
Blood Test May Predict Crohn's Disease 2 Years Before Onset
'It's pretty much accepted that Crohn's disease does not begin at diagnosis,' said Ryan Ungaro, MD, associate professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, speaking at Digestive Disease Week (DDW) 2025.
Although individual blood markers have been associated with the future risk for CD, what's needed, he said, is to understand which combination of biomarkers are most predictive.
Now, Ungaro and his team have developed a risk score they found accurate in predicting CD onset within 2 years before its onset.
It's an early version that will likely be further improved and needs additional validation, Ungaro told Medscape Medical News .
'Once we can accurately identify individuals at risk for developing Crohn's disease, we can then imagine a number of potential interventions,' Ungaro said.
Approaches would vary depending on how far away the onset is estimated to be. For people who likely wouldn't develop disease for many years, one intervention might be close monitoring to enable diagnosis in the earliest stages, when treatment works best, he said. Someone at a high risk of developing CD in the next 2 or 3 years, on the other hand, might be offered a pharmaceutical intervention.
Developing and Testing the Risk Score
To develop the risk score, Ungaro and colleagues analyzed data of 200 patients with CD and 100 healthy control participants from PREDICTS, a nested case-controlled study of active US military service members. The study is within the larger Department of Defense Serum Repository, which began in 1985 and has more than 62.5 million samples, all stored at −30 °C.
The researchers collected serum samples at four timepoints up to 6 or more years before the diagnosis. They assayed antimicrobial antibodies using the Prometheus Laboratories platform, proteomic markers using the Olink inflammation panel, and anti–granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Participants (median age, 33 years for both groups) were randomly divided into equally sized training and testing sets. In both the group, 83% of patients were White and about 90% were men.
Time-varying trajectories of marker abundance were estimated for each biomarker. Then, logistic regression modeled disease status as a function of each marker for different timepoints and multivariate modeling was performed via logistic LASSO regression.
A risk score to predict CD onset within 2 years was developed. Prediction models were fit on the testing set and predictive performance evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC).
Blood proteins and antibodies have differing associations with CD depending on the time before diagnosis, the researchers found.
The integrative model to predict CD onset within 2 years incorporated 10 biomarkers associated significantly with CD onset.
The AUC for the model was 0.87 (considered good, with 1 indicating perfect discrimination). It produced a specificity of 99% and a positive predictive value of 84%.
The researchers stratified the model scores into quartiles and found the CD incidence within 2 years increased from 2% in the first quartile to 57.7% in the fourth. The relative risk of developing CD in the top quartile individuals vs lower quartile individuals was 10.4.
The serologic and proteomic markers show dynamic changes years before the diagnosis, Ungaro said.
A Strong Start
The research represents 'an ambitious and exciting frontier for the future of IBD [inflammatory bowel disease] care,' said Victor G. Chedid, MD, MS, consultant and assistant professor of medicine at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, who reviewed the findings but was not involved in the study.
Currently, physicians treat IBD once it manifests, and it's difficult to predict who will get CD, he said.
The integrative model's AUC of 0.87 is impressive, and its specificity and positive predictive value levels show it is highly accurate in predicting the onset of CD within 2 years, Chedid added.
Further validation in larger and more diverse population is needed, Chedid said, but he sees the potential for the model to be practical in clinical practice.
'Additionally, the use of blood-based biomarkers makes the model relatively noninvasive and easy to implement in a clinical setting,' he said.
Now, the research goal is to understand the best biomarkers for characterizing the different preclinical phases of CD and to test different interventions in prevention trials, Ungaro told Medscape Medical News .
A few trials are planned or ongoing, he noted. The trial PIONIR trial will look at the impact of a specific diet on the risk of developing CD, and the INTERCEPT trial aims to develop a blood-based risk score that can identify individuals with a high risk of developing CD within 5 years after initial evaluation.
Ungaro reported being on the advisory board of and/or receiving speaker or consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myer Squibb, Celltrion, ECM Therapeutics, Genentech, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roivant, Sanofi, and Takeda. Chedid reported having no relevant disclosures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
‘How Thoughts Become Things': More Thoughts on 'The Secret'
Based on the popular New Age philosophy-based book 'The Secret,' this follow-up documentary is dedicated to only one aspect of the secret of human existence. 'Think and Grow Rich,' by Napoleon Hill, is a book many Americans are familiar with. Similar to its premise, the documentary 'How Thoughts Become Things' explores the human ability to shape our destinies by using the power of our thoughts.


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
I went blind after doing cartwheels — here's what I learned after losing my vision
A woman who lost her ability to see after a joyful romp on the beach is opening up about the frightening ordeal. Deborah Cobb was 19 years old when she broke out in a series of cartwheels — only to come up without her vision. Now 42, Cobb has said that she has the ocular health of an 80-year-old and anticipates she will soon return to blindness due to early-onset macular degeneration. Advertisement 4 Seemingly harmless horseplay caused temporary blindness and chronic illness for one 19-year-old woman. Mikhail Ulyannikov – In a new interview with Newsweek, Cobb said she was with her friends when she decided to challenge herself to do as many cartwheels in a row as she could 'just for fun.' 'I started doing them and got to 13 and fell over super dizzy. My eyes were kind of spinning, so it took a moment to realize that my eyes weren't focusing,' she recalled. Advertisement 'Looking at her face, it was a giant orange blur,' Cobb continued, referring to a friend who witnessed the shocking moments. 'My eyes wouldn't fully focus. There was no pain, and my peripheral vision was fine, but everything I looked directly at was blocked by an orange blur.' Cobb's harrowing story went viral in a recent post on Instagram, where she detailed the mysterious medical phenomenon that doctors first thought was a sign of leukemia and even AIDS. 'I had neither. Just weak blood vessels in my eyes that is apparently a genetic trait as I later learned,' she wrote of her condition, called macular degeneration. 4 Deborah Cobb, now 42, shared details of her macular degeneration diagnosis on Instagram. deborahcobb_ihp/Instagram Advertisement Cobb explained in the viral video post that her gymnastic stunts had caused internal hemorrhages in a part of her eye called the macula, an area at the center of the retina that is responsible for sharp, focused vision. Macular degeneration is the leading cause of vision loss, affecting more than 200,000 Americans every year, usually brought on by old age and other factors, including genetics and cardiovascular disease. The condition causes blurred and distorted vision, dark spots changes in color perception. She was deemed 'legally blind' for three months after the initial incident, and did not regain full vision for another three months thereafter. 4 Macular degeneration, usually only seen in the elderly, affects the eye's ability to bring sight into sharp focus. mihai – Advertisement Cobb's life came to a halt during that time. As a result of the injury, she was forced to quit massage school. She couldn't drive, watch TV or even look at herself in the mirror. Though she was eventually able to return to school and later earned her license in massage therapy, she still lives in fear of losing her vision again. 'I can't do anything upside down or anything that causes too much blood to rush to my head. It happened once from doing push-ups, so I have to limit myself physically,' Cobb wrote. 4 Due to her eye condition, Cobb can no longer engage in physically exhaustive activities without risk of losing her vision again. deborahcobb_ihp/Instagram The experience inspired Cobb to dedicate her career to integrative medicine, and she now works with clients who suffer from anxiety and nervous system dysregulation. Cobb has also said that losing her vision gave her a positive new outlook on life, saying she's so thankful for the lessons in empathy and 'to not take the simple things for granted.' 'I could live in fear because of it, or I could be filled with gratitude because of it,' Cobb concluded in the thoughtful post. 'I choose gratitude, because who wants to live in fear?!'


The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging
A recent poll conducted by CBS News provides an encouraging look into public support for the Artemis program to return astronauts to the moon and eventually send humans to Mars. Sixty-seven percent of respondents favor a return to the moon and just 33 percent oppose one. On Mars, sixty-five percent favor sending astronauts to the red planet with 35 percent in opposition. Support for sending astronauts back to the moon tracks favorably among all age groups, with 71 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds in favor. The current favorable view of the Artemis program contrasts with what people thought of the Apollo program to land men on the moon while it was ongoing. As space historian Roger Launius pointed out, most Americans, with the exception of one poll taken in July 1969, took a dim view of going to the moon. 'Consistently throughout the decade, 45-60 percent of Americans believed that the government was spending too much on space, indicative of a lack of commitment to the spaceflight agenda,' Launius wrote. Incidentally, the CBS News poll shows that now Americans believe that the Apollo program was worth the effort, 77 to 23 percent. The findings were consistent with those taken on the 50th and 40th anniversaries of the first moon landing. The fact that support for going back to the moon and on to Mars is uniform across all age groups jumps out. In times past, some have suggested that supporters for sending astronauts beyond low Earth orbit mainly consisted of boomers nostalgic for the glories of the Apollo program. If that was ever the case, it isn't any longer. Laura Seward Forczyk, a space career consultant, video blogger and author of ' Rise of the Space Age Millennials,' likely spoke for a lot of younger people on X when she posted, 'I hope to live to see humans walking on another world again. Artemis III can't come soon enough.' Her sentiment expresses a desire for something beautiful and glorious in a world often ugly and dispiriting. Come to think of it, that was the Apollo 11 moon landing in the midst of the turmoil of the 1960s. A lot of famous space influencers, such as former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine, billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman, video blogger Eliana Sheriff and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk were not alive when men first walked on the moon. One word of caution should be made about how poll results can often be influenced by question-wording. In 2023, the Pew organization released a poll suggesting that returning to the moon and on to Mars were of lower priority than things like asteroid detection and measuring climate change. Nevertheless, when combining the answers 'top priority' and 'important but lower priority' space exploration still enjoyed healthy support, with 57 percent favoring a return to the moon and 56 percent going to Mars. People are looking forward to witnessing the first footsteps on the moon in over 50 years and the first ever on Mars. Donald Trump was the latest president of the United States to make that promise when he started the Artemis program during his first term. Now, he has to deliver. Unfortunately, President Trump is in serious danger of blowing it. Over six months into his second administration, America still does not have a permanent NASA administrator, thanks to Trump's capricious, last-minute withdrawal of Isaacman's nomination. The White House and the Congress are wrangling over NASA science funding and how long the space agency should retain the Orion Space Launch System architecture for returning to the moon. Trump needs to move quickly to nominate a permanent head of NASA. He could change his mind again about Isaacman, though he may be loath to admit to making a mistake. The White House also needs to reestablish the National Space Council as a center for the formulation of space policy. The council performed great service during the first Trump administration. It can do so again. Finally, Trump and Musk should resolve their feud. The most powerful man in the world and the world's richest man work better together than at cross purposes. Trump has won some great domestic and foreign policy victories. It will be a pity if his legacy is one of letting China get back to the moon before we do. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.