
China's Rare Earth Gamble: A Double-Edged Sword in the Trade War
Although Washington announced a framework trade deal under which Beijing would speed up rare earth exports to the US, the Financial Times reported that China's export controls now extend beyond officially listed rare earths and magnets. Any product flagged with sensitive keywords is being held at customs for extra inspections and third-party chemical analysis.
On July 1, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged China to accelerate rare earth magnet exports, as shipments had yet to rebound to their early April levels.
It is clear that the CCP has no intention of abandoning the rare earth weapon. It intends to wield it to the fullest.
Beijing's ability to weaponize rare earths rests on decades of strategy. China is now the world's top holder of rare earth reserves. It also ranks first in production, exports, and domestic consumption. Here is China's share across each stage of the global rare earth supply chain. China's share of the global rare earths market at each stage. (©Inconvenient Truths)
While rare earths were originally an American domain, things changed drastically. In 1949, the US discovered the Mountain Pass mine, an open-pit rare earth site. Between 1965 and 1985, the US led in rare earth refining and supplied most of the global demand. But aggressive price undercutting by China gradually rendered Mountain Pass uncompetitive. It eventually closed in 2002, citing high costs and environmental issues.
Nevertheless, the US retains vast reserves — 13 million tons, or 13% of the global total, according to the US Geological Survey.
In China, large-scale rare earth reserves in Inner Mongolia's Bayan Obo region were confirmed in the mid-20th century. Yet it wasn't until the 1980s that the Chinese government began exploiting their potential.
In 1992, Deng Xiaoping famously said, "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths." This declaration unleashed a gold rush of rare earth extraction, with central and local governments, private players, and even criminal gangs diving into the sector. From 1985 to 1998, Beijing further boosted the industry with 13 years of export tax rebates.
This policy led to three major consequences:
The boom severely damaged ecosystems. In 2012, China issued its only white paper on rare earths, admitting that outdated mining and refining methods destroyed vegetation, caused soil erosion and acidification, and polluted surface and groundwater. One ton of ion-adsorption rare earths generated 2,000 tons of waste. Even modern in-situ leaching methods continue to release ammonia and heavy metals. In some areas, excessive mining has caused landslides, river blockages, and large-scale disasters.
In the early 1980s, China produced just 20 tons of rare earths annually. By the 1990s, it had surpassed the US, and post-2000, output topped 100,000 tons—90% of global supply. But global demand couldn't keep pace. Chinese companies undercut each other, selling rare earths like pork. Prices by the early 2000s were just one-fourth of 1990 levels, despite Beijing imposing export quotas from 1998 to 2014.
Chaos reigned. From 2006 to 2008, foreign customs data showed Chinese rare earth imports exceeded China's official export figures by 35%–59%. In 2011, the gap reached 120%. Still, Beijing sought to turn rare earths into a strategic asset.
In 2010, during the Diaoyu//Senkaku Islands dispute, China imposed a rare earth embargo on Japan — but failed to achieve its goals. Beijing concluded that fragmented industry control weakened its strategy. It responded by accelerating industry consolidation and nationalization.
In October 2016, a development plan mandated the integration of China's entire rare earth industry into six state-led conglomerates: Chinalco, Northern Rare Earth, Xiamen Tungsten, China Minmetals, Guangdong Rare Earth, and Southern Rare Earth. This integration was completed by December 2016.
On December 23, 2021, Minmetals, Chinalco, and Southern Rare Earth merged to form China Rare Earth Group. On January 1, 2024, it absorbed Guangdong Rare Earth, reducing the six giants to three. By then, Beijing had achieved full control over the industry.
New legal frameworks followed. On September 15, 2024, China imposed export controls on antimony. On October 1, the Rare Earth Management Regulations came into effect. By December 1, so did the Dual-Use Item Export Control Regulations .
By April 2025, with Trump launching another tariff offensive, the CCP was fully prepared. It immediately restricted exports of seven mid-to-heavy rare earth elements: samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. The restrictions took effect the same day, leaving no time for a US or global reaction.
In April 2025, rare earth magnet exports from China dropped to 3,000 tons — down 43% year-on-year, and nearly halved from March's 5,800 tons. In May, exports plunged to 1,238 tons, a 52.9% monthly drop and a 74% yearly decline — the lowest since February 2020.
From January to May, exports totaled just 19,132 tons, down 14.5% year-on-year, the lowest since 2021. The result was a global "rare earth shortage."
The CCP had, in effect, declared its dominance over the global rare earth supply chain.
Despite its grip on rare earths, the costs for China have been enormous:
The 2012 white paper remains largely accurate today. Land is scarred, water is polluted, and recovery efforts are slow and expensive. For every 100 yuan ($14 USD) earned from mining, the cost of environmental restoration might exceed 500 or even 1,000 yuan ($70-$140 USD). A small elite profits while the public bears the burden of a shattered homeland.
Although Beijing proclaims market reforms, in rare earths, it has reverted to full state control. Since 2006, total production and separation quotas are set jointly by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Ministry of Natural Resources. In February 2025, new regulations placed 92% of supply under direct control. Only designated state-run groups may mine or refine rare earths. Others are banned. The monopoly is absolute.
Rare earths are not truly rare; many nations have deposits. But the CCP seized control through unsustainable price wars.
After the 2010 Japan embargo, the US and others began diversifying. Japan's Hitachi Metals (now Proterial) opened a US factory in 2011 but closed it in 2020 due to cost pressures and US buyer reluctance. The CCP closely watches such moves and floods markets with low-cost supplies to undermine rivals.
Now, amid intensifying US-China rivalry, the West is fighting back.
The US is now leading an effort to create a China-free rare earth supply chain. Despite China's dominance, prices remain low and profits thin. From 2023 to now, export volume has slightly increased. But total revenues have fallen — showing persistent price decline. China's rare earth export quantity and value, 2020–2024. (©Inconvenient Truths)
Beijing's approach — sacrificing the environment and future generations for control — may prove unsustainable. The CCP's rare earth strategy, aimed at global domination, has instead turned into a national liability.
Meanwhile, the West is pushing forward. The Donald Trump administration is relaxing regulations and boosting investment in domestic supply chains. Experts see this as a turning point. Even if the CCP were to lift restrictions and flood the market again, the West is unlikely to retreat.
Ken Mushinski, CEO of Rare Element Resources, confirmed that America's effort to build an independent supply chain is "100% moving forward." His firm, backed by the US Department of Energy, is building a demonstration plant and expects full commercialization in two to three years.
Since January, Trump's second term has seen 11 executive orders supporting mining and refining of critical minerals. In June, the Department of Energy released new NEPA guidelines to simplify permitting. In April, the Department of the Interior included rare earth projects in its fast-track infrastructure list.
Still, with China's entrenched dominance, full US self-sufficiency may take 10–20 years. Until then, avoiding Beijing's chokehold remains a constant challenge.
Author: Jennifer Zeng
Find Jennifer Zeng's articles on JAPAN Forward . Follow her on X (formerly Twitter) and on her blog page, Jennifer's World .
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Forward
an hour ago
- Japan Forward
Caution Advised as Beijing Rewrites History for its Japan-bashing Extravaganza
Beijing is busily preparing for a grand ceremony and parade to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. That is, according to the Chinese Communist Party's preferred nomenclature, the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. I happened to be living in Beijing in 2015 when the 70th anniversary was marked. As I recall, every day all television channels seemed to broadcast anti-Japan programs one after the next. There were documentaries to be sure. But there were also numerous rather poorly produced, formulaic war dramas in which Japanese soldiers were invariably portrayed as sadistic brutes. By the end of these programs, the Japanese were bested by poorly armed but indomitable Communist guerrillas. Hardly mentioned were the regular forces of the Republic of China who did most of the fighting against the Japanese. This media blitz went on for weeks in the buildup to a mammoth ceremony and parade with 12,000 participants. It was staged in Tiananmen Square, which provided a splendid opportunity to display the regime's latest military hardware. Uniformed members of all the branches of the People's Liberation Army, male and female, lined Chang'an Avenue to be reviewed by Xi Jinping, who, clad in a natty Mao suit, was driven by at a brisk pace in a convertible and would regularly reward each formation with a shout out. He alternated between two expressions: Tongzhimen hao ! ("Greetings, Comrades!") and Tongzhimen xinkule ! ("Comrades, you've worked so hard!"). The later might best be translated as, "Comrades, you're doing a heck of a job!" If nothing else, Xi's performance art was a timely reminder that the PLA is not a true national army. It officially remains the armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party. There were heads of state and other dignitaries from foreign countries in attendance, many of them leaders of fellow dictatorships. Most Western nations, including the United States, sent their foreign ministers or lower-ranking officials. Ambassador Max Baucus represented the US. 3rd Squadron Hell's Angels, Flying Tigers, over China, photographed in 1942 by AVG pilot Robert T. Smith (via Wikipedia 2025 07 31) Among the honored guests were grizzled World War II veterans, including former Kuomintang soldiers. There was even a group of former Flying Tigers. The festivities were definitely not Japan-friendly. In part, that reflected the state of bilateral relations at the time. After the Japanese government purchased three of the islands in the Senkaku group from a private owner in September 2012, the Chinese government reacted sharply with a wave of jingoistic propaganda. One result was the largest anti-Japan protests since diplomatic relations were established in 1972. These swept more than 100 cities throughout China. Japanese businesses, restaurants and multinational corporations were targeted. Meanwhile, Japanese-made cars and even the Japanese embassy were vandalized. In a few cases, Japanese nationals were even attacked on the streets. Resentment against Japan still ran hot at the time of the parade. Of course, China's economy and military power have both grown enormously in the decade since then. And with the trade friction and intensifying geopolitical competition between China and the United States, now might seem like an opportune time for China to play the "Japan card." In other words, make friendly overtures to Tokyo, maybe even loan a Japanese zoo a panda or two. But that has not been the case. Beijing is not making the slightest effort to improve ties with Tokyo. Not only are its naval vessels nearly constantly prowling around in waters near the Senkaku Islands, there recently have been a series of incidents in which Chinese fighter jets have intruded into Japanese airspace or threatened Japanese aircraft. In fact, Japan's latest defense white paper, issued in mid-July, warns that China's intensified military activities are a cause for concern. As it states, those activities seriously impact Japan's security. It concluded, "International society is in a new crisis era and faces the biggest challenges since the end of World War II." September 3 is shaping up to be a day to remember. According to Chinese state media, "the military parade will feature marching formations, armored columns, aerial echelons and new types of combat forces, including unmanned and intelligent equipment." A Chinese J-15 fighter jet makes an abnormal approach to a Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force P3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8. (Photo courtesy of the Ministry of Defense) Chinese Navy aircraft carrier "Shandong" (Provided by the Ministry of Defense Joint Staff Office) All the equipment on display will be domestically produced and cover a full spectrum of capabilities. A gala will also be held that evening at the Great Hall of the People to mark the occasion. It will be broadcast live. Nor will the past be overcome. The Chinese government has released a new list of national-level anti-Japanese war memorial facilities and sites, as well as a new list of renowned Chinese heroes, martyrs and heroic groups. A special exhibition is also being staged in Beijing at the Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. Now, it is common knowledge that both Xi Jinping and Donald Trump love the pageantry of a military parade. Trump has also indicated on more than one occasion that he is eager to visit China. In fact on July 22 he told reporters, "President Xi has invited me to China, and we'll probably be doing that in the not-too-distant future." It is no surprise therefore that some Chinese commentators have suggested that Trump attend the September 3 festivities. What a splendid opportunity, they declare, for the leaders of the world's two superpowers to strike a "grand bargain." For example, Jin Canrong, a professor at the School of International Studies at Renmin University in Beijing has argued for a Trump visit on Guancha , a nationalistic news portal. By the way, Jin is said to have 3.6 million followers on Weibo, China's equivalent of Twitter/X. Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping attend an official welcoming ceremony in Beijing, China May 16, 2024. (©Sputnik/Pool via Reuters) Russian President Vladimir Putin has already announced that he will visit China for four days around the time of the parade. He said he looks forward to attending the event. That would provide the added opportunity for Trump to meet with Putin for the first time since his second term began. But whether that would be advantageous or not in his dealings with Xi is debatable. The Chinese appear up for the idea. In a Foreign Policy article entitled "China Should Invite Trump to Its Military Parade," influential commentator Deng Yuwen suggested it would offer "a rare chance for diplomacy." And Professor Jin sounded positively giddy when he wrote, "If the leaders of China, the US and Russia were to stand together during the military parade, it would be a great boon for the world." No doubt. But before rushing into anything, I would suggest that the Trump Administration would be well advised to consider what it would look like to the Japanese people for the president of the United States to attend such a propaganda fest. Especially at this sensitive point in time. The Peking duck can wait. Author: John Carroll


Toronto Star
4 hours ago
- Toronto Star
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.'


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. Recent economic reports suggest trouble ahead The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'