming agreements. Consequently, Boost Mobile can be hit or miss. For some, it offers great savings; for others, it's a significant downgrade.
While not generally recommended for just anyone, Boost can work well and save you a fortune if you live in a strong coverage area. If you're considering it, try a BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) plan with a secondary number first. Why? Because it's much easier to leave this way if it doesn't work out. Upgrading phones locks you into Boost Mobile for a full year, longer than major competitors.
Interested in learning more? You'll want to check out Boost Mobile's website.
RedPocket Mobile
Several readers have also asked about RedPocket Mobile in the past, but after taking a closer look, I've found that for most users, it simply doesn't stand out much, and you're likely better off elsewhere.
Pricing ranges from $10 to $40 per month, or slightly less if you pay annually upfront. All plans advertise 'unlimited' talk, text, and data, but premium data caps range from just 1GB to 50GB. Once you exceed that limit, speeds plummet to around 256Kbps, making even basic tasks painfully slow. Frankly, calling 1GB of data 'unlimited' is misleading in today's usage environment.
Comparatively, RedPocket's cheapest plan (1GB for $10/month) matches poorly against Tello, which offers double the data at the same price. Its top-tier Elite plan, with 50GB data, hotspot, and Apple Watch support for $40, isn't terrible — but competitors like Visible offer even better international features and smartwatch support at roughly the same price. You'll find even cheaper options at US Mobile, with the 2GB Light Plan starting at just $10 a month or as low as $8 if paid annually.
The one notable feature is that RedPocket lets you choose from all three major networks, though even here, US Mobile offers the same flexibility with better execution, including the ability to use two networks simultaneously.
At the end of the day, RedPocket isn't a bad carrier and offers customer service that's no worse than any other budget provider, but there's rarely a compelling reason to choose it over the competition.
Interested in learning more? You'll want to check out RedPocket Mobile's website.
Tracfone
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Tracfone occasionally appears in the comments as well, though not nearly as much as the others. Once the king of burner phones, it's now much less popular. Smartphone plans start around $15 per month for 1GB, considerably pricier than competitors like US Mobile or Tello. In most cases, you'll generally receive a better experience with other Verizon value brands like Straight Talk.
Today, Tracfone mainly serves those using basic phones as secondary devices — a shrinking market mostly consisting of older adults relying on landlines that look to cellphones only as an emergency device. For infrequent users, Tracfone can be affordable: for example, 365 days of service costs $125, including 1,500 minutes, 1,500 texts, and 1.5GB of data.
Interested in learning more? You'll want to check out TracFone's website.
Helium Mobile
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Now I actually have recommended Helium Mobile in a few pieces, but the truth is it's a pretty niche provider. For those who don't know, Helium Mobile runs on T-Mobile's network, but that's not its only claim to fame. The provider initially pushed itself as a crypto-carrier and leaned harder on its own Helium Network, but these days it feels a bit more like a typical prepaid carrier in reality.
Plans for Helium range from free to $30 a month. If you have strong T-Mobile coverage and don't suffer from major congestion issues, you'll find Helium is a compelling choice that runs every bit as well as any other T-Mobile-based alternative.
So why don't I mention it more? First, the network is very much involved with crypto-technologies, its own network, reward partnerships, and other aspects that might be seen a positive for some but also make Helium slightly more questionable when it comes to privacy. It's also clear that mobile service isn't this company's first priority.
There are so many other brands out there with a more proven record in the mobile space, and unless that changes, it'll never be a common recommendation on my end. Still, if you find it works well for you, there's really nothing wrong with Helium. In fact, if you have a young kid or elderly family member who doesn't need much data, the free plan or the kids plan can be a great way to test them on their first phone without much risk.
Interested in learning more? You'll want to check out Helium Mobile's website.
Total Wireless
Last on the list is Total Wireless, which is another carrier that I admit doesn't get a recommendation from me very often. When I do recommend this carrier, it's usually to those with bigger families, as this is where Total shines.
This Verizon-owned brand has plans ranging from $40 to $60 a month for one line, but the pricing drops significantly as you add more lines. In fact, the best savings are triggered once you reach five lines, with even the most expensive plan only coming out to around $27 a month per line and the cheapest plan dropping to just $23 a month.
All three plans include truly unlimited data, though you'll need to get the Total 5G Unlimited or 5G Plus Unlimited plan if you want higher priority data that's similar to what you'd get with postpaid Verizon access. These later plans also include international roaming and improved international calling features. Looking for streaming perks? The Plus plan even includes Disney Plus Premium for free, while the standard Unlimited plan just gives you a six-month trial.
If you have a large family, Total Wireless is a fairly tempting choice. This plan becomes even better if you happen to also have friends or family members outside of the US, as the perks here are quite good for the price. So why don't I mention this one more then? Honestly, it's because Visible is typically a better choice if you only need a line or two, as its pricing starts at just $25 for unlimited and maxes out at $45 a month, and yet it offers a very similar experience to Total, as it is also owned by Verizon.
Interested in learning more? You'll want to check out Total Wireless' website.
Are any of these carriers really worth it?
Would you consider any of these brands?
0 votes
Boost Mobile
NaN %
RedPocket Mobile
NaN %
Tracfone
NaN %
Helium
NaN %
Total Wireless
NaN %
Again, it really depends on what you are looking for. Out of all the brands on this list, I'd personally recommend Helium and Total Wireless the most. Helium is great if you don't mind taking a risk of a brand that's newer to the mobile space, and Total has family plans that are truly hard to beat. As for the other three? While none of them are bad choices per say, for most folks, there are simply better options for a similar price that will likely provide a better value long term.
Follow
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says semiconductors will face 100% tariff unless companies build in US
Trump says semiconductors will face 100% tariff unless companies build in US

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says semiconductors will face 100% tariff unless companies build in US

President Trump said that he will implement a 100% tariff on semiconductors manufactured overseas unless the companies have committed to build in the US. Trump made the announcement during a press event in the Oval Office alongside Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook who was onhand to unveil an additional $100 billion investment in research and manufacturing in the US. "The good news for companies like Apple is, if you're building in the United States, or have committed to build, without question, commited to build in the United States, there will be no charge," Trump said. The semiconductor tariff is a part of the Trump administration's Section 232 national security investigation into chip manufacturing. According to Trump, if a company says it will build in the US, but doesn't, they will once again face tariffs as well as back tariffs. The tech industry has been waiting on tenterhooks to find out what semiconductor tariffs would look like, and whether they would apply to individual semiconductors or to chips built into devices. Additional tariffs could drive up the price of everything from smartphones and laptops to home electornics and more. Apple also is also expected to dodge Trump's newest tariffs on India, which could reach as much as 50% in three weeks, with a White House official saying that the company wouldn't have to deal with the bulk of the tariffs. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Sign in to access your portfolio

Firefly Aerospace to price US IPO as it sets sights on a positive liftoff
Firefly Aerospace to price US IPO as it sets sights on a positive liftoff

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Firefly Aerospace to price US IPO as it sets sights on a positive liftoff

By Pritam Biswas and Arasu Kannagi Basil (Reuters) -Northrop Grumman-backed Firefly Aerospace, the buzzy space technology startup that put a lander on the moon, is set to price its U.S. IPO later on Wednesday. In a nascent but rapidly growing commercial space industry, Firefly's IPO has attracted investor attention because it successfully landed its uncrewed Blue Ghost spacecraft on the moon in its first attempt in March. Cedar Park, Texas-based Firefly Aerospace is set to sell 16.2 million shares of its stock, priced between $41 and $43 apiece. This range was raised earlier this week, signaling strong demand. U.S. President Donald Trump's focus on commercializing space technology and safeguarding the national interests in space has attracted venture capital firms and billionaires. Elon Musk's SpaceX — the most valuable private company in the world — has become a critical part of the U.S. satellite network, even prompting a need across the government to look for more contractors. The U.S. government is betting that diversifying its contractor base will foster innovation and cut the huge costs of sending rockets to space, as well as reduce over-reliance on a single provider for critical missions. NASA's procurement process now includes new entrants such as Firefly Aerospace and Sierra Space, alongside legacy companies, leveraging commercial partnerships for lunar landers, space station modules and cargo deliveries. While space-related IPOs have been scarce in recent years, the tide is starting to turn in 2025. Firefly's listing comes on the heels of the successful New York flotations of space and defense firms Karman, AIRO Group and Voyager. As of Tuesday's close, shares of Karman have more than doubled from their offer price, while Voyager has gained 10%. "Given Firefly and the success of Voyager, I think you are going to see several more space-related companies test the waters of a public offering," said Ross Carmel, partner at law firm Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel. TO THE MOON Formed in 2017, Firefly designs and manufactures small- to medium-lift launch vehicles, lunar landers and orbital vehicles. It had a backlog of roughly $1.1 billion and over 30 planned launches under contract as of March 31. While Houston-based Intuitive Machines' Odysseus lander was the first private lander to reach the moon last year, it made a lopsided touchdown, landing mostly intact but dooming many of its onboard instruments. Firefly's was the second, but its Blue Ghost spacecraft landed safely, reaching the moon's surface a month and a half after launching atop a SpaceX rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Last month, Firefly secured a $176.7 million contract to deliver five NASA payloads to the Moon's South Pole in 2029. Firefly was valued at more than $2 billion in a 2024 funding round. The company's backers include aerospace-focused private investment firm AE Industrial Partners. U.S. defense contractor Northrop Grumman, which invested $50 million into Firefly to aid the production of their jointly developed rocket, is one of three suppliers of solid rocket motors (SRMs) to the United States. Firefly is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "FLY" on Thursday.

Novo Nordisk Ramps Up U.S. Legal Fight Over Wegovy, Ozempic Copies
Novo Nordisk Ramps Up U.S. Legal Fight Over Wegovy, Ozempic Copies

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Novo Nordisk Ramps Up U.S. Legal Fight Over Wegovy, Ozempic Copies

Novo Nordisk (NOVO, Financials) expanded its U.S. legal campaign against makers of unapproved versions of semaglutide the active ingredient in its blockbuster weight?loss and diabetes drugs Wegovy and Ozempic. The Danish drugmaker said Tuesday it filed 14 new lawsuits; the targets include telehealth providers, compounding pharmacies, and medical spas accused of selling compounded semaglutide under the fake guise of personalization. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with NVO. The suits name firms such as Prism Aesthetics, Mochi Health, and Fella Health; some have also appeared in Eli Lilly's (LLY, Financials) litigation over knockoff versions of its weight?loss drug Zepbound. Novo claims the defendants are steering patients toward compounded semaglutide that has not been approved by regulators; in some cases, the products allegedly contain illicit foreign?sourced active pharmaceutical ingredients. Compounders were temporarily allowed to produce semaglutide during a declared shortage; when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ended that allowance, some companies shifted to offering personalized versions outside the approved drug label. Novo argues the approach violates state laws on corporate practice of medicine; it also raises safety concerns, as the copies have not been proven effective. Industry groups pushed back; Scott Brunner, CEO of the Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding, said Novo's claims misrepresent the work of legitimate, state?licensed pharmacies. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store