
Climate crisis must be tackled without resorting to degrowth, says MEP
Speaking at the Brussels' Economic Forum, the member of the European People's Party (EPP) said that the bloc must not resort to 'dangerous' solutions when tackling the climate crisis.
'If we want to find solutions, we have to find solutions with the moderates,' she said.
Pereira was responding to an argument for degrowth, proposed at the forum by Timothée Parrique, an economist and researcher at HEC Lausanne.
'This [degrowth] is not a political statement… this is a scientific reality that we have to grapple with,' Parrique said.
'There is no point being first when you're going in the wrong direction…economic growth has lost all correlation with quality of life.'
He continued: 'I can tell you with confidence wealth is not trickling down and pollution is not trickling out.'
The theory of degrowth, which has been around since the 1970s, warns against continual economic growth and instead advocates for economic shrinking. Proponents argue that the world doesn't have enough resources to make endless growth a realistic goal, meaning we need to scale back our consumption.
Although supported by some eminent academics, critics argue that degrowth would massively destabilise the interconnected global economy, resulting in unemployment and deepening inequality. They also argue that it's a tough political sell.
Even so, 'the costs of action are much lower than the cost of inaction,' stressed Parrique on Thursday, noting that growth-focused policies will have a 'huge drawback' in the long term. He suggested that public figures should do more to promote public awareness around this.
Lídia Pereira argued that the green transition can go hand in hand with the EU's push to become more competitive.
She pointed to subsidies in China and the US, notably former President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and said that Europe must do more to foster 'strategic autonomy in clean technologies'.
This is currently held back by a lack of progress on a fully-integrated capital market in the EU, she said. As a result, companies can't get their hands on the capital they need to compete on a global scale. Country-specific laws are still a hindrance to cross-border funding, forcing companies to be more reliant on banks, rather than private investors, for loans.
The EU claims to be climate neutral by 2050 and member states have specific strategies on how they plan to achieve this.
Pereira suggested that Europe could act as a pioneer for other economies when it comes to fulfilling climate commitments, which are becoming ever-more urgent.
This comes as, across the Atlantic, the US administration is pulling economic resources from initiatives designed to support the green transition.
Donald Trump in January signed an order to withdraw the US from the Paris climate agreement for the second time. The president is also pushing for a renewed focus on fossil fuels, as opposed to renewable technologies, and is rolling back elements of the IRA.
The combined economic output of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), was 0.1% in the first three months of 2025 compared to the previous quarter, according to provisional estimates of the organisation. This compares to a 0.5% rise in the last three months of 2024.
'This figure represents a departure from the higher and relatively stable growth rates recorded in the OECD area over the past two years,' the OECD said in its report.
The overall GDP growth rate also slowed for the G7, the seven strongest economies in the world, from 0.4% to 0.1% for the same period.
Japan and the US saw their economies contract from 0.6% in both countries to -0.2% and -0.1%, respectively. Both countries saw their imports increasing significantly; however, in the United States, imports of goods increased sharply by 10.8% in Q1, compared with a contraction of 1.3% in Q4.
'The rise in US imports of goods, likely influenced by anticipated changes to trade tariffs, was the main drag on growth,' the report said.
Growth also slowed in Canada, from 0.6% to 0.4%.
In a quarterly comparison, UK GDP growth jumped from 0.1% to 0.7%, mainly driven by investments and exports of goods.
In the EU, growth increased marginally in Italy (from 0.2% to 0.3%), and it turned positive in Germany (0.2%) and France (0.1%).
Ireland recorded the highest quarter-on-quarter growth rate in Q1 (3.2%).
On the other hand, Slovenia recorded the largest fall in GDP in Q1 (‑0.8%), followed by Portugal (-0.5%).
Year-on-year, GDP growth in the OECD was 1.6% in Q1 2025, down from 1.9% in Q4 2024. Among G7 economies, Canada recorded the highest growth over the last four quarters (2.3%), followed by the United States (2.0%), while Germany recorded the largest fall (-0.2%).
Year-on-year, GDP growth in the OECD was 1.6% in Q1 2025, down from 1.9% in Q4 2024. In Europe, the French economy expanded by 0.8% compared to the previous year, the Italian GDP also grew by 0.6%, but the German output contracted by 0.2%.
The OECD has recently published its global outlook, predicting slower growth, dragged down by trade disruptions and potential inflationary pressure. The organisation cut its global growth forecast by 0.2 percentage points to 3.1% for this year.
Europe's economy is also facing "heightened uncertainty" and is set for a weaker-than-expected recovery. As for the eurozone, the OECD expects GDP in the bloc to expand by 1% in 2025 instead of the previously expected 1.3%.
Recent data from Eurostat shows that the combined growth of the 20 member states rose by 0.3% in both the euro area, compared with the previous quarter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
The two faces of Ursula: Reinvention or deception at the EU's helm?
In December 2019 Ursula von der Leyen returned to Brussels, the city where she spent her childhood, with the poise of a self-assured centrist and the promise of a visionary. The Green Deal stood at the centre of her first presidency, offering climate hope and a surprisingly collaborative touch, flanked by the liberal Danish Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager and Frans Timmermans, the socialist Dutchman - co-stars in her ensemble cast. That was Season 1. But as Season 2 gets underway, followers of her first term might be wondering if they're still watching the same show. Or at least asking if the lead character has been switched and a doppelganger has taken the helm. So what's happened - is Ursula von der Leyen suffering an identity crisis, or simply channelling her inner political shapeshifter? Different style, different priorities The new Ursula appears to be a pragmatic political realist, even Machiavellian. A significant part of this shift toward centralisation can be attributed to her powerful chief of staff, Bjoern Seibert, an adept puppet master skilfully pulling the strings of power within the Berlaymont building. During Season 1, maverick Commissioners such as France's Thierry Breton and Luxembourg's Nicolas Schmit developed as characters critical of von der Leyen's decisions. This has now disappeared from the script, and Ursula's gone from ensemble lead to solo act. Most importantly, they've been replaced with lower-profile allies who are kept in the dark on key decisions - most notably during the unveiling of the EU's long-term budget, when Commissioners reportedly saw the figures only moments before the official curtain raise on the proposal. Core priorities have seemingly vanished. There's an air of political amnesia, or perhaps strategic dissociation, where past commitments are forgotten or discarded. But what are Ursula von der Leyen's true colours? Is she still the 'Green Queen' of 2019, or has she transformed into the grey, power-consolidating 'VDL'? The curious case of the vanishing Green Deal Let's rewind to 2019, when von der Leyen made the Green Deal the crown jewel of her presidency. Back then, 'green' wasn't just a policy, it was a vibe. The Green Deal was supposed to transform Europe's economy, its agriculture and transport. Fast forward to today: the vibe's off. Her environmental mission seems increasingly distant, if not altogether abandoned. Today, the Green Deal is conspicuously absent, not just from rhetoric, but also from official documents. In the new long-term EU budget proposal, for instance, the term isn't mentioned once. Many of its pillars are being dismantled piece by piece. The most glaring example is the systematic rollback of Green Deal initiatives - such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - through so-called "Omnibus" simplification proposals, with the latest retreat involving the proposed Green Claims Directive—meant to combat greenwashing. More symbolic is the disappearance of the "Farm to Fork" strategy, once the farming side of the Green Deal, which has all but vanished from speeches, policy documents, and public messaging. Its omission from the Commission's long-awaited 'Vision for Agriculture and Food' was effectively a quiet burial, making the document less of a vision and more a eulogy. Officially, the Commission remains in denial, but the signs of abandonment are impossible to ignore. Europe's Beating Cancer Plan - missing a beat? Green isn't the only colour fading from von der Leyen's palette, telling a story of a shifting focus. Over in the health file, there's a quiet code blue, with a key dossier on life support. In her first term, von der Leyen championed the European Health Union, with the Beating Cancer Plan as a cornerstone. With €4 billion on the table, the Commission pledged a full-frontal assault on tobacco, alcohol, asbestos, and other risk factors for cancer. But momentum has slowed dramatically. Measures targeting tobacco and alcohol reduction have stalled, and once-prioritised regulations (such as those governing sunbed usage) have been quietly dropped. The new EU4Health budget reflects this decline. In 2024, €115 million was allocated specifically for cancer. In 2025, this has been slashed to €60 million, now also covering not just cancer but also cardiovascular disease and other non-communicable illnesses. With attention diverted to pandemic preparedness and other priorities, it's unclear how much of the original vision will survive. And with more open files than open funding lines, Brussels insiders are asking: is health promotion and the fight against cancer being reassigned to sleepy interns and relegated to just a historical footnote? Back to her roots: Defence and military power And yet, amid the abandonment of green and health priorities, von der Leyen appears more energised than ever, but on a different front: defence. A year into her second term, the former German defence minister has returned to familiar territory. With the Green Deal receding, she has seized the geopolitical moment to promote a stronger European defence industry. With her former life as Germany's defence minister back in vogue (and with Frans Timmermans no longer breathing green fire down her neck), von der Leyen has pivoted hard to European defence. An example: the EU's upcoming budget cycle (starting in 2028) proposes a fivefold increase in defence and space funding. National budgets on defence are also rising, spurred by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Her Commission has also recently proposed structural changes: redirecting cohesion funds to defence, relaxing fiscal rules to allow greater military spending, launching the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF), and offering low-interest loans under the SAFE scheme. There's also an emphasis on simplifying defence procurement rules and boosting joint R&D initiatives. Still to come: a military mobility package aimed at streamlining troop and equipment movement, and the unveiling of plans for a true "European Defence Union". With the US increasingly focused on the Indo-Pacific, the EU faces a test: can it become a credible security actor within NATO? And will von der Leyen's defence push bear fruit in time to deter potential threats—particularly from Russia—by 2030? The verdict: the jury's still out... From Green Deal visionary to defence strategist, von der Leyen's transformation has raised eyebrows across Brussels and beyond, leaving many confused. The contrast between the two mandates could not be starker. So, who is the real Ursula von der Leyen? Is she the eco-champion who once promised to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent? Or the iron-fisted strategist consolidating power and refocusing on geopolitical muscle? Perhaps both. Perhaps only one of them ever truly existed. Or maybe neither. What's clear is that the second mandate is not just more of the same: It's a whole new season and a new cast. With the same protagonist wearing the same blazer but with different habits and a different mind. As Brussels braces for the next plot twist, especially with US tariffs and budget wrangling, one thing's for sure: Ursula von der Leyen is playing a different game. And the rest of Europe? Still trying to figure out if this is a character arc... or a complete reboot.


Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
EU diplomats confirm they won't yet sanction Israel on Gaza
EU diplomats on Monday failed to agree once again on a partial suspension of Israel from the Horizon Europe fund in response to the war in Gaza, several diplomats said. Gathered online for their regular Mashreq/Maghreb Working Party and despite mounting pressure on Israel over the hunger crisis in Gaza, the 27 EU diplomats still couldn't reach any qualified majority on a European Commission proposal to cut Israel from partial access to the EU's €95 billion Horizon Europe research fund. 'The situation has not changed,' one EU diplomat said, referring to a formal meeting of EU ambassadors last week which also failed to agree to the Commission's proposal. The diplomat said the issue was now in the hands of the EU's foreign affairs ministers, who will meet informally on 29 August. With Israel facing global criticism over allowing starvation in the besieged strip and talks between Hamas and Israel at an impasse, the proposal itself would be a largely symbolic gesture. Israel would lose access to €200 millions' worth of future grants and investments in Horizon's European Investment Council (EIC) which specialises in so-called disruptive technologies. Commission officials say it would not affect support for fundamental or collaborative research. But even for a minimal sanction, there was no agreement among Europeans on Monday. Some EU countries have preferred to condemn Israel through individual initiatives like France's recognition of Palestine. The diplomat said support from the big countries like Germany or Italy, which is essential for a qualified majority vote to pass, was still lacking on Monday. Germany and Italy are part of those who 'prefer that dialogue with Israel continues', he said, while France, Spain and Ireland support the Commission proposal. Others including Romania and Finland 'are still examining' the text, he said. 'The refusal of certain member states to take even this smallest possible step to pressure Israel, while civilians continue to be killed and starved in Gaza, is absolutely incriminating,' said Martin Konecny, who heads the European Middle East Project in Brussels. Monday's meeting also took place a day after videos showing two Israeli hostages in Gaza appearing emaciated and distressed were released, sparking outrage among western leaders.


Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
Tariffs: EU Commission to suspend retaliation by another six months
The European Commission will suspend on Tuesday a package of trade countermeasures targeting €93 billions' worth of American goods which was scheduled to take effect on 7 August, as it continues to negotiate a joint statement formalising the agreement struck by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump on 27 July. 'The EU continues to work with the US to finalise a joint statement, as agreed on 27 July,' EU spokesperson Olof Gill said, adding: 'With these objectives in mind, the Commission will take the necessary steps to suspend by six months the EU's countermeasures against the US, which were due to enter into force on 7 August.' In line with the agreement reached, the US reduced its tariff rate to 15% last Thursday. Gill said the step gained the EU immediate tariff relief, 'a first important foundation is laid for restoring clarity to EU companies exporting to the US". The trade dispute is not over However the trade dispute between the EU and the US is not over, as both sides still need to negotiate certain points of the agreement that have led to differing interpretations. Furthermore, the US Executive Order of July 31 does not provide relief to the EU automotive industry as expected (it remains subject to 25% tariffs), nor does it exempt strategic sectors such as aircraft. As negotiations continue, the Commission should postpone through urgency procedure the retaliation package it adopted against the US tariffs. It consists in two lists of products that were worth respectively €21 billion and €72 billion and were merged on 24 July after EU member states adopted them, targeting US products such as soyabean, cars, aircraft and Bourbon Whiskey.