logo
Gujarat ATS did not share info on Al-Qaeda operative's arrest: HM Dr G Parameshwara says it's SoP violation

Gujarat ATS did not share info on Al-Qaeda operative's arrest: HM Dr G Parameshwara says it's SoP violation

BENGALURU: Following the arrest of a 30-year-old woman from Hebbal by the Gujarat Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) for allegedly having links with a terror module linked to Al-Qaeda, Home Minister Dr G Parameshwara on Thursday said the investigating agency has not shared any information on this.
The Gujarat ATS arrested Shama Parveen Ansari, who had been staying in Bengaluru for the last three years, on Tuesday. Shama has been booked under various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Terrorist Act, and BNS.
'The woman alleged to have links with the Al-Qaeda network is not from Karnataka. The Gujarat ATS which arrested her has not shared any information. There were previous reports that sleeper cells are active in Bengaluru and the investigating agencies had found them,' the minister said.
'The accused, allegedly involved in manufacturing MDMA, arrived in Mysuru about 20 days ago. When one of the accused was caught in Mumbai, leads from that arrest led the police here. Even in our state, when such cases come to light, our police go to other states to arrest the accused. This is a standard procedure followed across the country,' the minister added.
The ATS, along with support from local police, raided Shama's house and seized multiple digital devices. Shama, a graduate who was unemployed, was staying with her younger brother, a software engineer. She is alleged to have been a key conspirator and handling social media accounts by posting information related to radical ideology. She is accused of organising activities from Karnataka. She reportedly shared extremist videos linked to Al-Qaeda operatives on social media platforms, especially Instagram, from the house in Hebbal. She was sharing provocative and violent content, including jihadi videos and messages. The officials found out that she was running two Facebook pages and an Instagram account with nearly 10,000 followers. She was reportedly posting content related to radicalisation of youths towards terrorism.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bengaluru girl shares private videos with friend, faces online blackmail
Bengaluru girl shares private videos with friend, faces online blackmail

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bengaluru girl shares private videos with friend, faces online blackmail

Bengaluru: A 20-year-old girl from the Central Business District (CBD) area had the shock of her lifetime when she found her private videos uploaded on social media platforms. The videos she shared with a friend had also surfaced on pornographic websites, giving her a traumatic time. Clara (name changed), a graduation student at a private college, Tuesday approached the Central CEN crime police with a complaint against Anoop (name changed), a native of Kochi in Kerala. On Aug 18, 2023, she had shared her video with Anoop through a messaging app. She filed a complaint with police on April 26 and requested the platforms to delete the videos from online. Her complaint was then treated as a petition. In June, the videos resurfaced on various adult content websites and were also shared on social media platforms with a downloadable link. A new video was posted on these sites recently. She requested the videos be taken down, but the sites failed to comply, causing her severe mental distress. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru According to her, Anoop, is currently staying in Cambridge in the UK. As she shared those videos only with him, she contacted him over the phone and questioned him about the videos appearing online. Anoop claimed he had no idea how the videos were leaked. Meanwhile, she received a message from an Instagram profile named Rony Ronel, with the handle '@irritattor', demanding Rs 5,000 to take down the videos. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now Undo When she refused to pay him, the suspect, who has extensive knowledge of the websites where the videos are posted, threatened to spread them further. He also shared his digital payment application number 9809009810, registered in the name of Rony Tom Scaria, and asked her to make the payment. Her videos have been uploaded on 23 websites. A senior officer said the complainant provided the links to all websites. Measures are being taken to remove them. A case has been registered against Anoop and the Instagram handler under section 67A (punishment for publishing or transmitting material containing sexually explicit acts, etc., in electronic form) of the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) section 308 (extortion). Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.

'Shields minors': Centre Defends Statutory Age Of 18 Years For Consent In Top Court
'Shields minors': Centre Defends Statutory Age Of 18 Years For Consent In Top Court

NDTV

time2 hours ago

  • NDTV

'Shields minors': Centre Defends Statutory Age Of 18 Years For Consent In Top Court

New Delhi: The Centre has defended in the Supreme Court the statutory age of consent of 18 years, saying the decision was a "deliberate, well-considered, and coherent" policy choice aimed at shielding minors from sexual exploitation. The Centre, in its written submissions through Additional Solicitor General Aishwaraya Bhati, argued diluting the age of consent or introducing exceptions under the guise of adolescent romance would be not only legally unsound but also dangerous. The government said it would provide a defence mechanism even to those abusers who exploit a child's emotional dependence or silence. The Centre further said the existing statutory age of consent must be strictly and uniformly enforced. "Any departure from this standard, even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy, would amount to rolling back decades of progress in child protection law, and undermine the deterrent character of statutes like the POCSO (the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act, 2012 and the BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita).' Moreover, the Centre argued that the discretion on case-to-case basis must remain judicial and must not be read into the statute as a general exception or a diluted standard. 'Introducing a legislative close-in-age exception or reducing the age of consent would irrevocably dilute the statutory presumption of vulnerability that lies at the heart of child protection law. A diluted law risks opening the floodgates to trafficking and other forms of child abuse under the garb of consent,' it said. Lowering the age of consent, the Centre said, would open the "floodgates" to trafficking and other forms of child abuse under the garb of assent. The case before the top court raises the point of age in adolescent relationships. 'The legislative determination to fix the age of consent at eighteen (18) years, and to treat all sexual activities with a person below that age as an offence irrespective of purported consent, is a product of a deliberate, well-considered, and coherent statutory policy,' the Centre said. The law does not treat the age limit as arbitrary and rather, it reflects a constitutional and legislative recognition of a minor's vulnerability, especially in a socio-economic context marked by deep inequalities and power imbalances, it added. A child's inability to report or resist is exacerbated when the perpetrator is a parent or close family member, it said, adding in such cases, presenting 'consent' as a defence only victimises the child, shifts the blame onto them, and undermines the very object of POCSO to protect children from exploitation regardless of whether they were 'willing'. The existing age of consent ought to be retained in order to give full effect to the legislative intent, protect the bodily integrity of children, and uphold the constitutional and statutory safeguards accorded to them, it said. 'The Supreme Court along with high courts across the country have always maintained the sanctity of legal age of consent as 18 years of age. This statutory yardstick has been upheld on numerous occasions, keeping in view the legislative intent and the pre-eminent constitutional mandate of protecting young children,' it said. Earlier, amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising had urged the bench to read down the statutory age of consent from 18 to 16 years. Jaising, who is assisting the top court in the case, then said the current law criminalises consensual romantic relationships among adolescents and violates their constitutional rights.

Lawyer falls for fake online profile, gets cheated of 2.5L
Lawyer falls for fake online profile, gets cheated of 2.5L

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Lawyer falls for fake online profile, gets cheated of 2.5L

Ahmedabad: A 26-year-old lawyer from Ghatlodia was cheated of Rs 2.5 lakh by a conman who posed as his brother-in-law through a fake Facebook profile, according to a complaint filed with Ghatlodia police on Wednesday. The complainant stated in his FIR that he received a Facebook message on July 17 from a profile bearing the photo and name of his brother-in-law, who lives in London. Thinking the message was genuine, he began chatting with the person. The fraudster told the victim that he was transferring Rs 3 lakh to his account to help with a visa renewal and shared a fake deposit receipt. He then directed the victim to coordinate with an "agent" named Manoj Kumar for further steps. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad The victim sent a message on the mobile number provided on WhatsApp. The person who responded claimed to be Kumar and asked for multiple payments to process the transaction. Believing he was assisting his brother-in-law, the victim transferred Rs 25,000 twice and Rs 30,000 to different Punjab National Bank accounts. He also sent Rs 15,000 to a Bank of Maharashtra account. After reaching the transaction limit on his account, he used his sister-in-law's SBI account to transfer Rs 50,000 each to two more Punjab National Bank accounts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Additionally, he used his friend's HDFC account to send another Rs 55,000 to an IDFC First Bank account. When he later spoke to his brother-in-law over the phone, he learned that the latter had made no such request. Realising he was duped, he reported the incident to the cybercrime helpline 1930 and filed a police complaint. Ghatlodia police registered a case of cheating and breach of trust under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita along with charges under the Information Technology Act. An investigation is on into the fake Facebook profile, the WhatsApp number and the bank accounts involved in the fraud. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store