First look: Third Way's plan for Dems to fight back
Why it matters: Anything "that seems performative will be tuned out or backfire," Third Way says. "It is a painful irony that while our very democracy is at stake, a focus on 'democracy' (and the trashing of democratic norms) simply won't save it."
In unveiling the project, Third Way says: "Shuttering USAID, using government power to attack political opponents, firing indiscriminately, degrading the civil service, releasing J6ers, or blaming Ukraine for the Russian invasion all are a combination of unwise, unethical, illegal, or unconstitutional. But none resonate much with key voters."
So as an opening frame, the project will focus on "Risking Americans' Safety and Security."
Between the lines: Matt Bennett, a Third Way co-founder, told Axios that there's "real concern among Democrats that the Trump/Musk attacks were coming so fast and so arbitrarily that the opposition was having trouble with a coherent response.
"The things we believe to be important — like foreign aid, or Trump actions that violate the law — don't always line up with voters' concerns," Bennett added. "We can fight back effectively ... but only if we are creating a singular narrative that is simple, memorable, and resonant. If we do that, Trump's allies will feel the heat."
🐘 The other side: Tony Fabrizio and Chris LaCivita, who run Trump's outside political operation, told us in response to the Third Way plan that "no matter the approach, Americans know that for the last four years their safety — economically and physically — has been put in jeopardy."
"One glaring flaw in their strategy: What happens when President Trump's policies work and deliver the change voters voted for? Once again, the Democrats — much like the Harris campaign — will be left having no position or a positive agenda for America."
Read the Third Way plan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's search to replace Fed Chair Powell continues as new report says up to 11 names under consideration
The Trump administration is broadening its search for the next Federal Reserve chair, with reports suggesting as many as 11 candidates may be in the running to replace Jerome Powell when his term expires in May. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is leading the search and interview process for the next Fed chair, said the administration is casting a "very wide net" for candidates. "The president has a very open mind," Bessent told the Fox Business Network on Tuesday. "He even considered Janet, reappointing Janet Yellen [in 2017], so we want to see what everyone's thinking," he said. "It's not ideological. It's about economics, what's best for the American people, what's best for the economy." The broadening search marks an evolution since last week, when Trump said he had narrowed down his list of candidates to three or four people. A report from CNBC on Wednesday morning citing two administration officials said Trump is now weighing up to 11 candidates to replace Powell, including Jefferies chief market strategist David Zervos and BlackRock chief investment officer for global fixed income Rick Rieder. BlackRock had no comment on the report. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments "President Trump will continue to nominate the most competent and experienced individuals to deliver on his pledge to Make America Wealthy Again. Unless it comes from President Trump himself, however, any discussion about personnel decisions should be regarded as pure speculation," White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Yahoo Finance. Last week, President Trump suggested in a CNBC interview that the pool of potential nominees to succeed Powell was down to four people, but he said Bessent had asked not to be nominated for the role. The president suggested that both former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett were at the top of the list. When asked about Fed governor Chris Waller, Trump didn't deny that Waller was among the four possible replacements for Powell. Former St. Louis Fed president Jim Bullard, Fed governor Michelle Bowman, Fed vice chair Philip Jefferson, Dallas Fed president Lorie Logan, and former Bush administration official Marc Summerlin, and former Fed governor Larry Lindsey are all also considered to be in the running. Meanwhile, the president nominated Stephen Miran, current chair of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors last week to replace Fed governor Adriana Kugler, who stepped down on Aug. 8. If confirmed by the Senate, Miran's term will run until Jan. 31, 2026. Bessent told Fox Business that Miran's appointment will "change the composition of the Fed" and suggested Miran could be renominated to a full term on the Fed board. He also said that the administration will have two seats on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to fill, assuming that when Powell's term as Fed chair expires next May, he will also step down from his position on the Board of Governors, which does not end until January 2028. Powell has not said what he plans to do. These changes at the central bank come as markets now expect the Fed to cut interest rates at its September meeting after electing to keep rates unchanged last month. Fed governors Waller and Bowman both voted in favor of a rate cut and later expanded on their views in statements issued in early August. San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly and Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari, neither of whom are voting members of the FOMC in 2025, have also said since the Fed's July 31 announcement that the case for rate cuts has strengthened. Powell's next major public appearance is expected on Aug. 22 at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium.
Boston Globe
3 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘No parent should have to go through this.' Mother of slain UMass student backs Trump's federal takeover of D.C. police.
'My son was murdered,' his mother said. 'I can never see him again. I can never talk to him again. I just stare at his ashes, at his picture ... No parent should have to go through this, or any family. And that's the goal— I don't want another kid to be shot or killed.' Tarpinian-Jachym's intensely personal goal coincides with Advertisement 'I think he understands how bad it is,' she said of Trump, adding that she does not believe he is using her son's death for political purposes. 'This is our nation's capital, and I have to agree with [Trump], it should be the safest place in the country, the cleanest place in the country, and safe for everybody in America or anybody from all over the world to come visit.' Advertisement Tarpinian-Jachym stressed that her goal is improved public safety and said that she and her husband, a retired postal worker, are both registered as independents. She said she was drawn to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s brief pursuit of the Democratic presidential nomination and has not been a MAGA supporter. A retired occupational therapist who practiced for many years in Springfield and Holyoke, Tarpinian-Jachym noted that Trump has indicated the federal takeover will be short-term. The deployment of National Guard troops should be given a chance to help local police, she said. Eric Tarpinian-Jachym grew up in Granby, about 15 miles north of Springfield, where he graduated from Pope Francis Preparatory School. He was seeking a degree in finance with a minor in political science at UMass Amherst. While her son wound up interning for a Republican, Ron Estes of Kansas, he was politically independent, she said. 'He was not this staunch Trumpster, like people are trying to make him out. He's an independent voter in Massachusetts, like all of us are,' she said. 'He was an independent, and he went to [Washington] to go and learn from both sides of the aisle.' Compounding the family's grief is the long, painful road Eric traveled in recent years. From 2020 until last year, he faced a number of health challenges — his mother declined to be specific — that required multiple surgeries, long and difficult rehabilitation, and accommodations at college when health problems derailed his class schedule. 'It was four years of hell' that included long stays at Boston's Children Hospital, his mother recalled. Advertisement But by January, his health had improved and Eric was 'The poor kid was having a good run for six months without being in a hospital, without complaining about pain,' she said. 'And on day 30 — he was there 30 days to the day — he got shot on that street and died the next day. That's why I am so angry." Around 10:30 p.m. on June 30, multiple people got out of a car at the intersection of 7th and M Street and began firing at a group of people, police said. Tarpinian-Jachym, a 16-year-old boy, and a woman were shot. Police believe the 16-year-old may have been the target and that Tarpinian-Jachym was an innocent bystander. A black Acura police believe was used in the shooting was later recovered, officials said. No arrests have been made and police have Tamara Tarpinian-Jachym said police have not returned any of her son's effects, including his phone that she keeps texting. 'Hopefully the case will be solved,' she said. Her son loved fishing, she recalled, especially with his father. In late May, they went to Block Island together and had an excellent day catching and releasing stripers. Advertisement Her husband worked part-time at the dining hall at Amherst College and would meet Eric for coffee at 4 p.m. in town nearly every day, she said. Those fishing trips, the meetings over coffee, and so much more are now gone, she said. 'Homicide is the worst thing a parent can experience, and my heart goes out to all parents of homicide victims,' she said. 'I wish it was me. My husband wishes it was him. So he could have lived his life." John R. Ellement can be reached at
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Dems finally lacing up their gloves, settle on midterm strategy?
Most people are soaking up the last days of summer — barbecues, beach trips, a little bit of 'out of office' energy. But Democrats? They're in no mood for lawn chairs and lemonade. They're finally lacing up their gloves. Take California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who decided to fight fire with fire this week. He took to X and trolled President Trump in a post that looked like it could have come straight from Trump's own Truth Social feed — caps lock and all — warning about Texas redistricting while mocking Trump's style: DONALD TRUMP, THE LOWEST POLLING PRESIDENT IN RECENT HISTORY, THIS IS YOUR SECOND-TO-LAST WARNING!!! (THE NEXT ONE IS THE LAST ONE!). STAND DOWN NOW OR CALIFORNIA WILL COUNTER-STRIKE (LEGALLY!) TO DESTROY YOUR ILLEGAL CROOKED MAPS IN RED STATES. PRESS CONFERENCE COMING — HOSTED BY AMERICA'S FAVORITE GOVERNOR, GAVIN NEWSOM. FINAL WARNING NEXT. YOU WON'T LIKE IT!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. And then there's former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke, who put it— well, a little less delicately: 'We're in basketball game right now, if you'll excuse the metaphor, where the refs have left the arena and the other side is just clobbering the s–t out of us, punching us in the face, kicking us in the n—ts, and we're kind of throwing our hands up and we're asking the crowd, the people of America, 'hey do you see what's going on here?! This is unfair, this isn't the rules we agreed to play by,' well who cares about the f–king rules right now? Punch back, kick back, dunk over their heads and win some f–king power!' So, yeah — Democrats are starting to fight back. And a lot of people are saying, 'finally!' Don't just take my word for it. A recent Associated Press poll found that about 15 percent of Democrats describe their leaders as 'weak' or 'apathetic.' After years of warning that Trump was 'assaulting democracy,' some Democrats have decided the warning labels aren't enough — it's time for action. Axios reports Senate Democrats held more than 100 events in the first week of summer recess — town halls, hospital visits, small-business roundtables, food bank tours — all aimed at hammering Republican policies before the 2026 midterms. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wants to localize the impact of what Trump and the GOP Congress are pushing: cuts to health care, tariffs, rising energy costs, and tax breaks for the wealthy. It's exactly the kind of retail politics voters have been begging for — less D.C. bubble, more Main Street reality. Meanwhile, Republicans have been steering clear of town halls. Earlier this year, Rep. Richard Hudson, who runs the GOP's House campaign arm, advised members to skip them entirely. Maybe that's because when they do show up, the reception isn't exactly warm. Just ask Nebraska Congressman Mike Flood, who got heckled last week when he tried to tout 'the big beautiful bill' as the room screamed back at him, 'Tax the rich! Tax the rich!' A Wall Street Journal poll shows 52 percent of Americans oppose that bill, a warning sign for Republicans heading into the midterms. So here's the bottom line: If Democrats keep showing backbone, meeting voters where they are, and making the case that Trump's policies hurt everyday Americans, they might actually turn 2026 into a comeback season. And if they don't? Well, they'll be back on the sidelines, wondering why the refs left the game in the first place.
