Japan heads to polls in key test for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba
Weak export data last week stoked fears that the world's fourth-largest economy could tip into a technical recession.Despite Ishiba securing an early meeting with Trump in February, and sending his trade envoy to Washington seven times, no agreement has been reached. For voters, tackling rising prices is a also a central concern.The cost of rice, a staple food for Japanese households, has nearly doubled since last year. For the past few months, the government has had to tap into its emergency stockpiles to tackle the shortage. Since last year's lower house election, which saw the coalition fall short of a majority, the LDP has not been able to regain the trust of voters who are disgruntled with stagnant wages and relentless inflation. Meanwhile, the populist Sanseito party, which has been using social media to attract younger voters, has seen a surge in popularity. Polls show its "Japanese First" slogan has struck a chord with some conservatives, although its hardline stance on foreigners has drawn criticism.The party wants "stricter rules and limits" on immigration, opposes "globalism" and "radical" gender policies, and wants a re-think on decarbonisation and vaccines.If Ishiba's ruling coalition fails to secure 50 seats, it will have lost majority in both chambers of parliament, which could threaten his leadership and lead to political instability. Ishiba's centre-right party has governed Japan almost continuously since 1955, albeit with frequent changes of leader.The last time the LDP and Komeito failed to win a majority in the upper house was in 2010, having already fallen below the threshold in 2007.That was followed by a rare change of government in 2009, when the now-defunct Democratic Party of Japan governed for a rocky three years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war but others make grim tariffs forecast
A prominent Democratic senator is backing President Donald Trump 's trade war strategy, even as others in his party warn that looming economic fallout could soon hit American consumers and industries. Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman, told Fox News Digital this week that the Trump administration's aggressive use of tariffs has been effective so far. 'Absolutely,' Fetterman said when asked if he believed the U.S. is winning the trade war. 'I'm a huge fan of Bill Maher, and I mean, I think he's really one of the oracles for my party, and he acknowledged it, it's like, hey, he thought that the tariffs were going to tank the economy, and then he acknowledged that it didn't,' Fetterman added. 'So, for me, it seems like the E.U. thing has been going well, and I guess we'll see how it happens with China.' Fetterman's comments come as Trump intensifies his tariff push. On Thursday, the 47th President signed two new executive orders - one raising tariffs on Canadian imports from 25 percent to 35 percent beginning Friday, and another modifying reciprocal tariff rates for countries with significant U.S. trade deficits. The White House cited Canada's failure to help curb fentanyl and other illicit drug imports as the reason for the increased tariffs. 'The goal is to secure fair, balanced and reciprocal trade relationships,' the White House said in a statement. The moves build on Trump's earlier decision this year to impose a baseline 10 percent tariff on all countries, with steeper rates for those running large trade surpluses with the U.S. Trump's recently installed tariffs took effect on April 9, and since then, the his administration has inked several major trade deals. During his second term, Trump and his administration reached a trade agreement with the European Union (EU) under which the E.U. committed to purchasing $750 billion in American energy and investing an additional $600 billion in the U.S. economy by 2028. As part of the deal, the E.U. accepted a 15 percent percent tariff rate. A separate agreement was struck with Japan, which pledged $550 billion in investments aimed at rebuilding and expanding key American industries. Japan also agreed to open its markets further to U.S. exports and, like the E.U., accepted a baseline 15 percent tariff rate. However, many top Democrats remain skeptical. While speaking with Fox News Digital, Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed cautioned that any short-term gains could be undercut by rising prices. 'Within a few weeks or months, you'll start seeing significant increases in most things you buy,' Reed said. 'And also, you will see disruption in terms of a lot of our industries, because they're not able to access product or supply.' Senator Chris Van Hollen, of Maryland, echoed those concerns, saying Trump's tariff strategy contradicts his campaign promises. 'This is the president who said he was going to come in and reduce prices. Prices are going to rise, and they're going to rise more over time,' Van Hollen warned. However, Massachusetts Senator, Elizabeth Warren, took a broader view, arguing that Trump's confrontational trade policies are pushing U.S. allies to look elsewhere for business. 'Donald Trump may beat his chest and say, "Man, I made him take a 15 percent tariff or 25 percent tariff," but also understand that every one of those trading partners is now looking hard all around the rest of the world to find other customers,' Warren said. 'The United States under Donald Trump is not a reliable trading partner. And that's not good for any of us.' Warren also linked the trade war to interest rate policy, blaming Trump's tariff decisions for the Federal Reserve's refusal to lower rates. 'Jerome Powell said last month that he would have lowered interest rates back in February if it hadn't been for the chaos that Donald Trump was creating over trade,' Warren said. 'And the consequence has been that American families have, for six months now, been paying more on credit cards, more on car loans, more home mortgages.' Republicans, however, are rallying behind the president's hardline stance. Texas Senator Ted Cruz called the strategy a 'big win'. 'I think it's exactly the right approach,' Cruz said. 'It's what I have been urging the president to do, and I think the successes he's winning are big wins for America.' Seemingly mocking Democrats' warnings of economic turmoil, and quoting the film Casa Blanca, Cruz added, 'I'm shocked, shocked that Democrats are rooting for the economy to do badly under President Trump.' 'It'd be nice if some Democrats would put their partisan hatred for Trump aside and actually start working together for American workers and American jobs. Unfortunately, I don't see a whole lot of Democrats interested in doing that right now,' he said. Louisiana Senator John Kennedy praised the E.U. deal and said he hopes it leads to what he calls 'ideal reciprocity'. 'Clearly, the president got a good deal from one perspective. The Europeans just caved, they did. Fifteen percent tariffs on them, zero on us, commitment to invest in our country,' Kennedy said. 'But the part of the deal I like the most - the E.U. and the president agreed that a whole bunch of goods would be tariff-free. That is, no American tariffs and no E.U. tariffs.' 'Let the free enterprise system work. May the best product at the best price win,' Kennedy added. 'That, to me, would be the perfect situation.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say
India will keep purchasing oil from Russia, despite President Donald Trump threatening to impose penalties for doing so, two Indian officials said on Saturday Officials in India, the most populous country on Earth, told Reuters and That contradicted a statement from Trump, who on Friday told reporters his understanding was that India would 'no longer' be buying oil from Russia. "These are long-term oil contracts," an unnamed Indian official told Reuters. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Last week, Trump said India would face unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil in addition to a 25 percent tariff on goods. However, China and Turkey, two countries that also purchase large amounts of Russian oil, have not faced similar penalty threats. India drastically increased its import of Russian oil after the Kremlin invaded Ukraine in 2022, while many other countries began to cut back it's imports. The cheap availability of Russian oil allowed India to reduce its reliance on other countries, such as Saudi Arabia or Iraq, who typically sell to Asian countries at a higher price. While India faced criticisms for doing so, the general consensus around India's increase in imports has been that it helps avoid a global surge in oil prices. It's unclear why exactly Trump has targeted India in reducing its import of Russian oil. The president has recently expressed frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin for failing to come to the peace talks table to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. On Friday, India's external affairs spokesperson Randdhir Jaiswal said India and Russia had a 'time-tested partnership' and that India was analyzing its energy sourcing. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," Jaiswal said, according to Reuters. India heavily relies on energy imports to sustain the needs of it's more than one billion population. It imports more than one million barrels per day.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin
This week sees the 80th anniversaries of the only two uses of nuclear weapons in war against human targets. The Hiroshima bomb will be commemorated on Wednesday. The Nagasaki bomb will be marked on Saturday. These actions, though generally believed to have brought the Second World War to an end, remain highly controversial, not least because of the large number of non-combatant civilians who died of appalling injuries. American military authorities prevented the publication of some pictures of the aftermath for many years. Some of the scientists involved in developing the bomb regretted it deeply. Albert Einstein, who had urged President Franklin Roosevelt to embark on the research which led to it, later said this was 'the one great mistake in my life'. But whatever we think now about President Harry Truman's decision to drop two bombs on Japan, such discoveries cannot be undiscovered. Several countries, including Britain, concluded that the best response was to build their own bombs, so deterring attack by any other nuclear power. This policy has, on the whole, worked. The 1961 Cuban missile crisis was defused because both Moscow and Washington had the sense to see that a compromise was better than the end of the world. Both backed down. Since then, most of us have believed that Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) would deter all but the crazy from taking actions which might lead to the use of nuclear weapons. The Russians have developed a grim system known as the Dead Hand, which would deliver a shattering nuclear response to an American nuclear strike, even if the Kremlin leadership were all dead in the ruins of an irradiated Moscow. It was this which former Russian President Dmitri Medvedev was referring to when he recently taunted Donald Trump over his approach to Russia. And Mr Trump duly rose to the bait, proclaiming that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions' in response to what he called the Russian's 'highly provocative' comments. This is probably bluster. Mr Trump's advisers will have told him that Mr Medvedev is not a significant figure. And the US Navy always has several of its 12 Ohio-class submarines, equipped with formidably accurate Trident multi-warhead missiles, within striking range of Russia. Even so, with a war still in Ukraine, it would be unwise to be complacent. MAD may have worked so far but the world is madder than for many years, with Russo-American relations tense, dogged by mutual incomprehension and personally unfriendly. Mr Trump may be unpredictable and erratic but the root of this problem is Vladimir Putin's cruel and lawless aggression, made worse by despicable bombing attacks on civilians. Mr Trump is right that it must stop, and it is Mr Putin who must stop it. If he does not, who knows where it might lead? Russia has relied too long on its nuclear strength to limit the West's response. The West must now deploy the most severe conventional military, diplomatic and economic means to bring Putin to the negotiating table and to obtain a ceasefire.
