Pollard Banknote (TSE:PBL) Is Paying Out A Dividend Of CA$0.05
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.
Pollard Banknote's Future Dividend Projections Appear Well Covered By Earnings
The dividend yield is a little bit low, but sustainability of the payments is also an important part of evaluating an income stock. Pollard Banknote is quite easily earning enough to cover the dividend, however it is being let down by weak cash flows. With the company not bringing in any cash, paying out to shareholders is bound to become difficult at some point.
Over the next year, EPS is forecast to expand by 33.7%. Assuming the dividend continues along recent trends, we think the payout ratio could be 12% by next year, which is in a pretty sustainable range.
Check out our latest analysis for Pollard Banknote
Pollard Banknote Has A Solid Track Record
Even over a long history of paying dividends, the company's distributions have been remarkably stable. Since 2015, the dividend has gone from CA$0.12 total annually to CA$0.20. This implies that the company grew its distributions at a yearly rate of about 5.2% over that duration. Dividends have grown at a reasonable rate over this period, and without any major cuts in the payment over time, we think this is an attractive combination as it provides a nice boost to shareholder returns.
The Dividend Looks Likely To Grow
Investors who have held shares in the company for the past few years will be happy with the dividend income they have received. We are encouraged to see that Pollard Banknote has grown earnings per share at 15% per year over the past five years. Growth in EPS bodes well for the dividend, as does the low payout ratio that the company is currently reporting.
Our Thoughts On Pollard Banknote's Dividend
In summary, while it's good to see that the dividend hasn't been cut, we are a bit cautious about Pollard Banknote's payments, as there could be some issues with sustaining them into the future. While Pollard Banknote is earning enough to cover the payments, the cash flows are lacking. We would probably look elsewhere for an income investment.
Investors generally tend to favour companies with a consistent, stable dividend policy as opposed to those operating an irregular one. Meanwhile, despite the importance of dividend payments, they are not the only factors our readers should know when assessing a company. For example, we've picked out 1 warning sign for Pollard Banknote that investors should know about before committing capital to this stock. Looking for more high-yielding dividend ideas? Try our collection of strong dividend payers.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Americans Said About Money In 1994 Still Rings Alarm Bells For Today's Crisis
Thirty years before today's financial influencers started preaching about emergency funds and investment basics on TikTok, ordinary Americans were already sounding the alarm about the nation's broken relationship with money. A revealing street interview from 1994, captured by documentary filmmaker David Hoffman on his YouTube channel, shows that the financial challenges plaguing Americans today have deeper roots than many realize. The Great Spending Hangover In 1994, Americans were experiencing what experts called a 'major transition' from the 1980s' culture of excess. The previous decade had been characterized as a 'decade of spending,' where people routinely spent more than they saved, riding high on what were described as 'terrific' market returns that weren't expected to continue. Don't Miss: Would You Have Invested in eBay or Uber Early? The Same Backers Are Betting on Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — 'The 1990s are turning out to be a savings decade,' one expert observed, noting that Americans were finally beginning to save 'a significant portion of their income'—something they 'hadn't followed before.' This shift was seen as the beginning of a 'long term savings boom.' Sound familiar? Today's Americans are grappling with similar realizations about overspending, just with different triggers—pandemic-induced financial stress, inflation, and economic uncertainty rather than the end of an 80s bull market. America's Savings Rate: A Global Embarrassment The numbers from 1994 paint a stark picture that resonates today. The U.S. maintained a 'very low savings rate' of around 4%—described as 'abysmally low' compared with international peers. Swedish citizens kept one year's income in the bank, Canadians managed three months of expenses, Japan saved 25%-30% of income and China saved in the mid-30s. Financial experts criticized Americans as 'sloppy and lazy' with their spending, advocating for savings rates between 10%-20% annually. The diagnosis was brutal but accurate: Americans 'lived beyond their means.' Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Fast forward to today, and the U.S. personal savings rate has fluctuated dramatically—spiking during the pandemic but generally remaining well below the levels financial advisors recommend for long-term stability. Retirement Reality Check: Then and Now Perhaps most prescient were 1994 Americans' concerns about retirement funding. They recognized that Social Security would 'not be enough' to support their desired lifestyle and understood they would 'have to have enough invested on their own' to retire comfortably. This realization drove increased interest in 401(k)s and IRAs as 'crucial investment vehicles for retirement'—a trend that has only intensified as traditional pension plans have largely disappeared and Social Security's long-term viability remains questionable. Timeless Investment Wisdom The investment advice shared in 1994 reads like a modern financial planning handbook. Americans understood that diversification was key to 'limiting risks' and should span different asset classes. They recognized that for long-term goals spanning 10, 15, 20, or 30 years, there was 'very little risk in stocks' because market 'dips will even out' and could represent buying opportunities. Most importantly, they grasped that trying to 'figure out the highs and the lows' of the market was 'virtually impossible'—a lesson many retail investors are still learning today amid meme stock frenzies and crypto Behavioral Trap That Never Changed Perhaps the most striking insight was the observation that people typically do the 'opposite' of what they should: buying more when prices rise (lower potential returns) and hesitating when prices fall (higher potential returns). This counter-intuitive behavior pattern remains one of the biggest obstacles to successful investing three decades later. The 1994 interviews reveal that while investment vehicles and technology have evolved dramatically, the fundamental challenges of saving, planning, and smart investing remain remarkably consistent. The Americans who recognized these truths 30 years ago were ahead of their time—and their insights remain more relevant than ever. Read Next: These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – Image: Imagn Images Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article What Americans Said About Money In 1994 Still Rings Alarm Bells For Today's Crisis originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
CBS News
5 minutes ago
- CBS News
Citi Field casino has "a very good shot," but is still risky, New York state senator says
The proposal to build a casino across from Citi Field in Queens may have the upper hand as New York narrows in on awarding three downstate casino licenses. State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, who opposes building a casino anywhere in New York City, said the plan led by New York Mets billionaire owner Steve Cohen has "a very good shot" at being approved, despite inherent risks. There have been no decisions on which casino bids will be awarded a license, but it stands to reason that two could go to Yonkers Raceway and Aqueduct in Queens, since both already have racinos. That would leave one license for a handful of new casino bids in the downstate region, mostly in New York City, including Coney Island, Times Square, Manhattan's East Side and Citi Field. Hoylman-Sigal appeared Sunday on CBS News New York's "The Point with Marcia Kramer." The current Democratic nominee for Manhattan borough president believes casinos do more harm than good to their surrounding areas, and he's especially against the Times Square and East Side bids. "If you want a casino in Manhattan, don't vote for Brad Hoylman-Sigal," he said, adding, "If you want to exacerbate the problem of quality of life in a neighborhood, drop a casino in the middle of that. Crime, traffic, addiction. Casinos feed on all of those societal problems." The New York City casino plans have all seen a degree of community opposition. Last week, several Broadway theaters lit up their marquees with the phrase "No Times Square Casino" during a community rally. But there's also support, since they stand to be major moneymakers. "In my opinion, [that's a] shortsighted way to raise revenue for the state, because look at the other side. Again, the problems that casinos bring to neighborhoods are well documented. Those cost the public purse a lot of money too," Hoylman-Sigal continued. "That said, if a community strongly embraces a casino in another borough, more power to them. I think the one at Citi Field has a very good shot after we amended a statute in Albany to allow that casino to go forward." The casino would be located in Citi Field's parking lot. Construction started on NYCFC's Etihad Park, the city's first soccer-specific stadium, across the street from the ballpark last year. While new casinos could help New York make up for lost revenue due to federal budget cuts without raising income taxes, Hoylman-Sigal said the state could consider other options, like taxing digital advertising revenue instead.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ASX Growth Companies With High Insider Ownership Growing Earnings At 76%
As the Australian market experiences a modest rise amid a generally subdued trading week, investors are keenly observing earnings season and its impact on growth trajectories. In this context, companies with high insider ownership often attract attention for their potential alignment of interests and commitment to long-term growth, making them intriguing options for those seeking robust performance in fluctuating conditions. Top 10 Growth Companies With High Insider Ownership In Australia Name Insider Ownership Earnings Growth Newfield Resources (ASX:NWF) 31.5% 72.1% IperionX (ASX:IPX) 18.7% 76.5% Image Resources (ASX:IMA) 22.3% 79.8% Findi (ASX:FND) 33.6% 91.2% Fenix Resources (ASX:FEX) 21.1% 54.7% Emerald Resources (ASX:EMR) 18.1% 36% Echo IQ (ASX:EIQ) 18% 51.4% Cyclopharm (ASX:CYC) 11.3% 97.8% Alfabs Australia (ASX:AAL) 10.8% 41.3% Acrux (ASX:ACR) 15.5% 106.9% Click here to see the full list of 96 stocks from our Fast Growing ASX Companies With High Insider Ownership screener. Let's take a closer look at a couple of our picks from the screened companies. Duratec Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Duratec Limited, listed as ASX:DUR, operates in Australia providing assessment, protection, remediation, and refurbishment services for steel and concrete infrastructure assets with a market cap of A$393.17 million. Operations: Duratec's revenue is primarily derived from its Defence segment at A$193.48 million, followed by Mining & Industrial at A$144.05 million, Buildings & Facades at A$113.64 million, and Energy at A$62.54 million. Insider Ownership: 31.2% Earnings Growth Forecast: 12% p.a. Duratec, with substantial insider ownership, shows promise as a growth company in Australia. Its earnings are projected to grow at 12.05% annually, outpacing the Australian market's average of 11%. Although revenue growth is forecasted at 7.9%, slower than the desired 20% for high-growth companies, it still surpasses the market average of 5.6%. Trading below its fair value by 20.6%, Duratec remains an attractive prospect despite its unstable dividend history and recent revised FY25 guidance discussions. Unlock comprehensive insights into our analysis of Duratec stock in this growth report. Our expertly prepared valuation report Duratec implies its share price may be lower than expected. IperionX Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: IperionX Limited focuses on the exploration and development of mineral properties in the United States, with a market capitalization of A$2.14 billion. Operations: IperionX Limited does not currently have any revenue segments to report. Insider Ownership: 18.7% Earnings Growth Forecast: 76.5% p.a. IperionX's high insider ownership aligns with its growth potential, as revenue is forecast to grow significantly at 75.5% annually, outpacing the Australian market. The company is expected to achieve profitability within three years, bolstered by a USD 99 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense for titanium components. Despite recent shareholder dilution and share price volatility, IperionX trades significantly below its estimated fair value, indicating potential upside for investors focused on growth opportunities in defense manufacturing. Get an in-depth perspective on IperionX's performance by reading our analyst estimates report here. Our valuation report unveils the possibility IperionX's shares may be trading at a premium. LGI Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: LGI Limited operates in the carbon abatement and renewable energy sector by utilizing biogas from landfill, with a market cap of A$385.43 million. Operations: The company's revenue segments consist of A$17.29 million from carbon abatement, A$17.08 million from renewable energy, and A$2.37 million from infrastructure construction and management. Insider Ownership: 24.7% Earnings Growth Forecast: 25% p.a. LGI's high insider ownership supports its growth trajectory, with earnings forecast to grow significantly at 25% annually, outpacing the Australian market. The recent contract for a grid-scale battery energy storage system at Belrose aligns with LGI's strategy to expand flexible electricity assets and leverage its Dynamic Asset Control System technology. Despite modest net income decline, LGI trades well below estimated fair value and anticipates revenue growth of 15.9%, surpassing the broader market expectations. Click here to discover the nuances of LGI with our detailed analytical future growth report. The valuation report we've compiled suggests that LGI's current price could be inflated. Where To Now? Embark on your investment journey to our 96 Fast Growing ASX Companies With High Insider Ownership selection here. Curious About Other Options? The latest GPUs need a type of rare earth metal called Terbium and there are only 28 companies in the world exploring or producing it. Find the list for free. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks analysis only considers stock directly held by insiders. It does not include indirectly owned stock through other vehicles such as corporate and/or trust entities. All forecast revenue and earnings growth rates quoted are in terms of annualised (per annum) growth rates over 1-3 years. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:DUR ASX:IPX and ASX:LGI. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@
