Should GMC's Rivals Worry About the Upcoming 2025 Acadia Denali Ultimate?
The luxurious GMC gets even fancier
The Acadia has always been a luxurious SUV. Even at the base level, for $43,000, it comes with a punchy 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine producing 328 horsepower, an updated Bose sound system, GMC's comprehensive safety suite, and can be equipped with GM's impressive semi-autonomous feature, Super Cruise. Depending on how you configure it, it can also seat up to 8. For $54,100, you can get the Denali, which is even fancier. Leather seats, a nicer heads-up display, and higher-quality interior materials all complete the package. At that price, it looks like the Toyota Highlander, Hyundai Palisade, Chevy Traverse, and Kia Telluride are directly in GMC's crosshairs.
2025 GMC Acadia Denali Ultimate —
Source: GMC
Recently, GMC announced the addition of the Denali Ultimate trim. Which, if you could believe it, brought GMC's flagship SUV to all-new heights of luxury. With styling changes on the outside and the inside, added technology, and creature comforts, the Acadia's top-shelf model turned up the sumptuousness, right when we all thought it wasn't possible. So, should GMC's key rivals be concerned? The answer truly depends on what it will cost when official pricing is announced closer to its autumn launch. At the very least, the aforementioned automakers should be paying close attention to what we do know.
But first, what's so special about the Denali Ultimate?
The most apparent changes are to the features list, but I feel we should discuss the stylistic changes first. On the outside, the grille is darker, painted in what GMC calls 'Vader Chrome.' As a Star Wars nerd, the ashy chrome color felt appropriate. The badge is darker, there are LED daytime running lights with animated lighting sequences, fancy badging, and 22-inch wheels with an equally galactic metallic finish. The seats are all-leather, complete with massaging capabilities, and beautiful contrast stitching. Genuine wood is included, too, and GMC had maps etched into the seat backs. The door trim, map pockets, and floor mats all have 'Denali Ultimate' badging.
2025 GMC Acadia Denali Ultimate —
Source: GMC
The Denali Ultimate will also feature a 16-speaker Bose sound system, Super Cruise, a large panoramic sunroof, a large, customizable heads-up display, and 'performance' suspension. It also has six different drive modes to choose from. They haven't been announced, but I'd wager they'd be Sport, Eco, Normal, Off-Road, Towing/Hauling, and Snow. Official pricing hasn't been announced either, but if I were to guess, the added technology over the Denali and styling changes will likely bring the price close to $70,000 without add-ons.
Autoblog Newsletter
Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too.
Sign up
or sign in with
Microsoft
Apple
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime.
The Acadia takes on the Highlander, but hybridization makes the Toyota more attractive
The Americans have always been competing with Japanese SUVs. First it was the RAV4, then the 4Runner, and now the updated Highlander. The one thing Toyota has over GMC, however, is the hybrid option for the Platinum model. With Toyota, buyers can choose between a gas-only engine or a hybrid option. As an AWD hybrid, the Highlander still earns around 30 mpg combined, and much higher overall range before needing a refill. The GMC Acadia, even if it's bought as an FWD SUV, earned around 23 mpg combined. All-wheel drive diminishes that slightly.
2025 Toyota Highlander —
Source: Toyota
If we focus on the gas-only price point for the Highlander to make it more fair, the Toyota comes out ahead. The base MSRP for the Highlander is $36,420, while the Acadia starts at $38,195. For higher-end models, the GMC has a higher price of $57,595 for the Denali, while the Highlander's top-shelf MSRP is $52,725 for the Platinum. With the higher resale value, reputation for longevity, and lower entry price, the Toyota is hard to beat. As a gas-only vehicle, the Highlander has the same towing rating of 5,000 lbs, too, so the only thing the GMC has over the Toyota is maybe buyer loyalty, interior design, and materials. Toyota's interiors are notoriously plain. Otherwise, I don't think Toyota should be too concerned, especially since the Denali Ultimate will likely be significantly more expensive than the Platinum, or even the Hybrid Platinum.
Hyundai's upcoming hybrid option for the Palisade may keep GMC on its toes
For some reason, Hyundai has lagged behind in offering the Palisade as a hybrid. The Santa Fe's hybrid model is a best seller for the brand, so putting that setup in the Palisade would only make sense (though I argue a 1.8-liter engine seems a bit small for a large SUV, but maybe that's just me). The Palisade is one of my favorite family SUVs, due to its size and long list of features for the price. The Night edition is especially nice, since every car looks good with black accenting. I love the V6 that's in the Palisade, but it's not the most efficient. When the Palisade gets the hybrid treatment for 2026, I'm sure it'll sell even better than the standard Palisade.
2026 Hyundai Palisade —
Source: Hyundai
Since the GMC Acadia, once again, does not come as a hybrid and GMC has made exactly zero announcements on whether or not it will come as a hybrid, buyers are stuck with the 2.5-liter turbo four for now. That's fine since it makes more power and has the same towing rating as an engine with two more cylinders, so it truly comes down to whether or not a buyer trusts Hyundai or GMC more as a brand. Since Hyundai's reliability ratings are improving and its warranty is superior, I'm not sure Hyundai should be overly concerned, especially with a hybrid version coming down the pike. The Palisade is quite fancy in the upper trim levels, too, so it's hard to say there's much the GMC has over it.
2025 GMC Acadia Denali Ultimate —
Source: GMC
Price-wise, the Hyundai comes out ahead, too. As a gas-only SUV, the prices range from $40,430 for the base SE model, and go up to $55,555 for the Calligraphy model. As a hybrid, the price starts at $45,155 for the SEL Blue and goes up to $57,775 for the Calligraphy trim. Which, I'm guessing, will still come under the Denali Ultimate's upcoming price announcements. Since the Palisade is longer, taller, and has more passenger space than the GMC, the Hyundai is a pretty easy choice.
What about Chevy's Traverse?
Chevy and GMC may swap recipes here and there since they're both companies under the General Motors umbrella, but the Traverse and the Acadia are two different beasts. Yes, they're both 3-row SUVs, but the Traverse is a tad larger, leaving more room for passengers and their cargo. Similar to the GMC, the Chevy also has a 2.5-liter turbo four, making the same 328 horsepower. The Chevrolet is obviously going to run a little bit cheaper and come with a more minimalistic interior, although the Traverse does come with a bigger infotainment screen than the GMC. The GMC is smaller, but it feels more refined and has a much more upscale interior.
2025 Chevrolet Traverse —
Source: Chevrolet
By cheaper, though, I should say marginally cheaper. The Traverse starts at $42,195, while the GMC starts at $43,000. So, for a bit more dough, you sacrifice a bit of cargo space, but you get a lot more technology, higher-quality interior materials, a nicer sound system, a more performance-oriented ride, better fuel economy, and a more elegant design language. The Chevy is a lot more rugged and rustic. If you're looking at higher trim levels, they're priced pretty similarly. The ZL1, which is second from the bottom, runs around $49,295, and the RS starts at $55,595. The Denali's base MSRP is, according to GMC's site, the exact same as Chevy's RS trim if you opt for FWD, and $57,595 if you get AWD.
2025 GMC Acadia Denali Ultimate —
Source: GMC
Since Chevy doesn't have a step above the RS trim for the Traverse, in this case, Chevy will have a lot of work to do to catch up to the level of pizazz in the Denali Ultimate. The Traverse doesn't come in a hybrid, at least not yet, so the Chevy is the GMC's direct competition. Until Chevy unleashes an equally snazzy trim level, the GMC will be ahead of the game. Chevy should pay very close attention to the Denali Ultimate, no doubt.
The Kia Telluride is a very close competitor, too
The Kia Telluride is another reasonably popular family SUV. It's spacious without being overly large, the third row is pretty roomy (even for adults), it boasts a very tech-forward interior, and there are enough trim levels to make just about anyone happy. The GMC Acadia's lineup is much more refined, while being known for its interior and ride quality. The Kia is bigger by about three inches all around and has more overall cargo space. However, if power is what you're looking for, the GMC is the answer. The Kia comes with a 3.8-liter V6 (for now) that offers 291 horsepower.
2025 Kia Telluride —
Source: Kia
The Kia Telluride can certainly be fancy, especially at the top-of-the-line SX Prestige X-Pro model, which starts at $53,685 and is noticeably less than GMC's $57,595 for the Denali. However, Kia's reputation is still recovering from its reputation for catching on fire and being fairly easy to steal. Kia's warranty is the best in the industry, though, so at least if your Telluride caught on fire or something failed, there's a 99.9% chance it would be covered under warranty.
2025 GMC Acadia Denali Ultimate —
Source: GMC
GMC's reputation isn't stellar either, but until people stop assuming the new Telluride can't be stolen with a screwdriver or spontaneously combust, the Telluride should certainly be nervous about the new Denali Ultimate trim.
Final thoughts
While we don't have pricing information about the 2025 GMC Acadia Denali Ultimate yet, its luxury touches could very well make it a strong competitor for the models listed above. If a hybrid engine joins the fray, that would make the newest Acadia an even stronger competitor in the luxury SUV segment.
About the Author
Kristen Brown View Profile
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
These are the cities where an Uber ride is going to cost you the most
Taking Ubers is getting expensive across the nation but a half-hour ride in certain states and cities is going to do far more damage to your wallet than in others, according to a new analysis. Net Credit collected the average price of a 30-minute ride in an Uber in locations across the U.S., and found ride-share passengers in Washington state are paying the most, with a half-hour drive costing on average $53.46. On the other side of the list is Indiana, where the average half-hour ride in an Uber will cost around $30.35. Other states with less expensive rides include Texas at $30.96, Utah at $30.71, and Oklahoma at $31.54. But a ride in plenty of other states is going to cost upwards of $40. The average price of a half-hour Uber ride in California, Oregon, Wyoming, Montana, Louisiana, Alabama, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York are all at least $40, and rides in several other states — South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arkansas, and Nevada — will cost just under that mark. When it comes to individual cities, Seattle tops the list as the most expensive city for a half-hour Uber ride. In Seattle a half-hour ride costs almost $60, according to the analysis. The nine next most expensive cities for Ubers aren't necessarily each the sprawling, wildly expensive, cities one might expect. Those are Cheyenne, Reno, New York City, San Diego, Baton Rouge, Newark, Anchorage, San Jose, and Portland. The cheapest overall city for Uber for a half-hour ride is Indianapolis where it'll cost around $28.33. Following Indianapolis, the most affordable cities for taking an Uber are Fort Worth, Tucson, Mesa, Omaha, Miami, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Houston, and Memphis. According to Net Credit, the price of Uber rides increased by 7.2 percent across the country in 2024. Net Credit noted that part of what may be driving down prices in Indianapolis is the appearance of a competitor, inDrive, which allows riders to propose a price for their ride, and drivers can counter-bid for a higher fee. 'We're giving both the driver and passenger the freedom to kind of choose their own adventure," Adam Warner, the company's head of U.S. operations, told Net Credit. 'So you get to select the driver. Are you willing to wait 10 minutes for this person to pick you up in a Tesla Model Y, or are you comfortable with the Chevy Malibu that's only two minutes away to pick you up?' Net Credit also worked out which city's Uber costs were the most and least expensive relative to the average wages of its residents. The city with the most affordable Uber rides — relative to its residents' average hourly wage — is Washington, D.C., where a 30-minute trip will still cost riders 106.5 percent of their average hourly wage. Following the nation's capital, the most affordable cities for Ubering relative to residents' average hourly wages include San Jose, San Francisco, Fort Worth, Indianapolis, Stamford, Raleigh, Boston, Mesa, and Baltimore. The least affordable city was determined to be Cheyenne, Wyoming, where a ride is 224 percent of a resident's average hourly wage. Reno, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Jackson, Seattle, Fresno, Las Vegas, Augusta, and Buffalo made up the rest of the list.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Ford raises projected tariff hit to results, shares drop 3%
DETROIT, July 30 (Reuters) - Ford Motor (F.N), opens new tab said on Wednesday that U.S. tariffs on imported vehicles, as well as on steel and aluminum, will likely cost more than expected for the year, and the automaker's shares slid about 3% in after-market trading. Ford reported that second-quarter results took an $800-million hit from tariffs, a less pronounced impact than some of its U.S. rivals thanks to Ford's strong domestic manufacturing base. For the full year, the automaker lifted the higher range of its projected hit to gross revenues from tariffs by $500 million, to $3 billion. Ford CEO Jim Farley said the company is in daily contact with the White House, with an ultimate goal of reducing its tariff costs, especially on parts tariffs. "We see there's a lot of upside depending on how the negotiation goes with the administration," Farley said. Chief Financial Officer Sherry House said Ford raised the projection because duties on Mexico and Canada have remained higher for longer than expected. She also cited elevated levies on aluminum and steel. The Dearborn, Michigan, automaker also issued guidance for annual results on Wednesday, after suspending it in May to assess the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Ford said it now plans to record full-year adjusted earnings before interest and taxes of $6.5 billion to $7.5 billion, down from its February 2025 projection of between $7 billion and $8.5 billion. For the latest quarter, the automaker reported a 21% decrease in earnings per share to 37 cents, beating LSEG analysts' expectation of 33 cents. Ford recorded a net loss for the quarter of $36 million, which it said was primarily due to special charges related to cancellation of a three-row electric SUV, and field service actions from a $570-million recall. Ford posted revenue of $50.2 billion for the quarter, up 5% from a year earlier. The automaker has clawed away market share from rivals with aggressive discounting programs and a "zero, zero, zero" campaign, which offers shoppers a $0 down payment, zero percent interest for 48 months, and zero payments for the first 90 days on most vehicles. "The substantial revenue outperformance demonstrates Ford's pricing power, but margin compression suggests underlying cost pressures remain problematic," CFRA Research analyst Garrett Nelson said in a note. Gasoline-powered vehicles notched a 15.5% increase in the quarter on the back of these deals. Hybrid offers were also popular with shoppers in the quarter. Ford said results for the quarter ending in June were $800 million lower because of Washington's tariffs. Competitor General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab reported steeper tariff headwinds, with a $1.1-billion hit for the quarter, largely from imports on its entry-level Chevrolet and Buick models made in South Korea. GM has projected a $4-billion to $5-billion tariff impact for the year, with plans to offset 30% of that expense. Ford has said it expects to offset $1 billion of its gross tariff costs. Jeep-maker Stellantis ( opens new tab said tariffs were expected to add $1.7 billion in expenses for the year. The White House did not reply to an email requesting comment on the automakers' projections. In the past, Trump has said the levies will bring manufacturing power and jobs back to the U.S. Ford boasts domestic production for around 80% of the vehicles it sells in the U.S., about 25% more than its two Detroit rivals, according to business analytics firm GlobalData's review of last year's imports. While this foundation has made it more resilient to tariffs, it still faces steep levies on aluminum, steel and copper that have rocked the industry. Additionally, executives have said that a pinched supply of rare earth magnets from China has disrupted production this quarter. Ford's EV investments and quality problems remained among its greatest challenges. Before tariffs hit, the automaker earlier this year said it expected to lose up to $5.5 billion on its EV and software business in 2025. It recorded a $1.3 billion operating loss on this segment for the quarter. Elimination of a $7,500 consumer tax credit in September is expected to additionally dampen EV sales growth. The automaker is also battling costly quality issues and an industry-topping volume of recalls. Reducing these problems has been a priority for Farley since he took on the role in 2020.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Ford raises projected tariff hit to results, shares down 4% after the bell
DETROIT, July 30 (Reuters) - Ford Motor (F.N), opens new tab said on Wednesday that U.S. tariffs on imported vehicles, as well as materials like steel and aluminum, will likely cost more than expected for the year, and the automaker's shares slid about 4% in after-market trading. Ford reported that second-quarter results took an $800 million hit from tariffs, a less pronounced impact than some of its U.S. rivals thanks to Ford's strong domestic manufacturing base. For the full year, the automaker lifted the higher range of its projected hit to gross revenues from tariffs by $500 million, to $3 billion. Chief Financial Officer Sherry House said Ford raised the projection because duties on Mexico and Canada have remained higher for longer than expected. She also cited elevated levies on aluminum and steel. The Dearborn, Michigan automaker also issued guidance for annual results on Wednesday, after suspending it in May to assess the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Ford said it now plans to record full-year adjusted earnings before interest and taxes of $6.5 billion to $7.5 billion, down from its February 2025 projection of between $7.0 billion and $8.5 billion. For the latest quarter, the auto giant reported a 21% decrease in earnings per share to 37 cents, beating LSEG analysts' expectation of 33 cents. Ford recorded a net loss for the quarter of $36 million, which it said was primarily due to special charges related to cancellation of a three-row electric SUV, and field service actions from a $570 million recall. Ford posted revenue of $50.2 billion for the quarter, up 5% from a year earlier. The automaker has clawed away market share from rivals with aggressive discounting programs and a "zero, zero, zero" campaign, which offers shoppers a $0 down payment, zero percent interest for 48 months, and zero payments for the first 90 days on most vehicles. "The substantial revenue outperformance demonstrates Ford's pricing power, but margin compression suggests underlying cost pressures remain problematic," CFRA Research analyst Garrett Nelson said in a note. Gasoline-powered vehicles notched a 15.5% increase in the quarter on the back of these deals. Hybrid offers were also popular with shoppers in the quarter. Ford said results for the quarter ending in June were $800 million lower because of Washington's tariffs. Competitor General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab reported steeper tariff headwinds, with a $1.1 billion hit for the quarter, largely from imports on its entry-level Chevrolet and Buick models made in South Korea. GM has projected a $4 billion to $5 billion tariff impact for the year, with plans to offset 30% of that expense. Ford has said it expects to offset $1 billion of its gross tariff costs. Jeep-maker Stellantis ( opens new tab said tariffs were expected to add $1.7 billion in expenses for the year. The White House did not reply to an email requesting comment on the automakers' projections. In the past, Trump has said the levies will bring manufacturing power and jobs back to the U.S. Ford boasts domestic production for around 80% of the vehicles it sells in the U.S., about 25% more than its two Detroit rivals, according to business analytics firm GlobalData's review of last year's imports. While this foundation has made it more resilient to tariffs, it still faces steep levies on aluminum, steel and copper that have rocked the industry. Additionally, executives have said that a pinched supply of rare earth magnets from China has disrupted production this quarter. Ford's EV investments and quality problems remained among its greatest challenges. Before tariffs hit, the automaker earlier this year said it expected to lose up to $5.5 billion on its EV and software business in 2025. It recorded a $1.3 billion operating loss on this segment for the quarter. Elimination of a $7,500 consumer tax credit in September is expected to additionally dampen EV sales growth. The automaker is also battling costly quality issues and an industry-topping volume of recalls. Reducing these problems has been a priority for Ford CEO Jim Farley since he took on the role in 2020.
