
Ford CEO Jim Farley says company will be ‘advantaged' around tariffs: ‘Fairest fight in decades'
Nearly two months after Donald Trump's far-reaching tariffs were unveiled, Ford Motors CEO Jim Farley told me how — despite that added complexity — he has never been more optimistic about Ford's future.
'I mean, how exciting is it to go from being criticized for our US plants — in every investor meeting I had, [hearing] why do you make so much in the US, why don't you localize overseas, why don't you do more of what your competitors do? — to actually be advantaged because we're building an American car company and always have.'
Despite globalization, Ford, a publicly traded but family-controlled company, has consistently invested in American operations, manufacturing high-value products domestically and exporting more than it imports. It's the largest US automaker by domestic production, and the F-150 is the biggest consumer product by revenue actually made in America, according to BCG.
The Trump administration's focus on American manufacturing, Farley said, aligns with Ford's long-standing strategy.
5 When he isn't running Ford, Jim Farley is constructing model cars with as many as 3,000 pieces or working on old Fords and other race cars.
Courtesy of Ford
'We're not quite there yet,' he said of how tariffs could motivate re-shoring, 'but that's the place we're gonna be.'
Getting it right has never been more challenging, amid global supply chain disruptions and economic uncertainty. Even with its emphasis on being an American company, Ford still sources a number of parts from outside the US, particularly China.
While some high-value parts such as transmissions could be re-shored, others, like wiring looms and bolts haven't been made Stateside in decades. Starting that market up again would, realistically, be cost-prohibitive. On its earnings call, Ford said that the tariffs could increase its costs as much as $1.5 billion this year on adjusted earnings.
5 Despite globalization, Ford, a publicly traded but family-controlled company, has consistently invested in American operations, manufacturing high-value products domestically and exporting more than it imports.
Getty Images
'If we made 100% of the parts in the US and not [Ford's current] 85%, that 15% times the US premium for all the other things I mentioned would add thousands,' Farley said.
For years, Ford 'just had a lower margin … It cost us a billion dollars a year [to manufacture so much domestically], and Wall Street wasn't happy with that.'
He has been speaking with the White House about the balance between affordability and making goods in America on an almost daily basis since March.
'[The White House and I are] working all those details every day. And I'm, very frankly, grateful,' Farley told me. 'They are really trying hard to work through the details.'
5 Ford CEO Jim Farley's grandfather was an early hire by Henry Ford.
Courtesy of Ford
Uncertainty about parts is also why, on an earnings call last week, Ford made the highly unusual move of suspending guidance for the rest of the year. Since then, Trump has hammered out a deal with China — providing enough clarity, Farley said, that the carmaker may be able to reinstate guidance.
'There are thousands of pieces in an F-150… we can't make it without parts from China,' Farley said.
But now? 'Our parts just got more affordable.'
This deal not only secures a more cost-effective supply chain but also may allow Ford to resume exports of its high-end vehicles, which remain highly popular in China — boosting production, bringing furloughed workers back and strengthening the company's position globally.
'I know how powerful tariffs are for changing fairness,' Farley added — noting that China, Japan, and South Korea have all been subsidizing car companies for years, to the tune of $2,000 to $3,000 a vehicle.
'It may not even be high enough for that to happen, depends on the country. But it's the fairest fight we've had in a couple of decades.'
And other considerations, including tax policy and emissions standards, will impact the company just as much as tariffs. The company has also faced a handful of setbacks over recalls — on Tuesday, Ford announced it was a battery recall affecting 270,000 vehicles.
5 'I'm a one trick pony. I work on my old cars on the weekend. I race cars, I build model cars, all my friends are car people,' Jim Farley said of his car obsession.
Courtesy of Ford
'China has decided vehicles are one of their key industries. [The US] can't just hole up … and hope everything is fine,' Farley said. Instead, he envisions America being a net exporter of vehicles across China, the rest of Asia and even the rest of the world.
Ford's global outlook has also shown Farley what happens when other countries, like Australia and England, eschew manufacturing.
This story is part of NYNext, an indispensable insider insight into the innovations, moonshots and political chess moves that matter most to NYC's power players (and those who aspire to be).
'Personally, I watched the Australian government give up manufacturing, and they regret it deeply,' he said — noting that, In Britain, 'people felt like they couldn't make their lives better… [which is why] Brexit happened.'
And it couldn't come any sooner. 'We still have more work to do as a country, around critical minerals, semiconductors and other things that we just outsourced and we lost the plot,' Farley said.
The car industry, he added, is 'now energy independent. We need to be industrially independent. And Ford will be in the middle of that … and we need to do it fast.'
Running Ford is also a remarkably personal story for Farley.
5 'There are thousands of pieces in an F-150… we can't make it without parts from China,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said. But Trump's recent deal with China means 'Our parts just got more affordable.'
Getty Images
His grandfather was hired in 1913 as Henry Ford's employee #389 and was one of the first workers to help build the Model T.
After spending the first 20 years of his career at Toyota — much to his family's chagrin, he jokes — Farley decided to leave California and move to Detroit to help rebuild after the 2008 financial crisis (Unlike GM and Chrysler, Ford did not take a bailout but continued to invest in the US). He joined as an executive and was elevated to CEO in 2020.
When he isn't running Ford, Farley is constructing model cars with as many as 3,000 pieces or working on old Fords and other race cars.
'I'm a one trick pony. I work on my old cars on the weekend. I race cars, I build model cars, all my friends are car people,' he said. 'I mean, this is my life. This is all I got, all I've got. And I know how important it is for our country.'
Send NYNext a tip: nynextlydia@nypost.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk calls Donald Trump-backed tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has criticised US President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, calling it "outrageous" and a "disgusting abomination". The bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax breaks, was passed by the House Republicans in May, and has been described by the president as a "big, beautiful bill". The tech billionaire hit out at the tax cuts on his platform X, writing: "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." In American politics, "pork" is a political metaphor used when government spending is allocated to local projects, usually to benefit politicians' constituencies. Musk left the administration abruptly last week after working to cut costs with his team, the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency - known as DOGE - with the ambition of sacking federal workers and cutting red tape. The White House brushed Musk's comments aside, claiming they did not surprise the president. In a press conference on Tuesday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that "the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill". She added: "This is one, big, beautiful bill. "And he's sticking to it."

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Illinois lawmakers again fail to act on hemp, while a new study highlights growing health concerns
A new report on hemp-derived THC highlights growing concerns over its safety, legality and impact on health — even as Illinois lawmakers have failed again to keep the products away from children. The report by the University of Illinois System Institute of Government and Public Affairs notes that the lack of regulation of hemp means there is no state oversight of ingredients, potency or marketing to kids. The report cites studies showing many hemp products had different amounts of THC than labeled, while some were well above the package limits for licensed cannabis products, and contained toxic solvents left over from processing. Some products also mimicked popular candy or snack packaging that could appeal to kids. Several incidents have occurred in the Chicago area of school-age children going to hospitals after ingesting hemp products. But as in previous years, state lawmakers failed to take any significant action on hemp in its latest session, which ended Saturday. Hemp is caught in a Catch-22 repeating cycle of inaction. The 2018 federal Farm Bill legalized hemp, defined as cannabis plants that have less than 0.3% by weight of Delta-9 THC, the primary component of the plant that gets users high. Although the Farm Bill allowed production of non-intoxicating hemp derivatives such as CBD, it also inadvertantly set off an explosion of intoxicating products now available across the nation at smoke shops and gas stations. Hemp processors found ways to use chemical solvents or other methods to produce variants such as Delta-8, Delta-10, and THCO, which can get users high like marijuana. And with little enforcement, many hemp products contain Delta-9 THC anyway. The federal law also set no age restriction for hemp products. While cannabis, which is the same plant but with high levels of Delta-9, remains federally illegal, it's legal for recreational use in Illinois and 23 other states. But getting a business license is extremely difficult and expensive, and regulations make it much more expensive to open and run a cannabis business than a hemp shop. As a result, hemp shops have proliferated, while many who hold cannabis business licenses have failed to get up and running. Cannabis industry leaders want to shut down their competition, saying unlicensed hemp undercuts those who went through arduous cannabis licensing. Hemp business owners say they want to be regulated instead. Proposed hemp legislation set guidelines that would have been similar to those on cannabis businesses: sales only to those 21 and over, and testing and labeling of products for potency and contaminants, but without the expensive licensing. The chief proponent of allowing hemp businesses to operate with further regulations in Springfield, Rep. La Shawn Ford, said lawmakers could not reach agreement over whether to ban or regulate hemp. But since the spring legislative session ended, Ford has had joint meetings with cannabis and hemp operators in an attempt to reach some compromise. With the lack of licensing and taxation for hemp, and continued problems for cannabis, the state is losing out on millions in potential tax revenue, Ford said. 'It's always been industry against industry, so now everyone has made a commitment to work together to regulate hemp and make some improvements to cannabis,' he said. At least 14 states have made intoxicating hemp products illegal, and numerous municipalities in Illinois have done so. Despite Gov. JB Pritzker calling last year for hemp restrictions, state lawmakers have been stuck between the two sides, unable to reach a consensus, and as a result have done nothing. Both cannabis and hemp businesses have made significant campaign contributions to legislators. Rachel Berry, president of the Illinois Hemp Growers Association, said the lack of legislation allows business to continue as usual, but again misses an opportunity for 'common-sense' regulation. 'It seems like there's been a lack of leadership amongst lawmakers to get this issue taken care of,' she said. 'This is something that the community has been asking for for years.' She also took issue with the hemp study's characterization of intoxicating hemp as a 'loophole' in the law. She noted that federal law explicitly allows for 'all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers' from hemp, which opened the door to Delta-8 and other intoxicating products. From the other side of the issue, the Cannabis Business Association of Illinois argues that intoxicating hemp products are flooding the market, undercutting licensed operators, evading health and safety regulations, and generating minimal state revenue because they aren't taxed at the high rate applied to licensed cannabis. 'Hemp and cannabis come from the same plant,' association Executive Director Tiffany Chappell Ingram said. 'Both products can get users high. It's time Illinois regulate intoxicating hemp in a manner similar to cannabis.' The National Poison Center reported about 5,000 cases of Delta-8, Delta-10 or THC-O acetate accidental or abusive ingestion, representing an 89% increase from 2021 to 2022. A 2022 national survey found that 10% of Illinois youths age 12 to 17 had used a hemp product in the past year. The University of Illinois hemp study concluded that producers would likely find new ways to get around a ban on intoxicating hemp products, which could merely drive customers online. Instead, requiring limits on hemp packaging amounts, and testing hemp products for potency, accuracy in labeling, and contaminants 'could best serve the public interest.' Tomasz Gliszewski, founder of Chicago Cannabis Co., which sells hemp products, has grown to three stores on the city's North Side since 2018, said lawmakers should approve a 21 and older age limit for hemp, with a 3% sales tax. Responsible hemp store operators already restrict sales to adults, he said, and sell tested products. His stores are described as 'Your neighborhood weed shop.' The company offers joints, vapes and edibles with THC or CBD, available by online ordering and same-day home delivery via DoorDash — something state-licensed cannabis companies can't do. 'It's been rough not having clarity,' Gliszewski said. 'Instead of trying to ban this stuff, they should pass common-sense legislation.' More companies are moving into the hemp business. Even Edible Brands, the parent company that makes Edible Arrangements fruit bouquets, has entered the market, with hemp-derived THC-infused products at Meanwhile, lawmakers took no major action to help struggling state-licensed cannabis businesses and their customers. A bill that would have expanded medical marijuana to all dispensaries, lowered licensing fees and allowed curbside pickup and drive-thru windows died again in Springfield this session.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls Trump's big tax break bill a 'disgusting abomination,' testing his influence over the GOP
WASHINGTON (AP) — Elon Musk blasted President Donald Trump's'big, beautiful bill" of tax breaks and spending cuts as a 'disgusting abomination" on Tuesday, testing the limits of his political influence as he targeted the centerpiece of Republicans' legislative agenda. The broadside, which Musk issued on his social media platform X, came just days after the president gave him a celebratory Oval Office farewell that marked the end of his work for the administration, where he spearheaded the Department of Government Efficiency. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The legislation, which has passed the House and is currently under debate in the Senate, would curtail subsidies that benefit Tesla, Musk's electric automaker. The tech billionaire followed his criticism with a threat aimed at Republicans. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' he wrote in another X post. It's a sharp shift for Musk, the world's richest person who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump's campaign last year. He previously pledged to help defeat Republican lawmakers deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump, but now he's suggesting voting them out if they advance the president's legislative priority. However, it's unclear how Musk will follow through on his criticism. He recently said that he would spend 'a lot less' on political campaigns, though he left the door open to political involvement "if I see a reason." The tech titan's missives could cause headaches for Republicans on Capitol Hill, who face conflicting demands from Trump and their party's wealthiest benefactor. Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, said 'it's not helpful' to have Musk criticizing the legislation, but he doesn't expect lawmakers to side with Musk over Trump. 'Senate Republicans are not going to let the tax cuts expire,' Conant said. 'It just makes leadership's job that much harder to wrangle the holdouts.' Trump can change the outcome in Republican primaries with his endorsements; Musk doesn't wield that level of influence, Conant said. 'No matter what Elon Musk or anybody else says — and I don't want to diminish him because I don't think that's fair — it's still going to be second fiddle to President Trump,' said Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito. Musk's business interests stand to take a hit if lawmakers approve Trump's bill, which would slash funding for electric vehicles and related technologies. Musk is the chief executive of Tesla, the nation's largest electric vehicle manufacturer, and SpaceX, which has massive defense contracts. Last month, Musk said he was 'disappointed' by the spending bill, a much milder criticism than the broadside he leveled on Tuesday. The budget package seeks to extend tax cuts approved in 2017, during Trump's first term at the White House, and add new ones he campaigned on. It also includes a massive build-up of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To defray some of the lost tax revenue to the government and limit piling onto the nation's $36 trillion debt load, Republicans want to reduce federal spending by imposing work requirements for some Americans who rely on government safety net services. Musk's post threw another hurdle in front of Senate Majority Leader John Thune's already complex task to pass a bill in time for Trump to achieve his goal of signing it by July 4. The South Dakota Republican has few votes to spare in the GOP's slim 53-seat majority. Two of the Senate's most fiscally hawkish Republicans quickly backed Musk. 'We can and must do better,' Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul wrote on X. Utah Sen. Mike Lee said 'federal spending has become excessive,' adding that it causes inflation and 'weaponizes government.' Still, Trump enjoys fierce loyalty among the GOP base, and in the end, his opinion may be the only one that matters. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt played down Musk's criticism. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said, and Musk's post 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' The tension in the GOP delighted Democrats, who found themselves in the unlikely position of siding with Musk. Democrats are waging an all-out political assault on GOP proposals to cut Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments to help pay for more than $4.5 trillion in tax cuts — with many lawmakers being hammered at boisterous town halls back home. 'We're in complete agreement,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said of Musk. The New York Democratic lawmaker stood alongside a poster-sized printout of Musk's post during a Capitol news conference. The last time Musk weighed in significantly on legislation, the scenario was far different. His power was ascendant after the election, with Trump joining him for a rocket test in Texas and appointing him to spearhead the Department of Government Efficiency. During the transition period, Musk started whipping up opposition to legislation that would prevent a government shutdown, posting about it repeatedly on X, his social media platform. Trump soon weighed in, encouraging Republicans to back out of a bipartisan deal. Lawmakers eventually patched together a new agreement. ___ Cooper reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writers Joey Capelletti and Mary Claire Jalonick in Washington contributed reporting.