Protesters in Serbia's north demolish ruling party offices
In Novi Sad, Serbia's second-largest city, police and SNS supporters loyal to populist President Aleksandar Vucic were absent as dozens of anti-government protesters smashed the windows of the party's offices, threw out furniture and SNS paraphernalia, and splashed paint across the entrance.
"He's gone," protesters chanted in unison, referring to Vucic's 13-year-long rule.
Police in full riot gear later cordoned off several blocks in Novi Sad's city centre and used tear gas to disperse the crowd.
Daily protests across Serbia, sparked by the deaths of 16 people when the roof of a renovated railway station in Novi Sad collapsed last November, have rattled the popularity of Vucic and the SNS.
In Belgrade, hundreds of protesters and SNS supporters threw flares and firecrackers at each other on one of the city's main boulevards.
Police in full riot gear charged the anti-government protesters and used tear gas to force them to leave the area, a Reuters witness said.
Interior Minister Ivica Dacic accused protesters of attacking police in Novi Sad and Belgrade, and towns of Pancevo and Sabac. At least five police officers were injured, he said.
"Police had to act ... to avert attacks," he told a news conference in Belgrade. "We are urging everyone to leave the streets."
In a live broadcast, the Belgrade-based N1 TV showed at least five protesters being detained by police.
Vucic pledged more arrests after the protests.
"I think it is clear they did not want peace and Ghandian protests. There will be more arrests," he said in a live broadcast by Belgrade-based private Informer TV.
The opposition Party of Freedom and Justice said that Pedja Mitrovic, its parliamentary deputy, was injured during the protests and hospitalised.
"This is the handwriting of this government and Aleksandar Vucic, this is how they see Serbia," the party said in a statement.
Similar protests were held in towns across the country.
Earlier on Thursday, Dacic said that 27 police officers and around 80 civilians were injured in Wednesday's clashes, and 47 people had been detained.
Protesters have blamed corruption for the Novi Sad railway station disaster and are demanding early elections in hopes of ousting Vucic and his party.
Students, opposition groups, and anti-corruption watchdogs have accused Vucic and his allies of ties to organized crime, using violence against political rivals, and suppressing media freedoms—allegations they deny.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
34 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man arrested after fatal hit and run in Antrim
A man has died and a woman was taken to hospital after being struck by a car in a hit and run collision in Co Antrim. Another man has been arrested in connection with the incident which occurred in the Ballyeaston Road area of Ballyclare on Friday night. Advertisement Detective Chief Inspector O'Loan said: 'Shortly before 10:35pm, it was reported that two pedestrians, one male and one female, were struck by a car which failed to stop at the scene. 'The male, aged in his 50s sadly died as a result of his injuries. 'The female, aged in her 40s, was taken to hospital for her injuries that are not believed to be life-threatening. 'One male has been arrested in respect of the collision and remains in police custody.' Alliance Councillor Lewis Boyle said: 'This is a deeply shocking and sad event. 'I offer my sincere condolences to the family of the deceased, and I wish the injured woman a full and speedy recovery. 'There is a sense of shock in the wider Ballyclare community upon hearing this tragic news. 'For anyone with any information or who may have witnessed the incident, please come forward and share any information you may have with the police.' Police are appealing for witnesses to get in touch with case reference number 1771 15/08/25.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Flawed domestic violence tool leaves women at mercy of abusers
More than 50 women have been murdered after police relied on a 'deeply flawed' screening tool that failed to identify them as high-risk, The Telegraph can reveal. For 16 years, officers and social workers have used a risk assessment called Dash – short for Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Honour-Based Violence – to decide which victims get urgent protection. Since Dash was introduced in 2009, women reporting abuse have been asked 27 questions by police officers and social workers to gauge the likelihood of imminent harm or death at the hands of their abuser. The checklist asks whether the perpetrator has ever used a weapon, threatened to kill, or attempted to strangle, choke, suffocate or drown the victim. SafeLives, the charity behind Dash, says victims must answer 'yes' to at least 14 questions to be classed as 'high risk' and guaranteed urgent intervention. Scores of nine to 13 mean 'medium' risk, while fewer than nine is 'standard' – but neither of these lower grading guarantees women automatic specialist support. Practitioners may use 'professional judgment' to override low scores and are instructed to escalate cases after three or more police callouts in a year. But academics and bereaved families told The Telegraph that these safeguards can fail, with fatal results. The Telegraph's investigation links at least 55 femicides, the intentional murder of women because of their gender, to the assessment. A data scientist behind a rival tool warned that the true toll could top 400 deaths. On Saturday, bereaved families likened the scandal to Horizon, the Post Office IT system that destroyed lives while officials looked away. The investigation raise questions over Labour's announcement, now expected next month, on how it will deliver its manifesto pledge to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) within a decade. Alicia Kearns MP, the shadow safeguarding minister, demanded ministers order an 'urgent' review of Dash, warning: 'We cannot gamble with the safety of women and girls. Too many have died without help as the Dash system failed to recognise the true threat they faced.' It comes as Freedom of Information figures lay bare how deeply embedded Dash remains in the UK. Three years after the National Police Chiefs' Council ordered forces to adopt a new tool to detect coercive control, more than half – 24 of 43 – have yet to switch. For years police knew Dash was failing. In 2016, the College of Policing said Dash was unfit for front-line use. Standing Together, a domestic violence charity, found that domestic homicide reviews showed victims had been killed after scoring an average of eight ticks, not the 14 needed for urgent support. In 2019, Manchester University researchers concluded 'officer risk predictions based on Dash are little better than random'. In 2022, academics from Manchester and Seville found Dash 'performs poorly at identifying high-risk victims', wrongly classifying more than 96 per cent as standard or medium risk. But although problems with Dash were widely known among researchers in the criminal justice sector, bereaved families whose loved ones were wrongly graded 'low' or 'medium' – or had 'high risk' status delayed – are only now discovering that it may explain why no one intervened. Pauline Jones, 61, told The Telegraph that when she learnt her daughter Bethany Fields had been denied support prior to being killed by her ex-partner because she had been graded only 'medium' risk using a Dash checklist, the revelation 'destroys not just your heart, but your very soul'. On Aug 9 2019, the 21-year-old told police that Paul Crowther had threatened to kill her. She gave a statement and an officer completed a Dash form. He ticked 'yes' to only nine questions, grading her at 'medium' risk. A month later Crowther stabbed her to death in the street. Ms Jones said: 'When you lose your only child in such horrendous circumstances, you don't think you could be any more devastated. But then you hear about the Dash, and you know your daughter's death was so easily preventable. It destroys not just your heart, but your very soul.' She asked: 'If a person is articulate and coherent enough to give their own statement, why are they not involved in the Dash risk assessment process?' Data released in response to freedom of information requests reveal that Bethany's case is far from isolated. Since 2019, reviews of domestic homicides in just 10 police force areas found that 55 women were killed by partners after being graded only 'standard' or 'medium' risk. More than half of these women, 36 in total, were assessed three or more times without ever being raised to 'high risk', while nine were killed having only ever been given the lowest risk score. Ba Linh Le, the co-founder and chief data officer at Frontline, a Berlin firm that has developed a rival AI-powered risk tool, said the findings matched their own estimates but that the real figure could be far higher. She said: 'The Telegraph's data covers fewer than a quarter of police forces and Dash had been in use for a decade before 2019, so the true number of women killed after being marked 'low' or 'medium' risk using a Dash checklist could exceed 400.' Across the 10 forces with available data on Dash scores for domestic homicides going back six years, 113 victims died after at least one assessment. Fifty-eight were classed 'high risk' at some point, but some were later downgraded before being killed. Natalie Saunders, 33, was murdered by Stephen Charlton in October 2018 after Cleveland Police repeatedly graded her as being at 'medium' risk. Her parents told The Telegraph they believe that earlier intervention could have saved her life. Barbara Saunders, 67, said: 'She's never been medium risk, in none of them. In not one assault, she's not been medium.' The only time officers rated her 'high risk' was when she briefly escaped her abuser and called the police. In the recording, shared with The Telegraph, she said she was 'covered in marks' from being 'battered' and wanted to report his violence. 'I think he might do something, like, to me,' she told the handler. 'I'm really worried.' A month later, on Aug 24, police carried out another Dash. Again she was scored 'medium'. On Oct 7, Charlton strangled her to death in her own home. Prof Jane Monckton-Smith, a former police officer and one of the UK's leading forensic criminologists specialising in domestic homicide, told The Telegraph: 'It is time for the concerns around Dash to be taken seriously. There's no rationale for the 14 'yes' ticks that lead to a high-risk grading.' It can also be revealed that, in May, the Home Office paid SafeLives an undisclosed sum to review how police and social services assess risk in domestic abuse cases. A department spokesman said the project is about 'making sure the police are supported with the right training and tools to identify offences and protect victims, and risk is correctly assessed to identify the level of risk posed to victims'. They added that the work will 'inform new government guidance on domestic abuse victims' risk and needs, which will be published this autumn'. Conflict of interest When The Telegraph raised the apparent conflict of interest in funding the charity that created Dash to scrutinise it, the Home Office clarified that the tool had been deliberately excluded from the review. However, SafeLives confirmed that they had surveyed stakeholders on their views of the tool as part of the review, saying: 'Of course we want to know what professionals think about Dash. We want to know what is and isn't working, because that is the basis of our recommendations to Government.' Ms Kearns called it 'farcical' for ministers to let SafeLives review how risk is assessed in domestic violence cases, and questioned how the Home Office could justify excluding Dash from scrutiny. She said: 'Something isn't adding up – SafeLives admitted to reviewing Dash, but now insist, along with the Home Office, that they are not. That leaves two options: either ministers are failing to review Dash, which is preposterous, or they have made the farcical decision to let SafeLives review their own work. 'Ministers must come clean and if they deliberately excluded Dash from this review, must independently review it or end its use. 'The families of murdered women deserve answers, and ministers must act urgently. I fear a national scandal born of a deeply flawed system that has denied vulnerable women life-saving support simply because they did not tick enough boxes on a checklist.' Families of women who died after being wrongly graded 'low' or 'medium' risk have also attacked the Home Office for awarding SafeLives a role in a separate £53 million project called DRIVE to target high-risk perpetrators with counselling. Mrs Saunders said the project was 'wrong' and wouldn't work. 'You can't change them, you can't. I don't care what anyone says,' she said. 'You can't say they were going from what they were doing to someone, to another relationship, and they're going to be lovey-dovey. I don't think so.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Murder investigation launched after woman fatally assaulted
Police have launched a murder investigation after a woman was fatally assaulted in the early hours of the morning. The Metropolitan Police said officers were called to Chadwell Heath, east London, just after 5.30am on Saturday after reports of an assault. Paramedics also attended but the woman was pronounced dead at the scene, the force said. The woman has not yet been formally identified, police said, but officers believe she was in her twenties. Her family have been informed and are being supported by family liaison officers, the force added. No one has yet been arrested in connection with the incident. Detective Superintendent Brian Hobbs said: 'Our thoughts today are with the victim's family and friends in light of this truly tragic event. 'Local residents will see an increased number of officers in and around the area while our investigative work is carried out. 'I want to thank residents for their patience while this continues. I would ask anyone who was in the area of Romford, who may have seen or heard anything suspicious, to come forward to us.' Anyone with any information about the incident is asked to contact police via 101 quoting 1625/16Aug, or call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.
