What did the pre-draft scouting reports say about Lions 5th-round OL Miles Frazier?
Frazier is the second offensive lineman the Lions selected after grabbing Ohio State's Tate Ratledge in Round 2. The pick represents a continued long-term investment in the driving force behind the Lions' offense that has carried them to the playoffs the last two seasons.
Advertisement
Scouting reports on Frazier ahead of the draft projected him among some of the better offensive linemen in the country, making his fall to pick No. 171 a surprising one depending on where you look for analysis.
Here's a look at a handful of key points from scouting reports from national media outlets:
Prospect Grade: 6.18 (out of 8)
League Projection: Good Backup with Potential to Develop into Starter
NFL Next Gen Stats Total Score: 71 (2025 Combine G Rank No. 12)
Analysis from NFL Analyst Lance Zierlein: Four-year starter who classifies as a physical short-area guard with satisfactory height, weight and length. Frazier has knock-back pop and is capable of mauling in tight spaces. His short pulls and lead blocks around the end are solid. Difficulties with reach blocks and second-level cut-offs on stretch plays could cause zone teams to scratch him. He possesses adequate range and foot quickness in protection and is fairly clear-eyed to recognize gaming fronts. His hand placement is average and he's tight in his knees, which could be a concern for his anchor. Frazier has things to clean up but carries pro measurables and a play demeanor that gives him a shot to become a starter.
2024 Run Block Grade: 64.1
2024 Pass Block Grade: 88.0
2024 Overall Grade: 70.3
Analysis from PFF: Frazier's athletic ability and versatility give him a solid chance to be a swingman in the NFL. His lack of length makes him a better fit at guard, but he'll need to get stronger in order to have a chance at a starting role.
Grade: 7.2
Overall Draft Rank: 90
Position Rank: IOL 10
Pro Comparison: Billy Turner
Analysis by BR NFL Scout Brandon Thorn: Miles Frazier is a four-year starter with at least one start at every position but center and the bulk of his time spent at guard. Frazier started 12 games in 2024 inside LSU's pass-first (60-40 pass-run split), multiple-run scheme. Frazier has a wide-bodied frame with good length, mass and girth throughout his build. He has adequate athletic ability and good play strength...Overall, Frazier has below-average movement skills and erratic sustain skills but is a big, strong, experienced guard prospect with impressive proven versatility on his resume and the skills to carve out a role inside a downhill, vertical run scheme.
Draft Projection: Adequate Starter, Day 2 Selection
Analysis from Daniel Harms: Miles Frazier draws attention with his size and power as soon as the tape comes on. Coming in at 6-foot-6 and 238 pounds, he looks the part of an NFL offensive lineman with the length to match. LSU showcased a lot of zone read and inside zone run concepts while Jayden Daniels was quarterbacking the team, but Frazier is a better power run fit with his explosive and powerful downhill mentality...Overall, Frazier plays with the right mentality and physicality, which is helped in the phone booth at guard. He's a guard-only prospect with many tools to succeed at the next level in a power-run scheme offense.
This article originally appeared on Lions Wire: Miles Frazier: What pre-draft scouting reports said of Lions rookie OL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
What is Jim Harbaugh's punishment in Michigan sign-stealing scandal?
When the NCAA's committee on infractions announced its penalties for Michigan's sign-stealing scandal Friday, it included heavy penalties for Los Angeles Chargers head coach Jim Harbaugh. Harbaugh received a 10-year show-cause order and a prohibition from "all athletically related activities." The new penalty will be added onto the back of a previously issued four-year show-cause order, which the NCAA had previously levied on the former Michigan head coach for violating recruitment rules in 2021. The current Chargers head coach was one of four people named directly in the NCAA's announcement of penalties. Here's what his show-cause order means and whether it will affect the Chargers: MICHIGAN FOOTBALL PUNISHMENT: NCAA suspends Sherrone Moore, show-cause for Connor Stalions What was Jim Harbaugh's punishment? The NCAA hit Harbaugh with a 10-year show-cause order for his involvement in Michigan's illicit "off-campus, in-person scouting scheme" in 2023. It will begin on Aug. 7, 2028, after his active, four-year show-cause order – handed out in 2024 because of recruiting violations in 2021 – ends. CONNOR STALIONS: What does NCAA punishment mean for former U-M staffer hit with show cause What is a show-cause order? A show-cause order is essentially a college football-wide ban on hiring a person to join their coaching staff, barring proof the team hiring the coach will foster an environment that will engender an equal playing field. If Michigan or any other college football program wanted to hire Harbaugh, it would have to appear before the NCAA's committee on infractions and make a strong case for why it specifically wants to hire him. In addition to Harbaugh's new, 10-year show cause, he has a one-year suspension from coaching college football – should he ever return – that the NCAA levied at the same time as Harbaugh's original, four-year show-cause order. The name "show cause" comes from the case that the prospective employer must make to the NCAA, showing reasonable cause to believe that previous infractions would not happen again if a previous offender is hired at a new program. Show-cause orders are a somewhat common penalty imposed on coaches or other personnel found to have violated major rules. DAN WOLKEN: Divided opinions on Michigan sign-stealing scandal just part of college football tribalism How does Jim Harbaugh's punishment affect the Chargers? Harbaugh's punishment was one enacted by the NCAA, which has no jurisdiction in NFL matter. His punishment at the hands of college football's governing entity will have no affect on his current head coaching job with Los Angeles. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Jim Harbaugh sign-stealing punishment from Michigan tenure revealed
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
The WNBA has a flying sex toy problem ... or does it?
Three experts put the dildo debacle into perspective. Let's review some recent WNBA headlines: Alyssa Thomas made history with three consecutive triple-doubles, the first three-peat in the league's history; Brittney Sykes was traded midseason from the Washington Mystics to the Seattle Storm; the Indiana Fever's Sydney Colson and Aari McDonald both suffered season-ending injuries. Did you read those stories? Probably not. But the sex toys being thrown onto WNBA courts — that's probably broken through. The first of the phallic-shaped objects hit the floor of the Gateway Center Arena in Georgia during a July 29 matchup between the Atlanta Dream and Golden State Valkyries. A few days later, another one landed in Wintrust Arena, where the Chicago Sky faced Golden State. The incidents sparked a few laughs, a lot of confusion and ultimately a ton of media coverage, especially as they continued to be thrown onto the home courts of the Los Angeles Sparks, Phoenix Mercury and New York Liberty, where a 12-year-old girl was struck by it. The NYPD is looking for that suspect, while arrests have been made in connection with incidents in Georgia and Phoenix. What to make of the incidents and how to respond to them has been a growing conversation. Sure, it could just be a viral prank, with the perpetrators wanting internet fame; there's also the possibility that this is sexism, or as Cosmopolitan put it, "misogyny plain and simple"; there's even the connection to cryptocurrency (maybe this is all a marketing ploy?!). Nevertheless, players and leaders in the league have reacted both seriously and with humor, while fans, commentators, TikTokers and basketball noobs debate whether the storyline should get as much attention as it has or if it even poses a threat to the rapidly rising WNBA. To help me understand the current events and conversations, and why they might or might not matter, I spoke with three experts who shared different points of view. Jodi Norgaard, author and founder of Go! Go! Sports Girls There's a pattern of sexist responses when women find success, Norgaard notes. 'We've seen women steadily rise in our culture. What we're seeing now is such a blowback to this rise because there's such a threat of power,' she tells Yahoo. 'When men cannot match our talent, they reach for props. When they can't silence us, they try to embarrass us.' She recognizes it as a part of a larger negative narrative surrounding the WNBA, especially when it comes to media coverage and social media conversations. 'Women are just more scrutinized than men,' says Norgaard, highlighting the misogynistic responses to Indiana Fever Sophie Cunningham's initial post on X about the sex toy saga as an example. But she doesn't see it as something that will defeat players. 'When something gets a lot of attention, that means it's on the radar, that means there's something to be talking about, so there's good in that. We're seeing the record viewership, we're seeing the record merchandise sales, we're seeing the athletes stepping into the cultural spotlight like we've never seen before,' Norgaard continues. 'I don't think we're going away. I just think there's a lot of fighting that we're going to have to do as we continue to rise.' Jordan Robinson, women's sports journalist and host of 'The Women's Hoop Show' podcast Robinson has been covering women's basketball for seven years, so she knows that sexism has appeared throughout the coverage of the WNBA both historically and during the 2025 season in particular. The focus on dildos being thrown onto the court might be the most blatant example, but it's also seen in discussions about higher pay for female athletes and even the narrative about physicality and perceived feuds, like the storyline around Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese. 'It's like we're choosing topics that aren't about the play on the court, and that isn't fair. For the NBA, for the NFL, we go through hours of coverage on major networks to talk about the matchups and the X's and O's. It feels like the WNBA only makes headlines when it's not basketball-related, and that's really annoying, honestly. The sex toys thing falls in line with that,' Robinson tells Yahoo. She too believes it's the 'cost of growth' for the women's league, especially when that brings in new audiences that don't know how to engage with it. 'People that don't typically cover the league on a weekly basis aren't really tapped in to know the top players or the standings or how it's a race for the playoffs. Instead, it's, 'What are the sex toys about? This is clickbaity, let's talk about this.' And it takes away from the seriousness of the league,' she says. On the flip side, it's provided an opportunity for players to respond in their own ways and become a part of the cultural conversation. 'Sydney Colson made a whole separate Instagram called the Mean Green and dressed in green and made a complete joke out of it,' says Robinson. 'It's a platform thing. … Her dressing up as the dildo is a part of her personal brand and is going to bring more people to her page and more ears to her podcast.' Howard Megdal, author of ' and founder of the IX Basketball Megdal, a man, focuses solely on women's basketball coverage because he knows it's needed — and the persistence of the sex toy conversation is Exhibit A. 'People will drink the sand when there's no water to be had,' he tells Yahoo, 'so for those who have discovered women's basketball and have come to love it, they're going to look to consume it in any and every way they can.' Certain storylines are a product of a newer part of the sports media industry that isn't qualified or doesn't care to cover the league's most important topics, like ongoing negotiations for higher pay (because why is Clark only making $78,000 this season?). Coverage of the WNBA's encounters with green and purple dildos might be a distraction from those pivotal issues, but he doesn't see it as a detriment. 'I remain unconvinced that it matters very much at all. If I'm the WNBA and I see television viewership going through the roof — not just when Caitlin Clark plays but also when she doesn't play — and I see numerous markets regularly selling out games and a moment in which expansion fees seem to be going up by the day, I don't know that I'd spend much time worrying about the nonsense when I got out of bed every day,' says Megdal. That's not to say that the league or its players should have to deal with it. But, as he sees it, this dialogue isn't a threat to its success. 'The conversation as it exists … is not reflective and does not have any sort of negative impact on the league's ability to grow,' he says. 'I'd probably stop bothering to worry about it.' The bigger picture The dildo incidents reflect the reality of the WNBA in 2025, as a league in the midst of explosive growth, grappling with the double-edged sword of visibility. The reaction to it shows the gap between what players put into the game and what the public and parts of the media choose to focus on. 'There is this overarching theme, unfortunately, that hovers over the WNBA, which is sexism,' says Robinson. 'I'm going to find the silver lining because five or six years ago, these teams weren't even playing in these arenas, and they would have been empty. Now, there are so many people in the audience to the point where somebody slipped in and threw a dildo. The positive is that it was sold out.' It's not something to be overlooked, but it's less of a threat than a test case for a women's league fighting for respect. And while the players shouldn't have to deal with it, they're proving that they know how to turn attention into fuel for the bigger game. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Bears-Bills joint practice observations: Defense gets after Josh Allen
The Chicago Bears were back on the practice field at Halas Hall on Friday for a joint training camp practice with the Buffalo Bills. While the Bears flat-out dominated the Miami Dolphins in last week's joint practice, it was more balanced against the Super Bowl contending Bills. But that's not to say this Dennis Allen defense didn't bring the heat, as the defense got after quarterback Josh Allen, including intercepting him three times. Meanwhile, quarterback Caleb Williams and the offense got off to an impressive start and faced some adversity during red zone and two-minute drill. But it was an overall successful practice, where Rome Odunze and Olamide Zaccheaus shined. Although, there's huge concerns about the Bears' left tackle battle and pre-snap penalties. As far as injuries go, rookie defensive tackle Shemar Turner returned to practice for the first time since the start of camp. But he didn't participate in team drills as he ramps back up to action. Meanwhile, quarterback Case Keenum is day-to-day with a leg injury. There was an injury scare where tight end Cole Kmet came up limping during a red-zone drill, but he returned to the field. Here are some observations, from media members and fans in attendance, following Friday's joint training camp practice: Left tackle concerns Bears defense brought it vs. Josh Allen Stock up: Caleb Williams-Rome Odunze connection Olamide Zaccheaus continues to make plays Pre-snap penalties continue to be a problem for offense Luther Burden has been standing out High snaps remain an issue Case Keenum is sidelined with leg injury Follow Bears Wire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram This article originally appeared on Bears Wire: Bears-Bills joint practice observations: Defense gets after Josh Allen
