
Whistleblower Protection Act amendments boost legal safeguards
Bangi MP Syahredzan Johan said the WPA was passed in 2010 to provide protection to whistleblowers, but there are several flaws in the Act that severely hampered its effectiveness.
'One major flaw in the Act is that the disclosure made must not be prohibited by any written law. This is found in a proviso in Section 6(1) of the Act.
'Thus, the disclosure of matters covered by the Official Secrets Act 1972, for example, would not attract protection under the Act.
'Consider the offence under Section 203A of the Penal Code of 'disclosure of information'. Under the section, a person who discloses any information or matter which he has obtained in the performance of his duties, or the exercise of his functions under any written law, commits an offence,' he said in a Facebook post on Tuesday (July 22).
For example, he said if an individual uncovers improper conduct in a ministry, but that information is classified by the Official Secrets Act (OSA), even if he discloses it to an enforcement agency, he will not be accorded protection under the WPA.
Syahredzan said laws such as the OSA and Section 203A of the Penal Code resulted in many whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers not falling under the ambit of protection within the WPA.
'With the amendment today, such disclosures are no longer disqualified. The proviso in Section 6(1) will be removed. In other words, even if the improper conduct is contained in a document classified under the OSA, the whistleblower can still be protected,' he said.
He further said that if this bill becomes law after going through the Dewan Negara and the rest of the legislative process, a whistleblower will be protected even though the disclosure is prohibited by law. - Bernama
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
Cross Border Insolvency Bill 2025 tabled in Dewan Rakyat for first reading
KUALA LUMPUR: The Cross Border Insolvency Bill 2025, enabling local creditors to recover debts from insolvent companies within the ASEAN region, has been tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said tabled the Bill on Monday (July 28). The proposed Bill aims to promote cooperation between courts and authorities in Malaysia and foreign states involved in cross-border insolvency cases. It also seeks to provide legal certainty for trade and investment and ensure fair administration of cross-border insolvencies, protecting creditors' interests and the debtor. The Bill aims to protect and maximise the value of the debtor's property and facilitate the rescue of financially troubled businesses. Clause 3 outlines the Bill's application when assistance is sought in Malaysia or any foreign state regarding cross-border insolvency proceedings, or when foreign creditors participate in Malaysian proceedings. However, the Bill does not apply to individual insolvency, bankruptcy, those carrying on a registered business under specific Acts, or limited liability partnerships under the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2011. Some of the notable Clauses are; > Clause 4 provides that the Bill is to be read alongside existing Malaysian insolvency laws, supplementing rather than replacing them. > Clause 6 authorises Malaysian insolvency office-holders or court-appointed individuals to act in foreign states subject to local laws, while Clause 7 gives theCourt discretion to refuse recognition or grant relief if it conflicts with Malaysian public policy. > Clause 11 states that foreign representatives appointed in foreign proceedings can apply to commence proceedings under Malaysian law if conditions are met. > Clause 12 allows foreign representatives to participate in Malaysian debtor proceedings upon the recognition of foreign proceedings while Clause 13 ensures foreign creditors have the same rights as Malaysian creditors, stating their claims shall not be ranked lower solely because they are foreign. > Clause 21 provides discretionary relief upon recognising foreign proceedings, allowing the foreign representative to manage the debtor's Malaysian property, ensuring local creditors' interests are protected and > Clause 32 ensures equitable payment in concurrent proceedings, preventing creditors from receiving more than their share compared to others in Malaysia. The Bill's tabling follows Malaysia's plan to adopt the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency.


New Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Bill for mandatory secondary education tabled
KUALA LUMPUR: The bill making secondary education compulsory was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat today. The government intends to insert a new provision – Section 32A – under the Education Act 1996, which allows the minister to publish an order in the gazette to make secondary education compulsory. The new provision penalises violation of the law with a maximum fine of RM5,000 or a maximum jail term of six months or both, unless the child is given an exemption. The bill also aims to change the scope of Section 29A to cover all Malaysian children residing in Malaysia. Currently, Section 29A of the Education Act only mandates primary education for children of Malaysian citizens residing in Malaysia. The Education (Amendment) Bill 2025 was presented for its first reading in Parliament by Deputy Education Minister Wong Kah Woh, who also said the bill's second and third readings are slated to be completed in the same session.


New Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Bill adopting UN model law on cross-border insolvency tabled
KUALA LUMPUR: A bill incorporating international principles on cross-border insolvency was tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat today, aimed at increasing cooperation between courts and authorities in Malaysia and other nations involved in cross-border insolvency. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said tabled the bill, which adopts the main principles of the 1997 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Its preamble states that the bill is intended to protect the interests of creditors, debtors and relevant parties while preserving and maximising the value of the debtor's assets. It also seeks to facilitate the rescue of financially distressed businesses to safeguard investments and preserve jobs. However, the bill does not apply to the insolvency or bankruptcy of individuals under the Insolvency Act 1967, limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and foreign LLPs under the LLP Act 2012, among others.