EU Parliament censure vote leaves von der Leyen weakened
The motion was tabled by Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea and signed by 77 members from the right-wing political groups, including the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), Patriots for Europe, and the Europe of Sovereign Nations. At the heart of their criticism lies von der Leyen's opaque handling of the EU's Pfizer vaccine procurement and her increasingly centralised approach to power.
Alberto Alemanno, Jean Monnet Professor of EU Law at HEC Paris, told Euronews that the motion's significance goes well beyond the numbers in Parliament, however.
'This motion of censure highlights many of the shortcomings that media and political observers have pointed out for some time—her presidential style, the centralisation of power, and her opacity,' Alemanno said.
He argued that while von der Leyen will likely retain the support of a majority of MEPs, the damage to her public image and political standing will be lasting.
'More and more citizens will ask themselves: is she really the right person to lead the EU in such turbulent times—negotiating with a potential Trump administration or playing a key role in Russia-Ukraine peace talks?'
Alemanno also noted that concerns about von der Leyen's leadership are not limited to the far-right. Her secretive handling of vaccine negotiations and unwillingness to engage with the media have drawn criticism across the political spectrum.
'This censure motion is acting as a lightning rod for broader frustration,' he added. 'It brings together complaints from multiple camps and highlights a growing desire for greater democratic accountability.'
A senior European Commission official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the vote had been widely discussed within the Berlaymont headquarters.
'Officials see this as a warning. Her leadership style—extremely centralised and often politically ambiguous—has made her vulnerable. There's a sense she's become a prisoner of her own European People's Party (EPP),' the official said.
Time for von der Leyen to realign her agenda, says MEP
Von der Leyen and the centre-right EPP have faced criticism in recent months for accepting far-right support in several parliamentary decisions, breaking with the EU's traditional centrist coalitions involving socialists, liberals, and greens.
One EPP decision-maker told Euronews that von der Leyen must now realign her agenda more clearly with the party's values.
'She should draw the consequences. An EPP-dominated Commission must better reflect the EPP's platform,' the source said.
Dutch Green MEP Bas Eickhout suggested the damage from this episode could extend beyond von der Leyen herself.
'What's clear is that the centrist majority in Parliament isn't functioning well—and that reflects poorly not only on von der Leyen, but on Manfred Weber too,' said Eickhout. 'In terms of public image, Weber may have suffered even more.'
Despite the motion's expected failure, political observers believe it will intensify scrutiny of von der Leyen's leadership and further limit her room to manoeuvre in a second term.
'She won't walk away strengthened,' Alemanno concluded. 'Even if the vote fails, the pressure to hold her accountable will only grow.'
This will put her on the spot as debate turns from next week to the European budget, "which is expected to be very contentious within and among member states of the union", he said.
"Up to now, up to this vote, von der Leyen could rely on both majorities based on political convenience," he says, referring to the traditional centrist platform on the one hand, and tie-ups with the right wing on the other.
By the time of von der Leyen's State of the Union address to the Parliament in September, she will be constrained to pick one of the two that she can rely on, he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
Plastic pollution treaty talks end without an agreement
Negotiators working on a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution won't reach an agreement in Geneva on Friday. They were meeting for the 11th day at the United Nations office in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis but remained deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce the exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. This round of negotiations was meant to be the last, producing the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. But now delegates are leaving without a treaty after talks collapsed, just like they did at the meeting in South Korea last year. Nations deeply disappointed to leave Geneva without a treaty Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and other nations said they were deeply disappointed to be leaving Geneva without a treaty. "We came to Geneva to secure a global plastics treaty because we know the stakes could not be higher," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall said in a post on social media. "While the latest text on the table does not yet meet all our ambitions, it is a step forward—and the perfect must not be the enemy of the good." Roswall added that the EU will continue to push for a stronger, binding agreement. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal takes other states' views more into account and addresses plastic production, which they consider outside the scope of the treaty. No further action on the latest draft text Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by nations at the talks. That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production but recognised that current levels of production and consumption are 'unsustainable' and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceed current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, 'thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.' The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning, as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall, that no further action is being proposed at this stage on the latest draft. Talks in Geneva have been an "abject failure", David Azoulay, health programme director and head of the delegation for the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "In the final days of the negotiations, we have clearly seen what many of us have known for some time - some countries did not come here to finalise a text, they came here to do the opposite: block any attempt at advancing a viable treaty. "It's impossible to find a common ground between those who are interested in protecting the status quo and the majority who are looking for a functional treaty that can be strengthened over time." What happens now? Delegates are still meeting and have not decided on the next steps yet. Azoulay said that, while negotiations will continue, they will fail again if solutions aren't identified and the process doesn't change. "We need a restart, not a repeat performance. Countries that want a treaty must now leave this process and form a treaty of the willing. And that process must include options for voting that deny the tyranny of consensus we have watched play out here."
Local France
16 hours ago
- Local France
'Neglected or ignored': Brits in Europe urged to back campaign for overseas MPs
Campaigners say there's growing recognition in the UK parliament of the need for an MP whose main role is representing Brits living abroad and the 'unique issues' they face – with a similar system already used in several EU countries. And while MPs get countless emails, a coalition of international citizens' rights groups has asked voters to send a postcard about the issue instead. READ ALSO: Campaign group for British overseas voters to hold first European meeting in Italy 'As MPs take a well deserved break, they should spare a thought for the millions of UK citizens abroad,' said Tom Brake, CEO of campaign group Unlock Democracy. 'Their views and priorities are often neglected or completely ignored. Establishing overseas constituencies is the best way to ensure their views are no longer marginalised.' The postcard campaign was 'a way to show MPs who and where we are – although we don't all live in picture postcard tourist spots,' said Clarissa Killwick, representing pan-European citizens' rights group Brexpats - Hear Our Voice. 'I live in Italy which has overseas MPs. They've helped bring about important changes such as improved consular services,' 'It is also a two-way street – for example, reducing over-punitive taxes has made Italians abroad more inclined to pay them.' Campaigner Clasissa Killwick sends her postcard from Italy. to her MP in the UK Photo courtesy of Clarissa Killwick. Under the proposed system, UK citizens abroad would elect MPs who represent their part of the world in the UK parliament, rather than voting for the MP in the UK constituency they might have left years ago. Italian citizens living abroad elect a total of 12 overseas parliamentarians - eight MPs and four senators. That accounts for two percent of the total number of seats in parliament. In France, 11 MPs are elected to the Assemblée nationale whose role is to represent the interests of French citizens living overseas - they each represent a 'constituency' such as French people in northern Europe. This type of representation often results in higher voter turnout and more focus on issues affecting overseas voters, according to the groups backing the campaign. Advertisement Terence Champion, Chair of Liberal Democrats Overseas, said: 'The more than 5,500,000 British citizens living overseas need their own MPs to represent their very specific concerns, which largely differ from those of domestic UK voters. 'Living overseas means facing some unique issues including frozen pensions, higher education fees, problems with UK bank accounts. spouse visas and complicated voting procedures, amongst others.' The issue of overseas constituencies was also among several topics to be discussed by the British Overseas Voters Forum (BOVF) at its inaugural meeting set to be held in Milan on September 9th . Organisations backing the campaign include: Unlock Democracy, New Europeans UK, British Overseas Voters Forum, Bremain in Spain, Liberal Democrats Abroad, Labour International, Brexpats - Hear Our Voice, and Liberal Democrats Overseas.
Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
Why some fight to use paper in a paperless world
The European Union made the digital transition as one of its priorities and more public services, as well as advertising, are being moved online and are now received by email. This is being presented as an opportunity to modernise the economy and save paper – however the "Keep Me Posted EU' group is arguing that it is leading to a digital exclusion of a not negligible part of the population. Keep Me Posted EU is a campaign financed by the industries of envelopes, printing, paper and posting services and supported by NGOs protecting older people, people with disabilities, union and consumers. In a report published earlier this year, they demonstrate how seniors, persons with disabilities, low-income households and inhabitants of rural areas were most likely to be excluded from the digital transition. Lack of digital literacy makes it harder for people to complete essential tasks such as filling out their taxes, access to medical bills or payment of electricity bills. In 2023, only 56% of EU citizens had basic or above-basic digital skills. Finland and the Netherlands lead the way with over 80% of their populations proficient in using digital tools, while Romania (27%) and Bulgaria (35%) rank lowest. The problem is also due to the fact that a large part of the population cannot easily go online as only 57% of households in the Romanian country side have access to internet. The report also notes that choosing paper over digital is not only about ability, but also about preference. Some business owners and citizens are quoted as favouring paper for keeping records of important documents. It also highlights, quoting a 2025 survey, that half of the population is worried about online security and the risk of personal information being hacked, and feel already overexposed to screens. With the EU drafting a roadmap for the next five years on consumer protection laws, Keep Me Posted urges the European Commission to ensure that no consumer is left behind in their strategy. In short, they are asking to leave the choice to citizens and for them not being charged more or less for choosing one of the options.
