
Oh Boy! The Yellow Line Is Now A Red Hot Political Battleground
The battle royale between Congress and BJP began with Surya pushing for the long-delayed Yellow Line of Namma Metro when he raised the issue in Parliament — twice.
Oh boy, here we go again. Bengaluru's metro — or more specifically, the Yellow Line — has become the newest arena for a not-so-subtle political wrestling match. On one side is BJP's Bengaluru South MP Tejasvi Surya, sprinting ahead with announcements, social media posts, and seeking fast-track governance in delivering citizen facilities. On the other, Karnataka's Deputy Chief Minister and Congress strongman DK Shivakumar, who thinks Surya is, quite literally, 'a boy in a hurry."
Now tracks, trains, and test runs are being overshadowed by barbs, blame games, and a whole lot of grandstanding.
The battle royale between the Congress and the BJP began with Surya pushing for the long-delayed Yellow Line of Namma Metro. He raised the issue in Parliament — twice — calling it the 'need of the hour."
Surya went ahead and declared that none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi would inaugurate the 19.2-km metro line that connects RV Road to Bommasandra.
PM Modi will land in Bengaluru on August 10 and will flag off the long-awaited Yellow line along with a net set of Vande bharat trains.
'This is a Rs 7,610 crore project. So far, only three trains have arrived. One more is expected by the 10th. It will take 10–15 more days to become fully operational. Our MP is still young, a boy, and he wanted operations to start urgently. But we can't rush things like that," he told the media.
DK Shivakumar clarified that it was the Congress government which had invited the Prime Minister for the inauguration — so there was no need for credit snatching.
'The 19.5-km Yellow Line received its safety certification only on July 31. The Prime Minister has been invited to inaugurate it on August 10 by the Siddaramaiah government," he said.
He confirmed, 'The Prime Minister has confirmed his participation in the inauguration of the Yellow Line. We are making necessary preparations and conducting inspections accordingly."
Surya wasn't about to let that slide. He said, 'This is not the era of slow-motion politics. This is the era of fast-track governance."
He posted his response to Shivakumar on X saying: 'I am in a hurry because I believe Bengaluru deserves better. Because I believe public projects must be delivered with speed, accountability, and integrity. Because I believe in politics of performance — not tokenism and photo-ops."
But Shivakumar wasn't done. He doubled down, saying the delay wasn't political — it was technical.
'It's not about the wait — the issue is technical. As a matter of duty, I must ensure that we get all the inspection and clearances done. Some MPs are still a bit immature and tend to speak carelessly — I can't function like that," he said.
'This requires certification from the concerned authorities, and that process is underway. The system has already been checked. Our priority now is to make sure the train runs. We need the certification to be complete for safety. We want the metro line to be launched to alleviate Bengaluru's traffic congestion. We understand, and our government is serious in addressing this issue."
But Surya took on Shivakumar's statement and sought accountability from the Congress government in Karnataka. He also did not mince words replying to being called a 'boy" and slammed what he sees as the Congress's chronic delay in delivering public infrastructure.
'Yes, I am in a hurry. Because I don't believe that public infrastructure should take decades to complete. Because I refuse to accept 8.5 years for a 2 km flyover. Because I represent a generation of Indians who want change now — not in some indefinite future.
Congress Party represents the politics of delay. He comes from a party where Indira Gandhi would lay the foundation stone, and Sonia Gandhi would inaugurate it decades later. I represent a New India under Modi where our Govt starts work on the project and also inaugurates it."
Surya also posted: 'I'm in a hurry because my city is choking. Because commuters waste hours stuck in traffic, where ordinary citizens — not ministers — bear the brunt of broken deadlines and bureaucratic apathy.
Instead of making personal jibes about my age, let the Deputy CM list a single concrete intervention he made to expedite the Yellow Line.
Where was he when the project was stuck in land acquisition?
Where was he when we were fighting for a full-time BMRCL MD?
Where was he when we had to coordinate across ministries and manufacturers to ensure timely delivery of rolling stock?
Where was he when we pushed for visas for foreign engineers to prevent further delay?
Where was he when I led a citizens' march demanding a firm and final date for inauguration?
He turned up three days before the PM's visit to orchestrate a media circus — but where was he for the last five years?"
Surya had earlier raised the issue of the delay in launching the Yellow Line during Zero Hour in Parliament. Calling Bengaluru India's economic engine, he said that it was one of the most important cities today — and also for India's growth in the future.
'However, the city is suffering from a big infrastructure deficit. The only way that the traffic congestion in the city can be addressed is through expedited metro construction."
It is learnt that the PM's Bengaluru visit will be limited to the Yellow Line inauguration and the launch of new Vande Bharat train services.
And while the leaders spar over credit, the pressure continues on the officials. A BMRCL official said:
top videos
View all
'Right now, we have only three trains, and more are expected. The frequency will increase and the travel time will reduce once we get another train set. Another train set is expected soon after the PM's visit," said a BMRCL official.
So, a metro line that was supposed to reduce traffic is now fuelling political gridlock. And as always, it's the common man or the commuter who's left stuck in the middle — in traffic or, in this case, between political one upmanship.
About the Author
Rohini Swamy
Rohini Swamy, Associate Editor at News18, has been a journalist for nearly two decades in the television and digital space. She covers south India for News18's digital platform. She has previously worked with t...Read More
tags :
DK Shivakumar Namma Metro southern slice tejasvi surya yellow line
view comments
Location :
Bengaluru, India, India
First Published:
August 08, 2025, 11:42 IST
News opinion Southern Slice | Oh Boy! The Yellow Line Is Now A Red Hot Political Battleground
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fish in new waters
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. Trump's extortionate tariffs needn't badly hurt seafood exporters. But governments have to act fast India's fisheries industry, seen as a sunrise sector, is in uncharted waters thanks to Trump's tariffs. India is the second-largest fish-producing country in the world, accounting for 8% of global production. In fact, seafood exports in 2024-25 reached an impressive $7.38bn. However, the sector is bracing for a whopping 59.72% in US duties if Washington goes ahead with the additional 25% tariff linked to Russian oil on top of the already announced 25% plus 5.76% countervailing duty and 3.96% anti-dumping duty. This will simply price out Indian producers and exporters from the US market. And that is a significant blow because 92% of India's seafood export is shrimp with more than 40% of this shrimp export heading to US. The situation calls for serious support to the industry that employs about 28mn people directly. In the long term, however, the industry must become more efficient not just to insulate itself from the vagaries of global trade but also challenges such as climate change. First, GOI must try to offset the potential loss of the US market by stitching up favourable trade deals with other countries that aid the fisheries industry. The India-UK FTA is a good template. Indian seafood exports to UK – currently valued at Rs 1,000cr – attracted 8.9% duty. With the deal that will come down to zero. We need similar deals with other lucrative markets such as EU. Second, there's an urgent need to harness untapped potential. Budget 2025-26 provides for a framework for sustainable harnessing of marine resources in India's exclusive economic zones and high seas. This must be expedited to increase seafood production. Third, India is facing stiff competition from other producers such as Ecuador, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand. To counter this, we need better marketing, storage and transportation to gain efficiency in distribution and sales. Finally, global warming-induced challenges are on the horizon. These range from increasing acidity of oceans to declining dissolved oxygen levels in inland water bodies. Hence, the fisheries industry needs to be backed by serious R&D to facilitate the adoption of new technologies and sustainable practices. Only this will keep the growth momentum going. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.


Hans India
16 minutes ago
- Hans India
Akhilesh slams BJP after Hindu groups vandalise centuries-old tomb in Fatehpur
New Delhi: Akhilesh slams BJP after Hindu groups vandalise centuries-old tomb in FatehpurSamajwadiParty chief Akhilesh Yadav has sharply criticised the BJP following fresh tensions in Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh, where Hindu groups vandalised a tomb, claiming it was originally a temple. In a statement, Yadav accused the BJP of pursuing divisive politics, saying, 'Only when society is divided and hatred is spread will the BJP be successful in politics. These people are following an ideology created by the British.' The incident took place at the centuries-old tomb of Nawab Abu Samad. On Monday, a group of Hindu activists staged a protest outside the structure, alleging that it was built after demolishing a Hindu temple. They reportedly sought permission from the district administration to conduct prayers at the site. Video clips circulating on social media show members of Hindu organisations vandalising parts of the mausoleum and hoisting saffron flags on it. The visuals have sparked outrage among the local Muslim community and political opposition. Following the unrest, police deployed tight security around the site to prevent further escalation. The administration is said to be investigating the matter, though tensions remain high. Yadav also pointed out that Fatehpur has witnessed similar communal incidents in the past, recalling that a mosque in the district was earlier demolished for being 'illegal' on the grounds that its construction map had not been approved. He added that in a separate earlier incident, a youth was killed, and action was taken only after considerable public and political pressure. Minister Kapil Dev stated that the Uttar Pradesh administration is fulfilling its responsibilities and emphasised that no individual will be permitted to take the law into their own hands. Minister Nand Kishor Gurjar commented on the controversy surrounding the site, asserting that there was no tomb originally present there. He claimed that the structures were built after the 17th century and linked their existence to the historical persecution of Hindus and the destruction of temples. He acknowledged that the recent vandalism was a reaction to that history, saying, 'Ideally, such actions should have been carried out through proper administrative channels. While those involved were not bad people, the act should have been conducted within the framework of the law.'


Hans India
16 minutes ago
- Hans India
Retd bank staffers stage hunger strike, demand pension updation
HYDERABAD: More than a thousand retired bank employees held a hunger strike and a mass protest at Indira Park on Monday, demanding the immediate implementation of long-overdue pension updation. Organised by the Coordination of Bank Pensioners and Retirees Organisations (CBPRO) and the All India Bank Pensioners' and Retirees' Confederation (AIBPARC), the protest saw participation from pensioners of public sector, State Bank of India, and select private sector banks. The protesters are pressing for several key demands, most notably the implementation of pension updation as mandated by statutory Pension Regulation 35(1). They highlighted that this has been delayed for nearly three decades, even though the pension corpus fund holds a substantial Rs 4.5 lakh crore. In addition to pension updation, the protesters demanded inclusion of special allowance in the calculation of gratuity and basic pension, extension of pension option to the small number of retirees who were previously left out, grant of consultative status to apex-level bank pensioners' and retirees' organisations and urged banks to cover the cost of the health insurance premium for the base policy. Addressing the crowd, K. Madhusudan, Secretary of AIBPARC's AP and TS Unit, lamented the indignities and discrimination faced by retirees, whose average age is over 75. He stated that despite their significant contributions to the banking industry, the government has shown little sympathy, forcing them to protest on the streets for their rights.