Faith groups call for calm after India strikes
Representatives of different faith groups in Bradford have called for calm after India launched a series of strikes on sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
The strikes came two weeks after a militant attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir which saw 26 people killed. Pakistan has denied any involvement in that attack.
Sofia Buncy, a community activist in Bradford who also works with the Council for Mosques, said people felt "understandably very vulnerable and emotional" after the events of the past 24 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
"Many of us, especially here in Bradford, have ties to Pakistan, India and Kashmir. We have family members there and friends or family visiting there," she said.
Sofia Buncy said Bradford had strong inter-faith relations [BBC]
Ms Buncy said after the news of the missile and air strikes emerged on Tuesday evening, there had been "a real feeling of panic for the wellbeing of those who are there".
There was also "grief in certain areas - people have not been able to get hold of family members".
"There have been blackouts in communication. So, there's a lot of fear," she said.
However, Ms Buncy added: "We've been very lucky in Bradford that over the decades we've had very strong inter-faith relations, very organic, and the door is always open.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
"So, we were able to have those very honest and forthright conversations as Muslim, Sikh and Hindu communities last night and this morning: how do we work through this together, from a point of unity, from a point of understanding, and a point of reconciliation?"
Ravinder Dharni said he was concerned about the possible "ripple effect" of the situation [BBC]
Ravinder Dharni, a voluntary worker, businessman and chairperson for the Bradford Hindu Council, said it was important to show that the different communities in the city stood "shoulder to shoulder".
While Mr Dharni explained that Hindus in Bradford felt "distressed" about the "innocent people that are going to get involved in this crossfire", he said it was also important for communities in the city to show solidarity.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
"We are more concerned that nothing happens here in our faith centres, in our groups and in our businesses," he said.
Mr Dharni said he was concerned about the "ripple effect" of the conflict, adding that different communities lived in "peace and harmony" in Bradford and all faiths worked collectively together.
"Bradford is a multi-cultural city and we know how important it is. People might remember us for the riots or being the curry capital of the UK, but we also want people to remember we have different faiths and work together," he said.
Simmy Sekhon said he believed "compromise has to be reached" [BBC]
Meanwhile, Simmy Sekhon, a solicitor, businessman and spokesperson for the Yorkshire Sikh Forum, said it was a time for "compromise", not for "escalating situations".
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
"If there is one thing we can learn from VE Day, it is the 80 years of peace in Europe that happened after conflict ended," he said.
Mr Sekhon said he believed it was the time to "make new friends".
"The reality is, here in the UK, we live, work and play together and the circumstances in India and Pakistan must be resolved by politicians," he said.
"They can learn from the way we interact and try to understand each other, but compromise has to be reached."
Mr Sekhon added that he wanted people "across the divide line" to "share the love we share here in places like Bradford and in Yorkshire".
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
6 minutes ago
- American Military News
Chinese vessels collide while chasing Philippine boat near disputed Scarborough Shoal
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. Two Chinese vessels collided in the South China Sea on Monday while pursuing a Philippine patrol boat near the contested Scarborough Shoal, officials in Manila said, releasing video footage of the incident. The video shows a Chinese coast guard vessel shooting a water cannon and tracking close behind a Philippine coast guard boat until it collided with a much larger People's Liberation Army craft, leaving visible damage on both Chinese vessels. Crew members aboard the smaller Chinese vessel had been visible just before the collision, Philippine coast guard spokesman Commodore Jay Tarriela said at a press briefing. He said the Chinese crew didn't respond to an offer of assistance from the Philippine crew. 'We're not sure whether they were able to rescue those personnel who were in front prior to the collision. But we are hoping that these personnel are in good condition,' he said. China's military confirmed the confrontation, but did not confirm or deny the collision. 'The China Coast Guard took necessary measures in accordance with the law, including monitoring, pressing from the outside, blocking and controlling the Philippine vessels to drive them away,' Gan Yu, a Chinese coast guard spokesperson, said in a statement. The incident comes days after the Philippine and Indian navies conducted joint exercises in the South China Sea, held to counter China's far-reaching maritime claims. The Scarborough Shoal is a triangular chain of reefs located 125 nautical miles from the main Philippine island of Luzon. Over the past year, China has sought to strengthen its claim to the shoal, mounted large-scale military drills and deployed the world's largest coast guard ship, known as 'The Monster,' in the area. Includes reporting from Agence France-Presse.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Bravo star Jennifer Welch slammed for claiming Trump voters should be banned from Mexican, Chinese, Indian restaurants
Bravo star Jennifer Welch wildly called for President Trump supporters to be banned from all Mexican, Chinese and Indian restaurants in the US — saying they should get their 'fat asses over to Cracker Barrel' instead. In a profanity-laden meltdown on her 'I've Had It' podcast, the mom-of-two unleashed on white voters who agree with Trump's border policies but still want to frequent restaurants run by immigrants. 'I've had it with white people that triple Trumped that have the nerve and the audacity to walk into a Mexican restaurant, a Chinese restaurant, an Indian restaurant, go to a gay hairdresser,' Welch raged. 'I don't think you should be able to enjoy anything but Cracker Barrel.' 3 Bravo star Jennifer Welch unleashed the profanity-laden meltdown on her 'I've Had It' podcast. IHIP The term 'triple Trump' refers to those who support what critics argue are the president's anti-stances on immigration, diversity and LGBTQ rights. 'If you want to triple Trump, if you want to brow beat DEI, if you want to brow beat gay people, you want to brow beat black people as you have been doing for hundreds of years… White people that triple Trumped should be boycotted, banned from enjoying the best thing that America has to offer, which is multiculturalism,' she ranted. 'Get your fat asses out of the Mexican restaurant. Get your fat asses over at a Cracker Barrel because nobody wants to see your f–ing smug ass, teeny weeny pink arm, big gut around.' 3 Welch said Trump supporters should take themselves to Cracker Barrel instead. REUTERS 3 The Bravo star was called 'unhinged and delusional' after the rant against Trump's supporters. AP 'Nobody wants to see that sh-t, no one,' she added. The backlash against Welch was swift on social media with many blasting the lefty host as 'unhinged and delusional.'
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
Trump's 50% Tariff on Indian Exports Threatens USD 87 Billion Trade, Experts Warn of Short-term Pain but Long-term Resilience
Nevertheless, there is still a possibility that the tariff tensions could be resolved. India has extended an invitation for talks and welcomed an understanding between the US and Russia for a leaders' meeting in Alaska on 15 August Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. US President Donald Trump's decision to double tariffs on Indian goods has sparked a fresh wave of trade tensions between Washington and New Delhi, with experts warning of immediate disruption but also opportunities for long-term diversification. The escalation began on 30th July 2025, when Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff, accompanied by a provocative tweet: "I don't care what happens between India and Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care." The remark drew sharp reactions in India and abroad. That initial tariff took effect on 7th August and was already viewed as a significant blow to Indian exporters. But on 6th August, Trump added another 25 per cent levy, raising the total tariff to 50 per cent, the highest rate the US has imposed on any trading partner. The additional 25 per cent is scheduled to take effect on 27 August, leaving a narrow three-week window for talks. The Trigger The move follows difficult trade negotiations and longstanding US criticism of India's high tariffs and non-monetary trade barriers. Washington has also been angered by India's continued purchase of discounted Russian oil, despite Western sanctions and efforts to isolate Moscow over its war in Ukraine. Citing "national security" concerns, the US imposed the measure as a punitive step. With USD 87 billion worth of Indian exports to the US now at risk, the stakes are high. Experts from across sectors weigh in on the long-term impact Aloke Nandi, President, Finrex Forex Advisory Services said, "Over the last few months, horror stories about the impact of tariff hikes by the US have been repeatedly splashed over the media. None of these really looked at the underlying data. Even with a pessimistic view, exports to the US might drop by USD 21 billion, but this will likely be partly offset by higher exports to other nations and reduced imports linked to these goods. A current account deficit (CAD) rising to 1–1.5 per cent is not life-threatening. Unless the US imposes extreme measures like full trade sanctions, India will withstand these tariffs." Sarvadnya Kulkarni, CEO, General Instruments Consortium, acknowledged the immediate blow but noted the potential silver lining, "In the short term, raising tariffs to 50 per cent will swiftly bite, especially for MSMEs. About USD 87 billion in US-bound exports could be affected. In the long run, though, this may force India to diversify markets, bolster value-added manufacturing, and enhance export competitiveness." In fact, the government is already looking to direct Indian exports towards alternative destinations. Recently, Union Minister for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Rajiv Ranjan Singh, noted that other markets are available for India's seafood exports. "The EU, Japan, South Korea, UK, Russia, Australia, West Asia, South East Asia, and many other countries are open for export of Indian seafood." Meanwhile, Smita Singh, Partner, S&A Law Offices, stressed the disadvantage India now faces. "With India now facing a 50 per cent tariff compared to Vietnam, Japan, and Bangladesh at 15–20 per cent, our exports could be costlier by 35 per cent. Sectors like gems, jewellery, textiles, footwear, apparel, and chemicals, which make up 55 per cent of exports to the US, will be most impacted. The government may need to offer targeted relief if negotiations fail." On the other hand, Kunal Gupta, Co-founder & CEO of EMotorad expressed, "We had projected INR 150 Cr in e-bike exports this year, with over INR 100 Cr destined for the US. The sudden hike has disrupted plans. But India has always thrived on adversity, we'll recalibrate, find new markets, and back our country's vision of self-reliance." In electronics and semiconductors, Sanjeev Kumar, CEO, Logic Fruit Technologies, warned of supply chain risks. "Tariffs of up to 100 per cent on Indian semiconductors and electronics risk erasing supply chain advantages and triggering production migration. Luxury exports like jewellery may remain resilient, but cost-sensitive segments could see significant damage. Policy agility in the coming weeks will define whether this is a setback or a catalyst for strategic course correction." Pawan Gupta, Co-Founder of Fashinza, believes apparel exports face an uphill battle. "At 50 per cent tariffs, exports become unviable. The good news is India's diverse, high-value-added products are in demand in the UK and EU. But apparel manufacturing, with its high labour input and low wages, is not viable in developed markets, this is why tariffs in this sector make little sense." For the medtech sector, Neeraj Katare, Founder of Tracky, sees both risks and opportunities. "The increase in tariffs is a double-edged sword for health tech. It raises import costs for essential components, but it also forces us to localise. With the right infrastructure and incentives, India can become a global health tech manufacturing hub." Himanshu Kohli, Co-founder, Client Associates, placed the issue in a broader economic context. "India's economy is largely domestic-oriented. Merchandise exports to the US account for only 2.2 per cent of GDP. A higher terminal tariff could trim GDP growth by 40–100 bps, but the economy remains relatively insulated compared to export-heavy Asian peers." Looking Ahead The US and India maintain a strong trade relationship, with bilateral trade reaching approximately USD 212 billion in 2024. That year, the US imported around USD 87.3 billion worth of goods from India, giving India roughly an 18 per cent share in total US goods imports. The US goods trade deficit with India stood at about USD 45.8 billion. India's top three exports to the US in 2024 were pharmaceuticals (USD 7.5–8.1 billion), telecom instruments (around USD 10 billion), and precious stones, gems, and jewellery (USD 5.3–10 billion). With the new US tariffs of up to 50 per cent, an estimated 55 per cent of this export value including textiles, gems and jewellery, and engineering goods is directly at risk. Nevertheless, there is still a possibility that the tariff tensions could be resolved. India has extended an invitation for talks and welcomed an understanding between the US and Russia for a leaders' meeting in Alaska on 15 August. New Delhi endorsed the summit, noting it could help end the Ukraine conflict and open prospects for peace, potentially easing the geopolitical tensions underpinning the tariffs. Though, many experts believe the disruption could serve as a catalyst for India to expand into new geographies, strengthen domestic manufacturing, and ultimately emerge more resilient in the global trade arena.
