Jail for ex-auxiliary police officer in charge of armoury who discharged revolver into countertop
Muhammad Mukhlis Kamis, 39, was sentenced to two months' jail on Monday (Jul 7).
He pleaded guilty to one count of a rash act endangering the personal safety of his subordinate by discharging a 0.38 calibre Taurus Revolver at a Singapore Air Freight Terminal building.
The court heard that Mukhlis was an auxiliary police officer with the Singapore Airport Terminal Services (SATS) Security Services for 11 years.
He held the rank of Sergeant, and was deployed as an armourer for five years in the leadup to the incident. According to his defence lawyer, he had been promoted to be overall in-charge of the armoury.
The court heard that Mukhlis was at the SATS Auxiliary Police Armoury at the Singapore Air Freight Terminal Core C Building on Nov 22, 2023.
At about 7.40am, another officer, Corporal Zulkarnaen Ramli went to the armoury ahead of his shift to withdraw his equipment and firearms. The 27-year-old was accompanied by a safety officer.
Mukhlis was in the armoury listening to music, which was playing on a speaker via his phone.
He issued nine rounds of 0.38mm ammunition with a Taurus revolver to CPL Zulkarnaen, but the corporal realised that there was one bullet missing and pointed it out.
Mukhlis then retrieved one bullet from the ammo drawer, which was below the countertop.
"He threw this 0.38mm round up in the air and caught it with his left hand," said the prosecutor. "He then inserted the single bullet into the cylinder of the revolver, spun the cylinder, and closed the cylinder."
Mukhlis was holding the revolver in his right hand, pointing it downward towards the countertop.
At his actions, CPL Zulkarnaen stepped back in fear.
Suddenly, Mukhlis placed his finger on the trigger and pulled it, discharging a round that hit the armoury countertop.
The entire sequence lasted about five seconds, the prosecutor said.
After discharging the round, Mukhlis called his supervisors and told them what happened. A thorough search uncovered the slug of the discharged round embedded in the countertop.
No one was injured and no repair costs were incurred for the damage to the countertop.
The SATS control room informed the police about the incident that same morning and Mukhlis was arrested. The revolver and the ammunition were seized.
After the incident, Mukhlis was let go by SATS, said his lawyer Mr Azri Imran Tan from IRB Law.
He sought no more than one to two months' jail, while the prosecutor asked for three to four months.
CLIENT DOESN'T KNOW WHY HE DID IT: DEFENCE
Mr Tan said his client had been working without incident as an armourer for over five years.
He was with SATS for more than 11 years, around the time he completed his national service, and had been commended for his work.
After being promoted to the rank of sergeant, Mukhlis was appointed as overall in-charge of the armoury by his then-commanding officer, said Mr Tan.
"To this day, our client cannot explain what drove him to decide to - foolishly - load the revolver," said the lawyer.
"Whatever the reasons for his ill-advised actions, he recognises they are inexcusable and in no circumstances should he have loaded the revolver with a live round, let alone fiddle with the same."
He said Mukhlis had immediately and voluntarily called his supervisors and disclosed what happened, cooperating with investigations.
Mukhlis had even told the authorities that he was listening to music at work and that he had thrown the bullet in the air and caught it with his left hand, said the lawyer.
The prosecutor said Mukhlis was "certainly conscious of the serious consequences of loading a live round into a revolver", as he was a certified armourer.
"There was an element of playfulness in his actions, by throwing the round into the air and catching it with his hand," said the prosecutor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
11 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
S'porean warns others after seeing 2 women approaching the elderly asking for money in Chinatown
SINGAPORE: After a man saw two women approaching older people in Chinatown, he posted photos of them in an effort to warn others. In a post on the popular COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page on Friday (Jul 4), the man wrote, 'Please beware!!!' FB screengrab/ COMPLAINT SINGAPORE He added that he had seen two women whom he believed to be from China and who appeared to target senior citizens in the area. However, when he tried to take a picture of the women, 'They quickly took money from an elderly man and left the scene.' The post has been shared dozens of times. It is not new for foreigners to be seen begging in Singapore nor for residents to express their concerns about the issue . Read related: Police arrest foreigner selling tissues and begging outside temple at Bugis Some commenters said they had seen people claiming to be tourists begging at Jurong, Clementi, Toa Payoh, and even Changi Airport. 'People's Park Food Centre a lot! Some old folks just give them S$50! They usually approach the old folk alone. Then, her gang will come later!' one added. 'Yes, last two weeks at Bukit Batok, they also tried to ask me for money but don't know it's the same person,' wrote another. 'One such woman at Tampines was approaching many people with a sob story about having no money left and being unable to do this and that. Told her blankly that she should know how expensive Singapore is and yet come here with insufficient money. Reminded her that the police will have her arrested,' a Facebook user wrote. 'It's happening at Paya Lebar train station nearest to Geylang, at HDB estates, along Geylang Road,' commented another. 'I encountered one as well in Jalan Kayu. She approached me asking whether I had loose change. Once I told her I don't carry cash, she walks away,' a netizen chimed in. One summed it up this way: 'Seems like these people are targeting everywhere.' 'Yeah, they are everywhere. Always take a few old men's money, already they will take the bus or MRT to go next spot. They won't stay at one spot for too long,' a netizen agreed. A commenter, sounding fed up, advised, 'Contact the police and embassy.. take photos and videos of their irksome faces.. post on their social media, let everyone know.' Under the Destitute Persons Act, begging is prohibited in Singapore, and a person caught habitually begging may be fined as much as S$3,000 or jailed for up to two years. Additionally, a foreigner caught begging would be considered a prohibited immigrant and could face deportation. The Independent Singapore has reached out to the post author for further comments or updates. /TISG Read also: Singaporeans raise concern about 'foreign beggars' on the streets
Independent Singapore
11 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Woman claims she can't sell her Bedok Reservoir HDB flat due to neighbour's clutter
SINGAPORE: Disputes between neighbours are not uncommon in space-scarce Singapore, but usually, these involve noise or other everyday issues. It escalates to another level, however, when one resident is unable to sell their unit allegedly because of their neighbour's behaviour. This appears to be the problem confronting a woman who lives at Bedok Reservoir View, according to a recent report in Shin Min Daily News. Her neighbour has so much clutter in the common areas that property agents have declined to help sell the woman's flat until the neighbour's stuff is cleared away. The 50-year-old woman told the Chinese-language daily that she's been living at Bedok Reservoir View with her family since 2009. Her neighbour moved in before she did and was already collecting various items at the time, but back then, these were kept inside his flat. Recently, however, he began to store items in the hallway, which ended up obstructing the common walkway. Photos posted in Shin Min Daily News show large items, including bicycles and TV or computer monitors. According to the woman, the man takes home items that people living nearby have discarded and then puts them in the riser or corridor. When she tried to talk him out of this in the past, he grew upset and raised his voice at her. However, she's not the only person who has attempted to raise the problem with the authorities — other residents have also complained about the clutter. This resulted in warnings being issued to the neighbour, but the woman said he cleared up the clutter after getting the warnings, and then began hoarding again. Additionally, since he thought that it was she who complained, he began to target her and her family. This is why they decided to move out, but when they contacted a property agent to help sell the flat, the agent said they would not do so until the neighbour's clutter was cleared up, as the mess would discourage those who would otherwise want to buy the unit. The woman then decided to file an official complaint with the town council, which resulted in the man being told to clear the corridor within a week. The neighbour's treatment of the woman worsened, however, as he allegedly harassed her in several ways, including recording her unit on his phone. He also wrote these threatening words on the warning posted by the town council: 'I am hunting you.' A photo of this was included in the Shin Min Daily News report. She also said that he spray-painted offensive words outside her door, which the town council had to paint over. /TISG Read also: 'It's like their storage unit' — Woman asks what can be done about neighbour who clutters the entrance corridor of their HDB unit
Independent Singapore
11 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
I have a backstabbing colleague at work, should I retaliate?
SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user asked others on the platform for advice concerning a colleague whom they considered a friend, but who got them into trouble at work when they backstabbed them. 'I came to realise that you should not view colleagues as friends,' wrote u/Alastor_888 in a post on r/askSingapore on Sunday (Jul 6). They went on to explain that they've had a good working relationship with this particular colleague but just realised that he has taken something the post author said without context to their managers, which resulted in the post author getting reprimanded. 'For most of the year, we have been very good friends sharing both personal and work troubles, so after finding out what he did, it really saddened and disappointed me,' he wrote. They now have a chance to retaliate but are unsure if they should do it. There was one conversation where the colleague 'threatened violence' if the post author did not do their task with 100% accuracy. This was overheard by some of their other colleagues, but the post author took it as a joke at the time. See also Guide for job seekers - Spotting red flags in job interviews 'But now, looking back, I am not so sure, considering all the backstabbing and snake-like behaviour,' they wrote, adding that they could escalate this to HR, since what he did was a fireable offence. The post author is uncertain whether they should 'ruin' their colleague's career over what he said but acknowledges that their career progression was somewhat derailed because of what he had done. 'I managed to clarify with my manager, but this whole thing still left an impression on the other senior managers, and I have no chance of changing their minds due to our limited interactions. Question is, should I escalate it to HR?' they asked. Commenters on the post advised u/Alastor_888 to tread carefully if they do proceed to escalate the matter to HR, including making sure they have proof of what the colleague had said. Another warned the post author, 'Gotta see your cards, if that colleague of yours is a favourite in the company, you are on the losing end.' A Reddit user, however, urged them to go ahead. 'He screwed you over, and you got a mark under your name… now you got opportunity to extend the same courtesy… and now you're asking this?? Collect proper evidence, and with witnesses would be better, then hentam him.' In contrast, another urged them to desist. 'Are you able to survive in the workplace and collect your monthly salary as long as you ignore this guy? Yes – just keep the peace, do nothing, and ring-fence yourself against this person.' A commenter had this wise piece of advice: ' The rule of thumb is never joke or write about stuff that you wouldn't be able to defend if it becomes public. Some jokes are ok between friends/close people, but not ok outside, and some jokes are never ok, learning that fast saves you a lot of trouble.' /TISG Read also: Employee claims colleagues backstabbed him — seeks advice on handling workplace tattletales
