
Climate crisis must be tackled without resorting to degrowth, says MEP
The EU is a 'beacon of stability' when it comes to climate policy on the world stage, said MEP Lídia Pereira on Thursday.
Speaking at the Brussels' Economic Forum, the member of the European People's Party (EPP) said that the bloc must not resort to 'dangerous' solutions when tackling the climate crisis.
'If we want to find solutions, we have to find solutions with the moderates,' she said.
Pereira was responding to an argument for degrowth, proposed at the forum by Timothée Parrique, an economist and researcher at HEC Lausanne.
'This [degrowth] is not a political statement… this is a scientific reality that we have to grapple with,' Parrique said.
'There is no point being first when you're going in the wrong direction…economic growth has lost all correlation with quality of life.'
He continued: 'I can tell you with confidence wealth is not trickling down and pollution is not trickling out.'
The theory of degrowth, which has been around since the 1970s, warns against continual economic growth and instead advocates for economic shrinking. Proponents argue that the world doesn't have enough resources to make endless growth a realistic goal, meaning we need to scale back our consumption.
Although supported by some eminent academics, critics argue that degrowth would massively destabilise the interconnected global economy, resulting in unemployment and deepening inequality. They also argue that it's a tough political sell.
Even so, 'the costs of action are much lower than the cost of inaction,' stressed Parrique on Thursday, noting that growth-focused policies will have a 'huge drawback' in the long term. He suggested that public figures should do more to promote public awareness around this.
Lídia Pereira argued that the green transition can go hand in hand with the EU's push to become more competitive.
She pointed to subsidies in China and the US, notably former President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and said that Europe must do more to foster 'strategic autonomy in clean technologies'.
This is currently held back by a lack of progress on a fully-integrated capital market in the EU, she said. As a result, companies can't get their hands on the capital they need to compete on a global scale. Country-specific laws are still a hindrance to cross-border funding, forcing companies to be more reliant on banks, rather than private investors, for loans.
The EU claims to be climate neutral by 2050 and member states have specific strategies on how they plan to achieve this.
Pereira suggested that Europe could act as a pioneer for other economies when it comes to fulfilling climate commitments, which are becoming ever-more urgent.
This comes as, across the Atlantic, the US administration is pulling economic resources from initiatives designed to support the green transition.
Donald Trump in January signed an order to withdraw the US from the Paris climate agreement for the second time. The president is also pushing for a renewed focus on fossil fuels, as opposed to renewable technologies, and is rolling back elements of the IRA.
The combined economic output of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), was 0.1% in the first three months of 2025 compared to the previous quarter, according to provisional estimates of the organisation. This compares to a 0.5% rise in the last three months of 2024.
'This figure represents a departure from the higher and relatively stable growth rates recorded in the OECD area over the past two years,' the OECD said in its report.
The overall GDP growth rate also slowed for the G7, the seven strongest economies in the world, from 0.4% to 0.1% for the same period.
Japan and the US saw their economies contract from 0.6% in both countries to -0.2% and -0.1%, respectively. Both countries saw their imports increasing significantly; however, in the United States, imports of goods increased sharply by 10.8% in Q1, compared with a contraction of 1.3% in Q4.
'The rise in US imports of goods, likely influenced by anticipated changes to trade tariffs, was the main drag on growth,' the report said.
Growth also slowed in Canada, from 0.6% to 0.4%.
In a quarterly comparison, UK GDP growth jumped from 0.1% to 0.7%, mainly driven by investments and exports of goods.
In the EU, growth increased marginally in Italy (from 0.2% to 0.3%), and it turned positive in Germany (0.2%) and France (0.1%).
Ireland recorded the highest quarter-on-quarter growth rate in Q1 (3.2%).
On the other hand, Slovenia recorded the largest fall in GDP in Q1 (‑0.8%), followed by Portugal (-0.5%).
Year-on-year, GDP growth in the OECD was 1.6% in Q1 2025, down from 1.9% in Q4 2024. Among G7 economies, Canada recorded the highest growth over the last four quarters (2.3%), followed by the United States (2.0%), while Germany recorded the largest fall (-0.2%).
Year-on-year, GDP growth in the OECD was 1.6% in Q1 2025, down from 1.9% in Q4 2024. In Europe, the French economy expanded by 0.8% compared to the previous year, the Italian GDP also grew by 0.6%, but the German output contracted by 0.2%.
The OECD has recently published its global outlook, predicting slower growth, dragged down by trade disruptions and potential inflationary pressure. The organisation cut its global growth forecast by 0.2 percentage points to 3.1% for this year.
Europe's economy is also facing "heightened uncertainty" and is set for a weaker-than-expected recovery. As for the eurozone, the OECD expects GDP in the bloc to expand by 1% in 2025 instead of the previously expected 1.3%.
Recent data from Eurostat shows that the combined growth of the 20 member states rose by 0.3% in both the euro area, compared with the previous quarter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
42 minutes ago
- Euronews
Working week: Where in Europe people clock the most and least hours?
The EU motto "United in Diversity" couldn't be truer for the average working hours across the bloc. The latest Eurostat dataset illustrates a very large spectrum of how much time employees spend grinding through a full-time working week. On paper, the Greeks slog the most. Workers there put in an average of nearly 40 hours (39.8), the highest in the EU. Bulgaria, Poland and Romania follow next with around 39 hours a week. But beyond the EU, the workweek stretches even further, 43 hours in Turkey and 41 in Serbia. The report also shows EU citizens work slightly less compared to ten years ago. The average across the bloc is now 36 hours, down from 37 in 2014. Data also shows which sectors work the most and the least. Agriculture workers tend to have the longest weeks: 41 hours, followed by mining and construction workers at nearly 39. At the other end of the spectrum, education workers have the shortest week with almost 32 hours, followed by arts employees at 32.9 and social workers at 33.4. Four-day working weeks have been trialled across Europe with mixed results and feedback. Companies took part in pilots and tests in countries like the UK, Germany, Portugal, Iceland, France and Spain. In any case, no European country has officially mandated a four-day work week with reduced hours across all working sectors. Belgium was the first European country to enshrine the shorter week into law, in 2022. However, although employees can choose to work four days instead of five, they still need to work the same number of hours.

LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Businesses left in the dark by uncertainty around US tariffs
The response from a European diplomat was weary, verging on resigned: "You have to expect there will always be uncertainty." During the night of Wednesday, May 28, to Thursday, May 29, three federal judges had caused a stir by ruling part of the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump illegal. Just a few hours later, a US court of appeals suspended their initial decision, temporarily restoring the tariffs while it considers the case. The court did not rule on the merits but reinstated the tariffs pending its judgment. How can Brussels, Tokyo or Beijing negotiate under such conditions? On one hand, Trump was eager to boast about "great deals" with his trade partners. On the other, the very foundation of trade negotiations is shifting constantly. The events of recent days have illustrated this in dramatic fashion. On May 23, Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs on European Union (EU) imports by June 1. On Sunday, May 25, after a phone call with Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, he postponed the deadline to July 9. On Wednesday, the legal basis for the tariffs collapsed. On Thursday, the appeals court's ruling temporarily reinstated them. "Anything can still happen. This is not the end of the story," a senior European official cautioned before the appeal decision.


Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
Is this the end of France's Crit'Air zones for drivers?
If you're driving in France's biggest towns and cities, your vehicle will need to display a sticker known as Crit'Air, denoting how polluting it is. Some of the oldest and most polluting vehicles under the Crit'Air scheme are banned from city centres, with plans to expand these low-emissions zones. First introduced in 2017, the low-emissions zones have helped to lower pollution levels in some cities, but they have long been the target of complaints that they are overly complicated and confusing, as well as poorly enforced. Because many of the rules were introduced on a local level, France ended up with a patchwork of different regulations, meaning the same vehicle might be allowed in the town centre in Bordeaux, but not in Paris. Added to that is the fact that local authorities can implement temporary bans on days when pollution levels are high. READ MORE: Crit'Air: How France's vehicle emissions stickers work A new law in 2021 aimed to standardise rules and expand the zones to smaller towns, although wide local disparities remain. Why are we talking about this now? On Wednesday, French MPs voted in favour of an amendment that would scrap low-emission zones, or zones à faibles émissions (ZFEs), as defined in the 2021 law. Advertisement The goal of ZFEs is to decrease air pollution, which contributes to thousands of deaths in France each year, but critics have said that the ZFEs penalise lower-income workers who rely on their vehicles for daily life and cannot afford to replace them with a newer, more environmentally friendly model. The move to get rid of ZFEs was primarily supported by members of the right and far-right, as well as some left-wing politicians. But despite the vote, it is not certain that the low-emission zones will actually be scrapped. What's next? The move to scrap low-emission zones was added as an amendment to a bill currently making its way through parliament, known as the 'simplification' bill , it aims to streamline administrative processes. As of Friday, there were still over 600 amendments left to study before MPs could vote on the full bill. Then, in order to pass, the bill must receive majority support in the Assemblée nationale. Even if the bill as a whole does pass, there are still several hurdles to clear. Firstly, the amendment related to ZFEs could also end up being scrapped by France's Constitutional Council (Conseil Constitutionnel). This happens relatively often in the French legislative process - if MPs add an amendment that is completely unrelated to the original idea of the bill, then the Conseil Constitutionnel has the power to deny it. READ MORE: EXPLAINED: What is France's Constitutional Council and how does it work? The other concern for French lawmakers has to do with the EU. The EU promised to give France €40 billion in subsidies as part of its 2020 European recovery plan , with the understanding that France would take steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. If France fails to meet these commitments, the country could be required to pay a portion of the aid money back to the EU. On top of that, France's own Conseil d'État (Council of State) could force the country to pay penalties for failing to meet air quality thresholds if the ZFEs are scrapped, French news site Capital reported. Advertisement What is the current status of the low-emission zones? As of January 2025, there were 42 urban areas classified as ZFEs, meaning motorists must display the Crit'Air sticker, but the requirement to gradually increase bans on polluting vehicles has been diluted quite a bit in the last few years, in response to criticism. READ MORE: MAP: The French cities with Crit'Air low emission zones in 2025 Initially, as part of France's 'climate and resistance law' from 2021, the parliament voted to gradually require urban areas with more than 150,000 inhabitants to bring in low-emission zones. The idea was that from 2023, Crit'Air 5 vehicles would be banned, then Crit'Air 4 vehicles from 2024 and eventually Crit'Air 3 vehicles from 2025. However, in reality, local authorities have been allowed to enforce the rules by their own standards, meaning the exceptions from city to city still vary greatly. Advertisement Following pushback from the public, the French government announced in 2023 they would soften the plans. They decided instead to create two separate distinctions for urban areas based on pollution levels. Cities that regularly exceed air quality thresholds (now called ZFE 'Territories') would have to continue to restrict highly polluting vehicles according to the original rules. In contrast, urban areas that stay within air quality thresholds would be considered 'vigilance zones' and would not be required to enforce new restrictions, though they can do so voluntarily. At the start of 2025, only a handful of cities opted to tighten restrictions on polluting vehicles, while Paris and Lyon were the only two classed as ZFE 'Territories' and required to restrict Crit'Air 3 vehicles. So do I still need a Crit'Air sticker? Fascinating as the French parliamentary process undoubtedly is, for most drivers the big question will be whether you still need a Crit'Air sticker to drive in France (and remember that these are required for foreign-registered vehicles as well). At present, the answer is yes, they are still required - it will take several months to exhaust the various next parliamentary steps, and then a date for ending the scheme must be formalised. In truth, Crit'Air is one of the most straightforward pieces of French admin - you order the sticker online (there's even an English-language version of the website ) at a cost of €3.18 if you are in France or €4.91 if you are in another country. The sticker lasts as long as you keep the vehicle.