
AI bands signal new era for music business
NEW YORK : A rising tide of artificial intelligence (AI) bands is ushering in a new era where work will be scarcer for musicians.
Whether it's Velvet Sundown's 1970s-style rock or country music projects 'Aventhis' and 'The Devil Inside,' bands whose members are pure AI creations, are seeing more than a million plays on streaming giant Spotify.
No major streaming service clearly labels tracks that come entirely from AI, except France's Deezer.
Meanwhile, the producers of these songs tend to be unreachable.
'I feel like we're at a place where nobody is really talking about it, but we are feeling it,' said music producer, composer and performer Leo Sidran.
'There is going to be a lot of music released that we can't really tell who made it or how it was made,' Sidran said.
The Oscar-winning artist sees the rise of AI music as perhaps a sign of how 'generic and formulaic' genres have become.
'AI highlights the chasm between music people listen to 'passively' while doing other things and 'active' listening in which fans care about what artists convey,' said producer and composer Yung Spielburg on the Imagine AI Live podcast.
Spielburg believes musicians will win out over AI with 'active' listeners but will be under pressure when it comes to tunes people play in the background while cooking dinner or performing mundane tasks.
If listeners can't discern which tunes are AI-made, publishers and labels will likely opt for synthetic bands that don't earn royalties, Spielburg predicted.
'AI is already in the music business and it's not going away because it is cheap and convenient,' said Mathieu Gendreau, associate professor at Rowan University in New Jersey, who is also a music industry executive.
'That will make it even more difficult for musicians to make a living,' Gendreau said.
Music streaming platforms already fill playlists with mood music attributed to artists about whom no information can be found, according to University of Rochester School of Music professor Dennis DeSantis.
'Meanwhile, AI-generated soundtracks have become tempting, cost-saving options in movies, television shows, ads, shops, elevators and other venues,' DeSantis added.
AI takes all?
Composer Sidran says he and his music industry peers have seen a sharp slowdown in work coming their way since late last year.
'I suspect that AI is a big part of the reason,' said Sidran, host of 'The Third Story' podcast.
'I get the feeling that a lot of the clients that would come to me for original music, or even music from a library of our work, are using AI to solve those problems,' Sidran said.
Technology has repeatedly helped shape the music industry, from electric guitars and synthesisers to multi-track recording and voice modulators.
Unlike such technologies that gave artists new tools and techniques, AI could lead to the 'eradication of the chance of sustainability for the vast majority of artists,' warned George Howard, a professor at the prestigious Berklee College of Music.
'AI is a far different challenge than any other historical technological innovation,' Howard said. 'And one that will likely be zero-sum,' he added.
Howard hopes courts will side with artists in the numerous legal battles with generative AI giants whose models imitate their styles or works.
Gendreau sees AI music as being here to stay and teaches students to be entrepreneurs as well as artists in order to survive in the business.
Sidran advises musicians to highlight what makes them unique, avoiding the expected in their works because 'AI will have done it'.
And, at least for now, musicians should capitalise on live shows where AI bands have yet to take the stage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
KPop Demon Hunters' track ‘Golden' makes history as first K-pop No. 1 on UK chart since ‘Gangnam Style'
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 2 — The hit song Golden from Netflix's animated blockbuster KPop Demon Hunters has soared to the top of the UK Official Singles Chart, making it the first K-pop track in over a decade to clinch the No. 1 spot. According to The Korea Herald, Golden hit No. 1 in its sixth week on the chart, rising three spots from the previous week. The track is performed by fictional girl group Huntr/x and forms part of the film's high-energy soundtrack, which features a K-pop girl group battling evil spirits to save the human world. The UK Official Charts Company confirmed it was the first time a K-pop song had reached the top spot since Psy's Gangnam Style in 2012. In a statement, the company's CEO Martin Talbot described the moment as 'another landmark' for the globally influential genre. Composed by Ejae, a former SM Entertainment trainee, and performed by Audrey Nuna and Rei Ami, Golden blends Korean and English lyrics — including standout lines like 'forever unbreakable' — and is produced by renowned hitmakers Teddy and 24 from The Black Label. The song's infectious melody and powerful vocals have struck a chord with global audiences, climbing from No. 93 to No. 4 before claiming the top spot. It has also reached No. 1 on South Korea's Melon Top 100 chart and No. 2 on the US Billboard Hot 100. Other tracks from the KPop Demon Hunters soundtrack are also making waves in the UK: Your Idol is at No. 10, Soda Pop at No. 11, and Takedown at No. 63. Let me know if you'd like an Instagram caption version too.

Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
US government turmoil stalls thousands of export approvals, sources say
NEW YORK, Aug 2 — Thousands of license applications by US companies to export goods and technology around the globe, including to China, are in limbo because turmoil at the agency in charge of approving them has left it nearly paralysed, two sources said. While US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has become a familiar face touting President Donald Trump's tariff and trade deals, sources said the export bureau under Lutnick's command has failed to issue expected new rules, stifled communications with industry representatives, pushed out experts, and lost staff through buyouts and resignations. Shipments of artificial intelligence chips from Nvidia to China are the most high-profile example of licenses not being swiftly approved. The company said July 14 the government assured it licenses would be granted for its H20 chip, and it hoped to start deliveries soon. Lutnick and other officials confirmed sales would be allowed. But sources said this week no licenses have yet been issued, and billions of dollars of AI chip orders are at stake. One US official said the backlog of license applications is the lengthiest in more than three decades. A spokesperson for Nvidia declined to comment. The Commerce Department defended its licensing practices, saying its Bureau of Industry and Security 'will no longer rubber-stamp license applications that raise grave questions of national security,' a spokesperson said. 'BIS is driving forward President Trump's agenda through strong rules and aggressive enforcement,' the person added. The turmoil and resulting inaction at an agency tasked with promoting overseas trade and safeguarding American technology are alarming both those seeking tougher restrictions on exports to China and companies trying to sell their wares abroad. 'Licensing is how the US does business and competes globally,' said Meghan Harris, who served on the National Security Council in the first Trump administration and has worked at Commerce. 'Delays and unpredictability put us at an unnecessary disadvantage.' BIS averaged 38 days per export license application in fiscal year 2023, the most recent data available, denying 2 per cent of 37,943 applications. The license process enforces US export restrictions in an effort to make sure sensitive goods and technology do not reach countries or entities whose use of the items could harm US national security. Some staff have criticised Jeffrey Kessler, who became BIS undersecretary in March, saying he has micromanaged the bureau and failed to communicate adequately. At a staff meeting soon after he took office, Kessler urged BIS staff to limit communications with company representatives and industry officials, according to two additional sources, who said he later asked for all meetings to be entered on a spreadsheet. Getting approval from Kessler's office to attend meetings with other government agencies has also been tricky, those sources said, speaking anonymously because they were not authorised to speak publicly. The BIS spokesperson said Kessler 'is restoring integrity' to the bureau and enjoys Lutnick's 'full confidence.' Frustration among exporters Frustration is growing within US industry. 'We're seeing whole sectors where there is no movement or indication if or when licenses will be issued,' including license applications for semiconductor manufacturing equipment worth billions of dollars, said Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council. While the clock is ticking on license applications, 'Chinese companies are exploring and doing deals with suppliers in China and other countries,' he said. 'The longer we have the delay, the more market share we're going to lose.' Jim Anzalone, president of Compliance Assurance, a Florida-based trade consultancy, said he has seen delays in license approvals for sensors, radars, and sonar to Latin America and other parts of the world. 'There's nothing official about what the policy is and when the backlog would be cleared,' he said. He has received denials sporadically after submitting some two dozen applications months ago to export semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, including four denials on Wednesday, he added. Sources stressed that some licenses are getting approved, especially exports to allied countries, and they noted that some communication with companies continues, especially around license applications. Commerce is also delaying regulatory changes. The agency said in May it would rescind and replace a Biden administration rule before it went into effect that month restricting where AI chips can be exported, but the agency has not done so yet. Other rules, which sources said have been drafted for months, have not been published, including one to expand export restrictions to subsidiaries of companies already banned from receiving controlled US exports. Meanwhile, important staff vacancies such as China-based export control officers have not been filled, and high-level career employees have resigned. A retirement party was held this week for Dan Clutch, acting director of the BIS Office of Export Enforcement, the latest experienced staff member to leave. — Reuters

Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay US$243m in fatal Autopilot crash
NEW YORK, Aug 2 — A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla liable to pay US$243 million (RM1.04 billion) to victims of a 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, a verdict that could encourage more legal action against Elon Musk's electric vehicle company. The verdict is a rare win for victims of accidents involving Autopilot. Musk has been pushing to rapidly expand Tesla's recently launched robotaxi business based on an advanced version of its driver assistance software. Tesla shares fell 1.8 per cent yesterday, and are down 25 per cent this year. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, US$129 million in compensatory damages plus US$200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla was held liable for 33 per cent of the compensatory damages, or US$42.6 million. Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67 per cent, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added. Tesla said it will appeal. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the company said. The plaintiffs had sought US$345 million of damages. Their lawyers said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. Impact on future cases Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly. 'It's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology.' The verdict could also impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly US$1 trillion market value hinges on Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence. Driver's role The trial concerned an April 25, 2019 incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph (100 kph) through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet (23 metres) to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. 'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. 'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software,' he added. 'That's a big deal.' Tesla, in its statement, said McGee was entirely at fault. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' the company said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver - from day one - admitted and accepted responsibility.' — Reuters