
I visited a tech-free retreat with my partner to see if the no-screen rule could bring us closer together
I have a confession: every single day begins and ends with my phone. It's the first thing I think of in the morning and the last thing I gaze upon before I close my eyes at night. My partner of 15 years doesn't get a look in. There's no chance of spontaneous sex – we're parents, I'm tired, overwhelmed and honestly, I'm looking for an effortless, fast dopamine fix.
I'd rather scroll mindlessly on Vinted and social media than genuinely connect or enrich my mind with a good book or activity. I can feel how bad it is for me, and for my relationship, but it's an addiction and one that, if we're being realistic here, you probably have too.
A smartphone relationship survey undertaken by SellCell has revealed that 71 per cent of people spend more of their personal time with their phone than their partner. Compounding this is the fact that 'no phone zones' don't exist in 82 per cent of homes, meaning phones are being used in the bedroom, which has been proven to disrupt sleep as well as meaningful connection.
Relationship coach and psychotherapist Ashley Parker is one of many experts who believes excessive screen time inevitably removes our presence in relationships. She explains that, 'healthy interaction in relationships requires our full presence. When we're distracted, there's a lack of eye contact, we miss non-verbal cues which is a huge proportion of our communication and we miss opportunities for connection.'
Parker says couples frequently complain about a lack of connection in her sessions because of time spent on screens, resulting in less talking and even less sex. 'It's not uncommon for couples to have some of their most meaningful interactions at bedtime, but with the rise in scrolling, this is often overtaken and means that those crucial times are being replaced. There's definitely an element of avoidance too. It's easy to gloss over difficult interactions or conflict by picking up your phone and drifting off into another world.'
Sometimes to break the habit, regardless of what the habit is, you have to get out of the environment where you've become comfortable feeding it. So, to get clean from the screen we decided to leave our son for a few nights for the first time in eight years, and head to a luxury, low-tech retreat in Cotignac.
Provincial French resort Lou Calen is not quite The White Lotus – they don't confiscate your phones and laptops on arrival but eschewing them is encouraged. There are no TVs in the bedrooms and you're immersed in nature – the estate comprises olive trees, fragrant flowers and an enchanting chorus of twittering birds, frogs and insects. The fruits and vegetables growing everywhere might end up on your plate at dinner at the retreat's Michelin starred restaurant. Plus, there are activities like locally grown wine tasting and traditional crafting workshops every week, developed specifically to bring you back to reality.
It was astonishing to notice the anxiety the impending screen ban brought up. Despite heading off on what we both knew was likely to be a wonderful and well-earned break, I kept thinking of all the reasons I needed to be online – what if I got an urgent work email? What about taking and uploading photos for my friends and family to see on social media? What about needing to video call our son?
Parker explains that calling out too much screen time is sometimes met with defensiveness and nerves, but approaching the topic with compassion and curiosity is key. 'Screen time doesn't have to be eradicated completely, but having some parameters around when both people will be completely present is important. This might look like ditching the phones at bedtime and in the morning – this is a prime time to reinvest energy in reflecting on your day. Or sharing what your hopes are for the coming day.'
Realistically screens are always going to be a big part of our lives at home. But I hoped that perhaps by having this break and instigating a change, we might be able to develop healthier relationship with our phones, and each other. Going screen free was hard, and I'll admit. There were many times I reached for my phone to start scrolling out of habit, and felt irritable and anxious when I couldn't. But as we had scheduled calls home and I was officially OOO, I forced myself to keep the phone out of reach, and keep the laptop – which I did bring 'in case of emergency' – switched off.
Over the course of three days, it felt like a weight had been lifted. Each morning, we woke and instead of immediately reading the news and checking notifications we connected with each other. We interpreted our dreams like we used to when we first met, talked about our plans and hopes and worries for the day ahead, and even had the chance to be physically intimate – definitely a better mood and energy boost than finding new likes on an Instagram post.
It was certainly easier being in the stunning and carefully curated environment of Lou Calen than it would have been at home. Back in Scotland, where we live, we've fallen into what I now recognise as pretty depressing lifestyle habits. Constant chores and childcare always feels as though there's never enough time for self care, to exercise or to enjoy a hobby. Suddenly with screen time gone there were several more hours to play with.
In Provence we swam in the outside pool, went to a wine tasting, played tennis, explored the village and learned its fascinating history. If we'd arrived a little earlier, we could have joined one of the retreat's drawing classes, learned to weave baskets or create flower wreaths. In the evenings we went for meals and actually spent the whole time in conversation – something 1 in 4 people, who say they play on their phone while eating with their partner, can't attest to. When we returned to our room, without our usual Netflix binge, we chose to read and make love.
Admittedly, this last part might have been the hardest. The urge to bed rot while watching a TV series until the damning question, 'are you still watching…?' pops up on the screen is very real. Somehow, the idea of taking time to meditate or draw, or knit or read feels like it's going to be an effort rather than relaxing, even though I know from my own experience and the endless research papers exploring downtime demonstrates quite the opposite. All I wanted to do after dinner was put on an episode of Peep Show that we'd watched a thousand times before, and stare at memes. But it turns out, when forced, getting lost in a good book is still really nice, like it always used to be.
Funnily enough, so is having sex and actually making that a priority. Maybe if I'd been forward thinking enough to bring some more activities with me, doodling, crafting or colouring in would have been pretty great too. Despite feeling a little jonesy, I ended up going to sleep earlier, waking feeling more refreshed and, here's the crazy twist: I did feel genuinely relaxed and happy, without the edge of despair and self-loathing that comes after a good scroll sesh.
Parker says there's an immediacy in scrolling that becomes addictive, which is a large part of the reason we continue to do this to ourselves, rather than seek meaningful connection and true relaxation. Until recently, the term 'addiction' has typically defined behaviours related to substances, but given our widespread, problematic use of popular platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and TikTok, this has now changed.
A first of its kind study, conducted by the UCLA, scanned the brains of 32 teenagers (who often have the most susceptible brains) while they used what they were told was a small social network similar to Instagram. The teenagers were shown 148 photos over the course of 12 minutes, including 40 photos each that they had submitted themselves. When they saw a large number of 'likes' on their own photos, the scan lit up in the brain's reward circuitry.
Very often couples will be watching other people doing the things they want to do, so why not invest the energy into actually doing that instead?
Ashley Parker
This constant synthetic use of our reward system has been linked to potential desensitisation and raised tolerance levels to feel-good chemicals, such as dopamine. This means that, just like an addiction, the more we use social media to get an approval fix, the more we feel we need to experience that happy feeling. Something that might have given us a healthy sense of satisfaction and enjoyment before, like reading or sex, would then be far less likely to.
'There's also a level of escapism and a low-level energy required,' Parker explains. 'Choosing screen time over connecting with your partner isn't necessarily a sign that the relationship is over, but perhaps more that the scrolling is serving as an avoidance or distraction. It can be really useful to consider what each person is actually getting from the screen time. What are you watching? What takes your interest? This really boils down to a deeper question – what are you both missing? You could think about how you might bring some of those interests into real life. Very often couples will be watching other people doing the things they want to do, so why not invest the energy into actually doing that instead?'
Leaving Lou Calen feeling refreshed, romantic and with a strong incentive to lay off the screens back at home, I still knew there was a long way to go before we were able to kick the habit. Of course, as soon as we landed we uploaded the photos we took, we checked our messages and that night, we watched TV.
But we've since deleted our social media apps and implemented a 'no phone zone' in the bedroom. It's baby steps, but having had a taste of freedom, I'm keen for us to break out of our virtual reality and relearn how to be present, and how to be happy with each other.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Sarepta reports second case of liver failure death after its gene therapy treatment
June 15 (Reuters) - Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT.O), opens new tab on Sunday said there had been a second reported case of acute liver failure resulting in death after a patient received the company's gene therapy for a rare form of muscular dystrophy. The patient was undergoing treatment with Sarepta's therapy called Elevidys, which is the only gene therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients aged four and above. The first instance of death was reported in March this year, a 16-year-old boy who died from acute liver failure months after receiving Elevidys. Liver damage is a known risk with Elevidys and other gene therapies that use adeno-associated viral vectors to infuse modified genes. Sarepta said it is taking steps to mitigate the risk of acute liver failure in patients by working to convene an independent group of experts in Duchenne and liver health to consider an enhanced immunosuppression regimen for Elevidys. It has also temporarily suspending shipments of the therapy and informed the FDA and global health authorities about the incident. Roche (ROG.S), opens new tab, which partners with Sarepta for commercialization of the gene therapy outside the United States, said in a separate statement on Sunday that it has paused the dosing of Elevidys in patients following the two cases of fatal acute liver failure.


Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Kara Tointon: Why I had a double mastectomy at 39
Last year I made one of the biggest decisions of my life. I chose to have a double mastectomy and have my fallopian tubes removed. I didn't have cancer, but my decision was driven by it. Six years ago, my mother, Carol, underwent chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. During that time, she was tested for the BRCA1 and 2 gene alterations, which put you at greater risk of breast and ovarian cancers, because we know they run in our family. It was suggested that my sister, Hannah, and I also take a test. We did so in our own time, when we felt ready. My result came back positive. Hannah's, thankfully, came back negative. She had convinced herself that we would enter the process together and so it took a moment for her to be able to talk about it, but she has been a rock for me and has been with me every step of the way. Finding out about the gene alteration gave us all a clarity and an explanation of the generations of women we'd lost in my family, all too early, to cancer. My mum had lost her mother to cancer at the age of 13. In 2002, my Auntie June died lost a ten-year battle to both ovarian and breast cancer and in 2019, two and a half years after her initial diagnosis and three months after my first son, Frey, was born, cancer claimed Mum's life too. For the next five years after my test I was put under 'surveillance' — I had mammograms and MRIs once per year. Doctors had told me about the option of having a mastectomy when I first took the BRCA alteration test in 2018, but I was hoping to have a second child before I went through any major surgery. The first scan showed a benign lump. When tested, this wasn't cancerous, but the risk suddenly felt a lot more real. When these lumps showed up again in a few more scans, it was enough to convince me that I wanted the double mastectomy. The process was surprisingly straightforward. After attending various meetings where everything was explained to me, I waited for the date of surgery. In April last year, I went into the Royal Marsden hospital for one night and returned home the next day with drainage tubes, two mesh layers under my skin where my breasts used to be, and implants underneath. The procedure usually takes up to three hours. My surgeon told me that, although some patients' are able to use fat from their abdomen and buttocks to reconstruct, this wasn't an option for me at this time, hence us choosing implants. Within a few weeks I was up and about; within two months I was able to lift things. The operation did take a mental toll — I found myself surprisingly tired for about three months, but to a certain extent that was overridden by the overwhelming sense of relief. I still have some procedures to complete but I'm very happy with the results and the decision I've made. Five months later, when I had just turned 40, I had a second surgery to remove my fallopian tubes, which reduced my risk of ovarian cancer without me needing to go into an early menopause. When I am closer to a natural menopause, I will have my ovaries removed to further reduce my risk. The procedure and my recovery was relatively quick, and again I only spent one night in hospital. One of the biggest fears people have around this type of surgery is the physical scars it leaves and, while I do have those, I don't worry about them. How you look becomes far less of a concern when you've seen your body heal from two potentially life-saving operations. I now live a peaceful life in Sogne, southern Norway, with my partner, Marius, and our two sons, but I hope I can use my experience to spread awareness of the tests and operations that can help defend against breast and ovarian cancer. Many people are afraid to speak about cancer; Mum certainly was. My childhood growing up in the picturesque Westcliff-on-Sea in Essex was joyful and I'm lucky to have such a close family, but there was one thing Mum would never speak about: her health. For me, speaking about my procedures with other women and hearing their stories makes me feel less alone. That's why I decided to share my experience on Instagram last month. I'd seen a video on my feed of somebody else sharing theirs and it gave me such comfort. At first I felt nervous posting something so personal, but the kind messages I received from other women, many of them going through the same thing, really moved me. Having the BRCA alteration test and preventive surgery is a personal decision and one with many different considerations, but it was the right one for me. I was able to take back some autonomy — cancer once dominated my family but I feel like I am no longer controlled by it. I will always grieve that more treatment options were not available to my mum, but I know that she would want me to give other women a message: don't ignore your body; confronting your health head-on could save your life. Kara is an ambassador for The Eve Appeal — the leading gynaecological cancers charity, which funds research and raises awareness for the prevention and earlier diagnosis of all gynae cancers. You can find information on BRCA gene alterations, genetic testing and preventive options at


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Futurist who predicted the iPhone reveals date humans will cheat death
A leading futurist who accurately predicted the rise of the iPhone has now set the date for humanity's most phenomenal breakthrough yet, the ability to cheat death. Ray Kurzweil, a former Google engineering director, has long been known for his bold predictions about the future of technology and humanity. His forecasts often focus on the convergence of biotech, AI, and nanotechnology to radically extend human capabilities. Now, Kurzweil claims humanity is just four years away from its most transformative leap yet, achieving 'longevity escape velocity' by 2029. While some experts remain skeptical, Kurzweil's influence in Silicon Valley ensures his predictions continue to shape the broader conversation around life extension and the future of human health. Longevity escape velocity (LEV) is a hypothetical scenario where the rate of medical advancement outpaces the aging process, leading to an ever-increasing life expectancy. Kurzweil believes that threshold is within reach because of recent exponential growth in the fields of line gene editing, mRNA vaccines, drug discovery led by artificial intelligence, and synthetic biology. He pointed to the development of COVID-19 vaccines as proof of humanity's rapid progress. 'We got the COVID vaccine out in 10 months,' he said in an interview with Bessemer Venture Partners. 'It took two days to create it. Because we sequenced through several billion different sequences in two days,' Kurzweil added. The controversial idea has long stirred debate in tech and scientific circles, with many gerontologists and longevity experts warning that the science is not yet close to achieving such a feat. In recent study, researchers noted that while some treatments have extended lifespan in animals, translating those results to humans remains a major challenge. Others, like Charles Brenner, a biochemist at City of Hope National Medical Center known as a 'longevity skeptic,' have cautioned against the hype surrounding claims of defeating aging and life-extension theories. We can't stop aging, he told the crowd. We can not use longevity genes to stay young because getting older is a fundamental property of life. But Kurzweil insists the world is on the verge of achieving it, pointing to exponential advances in AI, nanotechnology, and regenerative medicine as indicators that 'longevity escape velocity' could be reached within the decade. The concept hinges on cutting edge medicine becoming universally accessible, something many experts warn is far from guaranteed. While it does not promise immortality, it does suggest that death from old age could be delayed indefinitely, as technology advances over time. 'There's many other advances happening,' Kurzweil said. 'We're starting to see simulated biology being used and that's one of the reasons that we're going to make so much progress in the next five years.' Kurzweil has built a career on predicting the future, with many of his past forecasts coming true during the exact year he stated it would happen. He correctly foresaw the rise of portable computing in the 1990s, predicted the internet boom in the mid-1990s, and a computer would defeat a chess grandmaster by 1997. A milestone reached when IBM's Deep Blue defeated Garry Kasparov that year. Still, critics argue that forecasting a future without death, is far more complex than spotting tech trends. Venki Ramakrishnan, a Nobel Prize winning biologist, explained in his book ' ' that aging happens because of many connected biological factors, not just one cause. This makes it a very complex problem. Unlike technology, which usually improves in clear and predictable steps, the process of aging is much harder to understand and predict. Even if longevity escape velocity is technically possible by 2029, experts warn that widespread access could be limited by socioeconomic and ethical challenges. The technology needed to extend life in this way, such as genetic reprogramming, precision medicine, or nanobots, is expensive and still largely experimental. Medical advancements have significantly improved life expectancies, but achieving longevity escape velocity is not the same as achieving immortality. Kurzweil acknowledged that broad adoption is a massive hurdle. 'This doesn't mean you're going to live forever. A 10-year-old might have decades of potential, but they could still die tomorrow,' he said. There are limits. Randomness still plays a role. Cancer, for example, isn't a single disease but hundreds of mutations with no universal cure. While self-driving cars may reduce accidents, they won't eliminate them. Equally concerning is the disparity in global health care. Diseases like tuberculosis, which has a known cure, still kill more than a million people annually because treatments are unevenly distributed. The last few years have seen major breakthroughs in life-extension science. mRNA technology is now being adapted for cancer vaccines. CRISPR gene editing is being used in clinical trials to treat hereditary blindness and sickle cell disease. Meanwhile, researchers are growing entire organs in labs and experimenting with reversing aging in mice using cellular reprogramming techniques. AI is also accelerating biology. DeepMind's AlphaFold project solved one of biology's biggest puzzles, predicting how proteins fold in a feat that could revolutionize drug discovery. These advances are what Kurzweil cites as evidence that the human clock may soon start ticking backwards. Still, the idea of LEV captures something deeper, a human desire to defy mortality, to stay a step ahead of the inevitable. Kurzweil is not promising a magic pill or overnight change. He is predicting a tipping point in the near future, when medical progress starts to outpace aging in small, accumulating ways. If his timeline holds true, the early 2030s could mark the beginning of a very different relationship with aging, one in which dying of old age is no longer an assumed endpoint.